Water jet cutter

Not to be confused with pressure washer.
A diagram of a water jet cutter. #1: high-pressure water inlet. #2: jewel (ruby or diamond). #3: abrasive (garnet). #4: mixing tube. #5: guard. #6: cutting water jet. #7: cut material

A water jet cutter, also known as a water jet or waterjet, is an industrial tool capable of cutting a wide variety of materials using a very high-pressure jet of water, or a mixture of water and an abrasive substance. The term abrasive jet refers specifically to the use of a mixture of water and abrasive to cut hard materials such as metal or granite, while the terms pure waterjet and water-only cutting refer to waterjet cutting without the use of added abrasives, often used for softer materials such as wood or rubber.[1]

Waterjet cutting is often used during fabrication of machine parts. It is the preferred method when the materials being cut are sensitive to the high temperatures generated by other methods. Waterjet cutting is used in various industries, including mining and aerospace, for cutting, shaping, and reaming.


Waterjet CNC cutting machine.


While using high-pressure water for erosion dates back as far as the mid-1800s with hydraulic mining, it was not until the 1930s that narrow jets of water started to appear as an industrial cutting device. In 1933, the Paper Patents Company in Wisconsin developed a paper metering, cutting, and reeling machine that used a diagonally moving waterjet nozzle to cut a horizontally moving sheet of continuous paper.[2] These early applications were at a low pressure and restricted to soft materials like paper.

Waterjet technology evolved in the post-war era as researchers around the world searched for new methods of efficient cutting systems. In 1956, Carl Johnson of Durox International in Luxembourg developed a method for cutting plastic shapes using a thin stream high-pressure waterjet, but those materials, like paper, were soft materials.[3] In 1958, Billie Schwacha of North American Aviation developed a system using ultra-high-pressure liquid to cut hard materials.[4] This system used a 100,000 psi (690 MPa) pump to deliver a hypersonic liquid jet that could cut high strength alloys such as PH15-7-MO stainless steel. Used as a honeycomb laminate on the Mach 3 North American XB-70 Valkyrie, this cutting method resulted in delaminating at high speed, requiring changes to the manufacturing process.[5]

While not effective for the XB-70 project, the concept was valid and further research continued to evolve waterjet cutting. In 1962, Philip Rice of Union Carbide explored using a pulsing waterjet at up to 50,000 psi (340 MPa) to cut metals, stone, and other materials.[6] Research by S.J. Leach and G.L. Walker in the mid-1960s expanded on traditional coal waterjet cutting to determine ideal nozzle shape for high-pressure waterjet cutting of stone,[7] and Norman Franz in the late 1960s focused on waterjet cutting of soft materials by dissolving long chain polymers in the water to improve the cohesiveness of the jet stream.[8] In the early 1970s, the desire to improve the durability of the waterjet nozzle led Ray Chadwick, Michael Kurko, and Joseph Corriveau of the Bendix Corporation to come up with the idea of using corundum crystal to form a waterjet orifice,[9] while Norman Franz expanded on this and created a waterjet nozzle with an orifice as small as 0.002 inches (0.051 mm) that operated at pressures up to 70,000 psi (480 MPa).[10] John Olsen, along with George Hurlburt and Louis Kapcsandy at Flow Research (later Flow Industries), further improved the commercial potential of the waterjet by showing that treating the water beforehand could increase the operational life of the nozzle.[11]

High pressure

High-pressure vessels and pumps became affordable and reliable with the advent of steam power. By the mid-1800s, steam locomotives were common and the first efficient steam-driven fire engine was operational.[12] By the turn of the century, high-pressure reliability improved, with locomotive research leading to a sixfold increase in boiler pressure, some reaching 1,600 psi (11 MPa). Most high-pressure pumps at this time, though, operated around 500–800 psi (3.4–5.5 MPa).

High-pressure systems were further shaped by the aviation, automotive, and oil industries. Aircraft manufacturers such as Boeing developed seals for hydraulically boosted control systems in the 1940s,[13] while automotive designers followed similar research for hydraulic suspension systems.[14] Higher pressures in hydraulic systems in the oil industry also led to the development of advanced seals and packing to prevent leaks.[15]

These advances in seal technology, plus the rise of plastics in the post-war years, led to the development of the first reliable high-pressure pump. The invention of Marlex by Robert Banks and John Paul Hogan of the Phillips Petroleum company required a catalyst to be injected into the polyethylene.[16] McCartney Manufacturing Company in Baxter Springs, Kansas, began manufacturing these high-pressure pumps in 1960 for the polyethylene industry.[17] Flow Industries in Kent, Washington set the groundwork for commercial viability of waterjets with John Olsen’s development of the high-pressure fluid intensifier in 1973,[18] a design that was further refined in 1976.[19] Flow Industries then combined the high-pressure pump research with their waterjet nozzle research and brought waterjet cutting into the manufacturing world.

Abrasive waterjet

The Evolution of the Abrasive Waterjet Nozzle

While cutting with water is possible for soft materials, the addition of an abrasive turned the waterjet into a modern machining tool for all materials. This began in 1935 when the idea of adding an abrasive to the water stream was developed by Elmo Smith for the liquid abrasive blasting.[20] Smith’s design was further refined by Leslie Tirrell of the Hydroblast Corporation in 1937, resulting in a nozzle design that created a mix of high-pressure water and abrasive for the purpose of wet blasting.[21]

Working with Ingersoll-Rand Waterjet Systems, Michael Dixon implemented the first production practical means of cutting titanium sheets—an abrasive waterjet system very similar to those in widespread use today.[22] By January, 1985, that system was being run 24 hours a day producing titanium parts for the B-1B largely at Rockwell's North American Aviation facility in Newark, Ohio. By August, 1985, Rockwell estimated the system had already resulted in $2 million in labor savings.

Dr. Mohamed Hashish, who led an engineering research team at Flow Industries working on abrasive waterjet cutting technology, was granted a patent for his design in 1987.[23] Dr. Hashish, who also coined the new term Abrasive Waterjet AWJ, and his team continued to develop and improve the AWJ technology and its hardware for many applications which is now in over 50 industries worldwide. A most critical development was creating a durable mixing tube that could withstand the power of the high-pressure AWJ, and it was Boride Products (now Kennametal) development of their ROCTEC line of ceramic tungsten carbide composite tubes that significantly increased the operational life of the AWJ nozzle.[24] Current work on AWJ nozzles is on micro abrasive waterjet so cutting with jets smaller than 0.015 inches (0.38 mm) in diameter can be commercialized.

Waterjet control

As waterjet cutting moved into traditional manufacturing shops, controlling the cutter reliably and accurately was essential. Early waterjet cutting systems adapted traditional systems such as mechanical pantographs and CNC systems based on John Parsons’ 1952 NC milling machine and running G-code.[25] Challenges inherent to waterjet technology revealed the inadequacies of traditional G-Code, as accuracy depends on varying the speed of the nozzle as it approaches corners and details.[26] Creating motion control systems to incorporate those variables became a major innovation for leading waterjet manufacturers in the early 1990s, with Dr John Olsen of OMAX Corporation developing systems to precisely position the waterjet nozzle[27] while accurately specifying the speed at every point along the path,[28] and also utilizing common PCs as a controller. The largest waterjet manufacturer, Flow International (a spinoff of Flow Industries), recognized the benefits of that system and licensed the OMAX software, with the result that the vast majority of waterjet cutting machines worldwide are simple to use, fast, and accurate.[29]


All waterjets follow the same principle of using high pressure water focused into a beam by a nozzle. Most machines accomplish this by first running the water through a high pressure pump. There are two types of pumps used to create this high pressure; an intensifier pump and a direct drive or crankshaft pump. A direct drive pump works much like a car engine, forcing water through high pressure tubing using plungers attached to a crankshaft. An intensifier pump creates pressure by using hydraulic oil to move a piston forcing the water through a tiny hole.[30][31] The water then travels along the high pressure tubing to the nozzle of the waterjet. In the nozzle, the water is focused into a thin beam by a jewel orifice. This beam of water is ejected from the nozzle, cutting through the material by spraying it with the jet of high-speed water. The process is the same for abrasive waterjets until the water reaches the nozzle. Here abrasives such as garnet and aluminium oxide, are fed into the nozzle via an abrasive inlet. The abrasive then mixes with the water in a mixing tube and is forced out the end at high pressure.[32][33]


An important benefit of the water jet is the ability to cut material without interfering with its inherent structure, as there is no heat-affected zone (HAZ). Minimizing the effects of heat allows metals to be cut without harming or changing intrinsic properties.[34]

Water jet cutters are also capable of producing intricate cuts in material. With specialized software and 3-D machining heads, complex shapes can be produced.[35]

The kerf, or width, of the cut can be adjusted by swapping parts in the nozzle, as well as changing the type and size of abrasive. Typical abrasive cuts have a kerf in the range of 0.04 to 0.05 in (1.0–1.3 mm), but can be as narrow as 0.02 inches (0.51 mm). Non-abrasive cuts are normally 0.007 to 0.013 in (0.18–0.33 mm), but can be as small as 0.003 inches (0.076 mm), which is approximately that of a human hair. These small jets can permit small details in a wide range of applications.

Water jets are capable of attaining accuracy down to 0.005 inches (0.13 mm) and repeatability down to 0.001 inches (0.025 mm).[35]

Due to its relatively narrow kerf, water jet cutting can reduce the amount of scrap material produced, by allowing uncut parts to be nested more closely together than traditional cutting methods. Water jets use approximately 0.5 to 1 US gal (1.9–3.8 l) per minute (depending on the cutting head's orifice size), and the water can be recycled using a closed-loop system. Waste water usually is clean enough to filter and dispose of down a drain. The garnet abrasive is a non-toxic material that can be mostly recycled for repeated use; otherwise, it can usually be disposed in a landfill. Water jets also produce fewer airborne dust particles, smoke, fumes, and contaminants,[35] reducing operator exposure to hazardous materials.[36]

Meatcutting using waterjet technology eliminates the risk of cross contamination since there is no contact medium (namely, a blade) between different animals in the slaughterhouse.


A water jet cutting a metal tool

Because the nature of the cutting stream can be easily modified the water jet can be used in nearly every industry; there are many different materials that the water jet can cut. Some of them have unique characteristics that require special attention when cutting.

Materials commonly cut with a water jet include textiles, rubber, foam, plastics, leather, composites, stone, tile, glass, metals, food, paper and much more. "Most ceramics can also be cut on an abrasive water jet as long as the material is softer than the abrasive being used (between 7.5 and 8.5 on the Mohs scale)".[37] Examples of materials that cannot be cut with a water jet are tempered glass and diamonds.[36] Water is capable of cutting materials over 18 in (460 mm) thick.


Commercial water jet cutting systems are available from manufacturers all over the world, in a range of sizes, and with water pumps capable of a range of pressures. Typical water jet cutting machines have a working envelope as small as a few square feet, or up to hundreds of square feet. Ultra-high-pressure water pumps are available from as low as 40,000 psi (280 MPa) up to 100,000 psi (690 MPa).[35]


There are six main process characteristics to water jet cutting:

  1. Uses a high velocity stream of Ultra High Pressure Water 30,000–90,000 psi (210–620 MPa) which is produced by an intensifier pump with possible abrasive particles suspended in the stream.
  2. Is used for machining a large array of materials, including heat-sensitive, delicate or very hard materials.
  3. Produces no heat damage to workpiece surface or edges.
  4. Nozzles are typically made of sintered boride.
  5. Produces a taper of less than 1 degree on most cuts, which can be reduced or eliminated entirely by slowing down the cut process or tilting the jet.[38]
  6. Distance of nozzle from workpiece affects the size of the kerf and the removal rate of material. Typical distance is .125 in (3.2 mm).

Temperature is not as much of a factor.

Edge quality

Edge quality for water jet cut parts is defined with the quality numbers Q1 through Q5. Lower numbers indicate rougher edge finish; higher numbers are smoother. For thin materials, the difference in cutting speed for Q1 could be as much as 3 times faster than the speed for Q5. For thicker materials, Q1 could be 6 times faster than Q5. For example, 4 inches (100 mm) thick aluminium Q5 would be 0.72 in/min (18 mm/min) and Q1 would be 4.2 in/min (110 mm/min), 5.8 times faster.[39]

Multi-axis cutting

Main article: Multiaxis machining
A 5-Axis Waterjet Cutting Head
A 5-Axis Waterjet Part

By 1987, Ingersoll-Rand Waterjet Systems was offering a 5-axis pure-water waterjet cutting system called the Robotic Waterjet System. The system was an overhead gantry design, similar in overall size to the HS-1000.

With recent advances in control and motion technology, 5-axis water jet cutting (abrasive and pure) has become a reality. Where the normal axes on a water jet are named Y (back/forth), X (left/right) and Z (up/down), a 5-axis system will typically add an A axis (angle from perpendicular) and C axis (rotation around the Z-axis). Depending on the cutting head, the maximum cutting angle for the A axis can be anywhere from 55, 60, or in some cases even 90 degrees from vertical. As such, 5-axis cutting opens up a wide range of applications that can be machined on a water jet cutting machine.

A 5-axis cutting head can be used to cut 4-axis parts, where the bottom surface geometries are shifted a certain amount to produce the appropriate angle and the Z-axis remains at one height. This can be useful for applications like weld preparation where a bevel angle needs to be cut on all sides of a part that will later be welded, or for taper compensation purposes where the kerf angle is transferred to the waste material – thus eliminating the taper commonly found on water jet-cut parts. A 5-axis head can cut parts where the Z-axis is also moving along with all the other axis. This full 5-axis cutting could be used for cutting contours on various surfaces of formed parts.

Because of the angles that can be cut, part programs may need to have additional cuts to free the part from the sheet. Attempting to slide a complex part at a severe angle from a plate can be difficult without appropriate relief cuts.

See also


  1. About waterjets, archived from the original on 2010-02-13, retrieved 2010-02-13.
  2. Fourness, Charles A et al, Paper Metering, Cutting, and Reeling, filed May 22, 1933, and issued July 2, 1935.
  3. Johnson, Carl Olof, Method for Cutting Up Plastic and Semi-Plastic Masses, filed March 13, 1956, and issued April 14, 1959.
  4. Schwacha, Billie G., Liquid Cutting of Hard Metals, filed October 13, 1958, and issued May 23, 1961.
  5. Jenkins, Dennis R & Tony R Landis, Valkyrie: North American's Mach 3 Superbomber, Specialty Press, 2004, p. 108.
  6. Rice, Phillip K., Process for Cutting and Working Solid Materials, filed October 26, 1962, and issued October 19, 1965.
  7. Leach, S.J. and G.L. Walker, The Application of High Speed Liquid Jets to Cutting, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol 260, No 1110, July 28, 1966, pp. 295–310.
  8. Franz, Norman C., High Velocity Liquid Jet, filed May 31, 1968, and issued August 18, 1970.
  9. Chadwick, Ray F Chadwick, Michael C Kurko, and Joseph A Corriveau, Nozzle for Producing Fluid Cutting Jet, filed March 1, 1971, and issued September 4, 1973.
  10. Franz, Norman C., Very High Velocity Fluid Jet Nozzles and Methods of Making Same, filed July 16, 1971, and issued August 7, 1973.
  11. Olsen, John H., George H. Hurlburt, and Louis E. Kapcsandy, Method for Making High Velocity Liquid Jet, filed June 21, 1976, and issued August 12, 1980.
  12. "John Ericsson". British Made Steam Fire Engines. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  13. Berry, Mitchell M., Piston Sealing Assembly, filed March 3, 1941, and issued March 23, 1943.
  14. Templeton, Herbert W., Metering Valve Seal, filed July 11, 1958, and issued July 18, 1961.
  15. Webb, Derrel D., High Pressure Packing Means, filed August 12, 1957, and issued October 17, 1961.
  16. Hogan, John Paul and Robert L. Banks, Polymers and Production Thereof, filed March 26, 1956, and issued March 4, 1958.
  17. "KMT McCartney Products for the LDPE Industry". KMT McCartney Products. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  18. Olsen, John H., High Pressure Fluid Intensifier and Method, filed January 12, 1973, and issued May 21, 1974.
  19. Olsen, John H., High Pressure Fluid Intensifier and Method, filed March 16, 1976, and issued June 14, 1977.
  20. Smith, Elmo V., Liquid Blasting, filed June 10, 1935, and issued May 12, 1936.
  21. Tirrell, Leslie L., Sandblast Device, filed April 3, 1937, and issued October 17, 1939.
  22. "Michael D. Dixon, Performance and Improvement Award". ADCUT. Retrieved 2 Dec 2015.
  23. Hashish, Mohamed, Michael Kirby and Yih-Ho Pao, Method and Apparatus for Forming a High Velocity Liquid Abrasive Jet, filed October 7, 1985, and issued March 10, 1987.
  24. "ROCTEC Composite Carbide Abrasive Waterjet Nozzles" (PDF). Kennametal Boride Abrasive Flow Products. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  25. "Machining & CNC Manufacturing: A brief history". Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Archived from the original on 2004-08-20. Retrieved 25 June 2012.
  26. Olsen, John H. "What Really Determines the Time to Make a Part?". Dr Olsen's Lab. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  27. Olsen, John H., Motion Control for Quality in Jet Cutting, filed May 14, 1997, and issued April 6, 1999.
  28. Olsen, John H., Motion Control with Precomputation, filed October 7, 1993, and issued April 16, 1996.
  29. "SEC Form 8-K". Flow International Corporation. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  30. "Crankshaft vs. Intensifier pump". WaterJets.org. Olsen Software LLC. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  31. "Types of Pumps". www.wardjet.com. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  32. "Basic Waterjet Principles". WaterJets.org. Olsen Software LLC. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  33. "How Does a Waterjet Work?". OMAX Abrasive Waterjets. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  34. Lorincz, Jim. Waterjets: Evolving from Macro to Micro, Manufacturing Engineering, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, November, 2009
  35. 1 2 3 4 Lorincz, Waterjets: Evolving from Macro to Micro.
  36. 1 2 "Company". Jet Edge. Retrieved 2009-06-11.
  37. "What Materials Can a Waterjet Cut?". OMAX Abrasive Waterjets. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  38. Olsen, John. "Improving waterjet cutting precision by eliminating taper". TheFabricator.com. FMA Communications. Retrieved 18 July 2015.
  39. "Waterjet Relationship Parameters".
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/9/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.