Serb Uprising of 1596–97

Serb Uprising of 1596–97
Part of the Long Turkish War

Map showing the revolting tribes and key towns
DateLate 1596 — after April 10, 1597[b]
LocationEastern portion of the Sanjak of Herzegovina and parts of the Montenegro Vilayet
Result Ottoman victory
Belligerents
Bjelopavlići, Drobnjaci, Nikšići and Pivljani (tribes) Ottoman Empire
Commanders and leaders
Grdan
Organized by
Visarion and Jovan Kantul
Dervish Bey

The Serb Uprising of 1596–97[a] was a rebellion organized by Serbian Patriarch Jovan Kantul (s. 1592–1614) and led by Grdan, the vojvoda ("duke") of Nikšić against the Ottomans in the Sanjak of Herzegovina and Montenegro Vilayet, during the Long Turkish War (1593–1606). The uprising broke out in the aftermath of the failed Banat Uprising in 1594 and the burning of Saint Sava's relics on April 27, 1595; it included the tribes of Bjelopavlići, Drobnjaci, Nikšić and Piva. The rebels, defeated at the field of Gacko (Gatačko Polje) in 1597, were forced to capitulate due to a lack of foreign support.

Background

The burning of Saint Sava's remains (depicted) after the Banat Uprising provoked the Serbs in other regions to revolt against the Ottomans.[1]

In early 1594, the Serbs in Banat rose up against the Ottomans.[2] The rebels had, in the character of a holy war, carried war flags with the icon of Saint Sava.[3] The war banners were consecrated by Patriarch Jovan Kantul,[4] and the uprising was aided by Serbian Orthodox metropolitans Rufim Njeguš of Cetinje and Visarion of Trebinje (s. 1590–1602).[5] In response, Ottoman Grand Vizier Koca Sinan Pasha demanded that the green flag of the Prophet Muhammed be brought from Damascus to counter the Serb flag and ordered that the sarcophagus containing the relics of Saint Sava be removed from the Mileševa monastery and transferred to Belgrade via military convoy.[3][4] Along the way, the Ottoman convoy killed all the people in its path as a warning to the rebels.[3] The Ottomans publicly incinerated the relics of Saint Sava on a pyre atop the Vračar plateau on April 27, 1595, and had the ashes scattered.[3][4]

The incineration of Sava's relics provoked the Serbs, and empowered the Serb liberation movement. From 1596, the center of anti-Ottoman activity in Herzegovina was the Tvrdoš Monastery in Trebinje, where Metropolitan Visarion was seated. Many of the Orthodox bishops appealed to the Archduchy of Austria for help in liberating their lands. The Uskoks, irregular soldiers in Habsburg Croatia, supported Austria, being scattered over the whole area between Senj and Ragusa (modern day Dubrovnik). With a daring raid on April 8, 1596, the Uskoks even managed to occupy the Klis Fortress, though they were unable to hold it. At one point, Austrian officials considered taking military action in Bosnia, where Dalmatian-born Maltese knight Franjo Brtučević was in their service. However, they did not have the strength to fight the Ottomans in Bosnia. Earlier, Austrian forces had gone to great lengths and still barely managed to resist the Ottomans in Hungary.[6]

Uprising

Jovan Kantul
Pope Clement VIII
Patriarch Jovan Kantul and Pope Clement VIII

In 1596, the liberation movement spread into Ottoman Montenegro and the neighbouring tribes in Herzegovina, especially those under the influence of Metropolitan Visarion.[5] Of the priests, Patriarch Jovan depended mostly on Visarion, and of the chieftains, mostly on Grdan, the vojvoda ("duke") of Nikšić.[7] A Ragusan document from the beginning of 1596 claimed that the metropolitan and many Herzegovinian chieftains gathered in the Trebinje Monastery where they swore oath "to give up and donate 20,000 heroes to the [Austrian] emperors' light."[8] The rebels sought help from the Austrians, and asked to be handed an Austrian flag to show the Ottomans that they had at least symbolic Austrian support.[8] Shortly thereafter, on April 8, 1596, Klis was captured by the Uskoks, prompting a wave of excitement among Christians from Lika to Herzegovina.[8] At the end of 1596, after the outbreak of the Himara Revolt, Serbs began to rebel against the Ottomans.[6] The uprising, led by Grdan, broke out in Bjelopavlići, then spread to Drobnjaci, Nikšić, Piva and Gacko.[6] Save for the Brđani, the Montenegrin tribes did not participate in the uprising.[9] At the time, Dervish Bey, the sanjak bey of Montenegro, threatened the Montenegrins through the provveditore ("overseer") of Kotor.[9]

Two Serbian monks, Damjan Ljubibratić and Pavle, were dispatched by Patriarch Jovan Kantul to Pope Clement VIII in 1597.[10] Patriarch Jovan assured the pope of his "loyalty and obedience" to the Church of Rome, and sought help "to liberate the Serb people from the Ottomans".[10] The monks made an exhibition to the papal curia on Serbian history and, among other things, petitioned the pope to send an army to Herceg Novi, which would aid vojvoda Grdan on the land;[6] the tribes of Zupci, Nikšić, Piva, Banjani, Drobnjaci and Gacko would rise up in arms.[5] From there, they would go to Onogošt (Nikšić), where all chieftains of all Montenegro, Dukađin, and the nearby lands, would gather.[6] In the case of action, they could count on 100,000 fighters.[6] It was said that since the Ottomans took Saint Sava from the Serbs "God does not help them any more, Christians kill them from every side".[6] The curia then accused the monks, of "[praying] to God for our Evil."[6] The monks asked the pope, with the support of Serb spiritual and secular leaders, to send a respectable Christian to oversee them.[6]

Field of Gacko.

The Archbishop of Ohrid, Atanasije, after his movement had largely failed in Albania, was now in Rome.[6] The Serb uprising had no better luck; the Herzegovinian tribes, Drobnjaci, Nikšić and Piva began fighting, but were defeated at the field of Gacko (Gatačko Polje) by Dervish Bey[6] sometime in 1597.[b] According to the Venetian Lazzaro Soranzo (1599), the Piperi, Kuči, Klimenti, Bjelopavlići and others tried to liberate themselves from Ottoman tyranny, and upon hearing the false claim[11] that Sultan Mehmed III lost the battle and his life at the Siege of Eger, "they all rose up under the command of vojvoda Grdan and there was a great slaughter of Turks who were on their land. As I tried to find out more, I heard the contrary, that they unhappily withdrew into their mountains";[12][13] Montenegrin historian Gligor Stanojević, based on Soranzo's account, which he described as "the most interesting and most contradicting note on the movement of the Brda and Herzegovina tribes in this time", believed that the rebellion did not have the scale of a national uprising.[10]

[There were] spontaneous uprisings or rebellions which often erupted caused by some event and quickly died away. Such disturbances, insurrections or rebellions took place earlier and later in all parts of the Balkans, and the Turks very quickly and efficiently reacted to them. If those rebellions did not lead to anything, they were another drop of hatred between the conquerors and the people.[13]
Gligor Stanojević, Jugoslovenske zemlje u mletačko-turskim ratovima XVI–XVIII vijeka

When the talks between the rebels and the papacy led to nothing and no foreign support arrived, the rebels were forced to capitulate to the Ottomans.[14][10] Ahmed-paša Dugalić, the beylerbey ("governor") of Bosnia, pardoned Grdan of his crimes,[13] and did not even strip him of his lands in Nikšić.[15]

The rebels were challenged before any real action could be realized. Austria was not able to move towards Buda, let alone Bosnia or Serbia; the papal curia did not choose to aid the rebels; and Spain had their own problems. The diplomats—various adventurers, though well-meaning—were amateurs, and had wrongfully and colourfully painted the picture to both sides. To some they promised more than they could do, and to others they presented opportunities as being more mature than they were. Many false reports were made. [The rebels] naïvely thought that the messages and promises they received would give them greater success than they had. The only lesson learnt was for them to be more cautious. The Ottomans, occupied in Hungary, Croatia and the coast, were willing to somewhat leave them alone for the moment being. At this time, none of the prominent leaders in the Ottoman Serb regions were hurt.
Vladimir Ćorović, Preokret u držanju Srba[6]

Aftermath and legacy

After the failure of the uprising, many Herzegovinians moved to the Bay of Kotor and Dalmatia.[16] The earliest more significant Serb migrations took place between 1597 and 1600.[17] Grdan and Patriarch Jovan would continue to plan revolts against the Ottomans in the coming years.[5] Jovan contacted the pope again in 1599, without success.[5] Serbian, Greek, Bulgarian and Albanian monks visited European courts to solicit help.[18] The first decade of the XVII century saw some successful Montenegrin battles against the Ottomans under metropolitan Rufim. From the assembly in Kosijerevo monastery, on 18th February 1608, Serb leaders urged the Spanish and Neopolitan court for final energic action. Preoccupied, Spain couldn't do much in the Eastern Europe. However, Spanish fleet did attack Durrës in 1606. Finally, on 13th December 1608, Patriarch Jovan Kantul organized a huge assembly in Morača Monastery, gathering all the rebel leaders of Montenegro and Herzegovina. The assembly officially negotiated with Emanuel I to sent a force for the liberation of the Balkans, in exchange for "the Crown of Macedonia", at the same time requesting from the new pope Paul the privileges for the Orthodox church, explicitly stating that In our parts, we do not want any Jesuits, or anyone else, who intends on turning the Christian folk into Roman law.[18] Jovan assured him that an army of 20,000, 25 guns and weapons for 25,000 more to be distributed in the Balkans would overwhelm the Ottoman sultan.[18][19] After years of planning, nothing concrete resulted in it, because such an operation "required Spanish naval and logistical support". The rebellion slowly faded through 1609 towards the end of 1610.[18] The 1596–97 uprising would stand as a model for multiple anti-Ottoman uprisings in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the coming centuries.[1]

See also

Annotations

  1. ^ It has been called the Herzegovina Uprising (херцеговачки устанак) and Uprising in Herzegovina (Устанак у Xерцеговини). Other names include Patriarch Jovan's Uprising (устанак патријарха Јована) Grdan's Uprising (Грданов устанак) and Grdan's Rebellion (Грданова буна).
  2. ^ The timespan of the revolt was from the late or end of 1596 until sometime in 1597. In 1599, Lazzaro Soranzo claimed that the rebels rose up during the Siege of Eger,[13] which lasted from September 20 to October 12, 1596. One of Jovan Kantul's petitions to the Pope was presented by his emissaries on April 10, 1597.[20][21]

References

  1. 1 2 Bataković 1996, p. 33.
  2. Rajko L. Veselinović (1966). (1219-1766). Udžbenik za IV razred srpskih pravoslavnih bogoslovija. (Yu 68-1914). Sv. Arh. Sinod Srpske pravoslavne crkve. pp. 70–71. Устанак Срба у Банату и спалмваъье моштийу св. Саве 1594. — Почетком 1594. године Срби у Банату почели су нападати Турке. Устанак се -нарочито почео ширити после освадаъьа и спашьиваъьа Вршца од стране чете -Петра Маджадца. Устаници осводе неколико утврЬених градова (Охат [...] од шпанских представника и других, а херцеговачки митрополит Висарион са главарима обратио се 1596. године римском папи за помоп. Следепе године, 1597., под воЬством херцеговачког митрополита Висариона и никшипког водводе Грдана дигли су се на устанак БрЬани, Ецелопавлипи, Никшипц Пиваьани и Дробъьаци али су се после пораза на Гатачком пшьу смирили и прихватили понуЪени опроштад од Турака. " После неуспелог устанка водвода Грдан задедно са патридархом Лованом 'П.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Nikolaj Velimirović (January 1989). The Life of St. Sava. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. p. 159. ISBN 978-0-88141-065-5.
  4. 1 2 3 Mitja Velikonja (5 February 2003). Religious Separation and Political Intolerance in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Texas A&M University Press. pp. 75–. ISBN 978-1-58544-226-3.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Editions speciales. Naučno delo. 1971. Дошло ]е до похреаа Срба у Ба- нату, ко]и су помагали тадаппьи црногоски владика, Херувим и тре- бюьски, Висарион. До покрета и борбе против Ту рака дошло ]е 1596. године и у Цр- иэ] Гори и сус]едним племенима у Харцеговгаш, нарочито под утица- ]ем поменутог владике Висариона. Идупе, 1597. године, [...] Али, а\адика Висарион и во]вода Грдан радили су и дал>е на организован>у борбе, па су придобили и тадапньег пеЬког патри^арха 1ована. Ова] ]е папи Клименту VIII послао писмо, у коме каже да би се, у случа^у када би папа организовао напад на Нови, дигла на оруж]е и херцего- вачка племена: Зупци, Никшипи, Пивл>ани, Банъани, Дробшаци, Рудине и Гацко. Пошто ]е папа одговорио само уви]еним рщ'ечнма, патри- ]арх тован му се поново обрайао 1599. године, али без успеха.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ćorović 2001, Преокрет у држању Срба
  7. Istorija srpskog naroda: knj. Srbi pod tuđinskom vlašđu, 1537-1699 (2 v.). Srpska književna zadruga. 1993. p. 323. 1597. буну, одбијајући да својим породом плаћају данак у крви.195 У свом подухвату, патријарх Јован се, од свештених лица, најрадије ослањао на херцеговачког митрополита Висариона, а од наредних првака, које је окупљао, најближи му је био никшићки војвода Грдан. Они су се затекли, и остали, у средишту покрета. Производња лажних титула и звања, стварање планова о уништењу Османског Царства, писање историјских трактата, утемељених на фалсифи- катима, плима словинског ...
  8. 1 2 3 Istorisko društvo Bosne i Hercegovine (1959). Annuaire de la Société historique de Bosnie et Herzégovine. Istorisko društvo Bosne i Hercegovine. из Дубровника из почетка 1596 тврди да су се многи херцего- вачки главари са митрополитом састали у требшьском манастиру и заклели »да Ье се дати и поклонити светлости импературови су 20 тисуЪа ]унака«. Устаници траже помоЬ или бар симболично аустриску заставу као доказ везе са Аустри]ом. Ускоро ^е дошло до ускочког осва^ан>а Клиса (8 IV 1596) што ]е изазвало силно узбзфеиье од Лике до Херцеговине. Ускоци су ако развили сво^е походе; на бедемима дубровачким ста^але су отсечене главе цоги- нулих харамбаша"). Шпанско-папска флота била ^е у Месини и очекивала наре1>еNoе за удар против турских обала3"). На новом збору у Требин>у владиха Висарион и главари упутали су Доминика да оде у Грац и Праг. Избавили су да чекану »заповест за устанак«; тада ]е Клис ]ош био ускочки. Из Граца ]е стигао агент Михо ЗлатариЬ те ...
  9. 1 2 Историски записи. с.н. 1959. У покрету против Турака крајем XVI века не учествуЈу Црногорци, већ само Брђани. То је било у време када је Дервиш- бег Сарвановић претио которском провидуру Црногорцима. 3) Црном Гором влада у духовним стварима ...
  10. 1 2 3 4 Samardžić et al. 1993, p. 324.
  11. The Ottomans conquered Eger after a siege that lasted from September 20 to October 12.
  12. Marko Jačov (1997). I Balcani tra impero ottomano e potenze europee (sec. XVI e XVII): il ruolo della diplomazia pontificia. Periferia. sotto il commando di Gardan Vaivoda
  13. 1 2 3 4 Istorija Crne Gore: Od početka XVI do kraja XVIII vijeka. Red. za istoriju Crne Gore. 1975. Затим се Ахмет-паша Кадум помирио са војводом Грданом и опро- стио му.7 Млечанин Лацаро Соранцо, савременик догађаја и писац једне књиге о Турској, оставио је најинтересантнију и најпротиврјечнију биљешку о покрету брдских и херце- говачких племена у ово вријеме. По њему, Пипери, Кучи, Клименти, Бјелопавлићи и други покушали су да се осло- боде турске тираније. Кад су чули да је султан Мехмед изгубио битку и живот код Јегра „сви су устали под ко- мандом војводе Грдана и био је велики покољ Турака који су били у њиховом крају. Пошто сам настојао да сазнам више, чуо сам супротно, да су се повукли незадовољни у њихове планине".8 Као што се види, то уопште није био устанак. Били су то спонтани отпори или буне које чешће избијају иза- зване неким догађајем и брзо замру. Таквих метежа, буна и побуна било је и раније и касније у свим крајевима Балка- на, и на њих су Турци реаговали веома брзо и ефикасно. Ако те буне нијесу ни до чега довеле, долиле су још једну кап мржње између освајача и народа. Отада, све до своје смрти, војвода Грдан, заједно са српским патријархом Јованом, играо је главну улогу у свим преговорима са ...
  14. Trevor W. Harrison; Slobodan Drakulic (31 August 2011). Against Orthodoxy: Studies in Nationalism. UBC Press. pp. 99–. ISBN 978-0-7748-2096-7.
  15. Petar Kočić (1936). Razvitak. 3–4. ... Грдан Никшић је потучен на Гатачком Пољу, али му босански беглербег није учинио ништа чак му није одузео ни војводство у никшикћој нахији. Исто су се тако Турци споразумјели доцније и с његовим сином. Буњавци са Цетине одселили су с пристанком турских власти у Бачку, која је онда била у турској власти. И сеобе из Босне у Аустрију десиле су се више под утицајем православних калуђера и аустријских пограничких заповједника неголи из сопствене народне побуде. Крајем XVI вијека престало је и купљење дјеце у јањичаре.
  16. Jovan Cvijić (1987). Sabrana dela: Balkansko Poluostrvo. Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti. p. 145.
  17. Radovan Samardžić (1990). Seobe srpskog naroda od XIV do XX veka: zbornik radova posvećen tristagodišnjici velike seobe Srba. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Gregory Hanlon; University Research Professor Gregory Hanlon (22 February 2008). The Twilight Of A Military Tradition: Italian Aristocrats And European Conflicts, 1560-1800. Routledge. pp. 86–. ISBN 978-1-135-36143-3.
  19. http://www.rastko.rs/rastko-bl/istorija/corovic/istorija/6_5.html
  20. Miomir Dašić (1986). Vasojevići: od pomena do 1860. godine. Narodna knjiga. Из pannje спомин>ане представке Kojy су 10. априла 1597. године у име пепког патри^арха Дована предала папи Клименту VIII два српска калуфера, види се да се рачунало и на устанак становништва у Горн>ем Полимл^у („Хас ...
  21. Историски записи. 39. с.н. 1986. p. 36. Будимљанску жупу, односно нахију Будимља. То потврђује и молба од 10. априла 1597. године, који су ерпски калуђери Дамњан и Павле, у име пећког патријарха Јована, никшићког војводе Грдана и осталих српских старјешина, предали папи Клименту VIII у Риму, у којој је тражено да се папа заложи да хришћански владари западних држава пошаљу војну помоћ хришћанима покорених наших зе- маља ради вођења борбе за ослобођење од Турака. Найме, у тој молби се набрајају крајеви и области који су спремни за дизање на устанак, почев од Новог преко Оногошта до Сјенице и Новог

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.