Robert Briffault

Robert Stephen Briffault MC* ([ʁo.ˈbɛʁ stə.ˈfɑ̃ bʁi.ˈfo], 1874 – 11 December 1948) was a British surgeon who found fame as a social anthropologist and later in life as a novelist.[1]

Biography

Briffault was born in either France or London,[2][3] likely in 1874, the son of a French diplomat, Charles Frédéric Briffault, and the Scottish Margaret Mann (née Stewart).[4][5] He later cited his year of birth as 1876, likely to be young enough to enter the army in the First World War.[4]

He spent time in France and elsewhere in Europe following his father.[4][3] After the death of his father in 1887, Briffault and his mother moved to New Zealand. Briffault received his MB and ChB from the University of Dunedin in New Zealand and commenced medical practice.[6] After service on the Western Front during the war, (where he was twice awarded the Military Cross)[3]), he settled in England[6] where he turned to the study of sociology and anthropology.[7] He also lived for some time in the USA,[8] and later Paris.[3]

Briffault debated the institution of marriage with Bronisław Malinowski in the 1930s[9] and corresponded with Bertrand Russell.

He died in Hastings, Sussex, England on 11 December 1948.[6][10][1]

Asked how to pronounce his name, Briffault told The Literary Digest: "Should be pronounced bree'-foh, without attempting to give it a French pronunciation." [11]

His first wife (m. 1896) was Anna Clarke, with whom he had three children. After her death in 1919, he married Herma Hoyt (1898-1981), an American writer and translator.[1]

Briffault's Law

Briffault is known for what is called Briffault's Law:

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. — Robert Briffault, The Mothers, Vol. I, p. 191

In following, there are 3 corollaries:

Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit.
A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male.

Commentary on works

In 1930, H. L. Mencken wrote the following in his Treatise on the Gods:

Primitive society, like many savage societies of our own time, was probably strictly matriarchal. The mother was the head of the family. ...What masculine authority there was resided in the mother's brother. He was the man of the family, and to him the children yielded respect and obedience. Their father, at best, was simply a pleasant friend who fed them and played with them; at worst, he was an indecent loafer who sponged on the mother. They belonged, not to his family, but to their mother's. As they grew up they joined their uncle's group of hunters, not their father's. This matriarchal organization of the primitive tribe, though it finds obvious evidential support in the habits of higher animals, has been questioned by many anthropologists, but of late one of them, Briffault, demonstrated its high probability in three immense volumes [The Mothers: A Study of the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions]. It is hard to escape the cogency of his arguments, for they are based upon an almost overwhelming accumulation of facts. They not only show that, in what we may plausibly assume about the institutions of early man and in what we know positively about the institutions of savages today, the concepts inseparable from a matriarchate color every custom and every idea: they show also that those primeval concepts still condition our own ways of thinking and doing things, so that "the societal characters of the human mind" all seem to go back "to the functions of the female and not to those of the male." Thus it appears that man, in his remote infancy, was by no means the lord of creation that he has since become."[12]

Works

Non-fiction

Fiction

Articles

Other

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Mr. Robert Briffault". The Times. The Times Digital Archive. 15 December 1948. p. 7.
  2. Funk & Wagnell's New Encyclopedia 2006
  3. 1 2 3 4 Time Sept 27, 1937 Book Review
  4. 1 2 3 Passerini, Luisa (1999). Europe in Love, Love in Europe: Imagination and Politics in Britain Between the Wars. p. 150. Retrieved 18 March 2016.
  5. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NFK9-J5T : accessed 18 March 2016), Robert Stephen Briffault, 08 Nov 1874; citing Kirkdale, Lancashire, England, reference yr 1874-1876 p 68; FHL microfilm 1,545,931.
  6. 1 2 3 McMaster University Archives Briffault, Robert]
  7. Physician Writers A-C
  8. Time Magazine, July 18, 1932 People
  9. Marriage Past and Present: A debate between Robert Briffault and Bronislaw Malinowski (1956) edited by Ashley Montagu
  10. American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 51, No. 2 (Apr. - Jun., 1949), p. 341
  11. Charles Earle Funk, What's the Name, Please?, Funk & Wagnalls, 1936
  12. H. L. Mencken, Treatise on the Gods, Blue Ribbon Books, 1930, p. 84.
  13. L. H. Dudley Buxton, "The Mothers: A Study of the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions," Eugenics Review, Vol. XX, No. 2, July 1928.
  14. Suzanne Keller, "Does the Family Have a Future?," Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1971.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/14/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.