Sunni fatwas on Shias

While all sects of Islam recognise the Qur'an, they differ in which other authorities they acknowledge; in particular the question of the Succession to Muhammad separates the Sunni, who acknowledge the elected Rashidun Caliphs and their descendants, from the Shia, who acknowledge the Imams or descendants of Prophet Muhammad; these two branches are then subdivided by their views on the further course of the succession. Shia fiqh differs with Sunni fiqh on not only political issues, but also important theological issues. Various attitudes towards Shias can be found among the worldwide majority Sunni community.

Mahmood Shaltooth

Among the more ecumenical fatwas was most important statement made on July 6, 1959 by Mahmood Shaltooth, the then rector of al-Azhar theological university in Egypt, one of the main centers of Sunni scholarship, stating the following:

"The Shi'a is a school of thought that is religiously correct to follow in worship as are other Sunni schools of thought."

Faraz Rabbani

Shaykh Faraz Rabbani has noted that it is not the way of Sunnis to make blanket takfir of Shias. He writes:[1]

...we only declare someone who denies something necessarily known of the religion to be a kafir--and this is not the case with common Shias. Someone who says 'There is no God but Allah, Mohammed is the Prophet of Allah' is a Muslim. Shia Muslims, who make this declaration of faith are therefore MUSLIM.

Ibn Abidin

However, major Sunni scholars have declared the unbelief of Shias who hold certain beliefs. For example, Imam ibn Abidin, a source of authoritative fatwas for Hanafis writes:[2]

There is no doubt in the disbelief (kufr) of those that falsely accuse Sayyida Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) of adultery, deny the Companionship of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr ( Allah be pleased with him), believe that Sayyiduna Ali (Allah be pleased with him) was an Imam... even if they believe in Allah, the last Prophet, and the perfection of the Quran (Radd al-Muhtar, 4/453).

Ahmad Raza

According to Imam Ahmad Raza, the founder of the Barelwi-movement, most Shiites of his day were apostates because they repudiated necessities of religion. This includes, according to him, the following:[3]

a) to believe that Qur'an is incomplete.

b) to call it 'book of `Uthman'.

c) elevate sayyiduna `ali karram Allâhu wajhah and other imâms above the prophets .

d) if these imâms are held to be higher than even one prophet .

e) to allege that Allâh was regretful after issuing a command and hence remorsefully, changed His earlier ruling.

f) to allege that Allâh didn't realize the wisdom of a certain ruling (or the lack of it) and when He realized it, He changed the rule.

g) to allege that RasûlAllâh practised taqiyyah in the course of his tabligh.

Those who hold the above and other such statements that amount to disbelief are kâfirs by ijmâ`a. All dealings with them are similar to those with apostates. it is in Fatâwâ Dhahîriyyah, Fatâwâ hindiyyah, Hadiqatun Nadiyyah: [aHkâmuhum aHkâm al-murtaddîn] they are to be dealt with as apostates.

Even though nowadays, it is widely known and acknowledged that Twelver Shia Muslims do not hold such beliefs, there is a great propaganda drive to justify their persecution. However, Sunni Muslims counter this argument by claiming that the shia use taqiyya when they denounce these allegations and in actuality still hold those beliefs.

Others scholars

Other scholars who have declared Shiites as deviants or apostates:

  1. Ibn Hazm "Shia are not even Muslims", when Christians debating him brought a Shia book as reference.[4]
  2. Ibn Taymiya — He considered Shiites more heretical than Jews, Christians and many polytheists. Noting contemporary circumstances, he considered Shiites more harmful to the Muslim community than groups such as the Crusaders and Mongols.[5]
  3. Ibn Khaldoun "astray people", "Shia are the source of all deviant groups in Islam history".[6]
  4. Nizam al-Mulk — where he fully attacks the Rafida.[7]
  5. Manzur Nu'mani — issued a fatwa in December 1987 declaring Shia kuffar (non-believers), which was endorsed by hundreds of prominent Deobandi scholars in India and Pakistan.[8]
  6. Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz — Several of his fatwas denounced Shiites as atheists and apostates,[9] and, among other rulings, forbade Sunni marriage to Shiites.[10]
  7. Yusuf al-Qaradawi — After saying he had previously been misguided to pursue Sunni-Shia rapprochement, Qaradawi went on to condemn Shiites as heretics in several fatwas and praised virulently anti-Shia Saudi Wahhabi clerics for being “more mature and far-sighted” than himself in generally judging Shias.[11][12]
  8. Ehsan Elahi Zaheer — Denounced the Shia as infidels and Zionist agents.[13]
  9. Abdul-Rahman al-Barrak — In a "vicious" fatwa against the Shia he concluded with: "the Sunni and Shia mathhabs (beliefs) are completely contradictory and cannot be reconciled; the talk of Sunni-Shia rapprochement is utterly false."[14]
  10. Abu Basir al-Tartusi — In his fatwa against Shia, he warned Muslims to "Interact with the Shii Rejectionists as you would with a person whose very existence is full of betrayal, treachery, fury and hatred against Islam and Muslims!"[15]
  11. Ali al-Khudair — In his Fatwa fi l-Shi'a, he says: "What we have today are the Rafidis [i.e., Twelvers], the Batini Isma'ilis, the Batini Nusayris, and the Batini Duruz. These four groups are the ones who deify the Al al-Bayt [i.e., the family and descendants of the Prophet Muhammed], they seek their intercession and are the worshippers of graves (quburiyyun). So these [people] are infidel polytheists (mushrikun kuffar) and are not Muslims. There is no diffrerence [in status] between their scholars and followers (muqallidihim) or the ignorant among them (juhhalihim). They are all polytheists and are not Muslims and cannot be excused for their claim to be ignorant that they are worshipping other than God (la yu'dharan bi-l-jahl fi 'ibadati-him li-ghayr allah)."[16]
  12. Imam Ash-Sha'bi — "The Rafida are the Jews of this nation. They hate Islam as the Jews hate Christianity. They embraced Islam, not because they longed for it or because they feared Allah, but because they detested the Muslims and intended to overpower them."[17]
  13. Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab — In one of his fatwas he accused Shiites of shirk (polytheism) because of their cult of the saints, which included the adoration of figures such as Ali and Husayn and the veneration of tombs and shrines.[18][19]
  14. Shah Waliullah Dehlawi — He believed that the Shia interpretation and practices of Islam should be discarded, since they greatly misguide people.[20]

See also

References

  1. Sunnipath's stance on Shia: http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=13662&CATE=1
  2. Are Shi'as considered Muslims?: http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=1898&CATE=164
  3. Fatwa on Sunni marriage with shia: http://www.islamic.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Fiqh/Sunni%20marriage%20with%20Shia.htm
  4. See al-Millal wa al-Nahl الفصل في الملل والنحل 2/213
  5. V. G. Julie Rajan (30 Jan 2015). Al Qaeda’s Global Crisis: The Islamic State, Takfir and the Genocide of Muslims. Routledge. p. 159. ISBN 9781317645382.
  6. http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ik/Muqaddimah/Chapter3/Ch_3_25.htm Shi'ah tenets concerning the question of the imamate.
  7. See his book Siyasatnama, chap 41.
  8. Muhammad Moj (1 Mar 2015). The Deoband Madrassah Movement: Countercultural Trends and Tendencies. Appendix I: The Deobandi Stance vis-a-vis Muslim Groups Other Than The Barelwis: B. The DMM on Shia Muslims: iii. Changes in the Quran: Anthem Press. ISBN 9781783084463.
  9. Vali Nasr (17 Apr 2007). The Shia Revival: How Conflicts within Islam Will Shape the Future. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 236. ISBN 9780393066401.
  10. Anders Jerichow (1997). Saudi Arabia: Outside Global Law and Order : A Discussion Paper (illustrated ed.). Psychology Press. p. 69. ISBN 9780700709595.
  11. Hassan Hassan (28 January 2014). "Hatred, violence and the sad demise of Yusuf Al Qaradawi". The National. Retrieved 28 April 2015.
  12. "THE GULF AND SECTARIANISM" (PDF). European Council on Foreign Relations. November 2013. pp. 3, 11. Retrieved 28 April 2015.
  13. Moghadam, Assaf, ed. (21 Jul 2011). Militancy and Political Violence in Shiism: Trends and Patterns. Routledge. p. 166. ISBN 9781136663536.
  14. Emile Nakhleh (29 Dec 2008). A Necessary Engagement: Reinventing America's Relations with the Muslim World. Princeton University Press. p. 29. ISBN 9781400829989.
  15. V. G. Julie Rajan (30 Jan 2015). Al Qaeda’s Global Crisis: The Islamic State, Takfir and the Genocide of Muslims. Routledge. p. 122. ISBN 9781317645382.
  16. V. G. Julie Rajan (30 Jan 2015). Al Qaeda’s Global Crisis: The Islamic State, Takfir and the Genocide of Muslims. Routledge. pp. 121–2. ISBN 9781317645382.
  17. Israel Friedlaender (1908). "The Heterodoxies of the Shiites in the Presentation of Ibn Hazm" (PDF). Journal of the American Oriental Society. American Oriental Society. 29: 19. Retrieved 20 May 2015.
  18. Nabil Mouline (1 Jul 2014). The Clerics of Islam: Religious Authority and Political Power in Saudi Arabia (illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. p. 70. ISBN 9780300178906.
  19. Robert Lacey (30 Jun 2011). Inside the Kingdom. Random House. p. 43. ISBN 9781446472361.
  20. Saifudheen Kunju. "SHAH WALIULLAH AL-DEHLAWI: THOUGHTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS". Academia.edu. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/2/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.