Scott Carroll (biologist)

Scott P. Carroll, evolutionary ecologist, at the Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis

Dr Scott P. Carroll is an evolutionary biologist and ecologist affiliated with the University of California, Davis[1] and the University of Queensland. Carroll's main interests are in exploring contemporary evolution to better understand adaptive processes and how those processes can be harnessed to develop solutions to evolutionary challenges in food production, medical care and environmental conservation.[2] With Charles W. Fox, Carroll edited Conservation Biology: Evolution in Action, a book published by Oxford University Press in 2008 in which contributors, across the field of evolutionary biology and conservation, apply evolutionary thinking to concepts and practices in conservation biology, an area of research sometimes called evolutionary ecology.[3] Carroll is founding director of the Institute for Contemporary Evolution.[4]

Life and career

Scott P. Carroll was awarded his Ph.D. in Biology at the University of Utah in 1990. He gained his Master of Science in 1983 at the University of Oklahoma, graduating in 1981 with a bachelor of Science in Ecology & Behavioral Biology (magna cum laude) at the University of Minnesota.

After gaining his Ph. D. Carrol worked as an academic in Costa Rica, first working at the University of California in 1991.

In 2003-04 and again in 2007-08 he was a Fulbright Scholar at University of Queensland.

Professional practice

As a principal of Carroll-Loye Biological Research Consulting, Carroll undertakes insect repellent development, testing and registration, providing US EPA compliant efficacy evaluations of both conventional and biological insect repellents.[5] Amanda Mascarelli of the LA Times has written several articles on insect repellents with the help of Carroll-Loye.[6][7][8] In July 2014 Carroll appeared on Good Morning America assisting reporter Becky Worley with a mosquito box in a story comparing DEET based sprays with Picaridin.[9]

Awards and honours

Controversy

In conservation biology Carroll cautions against over-zealous "native species bias" which he believes may sometimes result in environmentally unwise, expensive and ultimately unsuccessful non-native-species eradication attempts, appearing as one of 19 authors (led by Mark Davis) of "Don't judge species on their origins" in Nature, Issue 7350.[10] This area of conservation biology is hotly debated, the Mark Davis et al. article sparking a response from Daniel Simberloff and another 140 scientists, also in Nature entitled "Non-natives: 141 scientists object."[11] Carroll and co-author Matthew Chew then responded to Simberloff et al. in an opinion piece in The Scientist.[12]

In a special issue of Evolutionary Applications[13] in March 2011, Carroll proposes a concilatory approach to manage the eco-evolutionary dynamics resulting from interactions of natives with non-natives.[14] Carroll expanded on his views on conciliation biology in an address to the Commonwealth Club of California, "An approach to conservation that reconciles past, present and future landscapes in nature", part of the Commonwealth Club's program “The science of conservation and biodiversity in the 21st century.”[15] Sharon Levy quotes Carroll in OnEarth magazine as saying: "Conciliation biology offers a valuable insight, not that we must give up the fight against invasive species but that we can enlist strong allies in the wild."[16] Ann Hild, a shrub-land ecologist at the University of Wyoming, says: "The heart of Carroll's argument will be hard for many to accept, because it means we're no longer striving for a pristine community of native plants." Levy agrees Carroll's is "the most practical approach in some cases, but preventing new invasions still seems most vital.[16]

Publications

Books

Textbooks

Included in:

Popular books

Mentioned in:

Journal articles

In order of most citations as of 3 September 2014

References

  1. "UC Davis Department of Entomology and Nematology". 2 September 2014. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
  2. "Institute for Contemporary Evolution". 2 September 2014. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
  3. "Oxford University Press, catalogue page for Conservation Biology: Evolution in Action". 2 September 2014. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
  4. "Institute for Contemporary Evolution". Institute for Contemporary Evolution. Institute for Contemporary Evolution. Retrieved 12 September 2014.
  5. "Carroll-Loye Biological Research Consulting". Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  6. "http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/01/health/la-he-summer-health-insect-repellents20110601". 1 June 2011. Retrieved 3 September 2014. External link in |title= (help)
  7. "DEET repels bugs, worries consumers". 1 June 2012. Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  8. "'Natural' insect repellents are plentiful but not always reliable". Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  9. "New Bug Spray Eliminates Risky Chemicals".
  10. "Nature, International weekly journal of science, archive". 3 September 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  11. "Nature 475, 36 (07 July 2011)". Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  12. "Opinion: The Invasive Ideology, Biologists and conservationists are too eager to demonize non-native species, by Matthew K. Chew and Scott P. Carroll". The Scientist. September 7, 2011.
  13. "Evolutionary Applications". Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  14. "Conciliation biology: the eco-evolutionary management of permanently invaded biotic systems". Special Issue: In the light of evolution: interdisciplinary challenges in food, health, and the environment. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  15. "Scott Carroll: Conciliation Biology". Retrieved 3 September 2014.
  16. 1 2 "Living With Aliens". Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). Retrieved 3 September 2014.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/14/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.