Washington Initiative 732

Elections in Washington
Federal elections Presidential elections 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 Presidential primaries and caucuses Democratic caucuses 2004 2008 2012 2016 Republican caucuses 2008 2012 2016 Senate elections 1980 1983 S 1986 1988 1992 1994 1998 2000 2004 2006 2010 2012 2016 House of Representatives elections 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
State elections General elections 2010 2012 2014 2016 Gubernatorial elections 1889 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 Attorney General elections 2000 2004 2008 Secretary of State elections 2004 2008 2012 2016 Executive branch elections 2004 2008 2012 State Senate elections 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2016 State House elections 2006 2008 2010 2012 2016 State Supreme Court elections 2004 2006 2008 2012 Other judicial elections 2008
Ballot measures 1972: 276 2004: 872 884 892 297 2295 2005: 912 2006: 920 933 937 4233 2007: 960 957 2008: 1000 1029 2009: 71 2012: 74 502 1185 1240 2013: 517 522 2016: 732
Local elections 2006 2008 2009
Seattle Mayoral elections 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 Ballot measures Sound Transit 3

Washington Initiative 732 (I-732) was an initiative to create a carbon tax to the Washington State Legislature, which appeared on the November 2016 ballot. The backers of I-732 submitted roughly 350,000 signatures in December 2015 to certify the initiative.^[1]

The initiative was spearheaded by environmental economist Yoram Bauman, a strong advocate of carbon pricing. It was modeled after the British Columbia carbon tax, which was considered "popular across the political spectrum".^[2] The carbon tax in British Columbia caused the province's fuel consumption to decrease by 16% and its greenhouse gas emissions to decrease 3.5 times faster than the emissions of Canada as a whole, while maintaining steady economic growth.^[3]

On November 8, it was rejected.

Ballot Measure Summary

The ballot measure summary as written by the Secretary of State of Washington:

"This measure would impose a carbon emission tax on the sale or use of certain fossil fuels and fossil-fuel-generated electricity, at $15 per metric ton of carbon dioxide in 2017, and increasing gradually to $100 per metric ton (2016 dollars adjusted for inflation), with more gradual phase-in for some users. It would reduce the sales tax rate by one percentage point over two years, increase a low-income sales tax exemption, and reduce certain manufacturing taxes.^[4]"

Provisions

Initiative 732 contained four provisions:^[5]

• Creates a new tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels initially set at $15 per ton, rising to $25 per ton after 6 months, and increasing annually to a cap of $100 per ton.
• Reduces the Washington State Sales Tax 1% from 6.5% to 5.5%
• Reduces the Business and Occupation Tax on Manufacturing Businesses in Washington State to .001%
• Funds the Working Families Tax rebate program, a 25% match on the state's version of the earned income tax credit for 460,000 Washington households.

Supporters

The primary sponsor of Initiative 732 was CarbonWA, a group founded by environmental economist Yoram Bauman to promote carbon pricing. The Audubon Society was also a major proponent of Initiative 732, "Audubon Washington believes Initiative 732 provides swift and effective action to reduce carbon pollution".^[6] Other organizations that supported Initiative 732 included the Sightline Institute,^[7] and the Citizens Climate Lobby. Other supporters include Washington State legislator Joe Fitzgibbon (D), Washington State Senator Steve Litzow (R), Washington State Senator Joe Fain (R), Washington State Senator Cyrus Habib (D), ^[8] and the editorial board of The Olympian.^[9] Climate scientist James Hansen, who has been involved with the Citizens Climate Lobby for many years, strongly supported the proposal.^[10]

The backers of initiative 732 claimed that I-732 "taxes carbon to fight climate change, boost clean energy, & save the environment for future generations".^[11]

Opponents

Opponents to Initiative 732 included the Washington State Labor Council stating "I-732 would send Washington in the wrong direction and create more damaging austerity choices",^[12] the Association of Washington Businesses,^[13] and Longview Daily News.^[14]

See Also

• Citizen's Climate Lobby
• Pigouvian tax
• , the campaign website for this measure

References