Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n
| Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued December 1, 2014 Decided March 9, 2015 | |||||||
| Full case name | Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association, et al.; Jerome Nickols, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association | ||||||
| Docket nos. |
13–1041 13–1052 | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan; Alito (expect part III-B) | ||||||
| Concurrence | Alito | ||||||
| Concurrence | Scalia | ||||||
| Concurrence | Thomas | ||||||
| Laws applied | |||||||
| Administrative Procedure Act | |||||||
Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the D.C. Circuit's Paralyzed Veterans doctrine is contrary to a clear reading of the Administrative Procedure Act and "improperly imposes on agencies an obligation beyond the Act's maximum procedural requirements."[1]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the opinion of the Court.[2]
Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas authored concurring opinions.
See also
References
External links
- Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
- SCOTUSblog coverage
- Oyez.org coverage
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.