Utility maximization problem

For a less technical introduction, see Utility.

In microeconomics, the utility maximization problem is the problem consumers face: "how should I spend my money in order to maximize my utility?" It is a type of optimal decision problem.

Human Evolutionary History and Psychology

Not only used in Microeconomics, it often used to explain human propensity or human behavior in terms of evolutionary psychology. Human has been known as "fitness maximizers" or "utility maximizers", which means that people tend to strive to obtain the greatest amount of profit and value possible when individuals invest on something. According to this theory, people would not behave irrationally or make any reckless decision that might hurt or devalue their property. However, situations in modern international relations are different from ancestors and adaptations to such environment might shape human behavior. Since Homo Sapiens evolved in small groups, not nation-states, people now would not always behave as "utility maximizes" but rather as "adaptation executors". This is related to human evolutionary psychology and contradicted to rational utility maximization model. Therefore, this idea of human adaptation can also be applied to the study of politics and international security.

Basic setup

Suppose the consumer's consumption set, or the enumeration of all possible consumption bundles that could be selected if there were no budget constraint, has L commodities and is limited to positive amounts of consumption of each commodity. Let x be the vector x={xi;i=1,...L} containing the amounts of each commodity; then

x\in {\mathbb {R}}_{+}^{L}\ .

Suppose also that the price vector (p) of the L commodities is positive,

p\in {\mathbb {R}}_{+}^{L}\ ,

and that the consumer's income is $I$ ; then the set of all affordable packages, the budget set, is

B(p,I)=\{x\in \mathbb {R} _{+}^{L}:\langle p,x\rangle \leq I\}\ ,

where $\langle p,x\rangle$ is the dot product of p and x, or the total cost of consuming x of the products at price level p:

\langle p,x\rangle =\sum _{{i=1}}^{L}p_{i}x_{i}.

The consumer would like to buy the best affordable package of commodities.

It is assumed that the consumer has an ordinal utility function, called u. It is a real valued function with domain being the set of all commodity bundles, or

u:{\mathbb {R}}_{+}^{L}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}_{+}\ .

Then the consumer's optimal choice $x(p,I)$ is the utility maximizing bundle of all bundles in the budget set, or

x(p,I)=\operatorname {argmax} _{x^{*}\in B(p,I)}u(x^{*})

Finding $x(p,I)$ is the utility maximization problem.

If u is continuous and no commodities are free of charge, then $x(p,I)$ exists, but it is not necessarily unique. If there is a unique maximizer for all values of the price and wealth parameters, then $x(p,I)$ is called the Marshallian demand function; otherwise, $x(p,I)$ is set-valued and it is called the Marshallian demand correspondence.

Reaction to changes in prices

For a given level of real wealth, only relative prices matter to consumers, not absolute prices. If consumers reacted to changes in nominal prices and nominal wealth even if relative prices and real wealth remained unchanged, this would be an effect called money illusion. The mathematical first order conditions for a maximum of the consumer problem guarantee that the demand for each good is homogeneous of degree zero jointly in nominal prices and nominal wealth, so there is no money illusion.

Bounded rationality

In practice, a consumer may not always pick an optimal package. For example, it may require too much thought. Bounded rationality is a theory that explains this behaviour with satisficing—picking packages that are suboptimal but good enough.

Related concepts

The relationship between the utility function and Marshallian demand in the utility maximization problem mirrors the relationship between the expenditure function and Hicksian demand in the expenditure minimization problem.

References

Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael; & Green, Jerry (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507340-1.
Lopez, Anthony C., Rose McDermott, and Michael Bang Petersen.(2011) "States in mind: Evolution, coalitional psychology, and international politics." International Security 36.2 : 48-83.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/29/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.