For other uses, see Mutation (disambiguation).

In biology, a mutation is the permanent alteration of the nucleotide sequence of the genome of an organism, virus, or extrachromosomal DNA or other genetic elements. Mutations result from errors during DNA replication or other types of damage to DNA, which then may undergo error-prone repair (especially microhomology-mediated end joining[1]), or cause an error during other forms of repair,[2][3] or else may cause an error during replication (translesion synthesis). Mutations may also result from insertion or deletion of segments of DNA due to mobile genetic elements.[4][5][6] Mutations may or may not produce discernible changes in the observable characteristics (phenotype) of an organism. Mutations play a part in both normal and abnormal biological processes including: evolution, cancer, and the development of the immune system, including junctional diversity.

The genomes of RNA viruses are based on RNA rather than DNA. The RNA viral genome can be double stranded (as in DNA) or single stranded. In some of these viruses (such as the single stranded human immunodeficiency virus) replication occurs quickly and there are no mechanisms to check the genome for accuracy. This error-prone process often results in mutations.

Mutation can result in many different types of change in sequences. Mutations in genes can either have no effect, alter the product of a gene, or prevent the gene from functioning properly or completely. Mutations can also occur in nongenic regions. One study on genetic variations between different species of Drosophila suggests that, if a mutation changes a protein produced by a gene, the result is likely to be harmful, with an estimated 70 percent of amino acid polymorphisms that have damaging effects, and the remainder being either neutral or marginally beneficial.[7] Due to the damaging effects that mutations can have on genes, organisms have mechanisms such as DNA repair to prevent or correct mutations by reverting the mutated sequence back to its original state.[4]


Mutations can involve the duplication of large sections of DNA, usually through genetic recombination.[8] These duplications are a major source of raw material for evolving new genes, with tens to hundreds of genes duplicated in animal genomes every million years.[9] Most genes belong to larger gene families of shared ancestry, known as homology.[10] Novel genes are produced by several methods, commonly through the duplication and mutation of an ancestral gene, or by recombining parts of different genes to form new combinations with new functions.[11][12]

Here, protein domains act as modules, each with a particular and independent function, that can be mixed together to produce genes encoding new proteins with novel properties.[13] For example, the human eye uses four genes to make structures that sense light: three for cone cell or color vision and one for rod cell or night vision; all four arose from a single ancestral gene.[14] Another advantage of duplicating a gene (or even an entire genome) is that this increases engineering redundancy; this allows one gene in the pair to acquire a new function while the other copy performs the original function.[15][16] Other types of mutation occasionally create new genes from previously noncoding DNA.[17][18]

Changes in chromosome number may involve even larger mutations, where segments of the DNA within chromosomes break and then rearrange. For example, in the Homininae, two chromosomes fused to produce human chromosome 2; this fusion did not occur in the lineage of the other apes, and they retain these separate chromosomes.[19] In evolution, the most important role of such chromosomal rearrangements may be to accelerate the divergence of a population into new species by making populations less likely to interbreed, thereby preserving genetic differences between these populations.[20]

Sequences of DNA that can move about the genome, such as transposons, make up a major fraction of the genetic material of plants and animals, and may have been important in the evolution of genomes.[21] For example, more than a million copies of the Alu sequence are present in the human genome, and these sequences have now been recruited to perform functions such as regulating gene expression.[22] Another effect of these mobile DNA sequences is that when they move within a genome, they can mutate or delete existing genes and thereby produce genetic diversity.[5]

Nonlethal mutations accumulate within the gene pool and increase the amount of genetic variation.[23] The abundance of some genetic changes within the gene pool can be reduced by natural selection, while other "more favorable" mutations may accumulate and result in adaptive changes.

Prodryas persephone, a Late Eocene butterfly

For example, a butterfly may produce offspring with new mutations. The majority of these mutations will have no effect; but one might change the color of one of the butterfly's offspring, making it harder (or easier) for predators to see. If this color change is advantageous, the chance of this butterfly's surviving and producing its own offspring are a little better, and over time the number of butterflies with this mutation may form a larger percentage of the population.

Neutral mutations are defined as mutations whose effects do not influence the fitness of an individual. These can accumulate over time due to genetic drift. It is believed that the overwhelming majority of mutations have no significant effect on an organism's fitness. Also, DNA repair mechanisms are able to mend most changes before they become permanent mutations, and many organisms have mechanisms for eliminating otherwise-permanently mutated somatic cells.

Beneficial mutations can improve reproductive success.


Main article: Mutagenesis

Four classes of mutations are (1) spontaneous mutations (molecular decay), (2) mutations due to error-prone replication bypass of naturally occurring DNA damage (also called error-prone translesion synthesis), (3) errors introduced during DNA repair, and (4) induced mutations caused by mutagens. Scientists may also deliberately introduce mutant sequences through DNA manipulation for the sake of scientific experimentation.

Spontaneous mutation

Spontaneous mutations on the molecular level can be caused by:[24]

Error-prone replication bypass

There is increasing evidence that the majority of spontaneously arising mutations are due to error-prone replication (translesion synthesis) past DNA damage in the template strand. Naturally occurring oxidative DNA damages arise at least 10,000 times per cell per day in humans and 50,000 times or more per cell per day in rats.[25] In mice, the majority of mutations are caused by translesion synthesis.[26] Likewise, in yeast, Kunz et al.[27] found that more than 60% of the spontaneous single base pair substitutions and deletions were caused by translesion synthesis.

Errors introduced during DNA repair

Although naturally occurring double-strand breaks occur at a relatively low frequency in DNA, their repair often causes mutation. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is a major pathway for repairing double-strand breaks. NHEJ involves removal of a few nucleotides to allow somewhat inaccurate alignment of the two ends for rejoining followed by addition of nucleotides to fill in gaps. As a consequence, NHEJ often introduces mutations.[28]

A covalent adduct between the metabolite of benzo[a]pyrene, the major mutagen in tobacco smoke, and DNA[29]

Induced mutation

Induced mutations on the molecular level can be caused by:-

Classification of mutation types

By effect on structure

Illustrations of five types of chromosomal mutations.
Selection of disease-causing mutations, in a standard table of the genetic code of amino acids.[32]

The sequence of a gene can be altered in a number of ways. Gene mutations have varying effects on health depending on where they occur and whether they alter the function of essential proteins. Mutations in the structure of genes can be classified as:

By effect on function

By effect on fitness

In applied genetics, it is usual to speak of mutations as either harmful or beneficial.

Distribution of fitness effects

Attempts have been made to infer the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) using mutagenesis experiments and theoretical models applied to molecular sequence data. DFE, as used to determine the relative abundance of different types of mutations (i.e., strongly deleterious, nearly neutral or advantageous), is relevant to many evolutionary questions, such as the maintenance of genetic variation,[44] the rate of genomic decay,[45] the maintenance of outcrossing sexual reproduction as opposed to inbreeding[46] and the evolution of sex and genetic recombination.[47] In summary, the DFE plays an important role in predicting evolutionary dynamics.[48][49] A variety of approaches have been used to study the DFE, including theoretical, experimental and analytical methods.

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of mutations in vesicular stomatitis virus. In this experiment, random mutations were introduced into the virus by site-directed mutagenesis, and the fitness of each mutant was compared with the ancestral type. A fitness of zero, less than one, one, more than one, respectively, indicates that mutations are lethal, deleterious, neutral, and advantageous.[50]

One of the earliest theoretical studies of the distribution of fitness effects was done by Motoo Kimura, an influential theoretical population geneticist. His neutral theory of molecular evolution proposes that most novel mutations will be highly deleterious, with a small fraction being neutral.[61][62] Hiroshi Akashi more recently proposed a bimodal model for the DFE, with modes centered around highly deleterious and neutral mutations.[63] Both theories agree that the vast majority of novel mutations are neutral or deleterious and that advantageous mutations are rare, which has been supported by experimental results. One example is a study done on the DFE of random mutations in vesicular stomatitis virus.[50] Out of all mutations, 39.6% were lethal, 31.2% were non-lethal deleterious, and 27.1% were neutral. Another example comes from a high throughput mutagenesis experiment with yeast.[55] In this experiment it was shown that the overall DFE is bimodal, with a cluster of neutral mutations, and a broad distribution of deleterious mutations.

Though relatively few mutations are advantageous, those that are play an important role in evolutionary changes.[64] Like neutral mutations, weakly selected advantageous mutations can be lost due to random genetic drift, but strongly selected advantageous mutations are more likely to be fixed. Knowing the DFE of advantageous mutations may lead to increased ability to predict the evolutionary dynamics. Theoretical work on the DFE for advantageous mutations has been done by John H. Gillespie[65] and H. Allen Orr.[66] They proposed that the distribution for advantageous mutations should be exponential under a wide range of conditions, which, in general, has been supported by experimental studies, at least for strongly selected advantageous mutations.[67][68][69]

In general, it is accepted that the majority of mutations are neutral or deleterious, with rare mutations being advantageous; however, the proportion of types of mutations varies between species. This indicates two important points: first, the proportion of effectively neutral mutations is likely to vary between species, resulting from dependence on effective population size; second, the average effect of deleterious mutations varies dramatically between species.[23] In addition, the DFE also differs between coding regions and noncoding regions, with the DFE of noncoding DNA containing more weakly selected mutations.[23]

By impact on protein sequence

In contrast, any insertion or deletion that is evenly divisible by three is termed an in-frame mutation

By inheritance

A mutation has caused this garden moss rose to produce flowers of different colors. This is a somatic mutation that may also be passed on in the germline.

In multicellular organisms with dedicated reproductive cells, mutations can be subdivided into germline mutations, which can be passed on to descendants through their reproductive cells, and somatic mutations (also called acquired mutations),[72] which involve cells outside the dedicated reproductive group and which are not usually transmitted to descendants.

A germline mutation gives rise to a constitutional mutation in the offspring, that is, a mutation that is present in every cell. A constitutional mutation can also occur very soon after fertilisation, or continue from a previous constitutional mutation in a parent.[73]

The distinction between germline and somatic mutations is important in animals that have a dedicated germline to produce reproductive cells. However, it is of little value in understanding the effects of mutations in plants, which lack dedicated germline. The distinction is also blurred in those animals that reproduce asexually through mechanisms such as budding, because the cells that give rise to the daughter organisms also give rise to that organism's germline. A new germline mutation that was not inherited from either parent is called a de novo mutation.

Diploid organisms (e.g., humans) contain two copies of each gene—a paternal and a maternal allele. Based on the occurrence of mutation on each chromosome, we may classify mutations into three types.

A wild type or homozygous non-mutated organism is one in which neither allele is mutated.

Special classes


In order to categorize a mutation as such, the "normal" sequence must be obtained from the DNA of a "normal" or "healthy" organism (as opposed to a "mutant" or "sick" one), it should be identified and reported; ideally, it should be made publicly available for a straightforward nucleotide-by-nucleotide comparison, and agreed upon by the scientific community or by a group of expert geneticists and biologists, who have the responsibility of establishing the standard or so-called "consensus" sequence. This step requires a tremendous scientific effort. (See DNA sequencing.) Once the consensus sequence is known, the mutations in a genome can be pinpointed, described, and classified. The committee of the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) has developed the standard human sequence variant nomenclature,[75] which should be used by researchers and DNA diagnostic centers to generate unambiguous mutation descriptions. In principle, this nomenclature can also be used to describe mutations in other organisms. The nomenclature specifies the type of mutation and base or amino acid changes.

Mutation rates

Further information: Mutation rate

Mutation rates vary substantially across species, and the evolutionary forces that generally determine mutation are the subject of ongoing investigation.

    Harmful mutations

    Changes in DNA caused by mutation can cause errors in protein sequence, creating partially or completely non-functional proteins. Each cell, in order to function correctly, depends on thousands of proteins to function in the right places at the right times. When a mutation alters a protein that plays a critical role in the body, a medical condition can result. A condition caused by mutations in one or more genes is called a Sheik disorder. Some mutations alter a gene's DNA base sequence but do not change the function of the protein made by the gene. One study on the comparison of genes between different species of Drosophila suggests that if a mutation does change a protein, this will probably be harmful, with an estimated 70 percent of amino acid polymorphisms having damaging effects, and the remainder being either neutral or weakly beneficial.]][7] Studies have shown that only 7% of point mutations in noncoding DNA of yeast are deleterious and 12% in coding DNA are deleterious. The rest of the mutations are either neutral or slightly beneficial.[76]

    If a mutation is present in a germ cell, it can give rise to offspring that carries the mutation in all of its cells. This is the case in hereditary diseases. In particular, if there is a mutation in a DNA repair gene within a germ cell, humans carrying such germline mutations may have an increased risk of cancer. A list of 34 such germline mutations is given in the article DNA repair-deficiency disorder. An example of one is albinism, a mutation that occurs in the OCA1 or OCA2 gene. Individuals with this disorder are more prone to many types of cancers, other disorders and have impaired vision. On the other hand, a mutation may occur in a somatic cell of an organism. Such mutations will be present in all descendants of this cell within the same organism, and certain mutations can cause the cell to become malignant, and, thus, cause cancer.[77]

    A DNA damage can cause an error when the DNA is replicated, and this error of replication can cause a gene mutation that, in turn, could cause a genetic disorder. DNA damages are repaired by the DNA repair system of the cell. Each cell has a number of pathways through which enzymes recognize and repair damages in DNA. Because DNA can be damaged in many ways, the process of DNA repair is an important way in which the body protects itself from disease. Once DNA damage has given rise to a mutation, the mutation cannot be repaired. DNA repair pathways can only recognize and act on "abnormal" structures in the DNA. Once a mutation occurs in a gene sequence it then has normal DNA structure and cannot be repaired.

    Beneficial mutations

    Although mutations that cause changes in protein sequences can be harmful to an organism, on occasions the effect may be positive in a given environment. In this case, the mutation may enable the mutant organism to withstand particular environmental stresses better than wild-type organisms, or reproduce more quickly. In these cases a mutation will tend to become more common in a population through natural selection.

    For example, a specific 32 base pair deletion in human CCR5 (CCR5-Δ32) confers HIV resistance to homozygotes and delays AIDS onset in heterozygotes.[78] One possible explanation of the etiology of the relatively high frequency of CCR5-Δ32 in the European population is that it conferred resistance to the bubonic plague in mid-14th century Europe. People with this mutation were more likely to survive infection; thus its frequency in the population increased.[79] This theory could explain why this mutation is not found in Southern Africa, which remained untouched by bubonic plague. A newer theory suggests that the selective pressure on the CCR5 Delta 32 mutation was caused by smallpox instead of the bubonic plague.[80]

    An example of a harmful mutation is sickle-cell disease, a blood disorder in which the body produces an abnormal type of the oxygen-carrying substance hemoglobin in the red blood cells. One-third of all indigenous inhabitants of Sub-Saharan Africa carry the gene, because, in areas where malaria is common, there is a survival value in carrying only a single sickle-cell gene (sickle cell trait).[81] Those with only one of the two alleles of the sickle-cell disease are more resistant to malaria, since the infestation of the malaria Plasmodium is halted by the sickling of the cells that it infests.

    Prion mutations

    Prions are proteins and do not contain genetic material. However, prion replication has been shown to be subject to mutation and natural selection just like other forms of replication.[82] The human gene PRNP codes for the major prion protein, PrP, and is subject to mutations that can give rise to disease-causing prions.

    Somatic mutations

    See also: Carcinogenesis

    A change in the genetic structure that is not inherited from a parent, and also not passed to offspring, is called a somatic cell genetic mutation or acquired mutation.[72]

    Cells with heterozygous mutations (one good copy of gene and one mutated copy) may function normally with the unmutated copy until the good copy has been spontaneously somatically mutated. This kind of mutation happens all the time in living organisms, but it is difficult to measure the rate. Measuring this rate is important in predicting the rate at which people may develop cancer.[83]

    Point mutations may arise from spontaneous mutations that occur during DNA replication. The rate of mutation may be increased by mutagens. Mutagens can be physical, such as radiation from UV rays, X-rays or extreme heat, or chemical (molecules that misplace base pairs or disrupt the helical shape of DNA). Mutagens associated with cancers are often studied to learn about cancer and its prevention.

    See also


    1. Sharma S, Javadekar SM, Pandey M, Srivastava M, Kumari R, Raghavan SC (2015). "Homology and enzymatic requirements of microhomology-dependent alternative end joining". Cell Death Dis. 6: e1697. doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.58. PMC 4385936Freely accessible. PMID 25789972.
    2. Chen J, Miller BF, Furano AV (2014). "Repair of naturally occurring mismatches can induce mutations in flanking DNA". Elife. 3: e02001. doi:10.7554/elife.02001. PMC 3999860Freely accessible. PMID 24843013.
    3. Rodgers K, McVey M (2016). "Error-Prone Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks". J. Cell. Physiol. 231 (1): 15–24. doi:10.1002/jcp.25053. PMID 26033759.
    4. 1 2 Bertram, John S. (December 2000). "The molecular biology of cancer". Molecular Aspects of Medicine. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 21 (6): 167–223. doi:10.1016/S0098-2997(00)00007-8. ISSN 0098-2997. PMID 11173079.
    5. 1 2 Aminetzach, Yael T.; Macpherson, J. Michael; Petrov, Dmitri A. (July 29, 2005). "Pesticide Resistance via Transposition-Mediated Adaptive Gene Truncation in Drosophila". Science. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 309 (5735): 764–767. Bibcode:2005Sci...309..764A. doi:10.1126/science.1112699. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16051794.
    6. Burrus, Vincent; Waldor, Matthew K. (June 2004). "Shaping bacterial genomes with integrative and conjugative elements". Research in Microbiology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 155 (5): 376–386. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.012. ISSN 0923-2508. PMID 15207870.
    7. 1 2 Sawyer, Stanley A.; Parsch, John; Zhi Zhang; et al. (April 17, 2007). "Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 104 (16): 6504–6510. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.6504S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701572104. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1871816Freely accessible. PMID 17409186.
    8. Hastings, P. J.; Lupski, James R.; Rosenberg, Susan M.; et al. (August 2009). "Mechanisms of change in gene copy number". Nature Reviews Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 10 (8): 551–564. doi:10.1038/nrg2593. ISSN 1471-0056. PMC 2864001Freely accessible. PMID 19597530.
    9. Carroll, Grenier & Weatherbee 2005
    10. Harrison, Paul M.; Gerstein, Mark (May 17, 2002). "Studying Genomes Through the Aeons: Protein Families, Pseudogenes and Proteome Evolution". Journal of Molecular Biology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 318 (5): 1155–1174. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00109-2. ISSN 0022-2836. PMID 12083509.
    11. Orengo, Christine A.; Thornton, Janet M. (July 2005). "Protein families and their evolution—a structural perspective". Annual Review of Biochemistry. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. 74: 867–900. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133029. ISSN 0066-4154. PMID 15954844.
    12. Manyuan Long; Betrán, Esther; Thornton, Kevin; et al. (November 2003). "The origin of new genes: glimpses from the young and old". Nature Reviews Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 4 (11): 865–875. doi:10.1038/nrg1204. ISSN 1471-0056. PMID 14634634.
    13. Minglei Wang; Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo (January 14, 2009). "The Evolutionary Mechanics of Domain Organization in Proteomes and the Rise of Modularity in the Protein World". Structure. Cambridge, MA: Cell Press. 17 (1): 66–78. doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.11.008. ISSN 0969-2126. PMID 19141283.
    14. Bowmaker, James K. (May 1998). "Evolution of colour vision in vertebrates". Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group. 12 (Pt 3b): 541–547. doi:10.1038/eye.1998.143. ISSN 0950-222X. PMID 9775215.
    15. Gregory, T. Ryan; Hebert, Paul D. N. (April 1999). "The Modulation of DNA Content: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Consequences". Genome Research. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 9 (4): 317–324. doi:10.1101/gr.9.4.317 (inactive 2015-01-09). ISSN 1088-9051. PMID 10207154. Retrieved 2015-10-01.
    16. Hurles, Matthew (July 13, 2004). "Gene Duplication: The Genomic Trade in Spare Parts". PLOS Biology. San Francisco, CA: Public Library of Science. 2 (7): E206. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020206. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 449868Freely accessible. PMID 15252449.
    17. Na Liu; Okamura, Katsutomo; Tyler, David M.; et al. (October 2008). "The evolution and functional diversification of animal microRNA genes". Cell Research. London: Nature Publishing Group on behalf of the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences. 18 (10): 985–996. doi:10.1038/cr.2008.278. ISSN 1001-0602. PMC 2712117Freely accessible. PMID 18711447.
    18. Siepel, Adam (October 2009). "Darwinian alchemy: Human genes from noncoding DNA". Genome Research. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 19 (10): 1693–1695. doi:10.1101/gr.098376.109. ISSN 1088-9051. PMC 2765273Freely accessible. PMID 19797681.
    19. Jianzhi Zhang; Xiaoxia Wang; Podlaha, Ondrej (May 2004). "Testing the Chromosomal Speciation Hypothesis for Humans and Chimpanzees". Genome Research. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 14 (5): 845–851. doi:10.1101/gr.1891104. ISSN 1088-9051. PMC 479111Freely accessible. PMID 15123584.
    20. Ayala, Francisco J.; Coluzzi, Mario (May 3, 2005). "Chromosome speciation: Humans, Drosophila, and mosquitoes". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 102 (Suppl 1): 6535–6542. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.6535A. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501847102. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1131864Freely accessible. PMID 15851677.
    21. Hurst, Gregory D. D.; Werren, John H. (August 2001). "The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution". Nature Reviews Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 2 (8): 597–606. doi:10.1038/35084545. ISSN 1471-0056. PMID 11483984.
    22. Häsler, Julien; Strub, Katharina (November 2006). "Alu elements as regulators of gene expression". Nucleic Acids Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 34 (19): 5491–5497. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl706. ISSN 0305-1048. PMC 1636486Freely accessible. PMID 17020921.
    23. 1 2 3 4 Eyre-Walker, Adam; Keightley, Peter D. (August 2007). "The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations" (PDF). Nature Reviews Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 8 (8): 610–618. doi:10.1038/nrg2146. ISSN 1471-0056. PMID 17637733. Retrieved 2015-10-02.
    24. Montelone, Beth A. (1998). "Mutation, Mutagens, and DNA Repair". Retrieved 2015-10-02.
    25. Bernstein C, Prasad AR, Nfonsam V, Bernstein H. (2013). DNA Damage, DNA Repair and Cancer, New Research Directions in DNA Repair, Prof. Clark Chen (Ed.), ISBN 978-953-51-1114-6, InTech,
    26. Stuart, Gregory R.; Oda, Yoshimitsu; de Boer, Johan G.; Glickman, Barry W. (March 2000). "Mutation Frequency and Specificity With Age in Liver, Bladder and Brain of lacI Transgenic Mice". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 154 (3): 1291–1300. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 1460990Freely accessible. PMID 10757770. Retrieved 2015-10-03.
    27. Kunz, Bernard A.; Ramachandran, Karthikeyan; Vonarx, Edward J. (April 1998). "DNA Sequence Analysis of Spontaneous Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 148 (4): 1491–1505. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 1460101Freely accessible. PMID 9560369. Retrieved 2015-10-03.
    28. Lieber, Michael R. (July 2010). "The Mechanism of Double-Strand DNA Break Repair by the Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining Pathway". Annual Review of Biochemistry. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. 79: 181–211. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131. ISSN 0066-4154. PMC 3079308Freely accessible. PMID 20192759.
    29. Created from PDB 1JDG
    30. Pfohl-Leszkowicz, Annie; Manderville, Richard A. (January 2007). "Ochratoxin A: An overview on toxicity and carcinogenicity in animals and humans". Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 51 (1): 61–99. doi:10.1002/mnfr.200600137. ISSN 1613-4125. PMID 17195275.
    31. Kozmin, Stanislav; Slezak, Guenaelle; Reynaud-Angelin, Anne; et al. (September 20, 2005). "UVA radiation is highly mutagenic in cells that are unable to repair 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 102 (38): 13538–13543. Bibcode:2005PNAS..10213538K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504497102. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1224634Freely accessible. PMID 16157879.
    32. References for the image are found in Wikimedia Commons page at: Commons:File:Notable mutations.svg#References.
    33. Freese, Ernst (April 15, 1959). "The difference between Spontaneous and Base-Analogue Induced Mutations of Phage T4". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 45 (4): 622–633. doi:10.1073/pnas.45.4.622. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 222607Freely accessible. PMID 16590424.
    34. Freese, Ernst (June 1959). "The specific mutagenic effect of base analogues on Phage T4". Journal of Molecular Biology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 1 (2): 87–105. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(59)80038-3. ISSN 0022-2836.
    35. McClean, Phillip (1999). "Types of Mutations". Genes and Mutations. Course material from PLSC 431/631 - Intermediate Genetics.
    36. Goh, Amanda M.; Coffill, Cynthia R; Lane, David P. (January 2011). "The role of mutant p53 in human cancer". The Journal of Pathology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 223 (2): 116–126. doi:10.1002/path.2784. ISSN 0022-3417. PMID 21125670.
    37. Chenevix-Trench G, Spurdle AB, Gatei M, et al. (February 6, 2002). "Dominant Negative ATM Mutations in Breast Cancer Families". Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 94 (3): 205–215. doi:10.1093/jnci/94.3.205. ISSN 0027-8874. PMID 11830610.
    38. Paz-Priel, Ido; Friedman, Alan (2011). "C/EBPα dysregulation in AML and ALL". Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis. Redding, CT: Begell House. 16 (1–2): 93–102. doi:10.1615/critrevoncog.v16.i1-2.90. ISSN 0893-9675. PMC 3243939Freely accessible. PMID 22150310. (subscription required (help)).
    39. Capaccio D, Ciccodicola A, Sabatino L, et al. (June 2010). "A novel germline mutation in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ gene associated with large intestine polyp formation and dyslipidemia". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 1802 (6): 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.01.012. ISSN 0925-4439. PMID 20123124.
    40. McKusick, Victor A. (July 25, 1991). "The defect in Marfan syndrome". Nature. London: Nature Publishing Group. 352 (6333): 279–281. Bibcode:1991Natur.352..279M. doi:10.1038/352279a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 1852198.
    41. Judge DP, Biery NJ, Keene DR, et al. (July 15, 2004). "Evidence for a critical contribution of haploinsufficiency in the complex pathogenesis of Marfan syndrome". Journal of Clinical Investigation. Ann Arbor, MI: American Society for Clinical Investigation. 114 (2): 172–181. doi:10.1172/JCI20641. ISSN 0021-9738. PMC 449744Freely accessible. PMID 15254584.
    42. Judge, Daniel P.; Dietz, Harry C. (December 3, 2005). "Marfan's syndrome". The Lancet. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 366 (9501): 1965–1976. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67789-6. ISSN 0140-6736. PMC 1513064Freely accessible. PMID 16325700.
    43. Ellis, Nathan A.; Ciocci, Susan; German, James (February 2001). "Back mutation can produce phenotype reversion in Bloom syndrome somatic cells". Human Genetics. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag. 108 (2): 167–173. doi:10.1007/s004390000447. ISSN 0340-6717. PMID 11281456.
    44. Charlesworth, Deborah; Charlesworth, Brian; Morgan, Martin T. (December 1995). "The Pattern of Neutral Molecular Variation Under the Background Selection Model". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 141 (4): 1619–1632. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 1206892Freely accessible. PMID 8601499.
    45. Loewe, Laurence (April 2006). "Quantifying the genomic decay paradox due to Muller's ratchet in human mitochondrial DNA". Genetical Research. London; New York: Cambridge University Press. 87 (2): 133–159. doi:10.1017/S0016672306008123. ISSN 0016-6723. PMID 16709275.
    46. Bernstein, H; Hopf, FA; Michod, RE (1987). "The molecular basis of the evolution of sex.". Adv Genet. 24: 323–70. doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60012-7. PMID 3324702.
    47. Peck, Joel R.; Barreau, Guillaume; Heath, Simon C. (April 1997). "Imperfect Genes, Fisherian Mutation and the Evolution of Sex". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 145 (4): 1171–1199. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 1207886Freely accessible. PMID 9093868.
    48. Keightley, Peter D.; Lynch, Michael (March 2003). "Toward a Realistic Model of Mutations Affecting Fitness". Evolution. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons for the Society for the Study of Evolution. 57 (3): 683–689. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0683:tarmom];2. ISSN 0014-3820. JSTOR 3094781. PMID 12703958.
    49. Barton, Nicholas H.; Keightley, Peter D. (January 2002). "Understanding quantitative genetic variation". Nature Reviews Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 3 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1038/nrg700. ISSN 1471-0056. PMID 11823787.
    50. 1 2 3 Sanjuán, Rafael; Moya, Andrés; Elena, Santiago F. (June 1, 2004). "The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 101 (22): 8396–8401. doi:10.1073/pnas.0400146101. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 420405Freely accessible. PMID 15159545.
    51. Carrasco, Purificación; de la Iglesia, Francisca; Elena, Santiago F. (December 2007). "Distribution of Fitness and Virulence Effects Caused by Single-Nucleotide Substitutions in Tobacco Etch Virus". Journal of Virology. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology. 81 (23): 12979–12984. doi:10.1128/JVI.00524-07. ISSN 0022-538X. PMC 2169111Freely accessible. PMID 17898073.
    52. Sanjuán, Rafael (June 27, 2010). "Mutational fitness effects in RNA and single-stranded DNA viruses: common patterns revealed by site-directed mutagenesis studies". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. London: Royal Society. 365 (1548): 1975–1982. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0063. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 2880115Freely accessible. PMID 20478892.
    53. Peris, Joan B.; Davis, Paulina; Cuevas, José M.; et al. (June 2010). "Distribution of Fitness Effects Caused by Single-Nucleotide Substitutions in Bacteriophage f1". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 185 (2): 603–609. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.115162. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 2881140Freely accessible. PMID 20382832.
    54. Elena, Santiago F.; Ekunwe, Lynette; Hajela, Neerja; et al. (March 1998). "Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in Escherichia coli". Genetica. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 102–103 (1–6): 349–358. doi:10.1023/A:1017031008316. ISSN 0016-6707. PMID 9720287.
    55. 1 2 Hietpas, Ryan T.; Jensen, Jeffrey D.; Bolon, Daniel N. A. (May 10, 2011). "Experimental illumination of a fitness landscape". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 108 (19): 7896–7901. doi:10.1073/pnas.1016024108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3093508Freely accessible. PMID 21464309.
    56. Davies, Esther K.; Peters, Andrew D.; Keightley, Peter D. (September 10, 1999). "High Frequency of Cryptic Deleterious Mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans". Science. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science. 285 (5434): 1748–1751. doi:10.1126/science.285.5434.1748. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 10481013.
    57. Loewe, Laurence; Charlesworth, Brian (September 22, 2006). "Inferring the distribution of mutational effects on fitness in Drosophila". Biology Letters. London: Royal Society. 2 (3): 426–430. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0481. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 1686194Freely accessible. PMID 17148422.
    58. Eyre-Walker, Adam; Woolfit, Megan; Phelps, Ted (June 2006). "The Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Deleterious Amino Acid Mutations in Humans". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 173 (2): 891–900. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.057570. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 1526495Freely accessible. PMID 16547091.
    59. Sawyer, Stanley A.; Kulathinal, Rob J.; Bustamante, Carlos D.; et al. (August 2003). "Bayesian Analysis Suggests that Most Amino Acid Replacements in Drosophila Are Driven by Positive Selection". Journal of Molecular Evolution. New York: Springer-Verlag. 57 (1): S154–S164. doi:10.1007/s00239-003-0022-3. ISSN 0022-2844. PMID 15008412.
    60. Piganeau, Gwenaël; Eyre-Walker, Adam (September 2, 2003). "Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 100 (18): 10335–10340. doi:10.1073/pnas.1833064100. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 193562Freely accessible. PMID 12925735.
    61. Kimura, Motoo (February 17, 1968). "Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level". Nature. London: Nature Publishing Group. 217 (5129): 624–626. doi:10.1038/217624a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 5637732.
    62. Kimura 1983
    63. Akashi, Hiroshi (September 30, 1999). "Within- and between-species DNA sequence variation and the 'footprint' of natural selection". Gene. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 238 (1): 39–51. doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00294-2. ISSN 0378-1119. PMID 10570982.
    64. Eyre-Walker, Adam (October 2006). "The genomic rate of adaptive evolution". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Cell Press. 21 (10): 569–575. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.015. ISSN 0169-5347. PMID 16820244.
    65. Gillespie, John H. (September 1984). "Molecular Evolution Over the Mutational Landscape". Evolution. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons for the Society for the Study of Evolution. 38 (5): 1116–1129. doi:10.2307/2408444. ISSN 0014-3820. JSTOR 2408444.
    66. Orr, H. Allen (April 2003). "The Distribution of Fitness Effects Among Beneficial Mutations". Genetics. Bethesda, MD: Genetics Society of America. 163 (4): 1519–1526. ISSN 0016-6731. PMC 1462510Freely accessible. PMID 12702694. Retrieved 2015-10-07.
    67. Kassen, Rees; Bataillon, Thomas (April 2006). "Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria". Nature Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 38 (4): 484–488. doi:10.1038/ng1751. ISSN 1061-4036. PMID 16550173.
    68. Rokyta, Darin R.; Joyce, Paul; Caudle, S. Brian; et al. (April 2005). "An empirical test of the mutational landscape model of adaptation using a single-stranded DNA virus". Nature Genetics. London: Nature Publishing Group. 37 (4): 441–444. doi:10.1038/ng1535. ISSN 1061-4036. PMID 15778707.
    69. Imhof, Marianne; Schlotterer, Christian (January 30, 2001). "Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 98 (3): 1113–1137. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.3.1113. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 14717Freely accessible. PMID 11158603.
    70. Hogan, C. Michael (October 12, 2010). "Mutation". In Monosson, Emily. Encyclopedia of Earth. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment. OCLC 72808636. Retrieved 2015-10-08.
    71. Boillée, Séverine; Vande Velde, Christine; Cleveland, Don W. (October 5, 2006). "ALS: A Disease of Motor Neurons and Their Nonneuronal Neighbors". Neuron. Cambridge, MA: Cell Press. 52 (1): 39–59. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.018. ISSN 0896-6273. PMID 17015226.
    72. 1 2 "Somatic cell genetic mutation". Genome Dictionary. Athens, Greece: Information Technology Associates. June 30, 2007. Retrieved 2010-06-06.
    73. "RB1 Genetics". Daisy's Eye Cancer Fund. Oxford, UK. Archived from the original on 2011-11-26. Retrieved 2015-10-09.
    74. "Compound heterozygote". MedTerms. New York: WebMD. June 14, 2012. Retrieved 2015-10-09.
    75. den Dunnen, Johan T.; Antonarakis, Stylianos E. (January 2000). "Mutation Nomenclature Extensions and Suggestions to Describe Complex Mutations: A Discussion". Human Mutation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss, Inc. 15 (1): 7–12. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<7::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-N. ISSN 1059-7794. PMID 10612815.
    76. Doniger, Scott W.; Hyun Seok Kim; Swain, Devjanee; et al. (August 29, 2008). Pritchard, Jonathan K., ed. "A Catalog of Neutral and Deleterious Polymorphism in Yeast". PLOS Genetics. San Francisco, CA: Public Library of Science. 4 (8): e1000183. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000183. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 2515631Freely accessible. PMID 18769710.
    77. Ionov, Yurij; Peinado, Miguel A.; Malkhosyan, Sergei; et al. (June 10, 1993). "Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis". Nature. London: Nature Publishing Group. 363 (6429): 558–561. Bibcode:1993Natur.363..558I. doi:10.1038/363558a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 8505985.
    78. Sullivan, Amy D.; Wigginton, Janis; Kirschner, Denise (August 28, 2001). "The coreceptor mutation CCR5Δ32 influences the dynamics of HIV epidemics and is selected for by HIV". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 95 (18): 10214–10219. Bibcode:2001PNAS...9810214S. doi:10.1073/pnas.181325198. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 56941Freely accessible. PMID 11517319.
    79. "Mystery of the Black Death". Secrets of the Dead. Season 3. Episode 2. October 30, 2002. PBS. Retrieved 2015-10-10. Episode background.
    80. Galvani, Alison P.; Slatkin, Montgomery (December 9, 2003). "Evaluating plague and smallpox as historical selective pressures for the CCR5-Δ32 HIV-resistance allele". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 100 (25): 15276–15279. Bibcode:2003PNAS..10015276G. doi:10.1073/pnas.2435085100. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 299980Freely accessible. PMID 14645720.
    81. Konotey-Ahulu, Felix. "Frequently Asked Questions [FAQ's]".
    82. "'Lifeless' prion proteins are 'capable of evolution'". Health. BBC News Online. London. January 1, 2010. Retrieved 2015-10-10.
    83. Araten, David J.; Golde, David W.; Rong H. Zhang; et al. (September 15, 2005). "A Quantitative Measurement of the Human Somatic Mutation Rate". Cancer Research. Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research. 65 (18): 8111–8117. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1198. ISSN 0008-5472. PMID 16166284.


    Wikimedia Commons has media related to Mutations.
    This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/29/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.