Role-playing video game

"CRPG" redirects here. For the sub-component of the Canadian Forces reserve, see Canadian Rangers.
Not to be confused with other forms of role-playing, such as tabletop role-playing game.
Part of a series on
Role-playing video games

A role-playing video game (commonly referred to as role-playing game or RPG, and in the past was also known as computer role-playing game or CRPG) is a video game genre where the player controls the actions of a character (and/or several party members) immersed in some well-defined world. Many role-playing video games have origins in pen-and-paper role-playing games[1] (Including Dungeons & Dragons) and use much of the same terminology, settings and game mechanics. Other major similarities with pen-and-paper games include developed story-telling and narrative elements, player character development, complexity, as well as replayability and immersion. The electronic medium removes the necessity for a gamemaster and increases combat resolution speed. RPGs have evolved from simple text-based console-window games into visually rich 3D experiences. Since the 1980s, Role-playing is the most commercially viable video game genre in Japan, and has more market share of any other genre in the japanese gaming industry, although in the 2010s first-person shooters and western iOS and Android games were becoming rapidly and increasingly popular in that country.


Role-playing video games use much of the same terminology, settings and game mechanics as early pen-and-paper role-playing games such as Dungeons & Dragons.[2] Players control a central game character, or multiple game characters, usually called a party, and attain victory by completing a series of quests or reaching the conclusion of a central storyline. Players explore a game world, while solving puzzles and engaging in tactical combat. A key feature of the genre is that characters grow in power and abilities, and characters are typically designed by the player.[1] RPGs rarely challenge a player's physical coordination or reaction time, with the exception of action role-playing games.[3]

Role-playing video games typically rely on a highly developed story and setting,[4] which is divided into a number of quests. Players control one or several characters by issuing commands, which are performed by the character at an effectiveness determined by that character's numeric attributes. Often these attributes increase each time a character gains a level, and a character's level goes up each time the player accumulates a certain amount of experience.[5]

Role-playing video games also typically attempt to offer more complex and dynamic character interaction than what is found in other video game genres. This usually involves additional focus on the artificial intelligence and scripted behavior of computer-controlled non-player characters.[3][6]

Story and setting

The premise of most role-playing games tasks the player with saving the world, or whichever level of society is threatened. There are often twists and turns as the story progresses, such as the surprise appearance of estranged relatives, or enemies who become friends or vice versa.[3] The game world tends to be set in a fantasy or science fiction universe,[7] which allows players to do things they cannot do in real life and helps players suspend their disbelief about the rapid character growth. To a lesser extent, settings closer to the present day or near future are possible.[3]

The story often provides much of the entertainment in the game.[3] Because these games have strong storylines, they can often make effective use of recorded dialog and voiceover narration.[3] Players of these games tend to appreciate long cutscenes more than players of faster action games.[3] While most games advance the plot when the player defeats an enemy or completes a level, role-playing games often progress the plot based on other important decisions. For example, a player may make the decision to join a guild, thus triggering a progression in the storyline that is usually irreversible.[3] New elements in the story may also be triggered by mere arrival in an area, rather than completing a specific challenge.[3] The plot is usually divided so that each game location is an opportunity to reveal a new chapter in the story.[3]

Pen-and-paper role-playing games typically involve a player called the gamemaster (or GM for short) who can dynamically create the story, setting, and rules, and react to a player's choices. In role-playing video games, the computer performs the function of the gamemaster. This offers the player a smaller set of possible actions, since computers can't engage in imaginative acting comparable to a skilled human gamemaster. In exchange, the typical role-playing video game may have storyline branches, user interfaces, and stylized cutscenes and gameplay to offer a more direct storytelling mechanism. Characterization of non-player characters in video games is often handled using a dialog tree. Saying the right things to the right non-player characters will elicit useful information for the player, and may even result in other rewards such as items or experience, as well as opening up possible storyline branches. Multiplayer online role-playing games can offer an exception to this contrast by allowing human interaction among multiple players and in some cases enabling a player to perform the role of a gamemaster.[3][8]

Exploration and quests

Overworld map from the tactical RPG The Battle for Wesnoth.

Exploring the world is an important aspect of all RPGs.[3] Players will walk through, talking to non-player characters, picking up objects, and avoiding traps.[3] Some games such as NetHack, Diablo, and the FATE series randomize the structure of individual levels, increasing the game's variety and replayability.[3] Role-playing games where players complete quests by exploring randomly generated dungeons and include the game mechanic "permadeath" are called roguelikes, named after the 1980 video game Rogue.[9]

The game's story is often mapped onto exploration, where each chapter of the story is mapped onto a different location. RPGs usually allow players to return to previously visited locations. Usually, there is nothing left to do there, although some locations change throughout the story and offer the player new things to do in response. Players must acquire enough power to overcome a major challenge in order to progress to the next area, and this structure can be compared to the boss characters at the end of levels in action games.[3]

The player typically must complete a linear sequence of certain quests in order to reach the end of the game's story, although quests in some games such as Arcanum or Geneforge can limit or enable certain choices later in the game. Many RPGs also often allow the player to seek out optional side-quests and character interactions. Quests of this sort can be found by talking to a non-player character, and there may be no penalty for abandoning or ignoring these quests other than a missed opportunity or reward.[3] Quests may involve defeating one or many enemies, rescuing a non-player character, item fetch quests, or locational puzzles such as mysteriously locked doors.

Items and inventory

Players can find loot (such as clothing, weapons, and armor) throughout the game world and collect it.[3] Players can trade items for currency and better equipment. Trade takes place while interacting with certain friendly non-player characters, such as shopkeepers, and often uses a specialized trading screen. Purchased items go into the player's inventory. Some games turn inventory management into a logistical challenge by limiting the size of the player's inventory, thus forcing the player to decide what they must carry at the time.[10] This can be done by limiting the maximum weight that a player can carry, by employing a system of arranging items in a virtual space, or by simply limiting the number of items that can be held.[3]

Character actions and abilities

Character information and inventory screen in a typical computer role-playing game. Pictured here is the roguelike S.C.O.U.R.G.E.: Heroes of Lesser Renown.

Most of the actions in an RPG are performed indirectly, with the player selecting an action and the character performing it by their own accord.[3] Success at that action depends on the character's numeric attributes. Role-playing video games often simulate die-rolling mechanics from non-electronic role-playing games to determine success or failure. As a character's attributes improve, their chances of succeeding at a particular action will increase.[3]

Many role-playing games allow players to play as an evil character. Although robbing and murdering indiscriminately may make it easier to get money, there are usually consequences in that other characters will become uncooperative or even hostile towards the player. Thus, these games allow players to make moral choices, but force players to live with the consequences of their actions.[3] Games often let the player control an entire party of characters. However, if winning is contingent upon the survival of a single character, then that character effectively becomes the player's avatar.[3] An example of this would be in Baldur's Gate, where if the character created by the player dies, the game ends and a previous save needs to be loaded.[11]

Although some single-player role-playing games give the player an avatar that is largely predefined for the sake of telling a specific story, many role-playing games make use of a character creation screen. This allows players to choose their character's sex, their race or species, and their character class. Although many of theses traits are cosmetic, there are functional aspects as well. Character classes will have different abilities and strengths. Common classes include fighters, spellcasters, thieves with stealth abilities, and clerics with healing abilities, or a mixed class, such as a fighter who can cast simple spells. Characters will also have a range of physical attributes such as dexterity and strength, which affect a player's performance in combat. Mental attributes such as intelligence may affect a player's ability to perform and learn spells, while social attributes such as charisma may limit the player's choices while conversing with non-player characters. These attribute systems often strongly resemble the Dungeons & Dragons ruleset.[3][12]

Some role-playing games make use of magical powers, or equivalents such as psychic powers or advanced technology. These abilities are confined to specific characters such as mages, spellcasters, or magic-users. In games where the player controls multiple characters, these magic-users usually complement the physical strength of other classes. Magic can be used to attack, to defend, or to temporarily change an enemy or ally's attributes. While some games allow players to gradually consume a spell, as ammunition is consumed by a gun, most games offer players a finite amount of mana which can be spent on any spell. Mana is restored by resting or by consuming potions. Characters can also gain other non-magical skills, which stay with the character as long as he lives.[3]

Experience and levels

An example of character creation in a video game.

Although the characterization of the game's avatar will develop through storytelling, characters may also become more functionally powerful by gaining new skills, weapons, and magic. This creates a positive-feedback cycle that is central to most role-playing games: The player grows in power, allowing them to overcome more difficult challenges, and gain even more power.[3] This is part of the appeal of the genre, where players experience growing from an ordinary person into a superhero with amazing powers. Whereas other games give the player these powers immediately, the player in a role-playing game will choose their powers and skills as they gain experience.[3]

Role-playing games usually measure progress by counting experience points and character levels. Experience is usually earned by defeating enemies in combat, with some games offering experience for completing certain quests or conversations. Experience becomes a form of score, and accumulating a certain amount of experience will cause the character's level to go up. This is called "levelling up", and gives the player an opportunity to raise one or more of his character's attributes. Many RPGs allow players to choose how to improve their character, by allocating a finite number of points into the attributes of their choice.[3] Gaining experience will also unlock new magic spells for characters that use magic.[3]

Some role-playing games also give the player specific skill points, which can be used to unlock a new skill or improve an existing one. This may sometimes be implemented as a skill tree. As with the technology trees seen in strategy video games, learning a particular skill in the tree will unlock more powerful skills deeper in the tree.[3]

Three different systems of rewarding the player characters for solving the tasks in the game can be set apart: the experience system (also known as the "level-based" system), the training system (also known as the "skill-based" system) and the skill-point system (also known as "level-free" system)


Older games often separated combat into its own mode of gameplay, distinct from exploring the game world. More recent games tend to maintain a consistent perspective for exploration and combat.[3] Some games, especially earlier video games, generate battles from random encounters; more modern RPGs are more likely to have persistent wandering monsters that move about the game world independently of the player. Most RPGs also use stationary boss monsters in key positions, and automatically trigger battles with them when the PCs enter these locations or perform certain actions. Combat options typically involve positioning characters, selecting which enemy to attack, and exercising special skills such as casting spells.[3]

In a classical turn-based system, only one character may act at a time; all other characters remain still, with a few exceptions that may involve the use of special abilities. The order in which the characters act is usually dependent on their attributes, such as speed or agility. This system rewards strategic planning more than quickness. It also points to the fact that realism in games is a means to the end of immersion in the game world, not an end in itself. A turn-based system makes it possible, for example, to run within range of an opponent and kill him before he gets a chance to act, or duck out from behind hard cover, fire, and retreat back without an opponent being able to fire, which are of course both impossibilities. However, tactical possibilities have been created by this unreality that did not exist before; the player determines whether the loss of immersion in the reality of the game is worth the satisfaction gained from the development of the tactic and its successful execution. Fallout has been praised as being "the shining example of a good turn-based Combat System [sic]".[13]

Real-time combat can import features from action games, creating a hybrid action RPG game genre. But other RPG battle systems such as the Final Fantasy battle systems have imported real-time choices without emphasizing coordination or reflexes. Other systems combine real-time combat with the ability to pause the game and issue orders to all characters under his/her control; when the game is unpaused, all characters follow the orders they were given. This "real-time with pause" system (RTwP) has been particularly popular in games designed by BioWare. The most famous RTwP engine is the Infinity Engine. Other names for "real-time with pause" include "active pause" and "semi real-time".[13][14] Tactical RPG maker Apeiron named their system Smart Pause Mode (SPM) because it would automatically pause based on a number of user-configurable settings.[15]

Early Ultima games featured a RTwP system: they were strictly turn-based, but if the player waited more than a second or so to issue a command, the game would automatically issue a pass command, allowing the monsters to take a turn while the PCs did nothing. Fallout Tactics: Brotherhood of Steel is another game which used this system.[13]

There is a further subdivision by the structure of the battle system; in many early games, such as Wizardry, monsters and the party are arrayed into ranks, and can only attack enemies in the front rank with melee weapons. Other games, such as most of the Ultima series, employed duplicates of the miniatures combat system traditionally used in the early role-playing games. Representations of the player characters and monsters would move around an arena modeled after the surrounding terrain, attacking any enemies that are sufficiently near.

Interface and graphics

Players typically navigate the game world from a first or third-person perspective in 3D RPGs. However, an isometric or aerial top-down perspective is common in party-based RPGs, in order to give the player a clear view of their entire party and their surroundings.[16] Role-playing games require the player to manage a large amount of information, and frequently make use of a windowed interface. For example, spell-casting characters will often have a menu of spells they can use. On the PC, players typically use the mouse to click on icons and menu options, while console games duplicate this functionality with the game controller. Older games often revealed calculations of the game as seen in Dungeons & Dragons games, although more recent games have removed this information to improve immersion.[3]

History and classification

The role-playing video game genre began in the mid-1970s on mainframe computers, inspired by pen-and-paper role-playing games such as Dungeons & Dragons.[17] Several other sources of inspiration for early role-playing video games also included tabletop wargames, sports simulation games, adventure games such as Colossal Cave Adventure, fantasy writings by authors such as J. R. R. Tolkien,[18] traditional strategy games such as chess,[19][20] and ancient epic literature dating back to Epic of Gilgamesh which followed the same basic structure of setting off in various quests in order to accomplish goals.[21]

After the success of role-playing video games such as Ultima and Wizardry, which in turn served as the blueprint for Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy, the role-playing genre eventually diverged into two styles, Eastern role-playing games and Western role-playing games, due to cultural differences, though roughly mirroring the platform divide between consoles and computers, respectively.[22] Finally, while the first RPGs offered strictly a single player experience, the popularity of multiplayer modes rose sharply during the early to mid-1990s with action role-playing games such as Secret of Mana and Diablo. With the advent of the Internet, multiplayer games have grown to become massively multiplayer online role-playing games, including Lineage, Final Fantasy XI, and World of Warcraft.[23]

Mainframe computers

The role-playing video game genre began in the mid-1970s, as an offshoot of early university mainframe text-based RPGs on PDP-10 and Unix-based computers, such as Dungeon, pedit5 and dnd.[24] In 1980, a very popular dungeon crawler, Rogue was released. Featuring ASCII graphics where the setting, monsters and items were represented by letters and a deep system of gameplay, it inspired a whole genre of similar clones on mainframe and home computers called "roguelikes".

Personal computers

One of the earliest role-playing video game on a microcomputer was Dungeon n Dragons, written by Peter Trefonas and published by CLOAD (1980). This early game, published for a TRS-80 Model 1, was just 16K long and included a limited word parser command line, character generation, a store to purchase equipment, combat, traps to solve, and a dungeon to explore.[25] Other contemporaneous CRPGs (Computer Role Playing Games) were Temple of Apshai, Odyssey: The Compleat Apventure and Akalabeth: World of Doom, the precursor to Ultima. Some early microcomputer RPGs (such as Telengard (1982) or Sword of Fargoal) were based on their mainframe counterparts, while others (such as Ultima or Wizardry, the most successful of the early CRPGs) were loose adaptations of D&D. They also included both first-person displays and overhead views, sometimes in the same game (Akalabeth, for example, used both perspectives). Most of the key features of RPGs were developed in this early period, prior to the release of Ultima III: Exodus, one of the prime influences on both computer and console RPG development. For example, Wizardry featured menu-driven combat, Tunnels of Doom featured tactical combat on a special "combat screen", and Dungeons of Daggorath featured real-time combat which took place on the main dungeon map.[26]

Starting in 1984 with Questron and 50 Mission Crush, SSI produced many series of CRPGs. Their 1985 game Phantasie is notable for introducing automapping and in-game scrolls providing hints and background information. They also released Pool of Radiance in 1988, the first of several "Gold Box" CRPGs based on the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons rules. These games featured a first-person display for movement, combined with an overhead tactical display for combat. One common feature of RPGs from this era, which Matt Barton calls the "Golden Age" of computer RPGs, is the use of numbered "paragraphs" printed in the manual or adjunct booklets, containing the game's lengthier texts; the player could be directed to read a certain paragraph, instead of being shown the text on screen. The ultimate exemplar of this approach was Sir-Tech's Star Saga trilogy (of which only two games were released); the first game contained 888 "textlets" (usually much longer than a single paragraph) spread across 13 booklets, while the second contained 50,000 paragraphs spread across 14 booklets. Most of the games from this era were turn-based, although Dungeon Master and its imitators had real-time combat. Other classic titles from this era include The Bard's Tale (1985), Wasteland (1988), the start of the Might and Magic (1986-2014) series and the continuing Ultima (1981-1999) series.[27]

Later, in the middle to late 1990s, isometric, sprite-based RPGs became commonplace, with video game publishers Interplay Entertainment and Blizzard North playing a lead role with such titles as the Baldur's Gate, Icewind Dale and the action-RPG Diablo series, as well as the dialogue-heavy Planescape: Torment and cult classics Fallout and Fallout 2. This era also saw a move toward 3D game engines with such games as Might and Magic VI: The Mandate of Heaven and The Elder Scrolls: Arena. TSR, dissatisfied with SSI's later products, such as Dark Sun: Wake of the Ravager and Menzoberranzan, transferred the AD&D license to several different developers, and eventually gave it to BioWare, who used it in Baldur's Gate (1998) and several later games. By the 2000s, 3D engines had become dominant.[28]

Video game consoles

The earliest RPG on a console was Dragonstomper on the Atari 2600 in 1982.[29] Another early RPG on a console was Bokosuka Wars, originally released for the Sharp X1 computer in 1983[30] and later ported to the MSX in 1984, the NES in 1985 and the Sharp X68000 as New Bokosuka Wars. The game laid the foundations for the tactical role-playing game genre, or "simulation RPG" genre as it is known in Japan. It was also an early example of a real-time,[31] action role-playing game.[32][33] In 1986, Chunsoft created the NES title Dragon Quest (called Dragon Warrior in North America until the eighth game), which drew inspiration from computer RPG's Ultima and Wizardry and is regarded as the template for future Japanese role-playing video games released since then.[34]

In 1987, the genre came into its own with the release of several highly influential console RPGs distinguishing themselves from computer RPGs, including the genre-defining Phantasy Star, released for the Master System. Shigeru Miyamoto's Zelda II: The Adventure of Link for the Famicom Disk System was one of the earliest action role-playing games, combining the action-adventure game framework of its predecessor The Legend of Zelda with the statistical elements of turn-based RPGs.[35] Most RPGs at this time were turn-based.[36] Faxanadu was another early action RPG for the NES, released as a side-story to the computer action RPG Dragon Slayer II: Xanadu.[37] Square's Final Fantasy for the NES introduced side-view battles, with the player characters on the right and the enemies on the left, which soon became the norm for numerous console RPGs.[38] In 1988, Dragon Warrior III introduced a character progression system allowing the player to change the party's character classes during the course of the game. Another "major innovation was the introduction of day/night cycles; certain items, characters, and quests are only accessible at certain times of day."[39] In 1989, Phantasy Star II for the Genesis established many conventions of the genre, including an epic, dramatic, character-driven storyline dealing with serious themes and subject matter, and a strategy-based battle system.[40]

Console RPGs distinguished themselves from computer RPGs to a greater degree in the early 1990s. As console RPGs became more heavily story-based than their computer counterparts, one of the major differences that emerged during this time was in the portrayal of the characters. Console RPGs often featured intricately related characters who had distinctive personalities and traits, with players assuming the roles of people who cared about each other, fell in love or even had families. Romance in particular was a theme that was common in most console RPGs at the time but absent from most computer RPGs.[41] During the 1990s, console RPGs had become increasingly dominant, exerting a greater influence on computer RPGs than the other way around.[42] Console RPGs had eclipsed computer RPGs for some time, though computer RPGs began making a comeback towards the end of the decade with interactive choice-filled adventures.[43]

The next major revolution came in the late 1990s, which saw the rise of optical disks in fifth generation consoles. The implications for RPGs were enormous—longer, more involved quests, better audio, and full-motion video. This was first clearly demonstrated in 1997 by the phenomenal success of Final Fantasy VII, which is considered one of the most influential games of all time.[44][45] With a record-breaking production budget of around $45 million,[44] the ambitious scope of Final Fantasy VII raised the possibilities for the genre, with its dozens of minigames and much higher production values. The latter includes innovations such as the use of 3D characters on pre-rendered backgrounds,[46] battles viewed from multiple different angles rather than a single angle, and for the first time full-motion CGI video seamlessly blended into the gameplay,[45] effectively integrated throughout the game.[44] The game was soon ported to the PC and gained much success there, as did several other originally console RPGs, blurring the line between the console and computer platforms.[42]

Cultural differences

After the success of console role-playing games in Japan, the role-playing genre eventually began being classified into two fairly distinct styles: computer RPG and console RPG, due to stylistic, gameplay and/or cultural reasons; with the latter having become popularized and heavily influenced by early Japanese video games such as Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy.[22][47][48][Note 1] In the early 2000s, however, as the platform differences began to blur, computer RPGs and console RPGs were eventually classified as Western role-playing games (or WRPGs) and Japanese role-playing games (or JRPGs), respectively.[49]

Though sharing fundamental premises, Western RPGs tend to feature darker graphics, older characters, and a greater focus on roaming freedom, realism, and the underlying game mechanics (e.g. "rules-based" or "system-based"[49]); whereas Eastern RPGs tend to feature brighter, anime-like graphics, younger characters, faster-paced gameplay, and a greater focus on tightly-orchestrated, linear storylines with intricate plots (e.g. "action-based" or "story-based"[49]).[22][50][51][52][53][54][55] Further, Western RPGs are more likely to allow players to create and customize characters from scratch,[56] and since the late 1990s have had a stronger focus on extensive dialog tree systems (e.g. Planescape: Torment).[57] On the other hand, Japanese RPGs tend to limit players to developing pre-defined player characters, and often do not allow the option to create or choose one's own playable characters or make decisions that alter the plot.[55][Note 2] In the early 1990s, Japanese RPGs were seen as being much closer to fantasy novels,[59] but by the late 1990s had become more cinematic in style (e.g. Final Fantasy series), while at the same time Western RPGs started becoming more novelistic in style (e.g. Planescape: Torment); by the late 2000s, Western RPGs had also adopted a more cinematic style (e.g. Mass Effect series).[60]

One reason given for these differences is that many early Japanese console RPGs can be seen as forms of interactive manga (Japanese comics) or anime wrapped around Western rule systems at the time,[61] in addition to the influence of visual novel adventure games.[62] As a result, Japanese console RPGs differentiated themselves with a stronger focus on scripted narratives and character drama,[50] alongside streamlined gameplay.[61] In recent years, these trends have in turn been adopted by Western RPGs, which have begun moving more towards tightly structured narratives, in addition to moving away from "numbers and rules" in favor of streamlined combat systems similar to action games.[61][63] In addition, a large number of Western independent games are modelled after Japanese RPGs,[64] especially those of the 16-bit era, partly due to the RPG Maker game development tools.[61]

Example of kawaii art. "Cute" art such as this is unpopular with some players.

Another oft-cited difference is the prominence or absence of kawaisa, or "cuteness", in Japanese culture, and different approaches with respect to character aesthetics.[22] Western RPGs tend to maintain a serious and gritty tone. JRPG protagonsists tend to be designed with an emphasis on aesthetic beauty, and even male characters are often young, androgynous, shōnen or bishōnen in appearance. JRPGs often have cute (and even comic-relief type) characters or animals, juxtaposed (or clashing) with more mature themes and situations; and many modern JRPGs feature characters designed in the same style as those in manga and anime.[56] The stylistic differences are often due to differing target audiences: Western RPGs are usually geared primarily towards teenage to adult males, whereas Japanese RPGs are usually intended for a much larger demographic,[65] including female audiences,[52] who, for example, accounted for nearly a third of Final Fantasy XIIIs fanbase.[66]

Modern Japanese RPGs are more likely to feature turn-based battles; while modern Western RPGs are more likely to feature real-time combat.[52][55][67] In the past, the reverse was often true: real-time action role-playing games were far more common among Japanese console RPGs than Western computer RPGs up until the late 1990s, due to gamepads usually being better suited to real-time action than the keyboard and mouse.[68] There are of course exceptions, such as Final Fantasy XII (2006) and Shin Megami Tensei: Devil Summoner (1995 onwards), two modern Eastern RPGs that feature real-time combat; and The Temple of Elemental Evil (2003), a modern Western RPG that features turn-based combat.

Some journalists and video game designers have questioned this cultural classification, arguing that the differences between Eastern and Western games have been exaggerated. In an interview held at the American Electronic Entertainment Expo, Japanese video game developer Tetsuya Nomura (who worked on Final Fantasy and Kingdom Hearts) emphasized that RPGs should not be classified by country-of-origin, but rather described simply for what they are: role-playing games.[69] Hironobu Sakaguchi, creator of Final Fantasy and The Last Story, noted that, while "users like to categorise" Japanese RPGs as "turn-based, traditional styles" and Western RPGs as "born from first-person shooters," there "are titles that don't fit the category," pointing to Chrono Trigger (which he also worked on) and the Mana games. He further noted that there have been "other games similar to the style of Chrono Trigger," but that "it's probably because the games weren't localised and didn't reach the Western audience."[70] Xeno series director Tetsuya Takahashi, in reference to Xenoblade Chronicles, stated that "I don’t know when exactly people started using the term 'JRPG,' but if this game makes people rethink the meaning of this term, I’ll be satisfied." The writer Jeremy Parish of states that "Xenoblade throws into high relief the sheer artificiality of the gaming community's obsession over the differences between" Western and Japanese RPGs, pointing out that it "does things that don't really fit into either genre. Gamers do love their boundaries and barriers and neat little rules, I know, but just because you cram something into a little box doesn't mean it belongs there."[71] Nick Doerr of Joystiq criticizes the claim that Japanese RPGs are "too linear," pointing out that non-linear Japanese RPGs are not uncommonfor instance, the Romancing SaGa series.[72] Likewise, Rowan Kaiser of Joystiq points out that linear Western RPGs were common in the 1990s, and argues that many of the often mentioned differences between Eastern and Western games are stereotypes that are generally "not true" and "never was", pointing to classic examples like Lands of Lore and Betrayal at Krondor that were more narrative-focused than the typical Western-style RPGs of the time.[49] In 2015, IGN noted in an interview with Xenoblade Chronicles X's development team that the label "JRPG" is most commonly used to refer to RPGs "whose presentation mimics the design sensibilities" of anime and manga, that it's "typically the presentation and character archetypes" that signal "this is a JRPG."[73]


Due to the cultural differences between Western and Japanese variations of role-playing games, both have often been compared and critiqued by those within the video games industry and press.

In the late 1980s, when traditional American computer RPGs such as Ultima and Defender of the Crown were ported to consoles, they received mixed reviews from console gamers, as they were "not perceived, by many of the players, to be as exciting as the Japanese imports," and lacked the arcade and action-adventure elements commonly found in Japanese console RPGs at the time.[74] In the early 1990s, American computer RPGs also began facing criticism for their plots, where "the party sticks together through thick and thin" and always "act together as a group" rather than as individuals, and where non-player characters are "one-dimensional characters," in comparison to the more fantasy novel approach of Squaresoft console RPGs such as Final Fantasy IV.[59] However in 1994, game designer Sandy Petersen noted that, among computer gamers, there was criticism against cartridge-based console JRPGs being "not role-playing at all" due to popular examples such as Secret of Mana and especially The Legend of Zelda using "direct" arcade-style action combat systems instead of the more "abstract" turn-based battle systems associated with computer RPGs. In response, he pointed out that not all console RPGs are action-based, pointing to Final Fantasy and Lufia.[75] Another early criticism, dating back to the Phantasy Star games in the late 1980s, was the frequent use of defined player characters, in contrast to the Wizardry and Gold Box games where the player's avatars (such as knights, clerics, or thieves) were blank slates.[76]

As Japanese console RPGs became increasingly more dominant in the 1990s,[42] and became known for being more heavily story and character-based, American computer RPGs began to face criticism for having characters devoid of personality or background, due to representing avatars which the player uses to interact with the world, in contrast to Japanese console RPGs which depicted characters with distinctive personalities. American computer RPGs were thus criticized for lacking "more of the traditional role-playing" offered by Japanese console RPGs, which instead emphasized character interactions.[50] In response, North American computer RPGs began making a comeback towards the end of the 1990s with interactive choice-filled adventures.[77]

In more recent years, several writers have criticized JRPGs as not being "true" RPGs, for heavy usage of scripted cutscenes and dialogue, and a frequent lack of branching outcomes.[78][Turner] Japanese RPGs are also sometimes criticized for having relatively simple battle systems in which players are able to win by repetitively mashing buttons,[78][Turner][78][79][Note 3] As a result, Japanese-style role-playing games are held in disdain by some Western gamers, leading to the term "JRPG" being held in the pejorative.[67] Some observers have also speculated that Japanese RPGs are stagnating or declining in both quality and popularity, including remarks by BioWare co-founder Greg Zeschuk and writing director Daniel Erickson that JRPGs are stagnating—and that Final Fantasy XIII is not even really an RPG;[81][82][83] criticisms regarding seemingly nebulous justifications by some Japanese designers for newly changed (or, alternately, newly un-changed) features of recent titles;[84] calls among some gaming journalists to "fix" JRPGs' problems;[85][86][87][88] as well as claims that some recent titles such as Front Mission Evolved are beginning to attempt—and failing to—imitate Western titles.[89] In an article for PSM3, Brittany Vincent of felt that "developers have mired the modern JRPG in unoriginality", citing Square Enix CEO Yoichi Wada who stated that "they’re strictly catering to a particular audience", the article noting the difference in game sales between Japan and North America before going on to suggest JRPGs may need to "move forward".[90] This criticism has also occurred in the wider media with an advertisement for Fallout: New Vegas (Obsidian Entertainment) in Japan openly mocked Japanese RPGs' traditional characteristics in favor of their own title.[91] Nick Doerr of Joystiq noted that Bethesda felt that Japanese RPGs "are all the same" and "too linear," to which he responded that "most part, it's true" but noted there are also non-linear Japanese RPGs such as the Romancing SaGa series.[72] Such criticisms have produced responses such as ones by Japanese video game developers, Shinji Mikami and Yuji Horii, to the effect that JRPGs were never as popular in the West to begin with, and that Western reviewers are biased against turn-based systems.[92][93][94][95] Jeff Fleming of Gamasutra also states that Japanese RPGs on home consoles are generally showing signs of staleness, but notes that handheld consoles such as the Nintendo DS have had more original and experimental Japanese RPGs released in recent years.[96]

Western RPGs have also received criticism in recent years. They remain less popular in Japan, where, until recently, Western games in general had a negative reputation.[53] In Japan, where the vast majority of early console role-playing video games originate,[97] Western RPGs remain largely unknown.[98] The developer Motomu Toriyama criticized Western RPGs, stating that they "dump you in a big open world, and let you do whatever you like [which makes it] difficult to tell a compelling story."[99] Hironobu Sakaguchi noted that "users like to categorise" Western RPGs as "a sort of different style, born from first person shooters."[70] In recent years, some have also criticized Western RPGs for becoming less RPG-like, instead with further emphasis on action[61] Christian Nutt of GameSpy states that, in contrast to Japanese RPGs, Western RPGs' greater control over the development and customization of playable characters has come at the expense of plot and gameplay, resulting in what he felt was generic dialogue, lack of character development within the narrative and weaker battle systems.[78][Nutt] He also states that Western RPGs tend to focus more on the underlying rules governing the battle system rather than on the experience itself.[78][Nutt] Tom Battey of Edge Magazine noted that the problems often cited against Japanese RPGs (mentioned above) also often apply to many Western RPGs as well as games outside of the RPG genre.[87] BioWare games have been criticized for "lack of innovation, repetitive structure and lack of real choice."[100] Western RPGs, such as Bethesda games, have also been criticized for lacking in "narrative strength" or "mechanical intricacy" due to the open-ended, sandbox structure of their games.[101]

Despite the criticisms leveled at both variations, Rowan Kaiser of Joystiq argued that many of the often mentioned differences between Eastern and Western games are stereotypes that are generally not true, noting various similarities between several Western titles (such as Lands of Lore, Betrayal at Krondor, and Dragon Age) and several classic Eastern titles (such as Final Fantasy and Phantasy Star), noting that both these Western and Japanese titles share a similar emphasis on linear storytelling, pre-defined characters and "bright-colored" graphics.[49] The developer Hironobu Sakaguchi also noted there are many games from both that don't fit such categorizations, such as his own Chrono Trigger as well as the Mana games, noting there have been many other such Japanese role-playing games that never released in Western markets.[70]


In what is viewed as the largely secular nature of Japanese culture has resulted in heavy usage of themes, symbols, and characters taken from a variety of religions, including Christianity and Japanese Shinto. This tends to be problematic when JRPGs are exported to Western countries where the topics of religion and blasphemy remain sensitive, such as the United States. It is not unusual for a JRPG to exhibit elements that would be controversial in the West, such as Xenogears or Final Fantasy Tactics featuring antagonists that bear similarities to the Abrahamic God and the Catholic Church, respectively;[102] and Nintendo has made efforts in the past to remove references such as these prior to introducing their games into the North American market.[22]

Relationship to other genres

RPGs seldom test a player's physical skill. Combat is typically a tactical challenge rather than a physical one, and games involve other non-action gameplay such as choosing dialog options, inventory management, or buying and selling items.[3]

Although RPGs share some combat rules with wargames, RPGs are often about a small group of individual characters.[57] Wargames tend to have large groups of identical units, as well as non-humanoid units such as tanks and airplanes. Role-playing games do not normally allow the player to produce more units. However, the Heroes of Might and Magic series crosses these genres by combining individual heroes with large amounts of troops in large battles.[3]

RPGs rival adventure games in terms of their rich storylines, in contrast to genres that do not rely upon storytelling such as sports games or puzzle games.[3] Both genres also feature highly detailed characters, and a great deal of exploration. However, adventure games usually have a well-defined character, whereas while RPGs may do so, many allow the player to design their characters. Adventure games usually focus on one character, whereas RPGs often feature an entire party. RPGs also feature a combat system, which adventure games usually lack. Whereas both adventure games and RPGs may focus on the personal or psychological growth of characters, RPGs tend to emphasize a complex eternal economy where characters are defined by increasing numerical attributes.

Gameplay elements strongly associated with this genre, such as statistical character development, have been widely adapted to other video game genres. For example, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, an action-adventure game, uses resource statistics (abbreviated as "stats") to define a wide range of attributes including stamina, weapon proficiency, driving, lung capacity, and muscle tone, and uses numerous cutscenes and quests to advance the story. Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos, a real-time strategy game, features heroes that can complete quests, obtain new equipment, and "learn" new abilities as they advance in level.

According to Satoru Iwata, former president of Nintendo, turn-based RPGs have been unfairly criticized as being outdated, and action-based RPGs can frustrate players who are unable to keep up with the battles.[36] According to Yuji Horii, creator of the popular Dragon Quest series and Ryutaro Ichimura, producer of Square Enix, turn-based RPGs allow the player time to make decisions without feeling rushed or worry about real-life distractions.


Main article: Roguelike
The interface of the original Rogue as it looked on an ASCII computer terminal

Roguelike is a subgenre of role-playing video games, characterized by procedural generation of game levels, turn-based gameplay, tile-based graphics, permanent death of the player-character, and typically based on a high fantasy narrative setting. Roguelikes descend from the 1980 game Rogue, particularly mirroring Rogue's character- or sprite-based graphics.[103][104] Some of the factors used in this definition include: These games were popularized among college students and computer programmers of the 1980s and 1990s, leading to a large number of variants but adhering to these common gameplay elements. Some of the more well-known variants include Hack, NetHack, Ancient Domains of Mystery, Moria, Angband, and Tales of Maj'Eyal.[105] The Japanese series of Mystery Dungeon games by Chunsoft, inspired by Rogue, also fall within the concept of roguelike games.[106]

More recently, with more powerful home computers and gaming systems, new variations of roguelikes incorporating other gameplay genres, thematic elements and graphical styles have become popular, typically retaining the notion of procedural generation. These titles are sometimes labeled as "roguelike-like", "rogue-lite", or "procedural death labyrinths" to reflect the variation from titles which mimic the gameplay of traditional roguelikes more faithfully.[106] Other games, like Diablo[107] and UnReal World,[108] took inspiration from roguelikes.

Action RPGs

Video showing basic gameplay of point-and-click action RPGs.

Typically action RPGs feature each player directly controlling a single character in real time, and feature a strong focus on combat and action with plot and character interaction kept to a minimum. Early action RPGs tended to follow the template set by 1980s Nihon Falcom titles such as the Dragon Slayer and Ys series, which feature hack and slash combat where the player character's movements and actions are controlled directly, using a keyboard or game controller, rather than using menus.[109] This formula was refined by the action-adventure game, The Legend of Zelda (1986), which set the template used by many subsequent action RPGs, including innovations such as an open world, nonlinear gameplay, battery backup saving,[110] and an attack button that animates a sword swing or projectile attack on the screen.[111][112] The game was largely responsible for the surge of action-oriented RPGs released since the late 1980s, both in Japan and North America.[113] The Legend of Zelda series would continue to exert an influence on the transition of both console and computer RPGs from stat-heavy, turn-based combat towards real-time action combat in the following decades.[114]

A different variation of the action RPG formula was popularized by Diablo (1996), where the majority of commands—such as moving and attacking—are executed using mouse clicks rather than via menus, though learned spells can also be assigned to hotkeys. In many action RPGs, non-player characters serve only one purpose, be it to buy or sell items or upgrade the player's abilities, or issue them with combat-centric quests. Problems players face also often have an action-based solution, such as breaking a wooden door open with an axe rather than finding the key needed to unlock it, though some games place greater emphasis on character attributes such as a "lockpicking" skill and puzzle-solving.

One common challenge in developing action RPGs is including content beyond that of killing enemies. With the sheer number of items, locations and monsters found in many such games, it can be difficult to create the needed depth to offer players a unique experience tailored to his or her beliefs, choices or actions.[109] This is doubly true if a game makes use of randomization, as is common. One notable example of a game which went beyond this is Deus Ex (2000) which offered multiple solutions to problems using intricately layered story options and individually constructed environments.[109] Instead of simply bashing their way through levels, players were challenged to act in character by choosing dialog options appropriately, and by using the surrounding environment intelligently. This produced an experience that was unique and tailored to each situation as opposed to one that repeated itself endlessly.[109]

At one time, action RPGs were much more common on consoles than on computers.[115] Though there had been attempts at creating action-oriented computer RPGs during the late 1980s and early 1990s, often in the vein of Zelda, very few saw any success, with the 1992 game Ultima VII being one of the more successful exceptions in North America.[115] On the PC, Diablo's effect on the market was significant: it had many imitators and its style of combat went on to be used by many games that came after. For many years afterwards, games that closely mimicked the Diablo formula were referred to as "Diablo clones".[116] Three of the four titles in the series were still sold together as part of the Diablo Battle Chest over a decade after Diablo's release. Other examples of action RPGs for the PC include Dungeon Siege, Sacred, Torchlight and Hellgate: Londonthe last of which was developed by a team headed by former Blizzard employees, some of whom had participated in the creation of the Diablo series.[116][117] Like Diablo and Rogue before it, Torchlight and Hellgate: London made use of procedural generation to generate game levels.[118][119]

Also included within this subgenre are role-playing shootersgames that incorporate elements of role-playing games and shooter games (including first-person and third-person). Recent examples include the Mass Effect series,[109][120] Borderlands 2 and The 3rd Birthday.

Tactical RPGs

This subgenre of role-playing game principally refers to games which incorporate elements from strategy games as an alternative to traditional role-playing game (RPG) systems.[121] Tactical RPGs are descendents of traditional strategy games, such as chess,[19] and table-top role-playing and strategic war games, such as Chainmail, which were mainly tactical in their original form.[122][123] The format of a tactical CRPG is also like a traditional RPG in its appearance, pacing and rule structure. Like standard RPGs, the player controls a finite party and battles a similar number of enemies.[121] And like other RPGs, death is usually temporary. But this genre incorporates strategic gameplay such as tactical movement on an isometric grid.[121] Tactical RPGs tend not to feature multiplayer play.

A number of early Western role-playing video games used a highly tactical form of combat, including parts of the Ultima series, which introduced party-based, tiled combat in Ultima III: Exodus (1983).[124] Ultima III would go on to be ported to many other platforms and influence the development of later titles,[125] as would Bokosuka Wars (1983), considered a pioneer in the strategy/simulation RPG genre, according to Nintendo.[126] Conventionally, however, the term tactical RPG (known as simulation RPG in Japan) refers to the distinct subgenre that was born in Japan; as the early origins of tactical RPGs are difficult to trace from the American side of the Pacific, where much of the early RPG genre developed.[122]

Many tactical RPGs can be both extremely time-consuming and extremely difficult. Hence, the appeal of most tactical RPGs is to the hardcore, not casual, computer and video game player.[127] Traditionally, tactical RPGs have been quite popular in Japan but have not enjoyed the same degree of success in North America and elsewhere.[128][129] However, the audience for Japanese tactical RPGs has grown substantially since the mid-90s, with PS1 and PS2 titles such as Final Fantasy Tactics, Suikoden Tactics, Vanguard Bandits, and Disgaea enjoying a surprising measure of popularity, as well as hand-held war games like Fire Emblem.[130] (Final Fantasy Tactics for the PS1 is often considered the breakthrough title outside Japan.[131][132]) Older TRPGs are also being re-released via software emulationsuch as on the Wii Virtual Consoleand on handheld game consoles, giving games a new lease on life and exposure to new audiences.[133] Japanese video games such as these are as a result no longer nearly as rare a commodity in North America as they were during the 1990s.

Western video games have utilized similar mechanics for years, as well, and were largely defined by X-COM: UFO Defense (1994) in much the same way as Eastern video games were by Fire Emblem.[134] Titles such as X-COM have generally allowed greater freedom of movement when interacting with the surrounding environment than their Eastern counterparts.[135][136] Other similar examples include the Jagged Alliance[137][138] (1994–2013) and Silent Storm[138][139] (2003–2005) series. According to a few developers, it became increasingly difficult during the 2000s to develop games of this type for the PC in the West (though several had been developed in Eastern Europe with mixed results);[140][141] and even some Japanese console RPG developers began to complain about a bias against turn-based systems.[94][95] Reasons cited include Western publishers' focus on developing real-time and action-oriented games instead.[141]

Lastly, there are a number of "full-fledged" CRPGs which could be described as having "tactical combat". Examples from the classic era of CRPGs include parts of the aforementioned Ultima series;[142] SSI's Wizard's Crown (1985) and The Eternal Dagger (1987);[28] the Gold Box games of the late '80s and early '90s, many of which were later ported to Japanese video game systems;[27] and the Realms of Arkania (1992-1996) series based on the German The Dark Eye pen-and-paper system.[28] More recent examples include Wasteland 2,[143] Shadowrun: Dragonfall[144] and Divinity: Original Sin[145]all released in 2014. Partly due to the release of these games 2014 has been called "The CRPG Renaissance".[146]


Though many of the original RPGs for the PLATO mainframe system in the late 1970s also supported multiple, simultaneous players,[147] the popularity of multiplayer modes in mainstream RPGs did not begin to rise sharply until the early to mid-1990s.[23] For instance, Secret of Mana (1993), an early action role-playing game by Square, was one of the first commercial RPGs to feature cooperative multiplayer gameplay, offering two-player and three-player action once the main character had acquired his party members.[148][149] Later, Diablo (1996) would combine CRPG and action game elements with an Internet multiplayer mode that allowed up to four players to enter the same world and fight monsters, trade items, or fight against each other.

Multiple people chat and play online in the MMORPG Daimonin.

Also during this time period, the MUD genre that had been spawned by MUD1 in 1978 was undergoing a tremendous expansion phase due to the release and spread of LPMud (1989) and DikuMUD (1991). Soon, driven by the mainstream adoption of the Internet, these parallel trends merged in the popularization of graphical MUDs, which would soon become known as massively multiplayer online role-playing games or MMORPGs,[150][151] beginning with games like Meridian 59 (1995), Nexus: The Kingdom of the Winds (1996), Ultima Online (1997), Lineage (1998), and EverQuest (1999), and leading to modern phenomena such as RuneScape (2001), Final Fantasy XI (2003), Eve Online (2003) and World of Warcraft (2004).

Though superficially similar, MMORPGs lend their appeal more to the socializing influences of being online with hundreds or even thousands of other players at a time, and trace their origins more from MUDs than from CRPGs like Ultima and Wizardry. Rather than focusing on the "old school" considerations of memorizing huge numbers of stats and esoterica and battling it out in complex, tactical environments, players instead spend much of their time forming and maintaining guilds and clans. The distinction between CRPGs and MMORPGs and MUDs can as a result be very sharp, likenable to the difference between "attending a renaissance fair and reading a good fantasy novel".[42]

Further, MMORPGs have been criticized for diluting the "epic" feeling of single-player RPGs and related media among thousands of concurrent adventurers. Stated simply: every player wants to be "The Hero", slay "The Monster", rescue "The Princess", or obtain "The Magic Sword". But when there are thousands of players all playing the same game, clearly not everyone can be the hero.[152] This problem became obvious to some in the game EverQuest, where groups of players would compete and sometimes harass each other in order to get monsters in the same dungeon to drop valuable items, leading to several undesirable behaviors such as kill stealing, spawn camping, and ninja looting.[153][154][155] In response—for instance by Richard Garriott in Tabula Rasa[152]—developers began turning to instance dungeons as a means of reducing competition over limited resources, as well as preserving the gaming experience—though this mechanic has its own set of detractors.[156]

Single-player games are great, and I love them. They have a great feature. Your life is very special. You are the hero and you get to save the whole world. (...) [Tabula Rasa] is like Disney World... You can go to shops and get food, but when you get on the boat for the pirate ride, you're in your own version of reality. Once the ride starts, you are blissfully unaware of the boats in front of you and behind you.

Richard Garriott, regarding the use of instancing in Tabula Rasa[152]

Lastly, there exist markets such as Korea and China that, while saturated with MMORPGs, have so far proved relatively unreceptive to single-player RPGs.[63] For instance, Internet-connected personal computers are relatively common in Korea when compared to other regions—particularly in the numerous "PC bangs" scattered around the country where patrons are able to pay to play multiplayer video games—possibly due to historical bans on Japanese imports, as well as a culture that traditionally sees video games as "frivolous toys" and computers as educational.[157] As a result, some wonder whether the stand-alone, single-player RPG is still viable commercially—especially on the personal computer—when there are competing pressures such as big-name publishers' marketing needs, video game piracy, a change in culture, and the competitive price-point-to-processing-power ratio (at least initially) of modern console systems.[42][63][158][Note 4]

Hybrid genres

Finally, a steadily increasing number of other non-RP video games have adopted aspects traditionally seen in RPGs, such as experience point systems, equipment management, and choices in dialogue, as developers push to fill the demand for role-playing elements in non-RPGs.[63][159] The blending of these elements with a number of different game engines and gameplay styles have created a myriad of hybrid game categories formed by mixing popular gameplay elements featured in other genres such as first-person shooters, platformers, and turn-based and real-time strategy games. Examples include first-person shooters such as parts of the Deus Ex (starting in 2000) and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. (starting in 2007) series;[160][161][162][163] real-time strategy games such as SpellForce: The Order of Dawn (2003) and Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II (2009);[164][165] puzzle video games such as Castlevania Puzzle (2010) and Puzzle Quest: Challenge of the Warlords (2007);[166][167] and turn-based strategy games like the Steel Panthers (1995–2006) series, which combined tactical military combat with RPG-derived unit advancement. As a group, hybrid games have been both praised and criticized; being referred to by one critic as the "poor man's" RPG for omitting the dialogue choices and story-driven character development of major AAA titles in order to cut costs,[159] and by another critic as "promising" for shedding the conventions of more established franchises in an attempt to innovate.[168]

Popularity and notable developers

Hironobu Sakaguchi at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco, California in 2007

The vast majority of RPG games that were successful were made from Japanese companies, making Japan a dominant country in an entertainment genre in East Asia, along with the Cinema of Hong Kong and the Korean wave, further increasing the prophecy that East Asian products are superior to those of the West. Notable RPG developers include Don Daglow for creating the first role-playing video game, Dungeon, in 1975; Yuji Horii for creating the Dragon Quest series; Hironobu Sakaguchi for creating the Final Fantasy series; Richard Garriott for creating the Ultima series; Brenda Romero for writing and design work on the entire Wizardry series, and Ray Muzyka and Greg Zeschuk for founding BioWare.[51] Ryozo Tsujimoto (Monster Hunter series) and Katsura Hashino (Persona series) were also cited as "Japanese Game Developers You Should Know" by in 2010.[169] Other notable RPG developers are Bethesda Game Studios, creators of Fallout 3", "Fallout 4", and The Elder Scrolls series, and CD Projekt, creators of The Witcher series and Cyberpunk 2077.

The best-selling RPG series worldwide is Pokémon,[51] which has sold over 260 million units as of March 2014.[170][171][172][173] The second and third best-selling RPG franchises worldwide are Square Enix's Final Fantasy and Dragon Quest series, with over 110 million units and over 64 million units sold as of March 31, 2014, respectively.[174][175][176] Pokémon Red, Blue, and Green alone sold approximately 23.64 million copies (10.23 million in Japan,[177] 9.85 million in US,[178] 3.56 million in UK).[179] Nearly all the games in the main Final Fantasy series and all the games in the main Dragon Quest series (as well as many of the spin-off games) have sold over a million copies each, with some games selling more than four million copies.[177] Square Enix's best-selling title is Final Fantasy VII, which has sold over 10 million copies worldwide.[180]

Among the best-selling PC RPGs overall is the massively multiplayer online game World of Warcraft with 11.5 million subscribers as of May 2010.[181] Among single player PC RPGs, Diablo II has sold the largest amount, with the most recently cited number being over 4 million copies as of 2001.[182] However, copies of the Diablo: Battle Chest continued to be sold in retail stores, with the compilation appearing on the NPD Group's top 10 PC games sales, list as recently as 2010.[183] Further, Diablo: Battle Chest was the 19th best selling PC game of 2008—a full seven years after the game's initial release;[184] and 11 million users still play Diablo II and StarCraft over[185] As a franchise, the Diablo series has sold over 20 million copies.[186] Diablo III was released for Windows and OS X on May 15, 2012.[187] It was also released for PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 on September 3, 2013,[188] and it will also be released for both PlayStation 4 and Xbox One on August 19, 2014.[189]

The Dragon Quest series was awarded with six world records in the 2008 Gamer's Edition of the Guinness Book of World Records, including "Best Selling Role Playing Game on the Super Famicom", "Fastest Selling Game in Japan", and "First Video Game Series to Inspire a Ballet".[190] Likewise, the Pokémon series received eight records, including "Most Successful RPG Series of All Time".[191] Diablo II was recognized in the 2000 standard edition for being the fastest selling computer game ever sold, with more than 1 million units sold in the first two weeks of availability;[192] though this number has been surpassed several times since.[193][194] A number of RPGs are also being exhibited in the Barbican Art Gallery's "Game On" exhibition (starting in 2002) and the Smithsonian's "The Art of Video Games" exhibit (starting in 2012); and video game developers are now finally able to apply for grants from the US National Endowment of the Arts.[195]

Bethesda Softworks' Fallout 3 booth at the Games Convention 2008

According to Metacritic, as of May 2011, the highest-rated game is the Xbox 360 version of Mass Effect 2, with an average metascore of 96 out of 100.[196][Note 5] According to GameRankings, the four top-rated video game RPGs, as of May 2010, are Mass Effect 2 with an average rating of 95.70% for the Xbox 360 version and 94.24% for the PC version; Fallout 3: Game of the Year Edition with an average rating of 95.40% for the PlayStation 3 version; Chrono Trigger with an average rating of 95.10%; and Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic with an average rating of 94.18% for the Xbox version.[51] Sales numbers for these six aforementioned titles are 10 million units sold worldwide for Final Fantasy VII as of May 2010;[180] 161,161 units of Xenoblade Chronicles sold in Japan as of December 2010;[197] 1.6 million units sold worldwide for Mass Effect 2 as of March 2010, just three months after release;[198] 4.7 million units for Fallout 3 on all three platforms as of November 2008, also only a few months after publication;[199] 3 million units for both the Xbox and PC versions of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic as of November 2004;[200] and more than 2.65 million units for the SNES and PlayStation versions of Chrono Trigger as of March 2003,[201] along with 790,000 copies for the Nintendo DS version as of March 31, 2009.[202] Among these titles, none were PC-exclusives, three were North American multi-platform titles released for consoles like the Xbox and Xbox 360 within the past decade, and three were Japanese titles released for consoles like the SNES, PlayStation and Wii.

Final Fantasy VII topped GamePro's "26 Best RPGs of All Time" list,[203] IGN's 2000 "Reader's Choice Game of the Century" poll,[204] and the GameFAQs "Best Game Ever" audience polls in 2004 and 2005.[205][206] It was also selected in Empire magazine's "100 Greatest Games of All Time" list as the highest-ranking RPG, at #2 on the list.[207] On IGN's "Top 100 Games Of All Time" list in 2007, the highest ranking RPG is Final Fantasy VI at 9th place;[208] and in both the 2006 and 2008 IGN Readers' Choice polls, Chrono Trigger is the top ranked RPG, in 2nd place.[209][210] Final Fantasy VI is also the top ranked RPG in Game Informer's list of its 200 best games of all time list, in 8th place; and is also one of the eight games to get a cover for the magazine's 200th issue.[211] The 2006 Famitsu readers' poll is dominated by RPGs, with nearly a dozen titles appearing in the top twenty;[212] while most were Japanese, a few Western titles also made a showing.[213] The highest-ranking games on the list were Final Fantasy X, followed by Final Fantasy VII and Dragon Warrior III.[212] For the past decade, the Megami Tensei series topped several "RPGs of the Decade" lists. RPGFan's "Top 20 RPGs of the Past Decade" list was topped by Shin Megami Tensei: Digital Devil Saga & Digital Devil Saga 2 followed by Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3,[214] while RPGamer's "Top RPGs of the Decade" list was topped by Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3, followed by Final Fantasy X and World of Warcraft.[215]

Lastly, in recent years, Western RPGs have consistently been released on consoles such as the Xbox and Xbox 360.[216][217] However, systems like the Xbox and Xbox 360 have not shown as much market dominance in Eastern markets such as Japan,[217][218][219] and only a few Western RPG titles have been localized to Japanese.[220][Note 6] Further, RPGs were not the dominant genre on the most popular of the seventh generation video game consoles, the Nintendo Wii,[221] although their presence among handheld systems such as the Nintendo DS is considerably greater.[222]


  1. The original Dragon Quest game is often cited as the first role-playing video game, though it borrows heavily from the Wizardry and Ultima series. Also, in spite of coming after it, Western audiences consider Final Fantasy "more important".[34]
  2. This often gives an impression that JRPGs are similar to adventure games.[58]
  3. Though some argue this has not been the case outside of tactical RPGs,[80] while others argue that combat systems in Japanese RPGs are too complex or lack accessibility.[79]
  4. Though things like downloadable content can stem piracy to some degree, and MMO and single-player RPGs may to some degree attract different audiences—and thus not interfere with each other financially.[42][63][158]
  5. It should be noted, however, that review aggregation sites like GameRankings and Metacritic lack many reviews from older print magazines.
  6. For instance, The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, which is the only Western RPG to have been awarded a near-perfect score by Japanese gaming magazine Famitsu.[220]


  1. 1 2 Adams, Rollings 2003, p. 347
  2. McNaughton, M.; Schaeffer, J.; Szafron, D.; Parker, D.; Redford J. (2004). "Code Generation for AI Scripting in Computer Role-Playing Games" (PDF). American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved October 10, 2009.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Adams, Rollings 2006
  4. Adams, Rollings 2003, p. 347-248
  5. Diveky, Marko; Bielikova, Maria (September 29 – October 2, 2009). "Generating Educational Interactive Stories in Computer Role-Playing Games". Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines: 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Proceedings. Nice, France: Springer. p. 495. ISBN 3-642-04635-5.
  6. Cutumisu, Maria; Szafron, Duane; Schaeffer, Jonathan; McNaughton, Matthew; Roy, Thomas; Onuczko, Curtis; Carbonaro, Mike (September–October 2006). "Generating Ambient Behaviors in Computer Role-Playing Games". IEEE Intelligent Systems. 21 (5): 19–27. doi:10.1109/MIS.2006.92.
  7. Adams, Rollings 2003, p. 351
  8. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, Simon; Smith, Jonas Heide; Tosca, Susana Pajares (2008). Understanding Video Games: the Essential Introduction. Taylor & Francis. p. 48. ISBN 0-415-97721-5.
  9. Parish, Jeremy. "The Essential 50 Part 12 -- Rogue". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  10. Adams, Rollings 2003, p. 362
  11. Desslock. "Baldur's Gate: Tales of the Sword Coast Review". Gamespot. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  12. Adams, Rollings 2003, pp. 358-361
  13. 1 2 3 Babovic, Branislav (2000). "Combat Systems in RPG Games". ActionTrip. Retrieved December 2, 2007.
  14. Davison, Pete (December 18, 2013). "Dungeon of the Endless: Not Your Usual Roguelike". Gamer Network. Retrieved December 16, 2015.
  15. Todd, Brett (November 29, 2006). "Brigade E5: New Jagged Union Review". Gamespot. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved December 16, 2015.
  16. Adams, Rollings 2003, pp. 364-367
  17. Barton 2007a, p. 1
  18. Barton 2008, p. 13
  19. 1 2 Justin Leeper (December 17, 2004). "Pathway to Glory". GameSpy. Retrieved May 19, 2011.
  20. Hendricks, Fayyaad (December 19, 2011). "A complete history of role-playing videogames: Part 1". EL33TONLINE. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  21. Johansen Quijano-Cruz (2009), "Chopin's Dream as Reality: A Critical Reading of Eternal Sonata", Eludamos Journal for Computer Game Culture, 3 (2): 209–218, retrieved May 16, 2011
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 Barton, Matt (June 21, 2010). "Kawaisa!: A Naive Glance at Western and Eastern RPGs". Armchair Arcade. Retrieved September 5, 2010.
  23. 1 2 Jøn, A. Asbjørn (2010). "The Development of MMORPG Culture and The Guild". Australian Folklore: A Yearly Journal of Folklore Studies. University of New England (25): 97–112. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
  24. Martell, Carey. "Interview with the creators of dnd (PLATO)". Retrieved May 5, 2012.
  25. Trefonas, Peter (May 1980). "Dungeons and Dragons" (PDF). CLOAD. Retrieved October 30, 2010.
  26. Barton 2007a
  27. 1 2 Barton 2007b
  28. 1 2 3 Barton 2007c
  29. "The History of Console RPGs". GameSpot. Archived from the original on March 29, 2010. Retrieved October 24, 2007.
  30. "Bokosuka Wars". GameSpot. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  31. Barnholt, Ray (October 25, 2004). "Dru Hill: The Chronicle of Druaga". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  32. Bokosuka Wars at Allgame
  33. Barnholt, Ray (January 6, 2011). "Gems In The Rough: Yesterday's Concepts Mined For Today". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  34. 1 2 "The GameSpy Hall of Fame: Dragon Warrior". GameSpy. Archived from the original on June 6, 2007. Retrieved May 29, 2005.
  35. Vestal, Andrew (November 2, 1998). "The History of Console RPGs - Zelda II: The Adventure of Link". GameSpot. Archived from the original on February 3, 2013. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  36. 1 2 "Iwata Asks video interview for Dragon Quest IX". Iwata Asks. Nintendo. Iwata Asks Dragon Quest IX Video 4, As a Turn-based RPG. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  37. Vestal, Andrew (November 2, 1998). "The History of Console RPGs: Other NES RPGs". GameSpot. Archived from the original on February 3, 2013. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  38. Vestal, Andrew (November 2, 1998). "The History of Final Fantasy - Final Fantasy (Part 2)". Gamespot. Archived from the original on May 2, 2003. Retrieved December 31, 2008.
  39. Vestal, Andrew (November 2, 1998). "The History of Console RPGs: Dragon Quest III". GameSpot. Archived from the original on February 3, 2013. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  40. Kasavin, Greg. "The Greatest Games of All Time: Phantasy Star II". GameSpot. CNET Networks, Inc. Archived from the original on July 18, 2005. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  41. Neal Hallford & Jana Hallford (2001), Swords & circuitry: a designer's guide to computer role-playing games, p. xxiv, Cengage Learning, ISBN 0-7615-3299-4
  42. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Barton 2007c, p. 12
  43. Neal Hallford & Jana Hallford (2001), Swords & circuitry: a designer's guide to computer role-playing games, pp. xxiv & xxv, Cengage Learning, ISBN 0-7615-3299-4
  44. 1 2 3 "Final Fantasy VII: The Old Order Passeth". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  45. 1 2 Loguidice & Barton 2009, p. 84
  46. Loguidice & Barton 2009, p. 78
  47. Vestal 1998a, p. "Final Fantasy"
  48. Vestal 1998a, p. "Other Game Boy RPGs"
  49. 1 2 3 4 5 Kaiser, Rowan (February 16, 2012). "East Is West: How Two Classic RPGs Prove the Stereotypes False". Engadget. AOL Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  50. 1 2 3 Neal Hallford & Jana Hallford (2001), Swords & circuitry: a designer's guide to computer role-playing games, Cengage Learning, p. xxiv, ISBN 0-7615-3299-4, retrieved May 16, 2011
  51. 1 2 3 4 Fahey, Mike (May 25, 2010). "A Visual Guide To The Role-Playing Game". Kotaku. Retrieved September 12, 2010.
  52. 1 2 3 English, Sherrin (January 7, 2008). "Japanese and Western RPGs - The Differences". NZGamer. Retrieved September 10, 2010.
  53. 1 2 Winterhalter, Ryan (September 6, 2010). "Square Enix Devs Discuss Secret AAA Title and What They've Learned From the West". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved September 10, 2010.
  54. Joynt, Patrick (March 29, 2006). "The Oblivion of Western RPGs: Is the PC RPG Dead? from". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  55. 1 2 3 Doucet, Lars (April 12, 2011). "RPGs and Suckage". Gamasutra. UBM Tech.
  56. 1 2 Loguidice & Barton 2009, p. 79
  57. 1 2 Kaiser, Rowan (March 1, 2012). "How Mass Effect challenged my definition of 'RPG'". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  58. Frederiksen, Eric (August 8, 2010). "An RPG is not an RPG When it's a JRPG". Archived from the original on August 19, 2010. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
  59. 1 2 Sandy Petersen (November 1993). "Reviews: Final Fantasy II". Dragon (199): 56 & 58.
  60. Kaiser, Rowan. "Opinion: How Mass Effect challenged my definition of 'RPG'". Gamasutra.
  61. 1 2 3 4 5 English, Fox (March 25, 2011). "The RPG Conundrum". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved May 13, 2011.
  62. "Extra Credits: Western & Japanese RPGs (Part 1)". Extra Credits. Penny Arcade. March 2012. Retrieved April 5, 2012.
  63. 1 2 3 4 5 Wilson, Jason (December 30, 2009). "The Future of Single-Player RPGs". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  64. Caoili, Eric (April 5, 2011). "GamersGate Holding Indie 'JRPG' Sale". GameSetWatch. UBM TechWeb. Retrieved 2011-05-19.
  65. Barton 2008, p. 223
  66. Ishaan (December 22, 2011). "A Closer Look At Final Fantasy XIII-2′s Performance In Japan". Siliconera. Curse Inc. Retrieved April 5, 2012.
  67. 1 2 Kalata, Kurt (March 19, 2008). "A Japanese RPG Primer: The Essential 20". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved May 14, 2011.
  68. Loguidice & Barton 2009, p. 43: "Action-oriented RPGs were far more plentiful on consoles than computers. [...] Brenesal’s comment brings us to an important point regarding computer and console games: modern computers are far more likely to have mice and keyboards than game pads, a factor with serious implications for gameplay. Game pads are designed with arcade-like gameplay in mind; keyboards and mice are primarily intended for productivity."
  69. Glasser, AJ (September 24, 2010). "Editorial: Where culture fits into games". GamePro Media. Archived from the original on September 29, 2010. Retrieved May 13, 2011.
  70. 1 2 3 Jenkins, David (February 23, 2012). "The Last Story Hironobu Sakaguchi interview - remaking the JRPG". Metro. Associated Newspapers Limited. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  71. Parish, Jeremy (April 5, 2012). "What Xenoblade Chronicles Gets Right". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved April 16, 2012.
  72. 1 2 Doerr, Nick (February 20, 2007). "Bethesda is sticking to RPGs for now". Engadget. AOL Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  73. Brown, Peter (June 24, 2015). "What's in a name?". GameSpot. CBS Interactive Inc.
  74. Adams, Roe R. (November 1990), "Westward Ho! (Toward Japan, That Is): An Overview of the Evolution of CRPGs on Dedicated Game Machines", Computer Gaming World (76), pp. 83–84 [84], Last year also saw the coattail effect of traditional bestselling CRPGs being ported over onto dedicated game machines as the new market of machines blossomed into money trees. Games like Ultima, Shadowgate, and Defender of the Crown appeared to mixed reviews. These stalwarts of computer fame were not perceived, by many of the players, to be as exciting as the Japanese imports.
  75. Petersen, Sandy (August 1994). "Eye of the Monitor". Dragon (208): 61. Not long ago, I received a letter from a DRAGON® Magazine reader. This particular woman attacked the whole concept of cartridge-based role-playing games very vigorously, claiming that games such as Zelda are not role-playing at all. Presumably, she thinks they are arcade games. Zelda has some features of the classic arcade game: combat is direct. Each push of the button results in one swing of the sword, which if it connects, harms or kills an enemy. In standard computer roleplaying games, at least until recently, combat is more abstract. [...] But all that is changing. [...] Ultima VIII requires you not only to control your character's every move in combat, but also his dodging of enemy blows, whether he kicks or stabs, etc. [...] The two forms of play: "arcade" and "role-playing" seem to be mixing more and more in computer and cartridge games. We'll see how far this trend goes, but I suspect there will always be a place for a game which is totally cerebral in combat, instead of relying on reflexes. For every Zelda, or Secret of Mana, there'll be a Final Fantasy II or Lufia.
  76. Patterson, Eric L. (December 27, 2011). "5 WAYS JAPANESE GAMING STILL RULES: ATELIER TOTORI". Electronic Gaming Monthly. EGM Media LLC. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  77. Neal Hallford & Jana Hallford (2001), Swords & circuitry: a designer's guide to computer role playing games, Cengage Learning, pp. xxiv & xxv, ISBN 0-7615-3299-4, retrieved May 16, 2011
  78. 1 2 3 4 5 Turner, Benjamin; Nutt, Christian (July 29, 2003). "Spy/Counterspy Case File 07: RPGs - East vs. West". GameSpy. Archived from the original on June 16, 2004. Retrieved August 14, 2006.
  79. 1 2 Robert Boyd (January 13, 2011). "The Zeboyd Games Approach to JRPG Design". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved May 13, 2011.
  80. Doucet, Lars (March 9, 2011). "Rebooting the RPG". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  81. PSM3 UK (March 16, 2010). "Are JRPGs dead?". GamesRadar. Future plc. Retrieved September 5, 2010.
  82. "BioWare co-founder: JRPGs suffer from 'lack of evolution'". Destructoid. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  83. Artefact (May 14, 2010). "Bioware: "Final Fantasy XIII Definitely Not An RPG"". Sankaku Complex. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  84. "Final Fantasy XIII not a JRPG, despite being a JRPG". Destructoid. March 16, 2006. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  85. Brudvig, Erik; Clements, Ryan (January 11, 2010). "Top 10 Ways to Fix JRPGs". IGN. Ziff Davis. Retrieved September 11, 2010.
  86. Brudvig, Erik; Goldstein, Hilary (November 25, 2008). "The Gameplay Mechanic: Fixing Square's RPG Machine". IGN. Ziff Davis. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  87. 1 2 "What's really wrong with JRPGs?". Future Publishing Limited. January 24, 2010. Archived from the original on 2010-03-01. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  88. Grenz, Brad. "Can the Japanese RPG Be Fixed?". Bitmob Media. Archived from the original on July 27, 2010. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  89. "Front Mission Evolved review". GameZone. October 8, 2010. Retrieved May 12, 2011. Japanese publishers have been singing the "I Wan'na Be Like You (The Monkey Song)" song from The Jungle Book for the past few years and it's no longer flattering. Instead of borrowing elements and making them their own, the publishers have opted to assimilate and attempt to hide within the Western crowd. Herein lies the problem with Front Mission Evolved: It wants to be so much more than it has been in the past and ends up stalling at the starting line.
  90. PSM3 UK (March 16, 2010). "Are JRPGs dead?". GamesRadar. Future Publishing. Retrieved May 19, 2013.
  91. Goldman, Tom (August 4, 2010). "News : Japanese Fallout: New Vegas Ads Hate On JRPGs". The Escapist. Defy Media LLC. Retrieved September 11, 2010.
  92. Robinson, Andy (June 10, 2010). "News: Japanese RPGs 'were never popular' - Mikami". Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on August 14, 2010. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  93. Sterling, Jim (March 16, 2006). "Mikami: Japanese RPGs were never really popular'". Destructoid. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  94. 1 2 Funk, John (July 13, 2010). "News : Dragon Quest Creator: Western Reviewers Dislike Turn-Based Games". The Escapist. Defy Media LLC. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  95. 1 2 "Interview: Yuji Horii and a Lifetime of Dragon Questing". IGN. Ziff Davis. July 10, 2010. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  96. Fleming, Jeff (December 30, 2009). "Opinion: 2009 - The Last Days of the Japanese RPG?". GameSetWatch. UBM TechWeb. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  97. Vestal 1998a, p. "The First Console RPG" "A devoted gamer could make a decent case for either of these Atari titles founding the RPG genre; nevertheless, there's no denying that Dragon Quest was the primary catalyst for the Japanese console RPG industry. And Japan is where the vast majority of console RPGs come from, to this day. Influenced by the popular PC RPGs of the day (most notably Ultima), both Excalibur and Dragon Quest "stripped down" the statistics while keeping features that can be found even in today's most technologically advanced titles. An RPG just wouldn't be complete, in many gamers' eyes, without a medieval setting, hit points, random enemy encounters, and endless supplies of gold. (...) The rise of the Japanese RPG as a dominant gaming genre and Nintendo's NES as the dominant console platform were closely intertwined."
  98. North, Dale (August 19, 2010). "Final Fantasy XIV director is not worried about Bethesda". Destructoid. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  99. Ingham, Tim (February 16, 2010). "Final Fantasy XIII boss responds to review scores". Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on February 10, 2011. Retrieved May 18, 2011.
  100. Snell, Dave (September 27, 2010). "Why I´m bored with Bioware". GameZone. GameZone Next. Retrieved April 19, 2012.
  101. St. Clair, Pride (April 18, 2012). "Why I Hate Big-Name, Open Ended WRPGs". Archived from the original on April 23, 2012. Retrieved April 19, 2012.
  102. Kalata, Kurt. "Cultural Differences". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved March 26, 2010.
  103. Hatfield, Tom (January 29, 2013). "Rise Of The Roguelikes: A Genre Evolves". GameSpy. IGN Entertainment, Inc. Retrieved April 24, 2013.
  104. Harris, John (December 18, 2009). "COLUMN: @Play: The Berlin Interpretation". GameSetWatch. UBM TechWeb. Retrieved November 17, 2015.
  105. Craddock, David L (August 5, 2015). Magrath, Andrew, ed. Dungeon Hacks: How NetHack, Angband, and Other Roguelikes Changed the Course of Video Games. Press Start Press. ISBN 069250186X.
  106. 1 2 Parish, Jeremy (April 6, 2015). "The Gateway Guide to Roguelikes". USGamer. Gamer Network. Retrieved May 4, 2015.
  107. "The best game ever – Linux". Salon. Salon Media Group, Inc. January 27, 2000. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
  108. Murphy, Stephen (December 26, 2012). "A Game 20 Years In the Making". Escapist. Defy Media LLC. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  109. 1 2 3 4 5 Bailey, Kat (May 18, 2010). "Hack and Slash: What Makes a Good Action RPG?". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  110. "15 Most Influential Games of All Time: The Legend of Zelda". GameSpot. CNET Networks, Inc. Archived from the original on May 11, 2001. Retrieved January 24, 2010.
  111. Kalata, Kurt. "Hardcore Gaming 101: Dragon Slayer". Hardcore Gaming 101. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  112. Kalata, Kurt; Greene, Robert. "Hydlide". Hardcore Gaming 101.
  113. Barton, Matt (2008). Dungeons & Desktops: The History of Computer Role-Playing Games. A K Peters, Ltd. pp. 182 & 212. ISBN 1-56881-411-9. Retrieved 2010-09-08.
  114. Loguidice, Bill; Barton, Matt (2009), Vintage Games: An Insider Look at the History of Grand Theft Auto, Super Mario, and the Most Influential Games of All Time, Focal Press, p. 317, ISBN 0-240-81146-1
  115. 1 2 Loguidice, Bill; Barton, Matt (2009), Vintage Games: An Insider Look at the History of Grand Theft Auto, Super Mario, and the Most Influential Games of All Time, Focal Press, p. 43, ISBN 0-240-81146-1
  116. 1 2 Barton 2007c, p. 8
  117. "Flagship Studios Opens with a Splash". Flagship Studios. November 22, 2003. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
  118. Donlan, Christian (September 14, 2009). "Torchlight PC Hands On". Eurogamer. Gamer Network. Retrieved January 12, 2011.
  119. Johnson, Andy (December 29, 2009). "By the Numbers: The Lost Art of Procedural Generation". Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  120. Remo, Chris (January 29, 2010). "Analysis: Mass Effect 2's Surprising Genre Experiment". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  121. 1 2 3 Parish, Jeremy. "Lord of the Rings: Tactics". Electronic Arts. Retrieved 2010-02-04.
  122. 1 2 Barton 2008, p. 12
  123. Bailey, Kat. "Active Time Babble XXI: Tactical RPGs & Ys Seven". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved May 12, 2011. The roots of tactical RPGs go back to tabletop role-playing games like Dungeons & Dragons and old-school wargames; in other words, the roots of gaming itself.
  124. Barton 2007a, p. 4
  125. King & Borland 2003
  126. Bokosuka Wars (translation), Nintendo
  127. Bailey, Kat (February 19, 2009). "Strategery: Your First Tactical RPG". IGN Entertainment Games. It wasn't too long ago that I mentioned how difficult it is to get into tactical RPGs. It's an intimidating genre, what with all the grids and customization and names like Tactics Ogre. People are worried that they won't understand what's going on. That it'll be hard. That it'll be boring. So if you've made it past all those fears and you're ready to take the plunge, congratulations. You're a lot stronger than I was while contemplating Final Fantasy Tactics a decade ago. But people like you have also been asking me the same question, time and time again—where to start?
  128. "Vandal Hearts II (PlayStation)". CNET. CBS Interactive. January 3, 2000. Archived from the original on March 15, 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2011. Although the RPG has gained popularity in the US, its tactical offshoot, the strategy-RPG, has had a harder time gaining similar popularity.
  129. Parfitt, Ben (July 17, 2007). "Disgaea 3 heading to PS3". MCV. Newbay Media. Retrieved December 19, 2015. The tactical RPG genre may not be a chart-topper in the West, but hardcore followers of Japanese RPG specialists Nippon Ichi will be delighted to hear that the studio is bringing the latest instalment to its critically acclaimed series to PS3 next year.
  130. Neufeld, Anna Marie. "Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones - Staff Review". RPGamer. Retrieved May 12, 2011. As the Tactical RPG genre has grown in recognition and popularity, it was inevitable that a few would manage to make their way to the handheld systems.
  131. Parish, Jeremy. "PlayStation Tactics". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved May 12, 2011. Tactical RPGs have been gaining popularity in the United States since a PS1 game called Final Fantasy Tactics introduced a legion of gamers to its detail-oriented strategy. ... Although FFT is often praised for giving birth to the tactical RPG genre, that PS1 masterpiece would never have existed without this classic pair of Super NES ports.
  132. Beckett, Michael. "Final Fantasy Tactics - Retroview". RPGamer. Retrieved May 12, 2011. Final Fantasy Tactics did much the same thing for tactical RPGs that Final Fantasy VII did for the genre as a whole—made it more popular, more accessible, and more visible to the rest of the gaming world.
  133. Bramwell, Tom (October 21, 2002). "Dynasty Tactics - First Impressions". Eurogamer. Gamer Network. Retrieved May 12, 2011. Final Fantasy Tactics is being given a new lease of life on Game Boy Advance, and Capcom has plans to release an Onimusha Tactics title in the near future too.
  134. Bailey, Kat (April 14, 2010). "X-COM: Distilling a Classic". IGN Entertainment Games. One of the absolute essentials from that era was X-COM: UFO Defense, which defined western tactical RPGs every bit as much as Fire Emblem did for strategy RPGs in the east. ... The crux of the game is efficiently defeating the aliens in turn-based combat, building up various bases, and outfitting soldiers with the latest and greatest equipment.
  135. Bailey, Kat (Oct 23, 2009). "Strategery: The Dragon Age Appetizer". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved February 4, 2010. The interesting wrinkle here is that when outside of battle, it's possible to explore the world in the same manner as any other RPG, and that's where Dragon Age Journeys has something in common with western tactical RPGs. The X-Coms of the world have always a great deal more freedom than even Valkyria Chronicles, and Dragon Age takes that one step further by offering actual dungeons to explore, rather than asking players to take on simple missions like 'kill everyone.'
  136. Bailey, Kat (September 4, 2009). "Strategery: Valkyria Chronicles and X-Com: UFO Defense". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved May 15, 2011. For Japan, the Famicom's Fire Emblem: Ankoku Ryu to Hikari is the archetype for the whole genre. Over the years, franchises like Tactics Ogre and Final Fantasy Tactics have offered unique twists and refinements, but the basic conceits have remained the same, with square-based grid being one of the subgenres most recognizable traits. Western SRPGs, however, have generally allowed for a bit more freedom of movement, with some like Freedom Force (and Dawn of War II, if you're willing to call it an SRPG) going real-time.
  137. S., Dennis. "Paradise Cracked Review". GamersHell. Retrieved November 26, 2007. The world of Paradise Cracked was largely influenced by such movies as Matrix, Blade Runner and Ghost in the Shell, as well as novels of Philip K. Dick and various other cyberpunk writers. It actually has one of the most interesting plots ever—but I won't give it away just yet. The game's genre can be called tactical RPG, drawing some of its best features from such games as X-Com, Jagged Alliance, Incubation and Fallout.
  138. 1 2 Thompson, Mike (June 22, 2006). "Night Watch". Game Helper Magazine. Archived from the original on December 28, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-26.
  139. Jonric (August 15, 2002). "Silent Storm Interview". RPG Vault. IGN Entertainment, Inc. Archived from the original on October 6, 2002. Retrieved November 26, 2007.
  140. Jonric (October 16, 2007). "Jagged Alliance 3 Interview". RPG Vault. IGN Entertainment, Inc. Archived from the original on October 18, 2007. Retrieved October 19, 2007. When choosing a team to develop a project of this type and scale, it was obvious that we needed Russian developers, the same people that created games with similarities to Jagged Alliance 2, both in genre and the time setting. I'm referring to releases like Silent Storm, Night Watch, Brigade E5 and others. Such projects have not been created in western countries for a long time, which can make development more difficult.
  141. 1 2 Gollop, Julian (August 14, 2010). "Comment by Julian Gollop, developer of X-COM and other genre titles". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Publishers run a mile from anything with turn-based mechanics—it is regarded as too niche. RTS games pretty much killed off turn-based strategy games in the mid-90s—but now even RTS games are regarded as niche. (...) Thanks to 'Advance Wars', 'Fire Emblem' and 'Final Fantasy Tactics' it seems turn-based games are not totally dead—at least for Nintendo handhelds.
  142. Tie, Sing Chie (August 1, 2000). "7 Deadly Games". neXus Central. The Student Publication Board, Multimedia University, Melaka campus. Archived from the original on December 18, 2007. Retrieved December 12, 2007.
  143. Sykes, Tom (February 9, 2013). "Wasteland 2 trailer shows off first gameplay footage, including tactical battles, giant bugs". PC Gamer. Future plc. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  144. "Shadowrun: Dragonfall Director's Cut Dated and Video Released". August 30, 2014. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  145. Kaiser, Rowan (July 16, 2014). "Divinity: Original Sin is an odd mix of old- and new-school RPG design". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  146. Thorman, Peter. "2014: the first year of the CRPG renaissance". PC Gamer. Future US, Inc. Retrieved December 5, 2015.
  147. Barton 2008, pp. 37–38
  148. Lee, Justin (February 15, 2004). "Secret of Mana". GameSpy. Archived from the original on January 25, 2005. Retrieved January 24, 2010.
  149. Thomas, Lucas M. (October 13, 2008). "Secret of Mana Review". IGN. Retrieved January 24, 2010.
  150. Castronova, Edward (2006). Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games. University Of Chicago Press. pp. 10, 291. ISBN 0-226-09627-0. [pp. 10] The ancestors of MMORPGS were text-based multiuser domains (MUDs) [...] [pp. 291] Indeed, MUDs generate perhaps the one historical connection between game-based VR and the traditional program [...]
  151. Bainbridge, William Sims (2004). Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 3. Berkshire Publishing Group. p. 474. ISBN 0-9743091-2-5. Developers had long considered writing a graphical MUD. [...] the last major 2D virtual environment in the West marked the true beginning of the fifth age of MUDs: Origin Systems' 1997 Ultima Online (UO).
  152. 1 2 3 King & Borland 2003, pp. 255–257 "Thousands of players have gathered online in massively multiplayer worlds, but that meant that thousands of people might be vying for the status of hero. Too many heroes mean that nobody, or only the few, can be special. Fighting even the most dangerous of monsters gives less of an epic thrill when it is clear that it will simply regenerate after you have killed it, and when 13 parties of adventurers are waiting behind you in line for their turn. There is only one Frodo in the Lord of the Rings, one Avatar in the land of Brittania."
  153. MacLellan, Jon (May 1, 2001). "Please? Maybe a Thank You?". GameSpy. IGN Entertainment, Inc. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  154. Hailey, Charlie (April 30, 2009). Camps: A Guide to 21st Century Space. The MIT Press. p. 74. ISBN 0-262-51287-4. Spawn camp affords an absolute position, controlling the game not by strategic action but through immobility—to the extent that popular games like EverQuest have come to be known as EverCamp.
  155. Lopez, Miguel (November 9, 2005). "Onlife #32: Good game ninja loot.". GameSpy. IGN Entertainment, Inc. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  156. McQuaid, Brad (November 29, 2005). "Instancing in Online Gaming". GamerGod. Archived from the original on March 24, 2006. Retrieved August 8, 2010.
  157. Stewart, K.; Choi, HP (2003). "PC-Bang (Room) Culture: A Study of Korean College Students' Private and Public Use of Computers and the Internet". Trends in Communication: 65. Retrieved October 12, 2010.
  158. 1 2 Crigger, Lara (2008). "Chasing D&D: A History of RPGs". IGN Entertainment Games. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  159. 1 2 The Rampant Coyote (October 23, 2006). "Are Hybrid RPGs Just Poor-Man's RPGs?". Tales of the Rampant Coyote. Archived from the original on November 9, 2006. Retrieved October 2, 2010. The core elements of a computer roleplaying game are pretty simple and straightforward. You basically have a task resolution system for an individual unit based on its statistics. Mix this with the ability to modify those stats through circumstances, equipment, spells, level increase or whatever. (...) Modern computer RPGs tend to be a bit more complex than this. (...) Hybrid RPG can emphasize some other element of gameplay that are FAR less development-intensive than pure roleplaying games. Thus they are cheaper and easier to make. Does this make them the "poor-man's RPG?" Meaning a poor / inexpensive substitution for the real thing? (...) Maybe.
  160. Martin, Joe (November 3, 2009). "Spector tried to buy Deus Ex rights". Retrieved October 2, 2010. Deus Ex, often considered one of the best PC games ever made, is a FPS/RPG hybrid about uncovering an international conspiracy in a near-future, cyber-punk setting.
  161. Boske, John. "Deus Ex: Invisible War - We Wanted Orange, We Got Lemon-Lime". RPGamer. Retrieved October 2, 2010. How do you beat your own record? How do you out-do a one-of-a-kind FPS/RPG hybrid that met substantial critical acclaim and garnered praise from gamers across the board? Perhaps this is one question that Ion Storm shouldn't have asked, for while Deus Ex: Invisible war is a functional, and even enjoyable title on its own, it is a far cry from its predecessor, and bears several serious flaws that keep it from being anything other than a mediocre experience.
  162. Cross, Tom (September 1, 2010). "Analysis: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Defense - The Hybrid Results". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved October 2, 2010. In this Gamasutra analysis piece, Tom Cross looks at GSC Game World's S.T.A.L.K.E.R: Clear Sky and its odd combination of FPS, RPG and tower defense game, examining the art of gameplay hybrids.
  163. Bishop, Stuart (June 16, 2007). "The Making of S.T.A.L.K.E.R., part one". Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on June 25, 2007. Retrieved October 2, 2010. Back in late 2001 we got our first look at an impressive game called Oblivion Lost, then a squad-based action game from GSC Game World. In 2007 the title that we now know as S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl finally released, plunging players into a survival-FPS-RPG hybrid and the post-apocalyptic wasteland surrounding the Chernobyl power plant after its meltdown.
  164. Dorsey, Mark (March 24, 2004). "SpellForce: The Order of Dawn Review". GameShark. Mad Catz, Inc. Archived from the original on March 14, 2012. Retrieved October 2, 2010. SpellForce is making the future of hybrid genre games look very positive indeed. (...) However, I do have a penchant for armies of minions doing my bidding and I do enjoy RPG elements in a game, which is why I was quite interested in the release of Phenomic's SpellForce, an RPG/RTS hybrid.
  165. Biessener, Adam (March 11, 2010). "Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II – Chaos Rising". Game Informer. Retrieved October 2, 2010. Standalone expansion continues solid mix of RPG and RTS
  166. Dietz, Jason; Doyle, Marc (July 30, 2010). "iPhone/iPad Games Guide: What to Buy This Month". Metacritic. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved October 6, 2010.
  167. Caoili, Eric (November 30, 2009). "Puzzle Quest 2 Releases For DS, XBLA Next Spring". GameSetWatch. UBM TechWeb.
  168. Luther, Jeff (April 20, 2001). "The RPG Experience: Conventions and Not Beyond". GamesFirst!. Retrieved October 2, 2010.
  169. "5 Japanese Game Developers You Should Know". IGN Entertainment Games. December 16, 2009. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  170. Lien, Tracey (August 18, 2014). "How successful is Pokémon? Take a look at the numbers!". Polygon. Vox Media. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
  171. "'Pokemon' titles sell 1 million on launch day". USA Today. March 9, 2011.
  172. DeVries, Jack (January 16, 2009). "Pokemon Report: World Records Edition". IGN. Archived from the original on February 28, 2009. Retrieved January 24, 2010.
  173. "Pokémon Black Version and Pokémon White Version for Nintendo DS coming to Europe in Spring 2011" (Press release). Nintendo. May 31, 2010. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  174. "Businesses - SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.". Square Enix. Retrieved August 15, 2014.
  175. Rose, Mike (June 7, 2011). "Final Fantasy Series Hits 100M Units Shipped". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved June 7, 2011.
  176. "『ドラゴンクエストIX 星空の守り人』の全世界累計出荷本数が530万本を突破" [Dragon Quest IX ships over 5.3 million worldwide]. Famitsu. KADOKAWA DWANGO CORPORATION. March 16, 2011. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  177. 1 2 "Japan Platinum Game Chart". The Magic Box. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  178. "US Platinum Videogame Chart". The Magic Box. December 27, 2007. Retrieved August 3, 2008.
  179. "ELSPA Sales Awards: Platinum". Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association. Archived from the original on May 15, 2009. Retrieved January 18, 2009.
  180. 1 2 Webster, Andrew (May 7, 2010). "Masterpiece: Final Fantasy VII". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  181. "World of Warcraft® Subscriber Base Reaches 11.5 Million Worldwide" (Press release). Blizzard Entertainment. December 23, 2008. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
  182. "Diablo II: Lord of Destruction Shatters Sales Records Worldwide With Over 1 Million Copies Sold" (Press release). Blizzard Entertainment. August 29, 2001. Retrieved June 11, 2008.
  183. Nunneley, Stephany (August 5, 2010). "Activision Blizzard Q2 financials: Net revenue comes in at $967 million". VG247. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  184. Thang, Jimmy (January 15, 2009). "Best-selling PC Games of 2008". IGN. Ziff Davis. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  185. Magrino, Tom (July 28, 2010). "Analysts bullish on Starcraft II sales - PC News at GameSpot". GameSpot. CBS Interactive Inc. Archived from the original on September 10, 2011. Retrieved September 11, 2010.
  186. Sinclair, Brendan (May 31, 2009). "E3 2010: Starcraft II by end of 2009, Call of Duty expanding to new genres - News". GameSpot. CBS Interactive Inc. Archived from the original on June 2, 2009. Retrieved September 16, 2010.
  187. "DIABLO III LAUNCHING MAY 15 – DIGITAL PRE-SALES NOW OPEN". Blizzard Entertainment. March 15, 2012.
  188. Kubba, Sinan (June 6, 2013). "Diablo 3 coming to Xbox 360 as well, dated worldwide Sept. 3". Engadget. AOL Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  189. Reiner, Andrew (May 12, 2014). "Diablo III: Ultimate Evil Edition Lands PlayStation 4, Xbox One Release Date".
  190. "Weird and Wonderful Records". Guinness Book of World Records. 2008. Archived from the original on March 29, 2008. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
  191. Clodfelter, Tim (April 17, 2008). "Record Book Focused on the Gamers". Winston-Salem Journal. p. 1.
  192. "Untold Legends: Brotherhood of the Blade". Official U. S. Playstation Magazine. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  193. "Blizzard Entertainment - Company Profile". Blizzard Entertainment. Archived from the original on March 11, 2008.
  194. "Blizzard Entertainment - Media Alert". Blizzard Entertainment. Archived from the original on 2008-12-01.
  195. Lasar, Matthew (May 17, 2001). "US government now funds video games... if they're "art"". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  196. "Highest and Lowest Scoring Games at metacritic". Metacritic. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved May 11, 2011.
  197. Ishaan (January 23, 2011). "Here's How Xenoblade And Metroid: Other M Did In Japan". Siliconera. Retrieved September 2, 2011.
  198. Iwatane Kane, Yukari (May 11, 2010). "Videogame Maker Electronic Arts Swings to Profit". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  199. "Bethesda Softworks Announces Successful Launch of Fallout 3". IGN. Ziff Davis. November 6, 2008. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  200. "About". BioWare. November 10, 2004. Archived from the original on September 4, 2010. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  201. "February 2, 2004 – February 4, 2004" (PDF). Square Enix. February 9, 2004. p. 27. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  202. "Results Briefing Session for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2009" (PDF). Square Enix. May 25, 2009. p. 28. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  203. GamePro Staff (November 5, 2008). "The 26 Best RPGs of the All Time". GamePro. Archived from the original on November 30, 2011. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  204. "Reader's Choice Game of the Century". IGN. Ziff Davis. January 12, 2000. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  205. "Spring 2004: Best. Game. Ever.". GameFAQs. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  206. "Fall 2005: 10-Year Anniversary Contest—The 10 Best Games Ever". GameFAQs. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  207. "2: Final FAntasy VII". Empire. Bauer Consumer Media. Archived from the original on July 6, 2011. Retrieved February 25, 2011.
  208. "IGN Top 100 Games 2007 - 9 Final Fantasy III (US)". IGN. Ziff Davis. 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2011.
  209. "Readers' Choice Top 100 Games of All Time - Chrono Trigger". IGN. 2008. Retrieved May 7, 2011.
  210. "IGN Readers' Choice 2006 - The Top 100 Games Ever". IGN. Ziff Davis. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  211. Cork, Jeff (November 16, 2009). "Game Informer's 200th Issue Revealed". Game Informer. Retrieved May 7, 2011.
  212. 1 2 Carless, Simon (March 3, 2006). "Famitsu Reveals Top 100 Reader-Voted Games Of All-Time". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  213. Choi, Dan (March 3, 2006). "Japan chooses its all-time top 100 list of games; Western games feel left out". Engadget. AOL Inc. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  214. "Top 20 RPGs of the Past Decade". RPGFan. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  215. "RPGs of the Decade - 2000 to 2009 - #1". RPGamer. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  216. Donaldson, Alex. "The Best Xbox 360 RPGs Available Right Now". RPG Site. Archived from the original on March 25, 2010. Retrieved September 11, 2010.
  217. 1 2 Romano, Sal (August 16, 2010). "Niitsuma: Xbox 360's low Japanese sales "a cultural thing"". Gematsu. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  218. Rusling, Matthew (January 10, 2006). "No clamor for Xbox in Japan". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved October 2, 2010. Ever since its 2002 release, Microsoft's Xbox has been a colossal sales flop in Japan.
  219. Gasse, Nicholas (September 21, 2010). "Xbox 360 dominance in Japan will come 'over time'". Ferrago Ltd. Retrieved October 2, 2010.
  220. 1 2 "JAPAN: Oblivion and Face Training". Edge. Future Publishing Limited. July 27, 2007. Archived from the original on September 25, 2011. Retrieved September 7, 2010.
  221. "Exclusive: Platform-Specific Q1 U.S. Sales Reveal Notable Trends". Gamasutra. UBM Tech. Retrieved September 15, 2010.
  222. DakotaG (December 8, 2008). "The RPGs of 2008: Handhelds leading". StrategyInformer. Archived from the original on August 14, 2008. Retrieved January 12, 2011.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Role-playing video games.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/26/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.