Wilner v. NSA
Wilner v. NSA is a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Thomas Wilner and fifteen other lawyers who represented Guantanamo captives against the United States National Security Agency.[1][2][3]
The lawyers argued that the NSA, through its warrantless wiretap program, had violated their attorney-client privilege.[1][2][3] They referred to the January 18, 2006 lawsuit CCR v. Bush, and called the NSA's response "inadequate". They assert that while the Government had released 85 pages of documents they had withheld another 85 that the law obliged them to release.
The other lawyers participating in the suit are:
| Thomas Wilner |
| Jonathan Hafetz |
| Gitanjali S. Gutierrez |
| Michael J. Sternhell |
| Jonathon Wells Dixon |
| Joshua Colangelo-Bryan |
| Brian J. Neff |
| Joseph Margulies |
| Scott S. Barker |
| Anne Castle |
| Jim Dorsey |
| Asmah Tareen |
| Richard A. Grigg |
| Thomas R. Johnson |
| George Brent Mickum IV |
| Charles H. Carpenter |
| Stephen M. Truitt |
References
- 1 2 Mike Rosen-Molina (May 19, 2007). "Ex-Guantanamo lawyers sue for recordings of client meetings". The Jurist. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
- 1 2 "Wilner v. NSA". The Jurist. Archived from the original on May 23, 2007. Retrieved May 22, 2007.
- 1 2 "Wilner v. NSA" (PDF). Center for Constitutional Rights. June 19, 2009. Retrieved June 19, 2009.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 1/10/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.