Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant

Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant

Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant

Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant
Location of Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant in Japan
Country Japan
Coordinates 36°27′59″N 140°36′24″E / 36.46639°N 140.60667°E / 36.46639; 140.60667Coordinates: 36°27′59″N 140°36′24″E / 36.46639°N 140.60667°E / 36.46639; 140.60667
Construction began March 1, 1961 (1961-03-01)
Commission date July 25, 1966 (1966-07-25)
Operator(s) Japan Atomic Power Company

The Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant (東海原子力発電所 Tōkai genshi-ryoku hatsuden-sho, Tōkai NPP) was Japan's first commercial nuclear power plant. It was built in the early 1960s to the British Magnox design, and generated power from 1966 until it was decommissioned in 1998. A second nuclear plant, built at the site in the 1970s, was the first in Japan to produce over 1000 MW of electricity.

Following the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami the number 2 reactor was shut down automatically. It has been suggested that the reactor should not be restarted and should be decommissioned.

Location

The site is located in Tokai in the Naka District in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan and is operated by the Japan Atomic Power Company. The total site area amounts to 0.76 km2 (188 acres) with 0.33 km2, or 43% of it, being green area that the company is working to preserve.[1]

Reactors on site

Unit Type Average electric power Capacity Construction started First criticality Commercial operation Closure
Tōkai I Magnox (GCR) 159 MW 166 MW March 1, 1961 November 10, 1965 July 25, 1966 March 31, 1998
Tōkai II BWR/5[2] 1060 MW 1100 MW October 3, 1973 March 13, 1978 November 28, 1978 Shutdown since March 2011

Unit 1

Tōkai I

This reactor was built based on British developed Magnox technology.[3] Unit 1 will be the first nuclear reactor to be decommissioned in Japan.[4] The experience in decommissioning this plant is expected to be of use in the future when more Japanese plants are decommissioned. Below is a brief time-line of the process.

Unit 2

This Boiling Water Reactor was the first nuclear reactor built in Japan to produce over 1,000 MW of electricity. By some formalities in the paperwork, the unit is technically separate from the rest of the nuclear facilities at Tokai-mura, but it is managed with the rest of them and even shares the same front gate.

Incidents

1997 & 1999

Two nuclear incidents happened in 1997 & 1999:

  1. On 11 March 1997, a small explosion in a Dōnen plant.
  2. On 30 September 1999, a serious criticality accident in a JCO plant.

2011

Following the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, the Number 2 reactor was one of eleven nuclear reactors nationwide to be shut down automatically.[5] It was reported on 14 March that a cooling system pump for the Number 2 reactor had stopped working.[6] Japan Atomic Power Company stated that there was a second operational pump and that cooling was working, but that two of three diesel generators used to power the cooling system were out of order.[7]

In 2007, Ibaraki Prefecture took action to shield the facility from tsunamis with heights of 5.7 metres, and additions to the seawall were made to a 6.1 metre height two days before the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 9 March 2011. A 5.4 metre tsunami arrived on 11 March at the plant. These facts were disclosed to the news media at the time of plant inspection by the Japanese Government on 13 February 2012.[8]

During the earthquake of 11 March 2011, the Tokai power plant suffered external power-loss, just like what happened in Fukushima. Thanks to extra voluntary measures taken by Japan Atomic Power, the reactors could still be safely cooled, and an additional major accident was prevented. In 2002, an evaluation technology adopted by the Japan Society of Civil Engineers had determined that the site of the plant could experience tsunami waves as high as 4.86 metres. The government of Ibaraki prefecture published their own calculations in October 2007, where they estimated that such waves could be as high as 6 to 7 metres. Japan Atomic Power changed its wave level assumption to 5.7 meters. Reconstruction works to raise the height of the 4.9-metre protection around the plant to 6.1 meters were started in July 2009, in order to protect the seawater pumps intended to cool an emergency diesel generator. Although most of the work was completed by September 2010, cable holes in the levee were still not fully covered. This work was scheduled to be completed around May 2011. When the tsunami did hit the Tokai plant in March, the waves were 5.3 to 5.4 metres in height, higher than earlier estimations but still 30 to 40 centimetres lower than the most recent estimation. The Tokai plant suffered a loss of external power-supply just like the Fukushima plant. The levee was overrun in Tokai, as with Fukushima, but only one of three seawater pumps failed, and the reactors could be kept stable and safe in cold shutdown with the emergency diesel generator cooled by the two remaining seawater pumps.[9]

After the disaster in Fukushima, a stress-test was ordered by the Japanese government, since an investigation of the electrical installations of the Tokai Daini reactor revealed that they did not meet the earthquake-resistance standards set by the government.[10]

On 19 March 2012, it was discovered that during the decommissioning of a nuclear reactor, 1500 liters of low-radioactive water (33.000 becquerel/liter) was leaked away over three days from a storage-tank, when it was pumped into another tank. Further investigation should reveal whether the water leaked into the sea or not. The water was used for decontamination.[11] Closer inspection proved that the leakage had been there for much longer, and that from October 2010 some 2200 liters extra had been lost. According to the owner of the plant, nothing leaked out of the building, and the water would be cleaned up.[12]

Public opinion

On 11 October 2011 Tatsuya Murakami, the mayor of the village Tokai, said in a meeting with minister Goshi Hosono, that the Tokai Daini reactor situated at 110 kilometer from Tokyo should be decommissioned, because the reactor was more than 30 years old, and the people had lost confidence in the nuclear safety commission of the government.[13]

In 2011 and 2012, about 100,000 signatures against the resumption of the plant's operation, halted since last year, were submitted to Ibaraki Gov. Masaru Hashimoto. The petition urges the prefectural government not to allow the Tokai power station to resume operation, saying, "We should not allow a recurrence of the irretrievable sacrifice and loss as experienced in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident".[14]

Stress-tests: extra checks needed, because active faults might move simultaneously

Seismic research in 2011 did show, that the March 11th quake was caused by the simultaneous movement by multiple active faults at the coast of the Pacific Ocean in northern Japan, and on this way a much bigger earthquakes could be triggered, than the plants were planned to withstand, at the time they were built. In February the Tokai Daini Plant in Ibaraki Prefecture and the Tomari power facility in Hokkaido, said that it could not ruled out the possibility that the plant was vulnerable. Other nuclear power stations declared that the active faults near their nuclear plants would not move at the same time, and even when this would happen, the impact would be limited. NISA would look into the evaluation of active faults done by the plants.[15][16]

Reprocessing plant

There is also a reprocessing plant in Tokai, but part of it is slated for closure.[17]

See also

References

  1. JAPC Official Document (Japanese). Report of Electric Generating Plant Environmental Activities for 2010.Page 20.
  2. "Reactors in operation". IAEA. 31 December 2009. Retrieved March 12, 2011.
  3. Tsutomu Nakajima, Kazukiyo Okano and Atsushi Murakami (1965). "Manufacture of Pressure Vessel for Nuclear Power Reactor" (PDF). Fuji Electric Review. Fuji Electric Co. 11 (1). Retrieved 17 April 2014.
  4. Satoh, T (Japan Atomic Power Co) (September 1997). "Permanent cessation of Tokai power plant's operation". IAEA. ISSN 1011-4289. INIS RN:29059902. Retrieved 17 April 2014.
  5. "Japan earthquake: Evacuations ordered as fears grow of radiation leak at nuclear plant; News.com.au". news.com.au. 12 March 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011. According to the industry ministry, a total of 11 nuclear reactors automatically shut down at the Onagawa plant, the Fukushima No. 1 and No. 2 plants and the Tokai No. 2 plant after the strongest recorded earthquake in the country's history
  6. "Cooling system pump stops at Tokai No.2 plant-Kyodo; Energy & Oil; Reuters". af.reuters.com. 13 March 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011.
  7. Takenaka, Kiyoshi (13 March 2011). "Tokai No.2 nuke plant cooling process working - operator | Reuters". uk.reuters.com. Retrieved 13 March 2011. Japan Atomic Power said Monday that the cooling process was working at its Tokai No.2 nuclear power plant's reactor although two of the three diesel power generators used for cooling were out of order.
  8. 防波壁完成、震災2日前…東海第二原発守った [Seawall completed 2 days before disaster, plant had protected.]. Yomiuri Shimbun (in Japanese). 2012-02-14. Retrieved 2012-02-16.
  9. The Mainichi Daily News (24 October 2011) New levee prevents total power loss at nuclear plant in Ibaraki
  10. NHK-world (8 July 2011) Nuke plant equipment fails quake-resistance check
  11. The Mainichi Shimbun (20 March 2012)Low-level radioactive water leaks at Tokai nuclear plant
  12. NHK-world (22 March 2012 10:52 +0900 (JST)'Wastewater leakage found at Tokai nuclear plant
  13. JAIF (12 October 2011)Tokai mayor wants nuclear reactor decommissioned
  14. "Over 100,000 signatures collected for Tokai nuclear plant scrapping". Mainichi Daily. February 11, 2012.
  15. NHK-world (1 March 2012) 2 plants to undergo checks for multiple faults
  16. JAIF (1 March 2012)Earthquake report 362: 2 plants to undergo checks for multiple faults
  17. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/WR-Tokai-reprocessing-plant-to-shut-2909144.html

Media related to Tōkai Nuclear Power Plant at Wikimedia Commons

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/30/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.