Luis Suárez racial abuse incident

After an incident which occurred on 15 October 2011 during a game of football between fierce rivals Liverpool and Manchester United, Liverpool's Luis Suárez was charged with, and found guilty of, racially abusing United's Patrice Evra by an FA commission. He was fined £40,000 and banned for eight games.

The incident was widely reported in the British media for months due to the nature of the incident and the controversial response of Liverpool and their manager Kenny Dalglish.

Background

Liverpool F.C. signed Luis Suárez for a club record fee of £22.8m in January 2011,^[1] while undergoing a ban in Netherlands for biting PSV Eindhoven player Otman Bakkal during a match on 20 November 2010.^[2] The Dutch daily newspaper De Telegraaf branded Suárez the "Cannibal of Ajax".^[3][4] The KNVB increased Suárez's suspension to seven league matches.^[5]

Manchester United F.C. signed Patrice Evra in January 2006 for a fee of £5.5m.^[6] In March 2006, it was reported that Liverpool defender Steve Finnan had racially abused Evra in the match that had taken place between the two clubs on January 22.^[7] The abuse claims surfaced from two deaf television viewers lodging a police complaint. The viewers claimed to have lip-read Finnan abusing Evra during the televised match.^[8] Finnan denied the charge and, after an investigation, The Football Association (FA) decided against charging the player.^[9]

Prior to the start of the 2008–09 season, on 18 July 2008, Evra was charged with four separate counts of improper conduct by the FA.^[10] The charges were related to an incident that occurred during the 2007-08 season when Evra had an altercation with a Chelsea groundsman during a cool-down following a match on 26 April. The defender denied the charges and was supported by several members of the club’s staff who commented that the player was racially abused by the groundsman prior to the confrontation.^[11] On 18 November 2008, the hearing date for the charges was set for 5 December. On the date of the hearing, Evra was handed a four-match ban – due to start on 22 December 2008 – and a £15,000 fine after he was found guilty of improper conduct by the FA.^[12]

Liverpool and their lawyers used these incidents to try and negate Evra's claims, claiming he was "not credible" and that he likes to "play the race card",^[13] despite the evidence to the contrary.^[14]

Incident and immediate reaction

During the game, with the game at 0-0, Suárez was being marked by Evra during a corner in the 62nd minute.^[15] It was at this point that the incident took place.^[15]

After the game, Suárez was accused of racially abusing Evra in an interview with French television station Canal+,^[16] and the Football Association (FA) opened up an investigation into the incident.^[16] Suárez wrote on his Twitter and Facebook pages that he was upset by the accusation and denied the claims.^[17] On 16 November, the FA announced it would charge Suárez with "abusive and/or insulting words and/or behaviour contrary to FA rules", including "a reference to the ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race of Patrice Evra." Liverpool later released a statement announcing Suárez would plead innocent, adding that they would "remain fully supportive" of him.^[18]

Liverpool and Suárez reaction to ban

On 20 December, the FA concluded a seven-day hearing, handing Suárez an eight-match ban and a £40,000 fine for racially abusing Evra.^[19][20][21]

Following the FA's ruling, Liverpool issued a statement which claimed the club was "very surprised and disappointed" at the ban, highlighted that the player was not accused of being racist, and cited Suárez's mixed race family background, as well as his involvement with multicultural projects.^[22] The club were criticised for attacking the moral integrity of the FA, having claimed during their statement that "the FA were determined to bring charges... even before interviewing [Suárez] at the beginning of November",^[23] although the panel overseeing the investigation were independent of the FA.^[21]

Following the verdict, Suárez received support from a number of colleagues who believed it to be unjust.^[24][25][26] To demonstrate support for Suárez, his team-mates and manager wore a T-shirt bearing Suárez's name and image before a match against Wigan Athletic.^[27] The T-shirts provoked criticism that the gesture conflicted with football's anti-racism campaign Kick It Out.^[28]

Verdict

On 31 December 2011, the FA released the contents of their findings.^[29] In a 115-page report,^[30] the FA said that Suárez "damaged the image of English football around the world". The FA, while finding Evra to be a credible witness, declared that Suárez's evidence was unreliable and inconsistent with the video footage. According to Evra's testimony, Suárez said in Spanish that he had earlier kicked Evra "because you are black", said "I don't speak to blacks" and used the word "negro" five times in total as they argued. Suárez had claimed that he used the word 'negro' only once to address Evra and this was intended to be conciliatory and friendly, but the FA rejected this claim as being "unsustainable and simply incredible given that the players were engaged in an acrimonious argument." As the conversation between Suárez and Evra took place in Spanish, linguistic experts were called in to help the panel with the meaning of the phrases. The panel concluded that "Suárez's use of the term [negro] was not intended as an attempt at conciliation or to establish rapport; neither was it meant in a conciliatory and friendly way." Suárez was also warned that two similar offences in the future could lead to "a permanent suspension".^[31]

Liverpool later made the decision not to appeal Suárez's eight match ban, releasing a statement voicing their support "to stamp out racism in every form, inside and outside the sport", adding that it was "for this reason that Liverpool will not appeal the eight-game suspension of Luis Suárez". Liverpool continued to maintain their belief in both Suárez's innocence and a "strongly held conviction" that the Football Association and the panel it selected constructed a highly subjective case...based on an accusation that was ultimately unsubstantiated".^[32]

Aftermath

On 11 February 2012, Liverpool played Manchester United at Old Trafford, which was Suárez' and Evra's first meeting since Suárez's ban. During the traditional pre-game handshakes, Suárez seemed to avoid shaking Evra's hand, leading to Evra grabbing Suárez's arm. Suárez ignored Evra and continued down the line causing Evra to throw his arms up in protest and Rio Ferdinand, whose brother Anton was the victim of a separate racial abuse incident with Chelsea captain John Terry, to avoid shaking Suárez's hand.^[33][34] Suárez and Dalglish faced fierce and outspread media condemnation.^[35] In a statement released by Liverpool managing director Ian Ayre, Liverpool also condemned Suárez, stating that Suárez had misled the club by claiming before the game that he would shake Evra's hand.^[36] The next day, Liverpool's club owners and shirt sponsor forced both Suárez and Dalglish to issue formal apologies for their conduct.^[37][38] The club later dismissed these claims, stating 'The actions the club decided to take on Sunday were supported by Standard Chartered'.^[39]

In an interview in July 2012, Suárez accused Manchester United of wielding "political power" to get him suspended as a way of getting at Liverpool; Suárez also suggested that the English media conspired to manipulate coverage of the handshake incident against him.^[40]

In 2014, Suárez released his autobiography Crossing the Line, in which he continued to deny the verdict that he had racially abused Evra, stating "what some people will never want to accept is that the argument took place in Spanish. I did not use the word "negro" the way it can be used in English", despite admitting that the word "negro" means "black".^[41] He also complained about the after-effects, saying the verdict that he was a racist would be "a stain on my character that will probably be there forever".^[42] He also criticised Liverpool's handling of the situation, blaming Damien Comolli for being unable to understand the intricacies of the Spanish language.^[43]

See also

• Luis Suárez controversies
• Racism in association football

References