List of thermal conductivities

In heat transfer, the thermal conductivity of a substance, k, is an intensive property that indicates its ability to conduct heat.

Thermal conductivity is often measured with laser flash analysis. Alternative measurements are also established.

Mixtures may have variable thermal conductivities due to composition. Note that for gases in usual conditions, heat transfer by advection (caused by convection or turbulence for instance) is the dominant mechanism compared to conduction.

This table shows thermal conductivity in SI units of watts per metre per Kelvin (W·m⁻¹·K⁻¹). Some measurements use the imperial unit BTUs per foot per hour per degree Fahrenheit (1 BTU h⁻¹ ft⁻¹ F⁻¹ = 1.728 W·m⁻¹·K⁻¹).^[1]

Conductivity under standard conditions

This concerns materials at atmospheric pressure and around 293K.

Material	Thermal conductivity [W·m−1·K−1]	Notes
Acrylic Glass (Plexiglas V045i)	6999190000000000000♠0.170-0.200[2]-[3]
Alcohols OR Oils	6999100000000000000♠0.100[4][5]
Aluminium	7002237000000000000♠237[6]
Copper, pure	7002401000000000000♠401[4][7][8]	For main article, see: Copper in heat exchangers.
Diamond	7003100000000000000♠1,000[4]
Fiberglass or Foam-glass	6998450000000000000♠0.045[5]
Polyurethane foam	6998205000000000000♠0.020-0.021[4]
Expanded polystyrene	6998360009999900000♠0.033-0.046[9]
Manganese	7000781000000000000♠7.810[4]	lowest thermal conductivity of any pure metal
Water	6999591800000000000♠0.591[10]
Marble	7000250500000000000♠2.070-2.940[4][11]
Snow (dry)	6999136000000000000♠0.050[4]-0.250[4]
Teflon	6999250000000000000♠ 0.25[4]
Material	Thermal conductivity [W·m−1·K−1]	Notes

Non-standard conditions

Material	Thermal conductivity [W·m−1·K−1]	Temperature [K]	Electrical conductivity @ 293 K [Ω−1·m−1]	Notes
Acrylic Glass (Plexiglas V045i)	6999186670000000000♠0.17[2]-0.19[2]-0.2[3]	7002296000000000000♠296[2]	6986125000000000000♠7.143E-15[2] - 5.0E-14[2]
Air, macrostructure	6998242500000000000♠0.024[4][12][13]-0.025[5] 0.0262 (1 bar)[14] 0.0457 (1 bar)[14] Formula Values d=1 centimeter Standard Atmospheric Pressure 0.0209[15] 0.0235[15] 0.0260[15] 0.1 atmosphere 0.0209[16] 0.0235[16] 0.0260[16] 0.01 atmospheres 0.0209[16] 0.0235[16] 0.0259[16] 0.001 atmospheres 0.0205[16] 0.0230[16] 0.0254[16] 0.0001 atmospheres 0.0178[16] 0.0196[16] 0.0212[16] 10−5atmospheres 0.00760[16] 0.00783[16] 0.00800[16] 10−6atmospheres 0.00113[16] 0.00112[16] 0.00111[16] 10−7atmospheres 0.000119[16] 0.000117[16] 0.000115[16]	7002284250000000000♠273[12][13]-293[5]-298[4] 300[14] 600[14] 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2[15] 266.5[15] 299.9[15]	6985539000000000000♠hiAerosols2.95[17]-loAerosols7.83[17]×10−15	(78.03%N2,21%O2,+0.93%Ar,+0.04%CO2) (1 atm) All formula values calculated from the Lasance formula: Lasance, Clemens J., "The Thermal Conductivity of Air at Reduced Pressures and Length Scales," Electronics Cooling, November 2002.[16] Plate separation = one centimeter. The primary values were taken from Weast at the normal pressures table in the CRC handbook on page E2.[15]
Air, microstructure	Formula Values d=1 millimeter Standard Atmospheric Pressure 0.0209 0.0235 0.0260 0.1 atmosphere 0.0209 0.0235 0.0259 0.01 atmospheres 0.0205 0.0230 0.0254 0.001 atmospheres 0.0178 0.0196 0.0212 0.0001 atmospheres 0.00760 0.00783 0.00800 10−5 atmospheres 0.00113 0.00112 0.00111 10−6 atmospheres 0.000119 0.000117 0.000115 10−7 atmospheres 0.0000119 0.0000117 0.0000116 List[16]	233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9 233.2 266.5 299.9		All values calculated from the Lasance formula: Lasance, Clemens J., "The Thermal Conductivity of Air at Reduced Pressures and Length Scales," Electronics Cooling, November 2002.[16] Plate separation = one millimeter. Note that no amount of vacuum will obstruct thermal radiation. Instead the most effective vacuum insulation that is found in the literature has numerous foils in it. Such insulation has been reported with total heat transfer as low as 0.0001 W⋅m−1⋅K−1 through some low temperature intervals that sound like they might extend with one end of them up to room temperature sometimes.[18]
Alcohols OR Oils	6999157000000000000♠0.1[4][5]-0.110[19]-0.21[4][5]-0.212[19]	7002297000000000000♠293[5]-298[4]-300[19]
Aluminum, alloy	Mannchen 1931: 92% Aluminum, 8% Magnesium Cast 72.8 100.0 126 1.xx⋅102 Annealed 76.6 1.0x⋅102 120.1 135.6 88%Aluminum, 12% Magnesium Cast 56.1 77.4 101.3 118.4 Mever-Rassler 1940: 93.0% Aluminum, 7.0% Magnesium 108.7 List[20]	87 273 373 476 87 273 373 476 87 273 373 476 348.2		Mannchen, W., Z Metalik..23, 193-6, 1931 in TPRC Volume 1 pages 478, 479 and 1447. Xs have been entered where the numbers in the TPRC Data Series are smudged up too much and various electrical conductivities at various temperatures are specified in the reference. Mever-Rassler. The Mever-Rassler alloy has a density of 2.63 g cm−1. Mever-Rassler, F., Metallwirtschaft. 19, 713-21, 1940 in Volume 1 pages 478, 479 and 1464.[20]
Aluminum, pure	7002226800000000000♠204.3[21]-205[12]-220[22]-237[5][7][23][24]-250[4] 214.6[21] 249.3[21] TPRC Aluminum 4102 8200 12100 15700 18800 21300 22900 23800 24000 23500 22700 20200 17600 11700 7730 3180[?] 2380 1230 754 532 414 344 302 248 237 236 237 240 237 232 226 220 213 List[20] CRC Aluminum 780 1550 2320 3080 3810 4510 5150 5730 6220 6610 6900 7080 7150 7130 7020 6840 6350 5650 4000 2850 2100 1600 1250 1000 670 500 400 340 300 247 237 235 236 237 240 240 237 232 226 220 213 List[15]	7002379000000000000♠293[5][21]-298[4][7][24] 366[21] 478[21] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 150 200 273.2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 150 200 250 273 300 350 400 500 600 700 800 900	7007375939849624060♠37,450,000[24] - 37,740,000[25]	The TPRC list is the estimate of the Thermophysical Properties Research Center which was sponsored by the government in the 1960s. Performing Organization: Purdue University. Controlling Organization: Defense Logistics Agency. Documented summaries from numerous scientific journals and etc. and critical estimates. 17000 pages in 13 volumes. TPRC pure aluminum is aluminum that is 99.9999% pure aluminum and residual electrical resistivity ρ0=0.000593 μΩ cm. By comparison CRC pure aluminum is aluminum that is 99.996+% pure aluminum and ρ at 4.2 Kelvins is used approximately as ρ0. In any case the CRC kind of pure aluminum has its CRC kind of ρ0=0.00315 μΩ cm. CRC handbook, 48th Edition, E-10.[15] This material is superconductive (electrical) at temperatures below 1.183 Kelvins. Weast page E-78[15]
Aluminum nitride	7002178333000000000♠170[23]-175[26]-190[26]	7002293000000000000♠293[26]	6989100009999900000♠1×10^−11[26]
Aluminum oxide	Pure 7001340000000000000♠26[27]-30[5]-35[27]-39[23]-40[28] NBS, Ordinary 27[29] 16[29] 10.5[29] 8.0[29] 6.6[29] 5.9[29] 5.6[29] 5.6[29] 6.0[29] 7.2[29] Slip Cast: 11.1[30] 10.0[30] 8.37[30] 7.95[30] 6.90[30] 5.86[30] 5.65[30] 5.65[30] 5.65[30] Sapphire 15.5[30] 13.9[30] 12.4[30] 10.6[30] 8.71[30] 8.04[30] 7.68[30] 7.59[30] 7.61[30] 7.86[30] 8.13[30] 8.49[30]	7002293000000000000♠293[5][27][28] 400[29] 600[29] 800[29] 1000[29] 1200[29] 1400[29] 1600[29] 1800[29] 2000[29] 2200[29] 613.2[30] 688.2[30] 703.2[30] 873.2[30] 943.2[30] 1033.2[30] 1093[30] 1203.2[30] 1258.2[30] 591.5[30] 651.2[30] 690.2[30] 775.2[30] 957.2[30] 1073.2[30] 1173.2[30] 1257.2[30] 1313.2[30] 1384.2[30] 14X9.2[30] 1508.2[30]	6988100000000000000♠1×10^−12-[27][28]	The NBS recommended ordinary values are for 99.5% pure polycrystalline alumina at 98% density.[29] Slip Cast Values are taken from Kingery, W.D., J. Am Ceram. Soc., 37, 88-90, 1954, TPRC pages 423 and 1553.[30] Sapphire values are taken from Kingery, W.D. and Norton, F.H., USAEC Rept. NYO-6447, 1-14, 1955, TPRC pages 94, 96 & 1160.[30] Errata: The numbered references in the NSRDS-NBS-8 pdf are found near the end of the TPRC Data Book Volume 2 and not somewhere in Volume 3 like it says.[30]
Aluminum oxide, porous	22% Porosity 7000230000000099999♠2.3[29]	Constant 1000-1773[29]		This is number 54 on pages 73 and 76. Shakhtin, D.M. and Vishnevskii, I.I., 1957, interval 893-1773 Kelvins.[29]
Ammonia, saturated	6999507000000000000♠0.507[19]	7002300000000000000♠300[19]
Argon	6998173800000000000♠0.016[4]-0.01772[7]-0.0179[7][31]	7002299000000000000♠298[4][7]-300[7][31]
Beryllium oxide	7002259333330000000♠218[23]-260[32]-300[32] TPRC Recommended: 424[30] 302[30] 272[30] 196[30] 146[30] 111[30] 87[30] 70[30] 57[30] 47[30] 39[30] 33[30] 28.3[30] 24.5[30] 21.5[30] 19.5[30] 18.0[30] 16.7[30] 15.6[30] 15.0[30]	7002293000000000000♠293[32] 200[30] 273.2[30] 300[30] 400[30] 500[30] 600[30] 700[30] 800[30] 900[30] 1000[30] 1100[30] 1200[30] 1300[30] 1400[30] 1500[30] 1600[30] 1700[30] 1800[30] 1900[30] 2000[30]	6988100000000000000♠1×10^−12[32]	Recommended values are found on page 137 of volume 2, TPRC Data Series, 1971[30]
Bismuth	7000797000000000000♠7.97[7]	7002300000000000000♠300[7]
Brass Cu63%	7002125000000000000♠125[33]	7002296000000000000♠296[33]	7007156250000000000♠15,150,000[33] - 16,130,000[33]	(Cu63%, Zn37%)
Brass Cu70%	7002113000000000000♠109[12][34] - 121[34]	7002295000000000000♠293[12]-296[34]	7007142857142857140♠12,820,000[34] - 16,130,000[34]	(Cu70%, Zn30%)
Brick	6999687500000000000♠0.15[12]-0.6[12]-0.69[4]-1.31[4] British 2016: Inner leaf (1700 kg/m3): 0.62[35] Outer leaf (1700 kg/m3): 0.84[35] 1920s Values: Brick #1: 0.674[30] Brick #2: 0.732[30]	7002295500000000000♠293[12]-298[4] 373.2[30] 373.2[30]		Brick #1: 76.32% SiO2, 21.96%Al2O3, 1.88%Fe2O3 traces of CaO and MgO, commercial brick, density 1.795 g ⋅ cm−3. Brick #2: 76.52%SiO2, 13.67%Al2O3, 6.77%Fe2O3, 1.77%CaO, 0.42%MgO, 0.27%MnO, no specified density. Judging from the descriptions the TPRC has put the wrong labels on their bricks, and if that is the case then Brick #1 is "Common Brick" and Brick #2 is "Red Brick." Tadokoro, Y., Science Repts. Tohoku Imp. Univ., 10, 339-410, 1921, TPRC pages 493 & 1169.[30]
Bronze	7001393330000000000♠26[22] 42[36]-50[21][36]	7002295000000000000♠293[21]-296[36]	7006645161290322580♠ 5,882,000[36] - 7,143,000[36]	Sn25%[22] (Cu89%, Sn11%)[36]
Calcium silicate	6998630000000000000♠0.063[37]	7002373000000000000♠373[37]
Carbon dioxide	6998146000000000000♠0.0146[4]-0.01465[38]-0.0168[31](sat. liquid 0.087[39])	7002290333000000000♠298[4]-273[38]-300[31](293[39])
Carbon nanotubes, bulk	7000250000000000000♠2.5 (multiwall)[40] - 35 (single wall, disordered mats)[40] - 200(single wall, aligned mats)[40]	7002300000000000000♠300[40]		"bulk" refers to a group of nanotubes either arranged or disordered, for a single nanotube, see "carbon nanotube, single".[40]
Carbon nanotube, single	7003334000000000000♠3180 (multiwall)[41][42]-3500 (single wall)[43] (SWcalc.6,600[41][44]-37,000[41][44])	7002310000000000000♠320[41][42]-300[43] (300[41][44]-100[41][44])	6996100000000000000♠(Lateral)10−16[45] - (Ballistic)108[45])	values only for one single SWNT(length:2.6 μm, diameter:1.7 nm) and CNT. "Single", as opposed to "bulk" quantity (see "carbon nanotubes, bulk" ) of many nanotubes, which should not be confused with the denomination of nanotubes themselves which can be singlewall(SWNT) or multiwall(CNT)[40]
Cerium dioxide	1.70[6] 1.54[6] 1.00[6] 0.938[6] 0.851[6] 0.765[6]	1292.1[6] 1322.1[6] 1555.9[6] 1628.2[6] 1969.2[6] 2005.9[6]		Pears, C.D., Project director, Southern Res. Inst. Tech. Documentary Rept. ASD TDR-62-765, 20-402, 1963. TPRC Vol 2, pages 145, 146 and 1162[30]
Concrete	7000104000000000000♠0.8[12] - 1.28[5] - 1.65 [46] - 2.5 [46]	7002293000000000000♠293[5]		~61-67%CaO
Copper, commercial	Wright, W.H., M.S. Thesis: Sample 1 423 385 358 311 346 347 350 360 Sample 2 353 360 366 363 365 Lists[20] Taga, M., periodical First run: 378 Second run: 374 Third run: 378 Fourth run: 382 List[20]	80.06 95.34 115.62 135.53 159.46 181.56 198.35 217.30 198.53 220.90 240.88 257.38 275.40 363.2 363.2 363.2 363.2		Wright, W.H., M.S. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1-225, 1960. TPRC Data Series Volume 1, pages 75, 80 and 1465.[20] Taga, commercial grade, 99.82% purity, density 8.3 g⋅cm−3. Taga, M., [Bull?], Japan Soc. Mech. Engrs., 3 (11) 346-52, 1960. TPRC Data Series Vol 1, pages 74, 79 and 1459.[20]
Copper, pure	7002385755560000000♠385[12]-386[21][22]-390[5]-401[4][7][8] 368.7[21] 353.1[21] 1970s values: TPRC 2870 13800 19600 10500 4300 2050 1220 850 670 570 514 483 413 401 398 392 388 383 377 371 364 357 350 342 334 List[20] The Soviet Union 403[47]	7002400500000000000♠293[4][5][7][8][12][21] 573[21] 873[21] 1 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 273 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 273.15	7007593824228028500♠59,170,000[8] - 59,590,000[25]	International Annealed Copper Standard (IACS) pure =1.7×10−8Ω•m =58.82×106Ω−1•m−1 For main article, see: Copper in heat exchangers. The TPRC recommended values are for well annealed 99.999% pure copper with residual electrical resistivity of ρ0=0.000851 μΩ⋅cm. TPRC Data Series volume 1 page 81.[20] The Soviet report did not specify anything about the purity of the material.
Cork	6998550000000000000♠0.04[12] - 0.07[5] 1940s values: Density=0.195 g cm−3 0.0381[30] 0.0446[30] Density=0.104 g cm−3 0.0320[30] 0.0400[30]	7002293000000000000♠293[5] --- 222.0[30] 305.5[30] 222.0[30] 305.5[30]		1940s values are for oven dried cork at specified densities: Rowley, F.B., Jordan, R.C. and Lander, R.M., Refrigeration Engineering, 53, 35-9. 1947, TPRC pages 1064, 1067 & 1161.[30]
Cotton or Plastic Insulation-foamed	6998300000000000000♠0.03[4][5]	7002293000000000000♠293[5]
Diamond, impure	7003100000000000000♠1,000[12][48]	7002283000000000000♠273[48] - 293[12]	6984100000000000000♠1×10^−16~[49]	Type I (98.1% of Gem Diamonds) (C+0.1%N)
Diamond, natural	7003220000000000000♠2,200[50]	7002293000000000000♠293[50]	6984100000000000000♠1×10^−16~[49]	Type IIa (99%12C and 1%13C)
Diamond, isotopically enriched	7003332000000000000♠3,320[50]-41,000[41][51](99.999% 12C calc.200,000[51])	7002293000000000000♠293[50]-104[41][51](~80[51])	6996100000000000000♠(Lateral)10−16[49] - (Ballistic)108[49]	Type IIa isotopically enriched (>99.9%12C)
Epoxy, thermally conductive	7000103509999999999♠ 0.682[52] - 1.038 - 1.384[53] - 4.8[54]
Expanded polystyrene - EPS	6998322500000000000♠0.03[4]-0.033[4][12][48]((PS Only)0.1[55]-0.13[55])	7002198000000000000♠98[48]-298[4][48](296[55])	6986100009999900000♠1×10^−14[55]	(PS+Air+CO2+CnH2n+x)
Extruded polystyrene - XPS	6998350000000000000♠0.029 - 0.39	7002198000000000000♠98-298
Fiberglass or Foam-glass	6998450000000000000♠0.045[5]	7002293000000000000♠293[5]
Gallium arsenide	7001560000000000000♠56[48]	7002300000000000000♠300[48]
Glass	7000106600000000000♠0.8[12]-0.93[5](SiO2pure1[23]-SiO296%1.2[56]-1.4[56]) Corning Code 7740* 0.58[57] 0.90[57] 1.11[57] 1.25[57] 1.36[57] 1.50[57] 1.62[57] 1.89[57]	7002293000000000000♠293[5][12][56] 100[57] 200[57] 300[57] 400[57] 500[57] 600[57] 700[57] 800[57]	6988100000000000000♠10−14[58][59]-10−12[56]-10−10[58][59]	<1% Iron oxides *Corning Code 7740 is pyrex glass as known to the National Bureau of Standards in 1966 and at that time the composition was about 80.6% SiO2, 13% B2O3, 4.3% Na2O and 2.1% Al2O3.[57] Similar glasses have a coefficient of linear expansion of about 3 parts per million per Kelvin at 20°Celsius.[60] Errata: The numbered references in the NSRDS-NBS-8 pdf are found near the end of the TPRC Data Book Volume 2 and not somewhere in Volume 3 like it says.[30]
Glycerol	6999287490000000000♠0.285[19]-0.29[5]	7002296500000000000♠300[19]-293[5]
Gold, pure	7002316000000000000♠314[12]-315[21]-318[7][22][61] 1970s values: 444 885 2820 1500 345 327 318 315 312 309 304 298 292 285 List[20]	7002296333330000000♠293[21]-298[7][61] 1 2 10 20 100 200 273.2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900	7007453103760761210♠45,170,000[25] - 45,450,000[61]	1970s values are found on page 137, TPRC Data Series volume 1 (1970).[20]
Granite	7000285500000000000♠1.73[11] - 3.98[11] Nevada Granite: 1.78[30] 1.95[30] 1.86[30] 1.74[30] 1.80[30] Scottish Granite: 3.39[30] 3.39[30]	368[30] 523[30] 600[30] 643[30] 733[30] 306.9[30] 320.2[30]		(72%SiO2+14%Al2O3+4%K2O etc.) Scottish Granite: Nancarrow, H. A., Proc. Phys. Soc. (London). 45, 447-61, 1933, TPRC pages 818 and 1172.[30] Nevada Granite: Stephens, D. R., USAEC UCRL-7605, 1-19, 1963, TPRC pages 818 and 1172.[30] A 1960 report on the Nevada granite (Izett, USGS) is posted on the internet but the very small numbers there are hard to understand.[62]
Graphene	7003507000000000000♠(4840±440)[63] - (5300±480)[63]	7002293000000000000♠293[63]	7008100000000000000♠100,000,000[64]
Graphite, natural	7001250000000000000♠25-470[65]	293[65]	2992750000000000000♠5,000,000-30,000,000[65]
Helium II	7005100000000000000♠ ≳100000[66] in practice, phonon scattering at solid-liquid interface is main barrier to heat transfer.	7000220000000000000♠ 2.2		liquid Helium in its superfluid state below 2.2 K
House	American 2016 Wood Product Blow-in, Attic Insulation 0.0440 − 0.0448[67] FIBERGLASTM Blow-in, Attic Insulation 0.0474 − 0.0531[68] PINK FIBERGLASTM Flexible Insulation 0.0336 − 0.0459[69] British CONCRETE: General 1.28[35] (2300 kg/m3) 1.63[35] (2100 kg/m3 typical floor) 1.40[35] (2000 kg/m3 typical floor) 1.13[35] (medium 1400 kg/m3) 0.51[35] (lightweight 1200 kg/m3) 0.38[35] (lightweight 600 kg/m3) 0.19[35] (aerated 500 kg/m3) 0.16[35] PLASTER: (1300 kg/m3) 0.50[35] (600 kg/m3) 0.16[35] TIMBER: Timber (650 kg/m3) 0.14[35] Timber flooring (650 kg/m3) 0.14[35] Timber rafters 0.13[35] Timber floor joists 0.13[35] MISC.: Calcium silicate board (600 kg/m3) 0.17[35] Expanded polystyrene 0.030 −0.038[35] Plywood (950 kg/m3) 0.16[35] Rock mineral wool 0.034 −0.042[35] 1960s Values Dry Zero − Kapok between burlap or paper density 0.016 g cm−3, TC=0.035 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Hair Felt − Felted cattle hair density 0.176 g cm−3, TC=0.037 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.208 g cm−3, TC=0.037 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Balsam Wool − Chemically treated wood fibre density 0.035 g cm−3, TC=0.039 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Hairinsul − 50% hair 50% jute density 0.098 g cm−3, TC=0.037 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Rock Wool − Fibrous material made from rock density 0.096 g cm−3, TC=0.037 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.160 g cm−3, TC=0.039 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.224 g cm−3, TC=0.040 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Glass Wool − Pyrex glass curled density 0.064 g cm−3, TC=0.042 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.160 g cm−3, TC=0.042 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Corkboard − No added binder density 0.086 g cm−3, TC=0.036 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.112 g cm−3, TC=0.039 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.170 g cm−3, TC=0.043 W⋅m−1K−1[70] density 0.224 g cm−3, TC=0.049 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Corkboard − with asphaltic binder density 0.232 g cm−3, TC=0.046 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Cornstalk Pith Board: 0.035 − 0.043[70] Cypress density 0.465 g cm−3, TC=0.097 W⋅m−1K−1[70] White pine density 0.513 g cm−3, TC=0.112 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Mahogany density 0.545 g cm−3, TC=0.123 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Virginia pine density 0.545 g cm−3, TC=0.141 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Oak density 0.609 g cm−3, TC=0.147 W⋅m−1K−1[70] Maple density 0.705 g cm−3, TC=0.159 W⋅m−1K−1[70]			American 2016: Flexible Insulation from Owens Corning includes faced and unfaced rolls of glass wool and with foil.[69] 1960s values: All thermal conductivities from Cypress to Maple are given across the grain.[70]
Hydrogen	6999181900000000000♠ 0.1819[71]	7002290000000000000♠ 290		Hydrogen gas at room temperature.
Ice	7000202999999999999♠1.6[12]-2.1[5]-2.2[48]-2.22[72]	7002283000000000000♠293[5][12] - 273[48][72]
Indium phosphide	7001800000000000000♠80[48]	7002300000000000000♠300[48]
Insulating Firebrick	Sheffield Pottery, 2016: NC-23 0.19[73] 0.20[73] 0.23[73] 0.26[73] NC-26 0.25[73] 0.26[73] 0.27[73] 0.30[73] NC-28 0.29[73] 0.32[73] 0.33[73] 0.36[73] 1940s Blast Furnace: 1.58[30] 1.55[30] 1.53[30]	533[73] 811[73] 1089[73] 1366[73] 533[73] 811[73] 1089[73] 1366[73] 533[73] 811[73] 1089[73] 1366[73] --- 636.2[30] 843.2[30] 1036.2[30]		Sheffield Pottery: Standard ASTM 155 Grades, 05/10/2006: NC-23, Cold Crushing Strength=145 lbs/inch2, density=36 lbs/ft3 NC-26, Cold Crushing Strength=220 lbs/inch2, density=46 lbs/ft3 NC-28, Cold Crushing Strength=250 lbs/inch2, density=55 lbs/ft3 [73] --- 1940s Blast Furnace: Kolechkova, A. F. and Goncharov, V. V., Ogneupory, 14, 445-53, 1949, TPRC pages 488, 493 & 1161.[30]
Iron, pure	7001705555600000000♠71.8[22]-72.7[21]-79.5[12]-80[4]-80.2[48]-80.4[7][74] 55.4[21] 34.6[21] TPRC 149 224 297 371 442 513 580 645 705 997 814 555 372 265 204 168 146 132 94 83.5 80.3 69.4 61.3 54.7 48.7 43.3 38.0 32.6 29.7 29.9 27.9 28.2 29.9 30.9 31.8 List[20] The Soviet Union 86.5[47]	7002453750000000000♠293[12][21]-298[4]-300[7][48][74] 573[21] 1273[21] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 273.2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1183 1183 1200 1300 1400 1500 273.15	7007101471334348050♠9,901,000[74] - 10,410,000[25]	The TPRC recommended values are for well annealed 99.998% pure iron with residual electrical resistivity of ρ0=0.0327 μΩ⋅cm. TPRC Data Series volume 1 page 169.[20]
Iron, cast	7001550000000000000♠55[4][22]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]		(Fe+(2-4)%C+(1-3)%Si)
Lead, pure	7001342571400000000♠34.7[12][21]-35.0[4][22]-35.3[7][75] 29.8[21] TPRC 2770 4240 3400 2240 1380 820 490 320 230 178 146 123 107 94 84 77 66 59 50.7 47.7 45.1 43.5 39.6 36.6 35.5 35.2 33.8 32.5 31.2 List[20] The Soviet Union 35.6[47]	7002342833330000000♠293[12][21]-298[4]-300[7][75] 573[21] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 25 30 40 50 100 200 273.2 300 400 500 600 273.15	7006483091787439610♠4,808,000[25] - 4,854,000[75]	The TPRC List is the TPRC estimate for well annealed Lead of 99.99+% purity and residual electrical resistivity ρ0=0.000880 μΩ cm. TPRC Data Series Volume 1, page 191.[20] This material is superconductive (electrical) at temperatures below 7.193 Kelvins. Weast page E-87.[15]
Limestone	7000129500000000000♠1.26[11] - 1.33[11] Indiana Limestone 1.19[76] 1.21[76] 1.19[76] 1.11[76] 1.12[76] 1.07[76] 1.03[76] 0.62[76] 0.57[76] 0.54[76] Queenstone Grey 1.43[30] 1.41[30] 1.40[30] 1.33[30]	---- 472[76] 553[76] 683[76] 813[76] 952[76] 1013[76] 1075[76] 1181[76] 1253[76] 1324[76] 395.9[30] 450.4[30] 527.6[30] 605.4[30]		Mostly CaCO3 and the "Indiana Limestone" is 98.4% CaCO3, 1% quartz and 0.6% hematite.[76] By comparison Queenstone Grey is a mixture of dolomite and calcite containing 22% MgCO2. Density=2.675 g cm−3. Niven, C.D., Can J. Research, A18, 132-7, 1940, TPRC pages 821 and 1170.[30]
Manganese	7000781000000000000♠7.81[4]			lowest thermal conductivity of any pure metal
Marble	7000250500000000000♠2.07[11]-2.08[4]-2.94[4][11]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]
Methane	6998314050000000000♠0.030[4]-0.03281[77]	7002285500000000000♠298[4]-273[77]
Mineral Insulation or Wool(Felt/Glass/Rock)	6998400000000000000♠0.04[4][5][12]	7002295500000000000♠293[5]-298[4]
Nickel	7001909500000000000♠90.9[7]-91[4]	7002298000000000000♠298[4][7]
Nitrogen, pure	6998250460000000000♠0.0234[12]-0.024[4]-0.02583[7]-0.026[31][48]	7002298200000000000♠293[12]-298[4]-300[7][31][48]		(N2) (1 atm)
Oxygen, pure (gas)	6998251700000000000♠0.0238[12]-0.024[4]-0.0263[31]-0.02658[7]	7002297750000000000♠293[12]-298[4]-300[7][31]		(O2) (1 atm)
Paper	6998500000000000000♠0.05[4]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]
Perlite, (1 atm)	6998310000000000000♠0.031[4]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]
Perlite in partial vacuum	6997136990000099999♠0.00137[4]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]
Pine	0.0886[30] 0.0913[30] 0.0939[30] 0.0966[30] 0.0994[30] 0.102[30]	222.0[30] 238.7[30] 255.4[30] 272.2[30] 288.9[30] 305.5[30]		Density=0.386 g cm−3. Rowley, F. B., Jordan, R. C. and Lander, R. M., Refrigeration Engineering, 53, 35-9, 1947, TPRC pages 1083 and 1161.[30]
Plastic, fiber-reinforced	6999663330000000000♠0.23[78] - 0.7[78] - 1.06[5]	7002294500000000000♠293[5] - 296[78]	6992316227766016840♠10−15[78] - 100[78]	10-40%GF or CF
Polyethylene High Density	6999465000000000000♠0.42[4] - 0.51[4]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]
Polymer, High-Density	6999425000000000000♠0.33[78] - 0.52[78]	7002296000000000000♠296[78]	6993100000000000000♠10−16[78] - 102[78]
Polymer, Low-density	6999195000000000000♠0.04[78] - 0.16[5] - 0.25[5] - 0.33[78]	7002294500000000000♠293[5] - 296[78]	6991316227766016840♠10−17[78] - 100[78]
Polyurethane foam	6998205000000000000♠0.02[4] - 0.021[4]	7002298000000000000♠298[4]
Quartz−Single Crystal	7000940000000000000♠12[48] to c axis, 06.8[48] to c axis Rutgers University 11.1[79] to c axis, 5.88[79] to c axis 9.34[79] to c axis, 5.19[79] to c axis 8.68[79] to c axis, 4.50[79] to c axis NBS 6.00[80] to c axis, 3.90[80] to c axis 5.00[80] to c axis, 3.41[80] to c axis 4.47[80] to c axis, 3.12[80] to c axis 4.19[80] to c axis, 3.04[80] to c axis	7002300000000000000♠300[48] ------ 311[79] 366[79] 422[79] ------ 500[80] 600[80] 700[80] 800[80]		The noted authorities have reported some values in three digits as cited here in metric translation but they have not demonstrated three digit measurement.[81] Errata: The numbered references in the NSRDS-NBS-8 pdf are found near the end of the TPRC Data Book Volume 2 and not somewhere in Volume 3 like it says.[30]
Quartz-Fused or Vitreous Silica or Fused Silica	7000195333000000000♠1.46[82]-3[5] 1.4[48] England 0.84[83] 1.05[83] 1.20[83] 1.32[83] 1.41[83] 1.48[83] America 0.52[80] 1.13[80] 1.23[80] 1.40[80] 1.42[80] 1.50[80] 1.53[80] 1.59[80] 1.73[80] 1.92[80] 2.17[80] 2.48[80] 2.87[80] 3.34[80] 4.00[80] 4.80[80] 6.18[80]	7002303000000000000♠293[5][82] 323[48] 123[83] 173[83] 223[83] 273[83] 323[83] 373[83] 100[80] 200[80] 223[80] 293[80] 323[80] 373[80] 400[80] 500[80] 600[80] 700[80] 800[80] 900[80] 1000[80] 1100[80] 1200[80] 1300[80] 1400[80]	6983116666666666670♠1.333E-18[58] - 10−16[82]
Quartz-Slip Cast	First Run 0.34[84] 0.39[84] 0.45[84] 0.51[84] 0.62[84] Second Run 0.63[84] 0.66[84] 0.69[84]	7002500000000000000♠500[84] 700[84] 900[84] 1100[84] 1300[84] 900[84] 1000[84] 1100[84]		This material which must have started out like unfired pottery was slip cast from fused silica. Then it was dried four days at 333 K before being tested. It was 9 inches in diameter and 1 inch thick, density 1.78 ⋅ cm−3. The first run went to 1317K and then on the second run the same insulator proved to be more conductive. 1959.[84]
Quartz-Powdered	0.178[85] 0.184[85] 0.209[85] 0.230[85] 0.259[85]	373.2[85] 483.2[85] 588.2[85] 673.2[85] 723.2[85]		In the particular case the powdered quartz has been roughly competitive with insulating firebrick. The noted grain sizes ranged from 0.3 to 1 mm diameter and the density was 0.54 grams ⋅ cm−3. Kozak, M.I. Zhur. Tekh. Fiz., 22 (1), 73-6, 1952. Reference No. 326, page 1166.[85][30]
Redwood Bark	Whole: Density=0.0641 g cm−3: 0.0286[30] 0.0307[30] 0.0330[30] 0.0356[30] 0.0379[30] 0.0407[30] Shredded: Density=0.0625 g cm−3: 0.0107[30]	222.2[30] 239.2[30] 255.5[30] 272.1[30] 288.8[30] 305.3[30] 318.7[30]		Whole: Rowley, F. B., Jordan, R. C. and Lander, R. M., Refrig. Eng., 50, 541-4, 1945, TPRC pages 1084 & 1172.[30] Shredded: Wilkes, G. B., Refrig. Eng., 52, 37-42, 1946, TPRC pages 1084 & 1162.[30]
Rice hulls (ash)	6998620000000000000♠0.062[86]
Rice hulls (whole)	6998359000000000000♠0.0359[86]
Rubber (92%)	6999160000000000000♠0.16[48]	7002303000000000000♠303[48]	6987100000000000000♠1×10^−13~[58]
Sandstone	7000236500000000000♠1.83[11] - 2.90[11] 2.1[87] - 3.9[87]			~95-71%SiO2 ~98-48%SiO2, ~16-30% Porosity
Silica Aerogel	6997300000000000000♠0.003[48](carbon black9%~0.0042[88])-0.008[88]-0.017[88]-0.02[4]-0.03[48]	7002231333000000000♠98[48] - 298[4][48]		Foamed Glass
Silver, pure	7002422666670000000♠406[12]-407[21]-418[22] 427[23]-429[4][7][48][89]-430[7] 1970s values: TPRC 3940 7830 17200 16800 5100 1930 1050 700 550 497 471 460 450 432 430 428 427 420 413 405 397 389 382 List[20] The Soviet Union 429[47]	7002297142860000000♠293[12][21] 298[4][7][89]-300[7][48] 1 2 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 150 200 273.2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 273.15	7007621697233447310♠61,350,000[89] - 63,010,000[25]	Highest electrical conductivity of any metal TPRC recommended values are for well annealed 99.999% pure silver with residual electrical resistivity of ρ0=0.000620 μΩ⋅cm. TPRC Data Series volume 1 page 348 (1970).[20]
Silver, sterling	7002361400000000000♠361[90]
Snow, dry	6999136667000000000♠0.05[4]-0.11[12]-0.25[4]	7002273000000000000♠273[4]
Sodium chloride	7001351000000000000♠35.1 - 6.5 - 4.85[91]	80 - 289 - 400[91]
Soil, dry w/ organic matter	7000110000000000000♠0.15[5][92]-1.15[92]-2[5]	7002293000000000000♠293[5]		composition may vary
Soil, saturated	7000230000000099999♠0.6[5]-4[5]	7002293000000000000♠293[5]		composition may vary
Soils, 1950s Values	Mineral; density 2.65 g cm−3: 2.93[93] Organic; density 1.3 g cm−3: 0.251[93] Soil, mineral, dry; density 1.50 g cm−3: 0.209[93] Soil, mineral, saturated; density 1.93 g cm−3: 2.09[93] Soil, organic, dry; density 0.13 g cm−3: 0.0335[93] Soil, organic, sat.; density 1.03 g cm−3: 0.502[93]	293.2[93]		The TPRC Data Book has been quoting de Vries with values of 0.0251 and 0.0109 W⋅cm−3⋅Kelvin−1 for the thermal conductivities of organic and dry mineral soils respectively but the original article is free at the website of their cited journal. Errors: TPRC Volume 2 pages 847 and 1159.[30] Journal archives.[93]
Solder, Sn/63% Pb/37%	7001500000000000000♠50[94]
Lead free solder, Sn/95.6% Ag/3.5% Cu/0.9%, Sn/95.5% Ag/3.8% Cu/0.7% (SAC)	7001600000000000000♠~60[94]
Steel, carbon	7001467428600000000♠36[21][22]-43[4] 50.2[12]-54[4][21][22]	7002295000000000000♠293[12][21]-298[4]		(Fe+(1.5-0.5)%C)
Steel, stainless	7001173888888888890♠16.3[22][95]-16.7[96]-18[97]-24[97]	7002296000000000000♠296[95][96][97]	7006141843971631210♠1,176,000[96] - 1,786,000[97]	(Fe, Cr12.5-25%, Ni0-20%, Mo0-3%, Ti0-trace)
Styrofoam-Expanded Polystyrene	Dow Chemical 0.033-0.036[98] K. T. Yucel et al. 0.036-0.046[9]
Thermal grease	6999400000000000000♠0.4 - 3.0
Thermal tape	6999600000000000000♠0.60[99]
Thorium dioxide	3.68[30] 3.12[30] 2.84[30] 2.66[30] 2.54[30]	1000[30] 1200[30] 1400[30] 1600[30] 1800[30]		Recommended values, TPRC, Polycrystaline, 99.5% pure, 98% dense, page 198[30]
Tin	TPRC 20400to the c axis, 14200 to the c axis, 18300 P 36000to the c axis, 25000 to the c axis, 32300 P 33100to the c axis, 23000 to the c axis, 29700 P 20200to the c axis, 14000 to the c axis, 18100 P 13000to the c axis, 9000 to the c axis, (11700) P 8500to the c axis, 5900 to the c axis, (7600) P 5800to the c axis, 4000 to the c axis, (5200) P 4000to the c axis, 2800 to the c axis, (3600) P 2900to the c axis, 2010 to the c axis, (2600) P 2150to the c axis, 1490 to the c axis, (1930) P 1650to the c axis, 1140 to the c axis, (1480) P 1290to the c axis, 900 to the c axis, (1160) P 1040to the c axis, 720 to the c axis, (930) P 850to the c axis, 590 to the c axis, (760) P 700to the c axis, 490 to the c axis, (630) P 590to the c axis, 410 to the c axis, (530) P 450to the c axis, 310 to the c axis, (400) P 360to the c axis, 250 to the c axis, (320) P 250to the c axis, 172 to the c axis, (222) P 200to the c axis, 136* to the c axis, (176) P 167to the c axis, 116 to the c axis, (150) P (150)to the c axis, (104) to the c axis, (133) P (137)to the c axis, (95) to the c axis, (123) P (128)to the c axis, (89) to the c axis, (115) P (107)to the c axis, (74) to the c axis, (96) P (98.0)to the c axis, (68.0) to the c axis, (88.0) P (95.0)to the c axis, (66.0) to the c axis, (85.0) P (86.7)to the c axis, (60.2) to the c axis, (77.9) P (81.6)to the c axis, (56.7) to the c axis, (73.3) P (75.9)to the c axis, (52.7) to the c axis, 68.2 P (74.2)to the c axis, (51.5) to the c axis, 66.6 P 69.3to the c axis, 48.1 to the c axis, 62.2 P 66.4to the c axis, 46.1 to the c axis, 59.6 P List[20] The Soviet Union 68.2[47]	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 70 90 100 150 200 273.2 300 400 500 273.15		TPRC Tin is well annealed 99.999+% pure white tin with residual electrical resistivity ρ0=0.000120, 0.0001272 & 0.000133 μΩ cm respectively for the single crystal along directions perpendicular and parallel to the c axis and for polycrystalline tin P. The recommended values are thought to be accurate to within 3% near room temperature and 3 to [unintelligible] at other temperatures. Values in parenthesis are extrapolated, interpolated, or estimated. *It happens that the online record has the thermal conductivity at 30 Kelvins and to the c axis posted at 1.36 W⋅cm−1 K−1 and 78.0 Btu hr−1 ft−1 F−1 which is incorrect. Also the copy is blurred up enough to give you the impression that maybe what it really means is 1.36 W−1 cm−1 K−1 and 78.6 Btu hr−1 ft−1 F−1 and a type-head that got overdue for its cleaning since the secretary had a tall heap of papers on her desk and if that is the case then the multilingual expression is perfectly consistent. TPRC Data Series Volume 1, page 408.[20] This material is superconductive (electrical) at temperatures below 3.722 Kelvins. Weast page E-75.[15]
Titanium, pure	7001201800000000000♠15.6[22]-19.0[21]-21.9[7][100]-22.5[21]	7002296500000000000♠293[21]-300[7][100]	7006208333333333330♠1,852,000[100] - 2,381,000[25]
Titanium Alloy	7000580000000000000♠5.8[101]	7002296000000000000♠296[101]	7005595200000000000♠595,200[101]	(Ti+6%Al+4%V)
Tungsten, Pure	7002173000000000000♠173[102]	7002293000000000000♠293[102]	7007189400000000000♠18,940,000[102]
Water	6999593600000000000♠0.563[103]-0.596[103]-0.6[5][12]-0.609[19] TPRC 0.5225* 0.5551* 0.5818 0.5918 0.6084 0.6233 0.6367 0.6485 0.6587 0.6673 0.6797 0.6864 0.6727 0.6348 0.5708 List[10] The Soviet Union 0.599[47]	7002290390000000000♠273[103]-293[5][12][103]-300[19] 250 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 370 400 450 500 550 293.15	6997500000000000000♠5×Pure10−6[49]-Sweet10−3±1[49]-Sea1[103]	<4[103]%(NaCl+MgCl2+CaCl2) *The TPRC Estimates for water at 250K and 270K are for supercooled liquid. Of course the values for 400K and above are for water under steam pressure.[10]
Wallboard (1929)	0.0640[30] 0.0581[30] 0.0594[30] 0.0633[30]	322.8[30]		Stiles, H., Chem. Met. Eng., 36, 625-6, 1929, TPRC pages 1131 and 1172.[30]
Water vapor	6998203950000000000♠0.016[4]-0.02479 (101.3 kPa)[104] 0.0471 (1 bar)[14]	7002295500000000000♠293[104]-398[4] 600[14]
Wood, moist	6999215230000000000♠+>=12% water: 0.09091[105]-0.16[48]-0.21[105]-0.4[5] The Royal Society: Fir, 15%, ⊥ to the grain: 0.117[30] Mahogany, 15%, ⊥ to the grain: 0.167[30] ⊥ to the grain: 0.155[30] Oak, 14%, ⊥ to the grain: 0.117[30] Spruce: ⊥ to the grain: 3.40%: 0.122[30] ⊥ to the grain: 5.80%: 0.126[30] ⊥ to the grain: 7.70%: 0.129[30] ⊥ to the grain: 9.95%: 0.133[30] ⊥ to the grain: 17.0%: 0.142[30] to the grain: 16%: 0.222[30]	7002295500000000000♠298[48]-293[5] 293.2[30] 293.2[30] 293.2[30] 293.2[30] 373.2[30] 373.2[30] 373.2[30] 373.2[30] 373.2[30] 293.2[30]		Species-Variable[105] The Royal Society: Griffiths, E. and Kaye, G. W. C., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A104, 71-98, 1923, TPRC pages 1073, 1080, 1082, 1086 and 1162.[30] Re: Reference No 7: Maple in particular has been measured at more than 0.4⋅W m−1K−1 parallel to the grain. Density 0.72. TPRC Volume 2, page 1081 (1920)[30]
Wood, oven-dry	6999105320000000000♠0.04[12]-0.055[4]-0.07692[105]-0.12[12]-0.17[4][105]	7002295500000000000♠293[12]-298[4]		Balsa[4]-Cedar[105]-Hickory[105]/Oak[4]
Wool, Angora Wool	0.0464[30]	293.2[30]		Bettini, T. M., Ric. Sci. 20 (4), 464-6, 1950, TPRC pages 1092 and 1172[30]
Wool felt	0.0623[30] 0.0732[30]	313.2[30] 343.2[30]		Taylor, T. S., Mech. Eng., 42, 8-10, 1920, TPRC pages 1133 and 1161.[30]
Zinc, Pure	7002116000000000000♠116[49]	7002293000000000000♠293[49]	7007169500000000000♠16,950,000[49]
Zinc oxide	7001210000000000000♠21[23]
Zirconium dioxide	Slip Cast, first run (1950) 2.03[30] 1.98[30] 1.96[30] 1.91[30] 1.91[30] 1.90[30] Second Run (1950) 1.81[30] 1.80[30] 1.92[30] 1.90[30] 1.95[30] 1.92[30] 1.97[30] 1.98[30] 2.04[30] 2.29[30] CaO stabilized (1964) 1.54[30] 1.64[30] 1.64[30] 1.76[30] 1.62[30] 1.79[30] 1.80[30] 2.46[30] 2.33[30] 2.80[30] 2.56[30] 2.70[30]	766.2[30] 899.2[30] 1006.2[30] 1090.2[30] 1171.2[30] 1233.2[30] 386.2[30] 470.2[30] 553.2[30] 632.2[30] 734.2[30] 839.2[30] 961.2[30] 1076.2[30] 1163.2[30] 1203.2[30] 1343.2[30] 1513.2[30] 1593.2[30] 1663.2[30] 1743.2[30] 2003.2[30] 2103.2[30] 2323.2[30] 2413.2[30] 2413.2[30] 2493.2[30] 2523.2[30]		First Run: Density=5.35 g cm−3. Norton, F. H., Kingery, W. D., Fellows, D. M., Adams, M., McQuarrie, M. C. and Coble, R. L. USAEC Rept. NYO-596, 1-9, 1950, TPRC pages 247 and 1160[30] Second Run: Same Specimen, same USAEC Report.[30] CaO stabilized: Density=4.046 g cm−3 (66.3% of theoretical). Feith, A. D., Gen. Elec. Co., Adv. Tech. Service, USAEC Rept. GEMP-296, 1-25, 1964, TPRC pages 247 and 1165[30]
Material	Thermal conductivity [W·m−1·K−1]	Temperature [K]	Electrical conductivity @ 293 K [Ω−1·m−1]	Notes

See also

• Laser flash analysis
• List of insulation material
• R-value (insulation)
• Specific heat capacity
• Thermal conductivity
• Thermal conductivities of the elements (data page)
• Thermal diffusivity

References

• David R. Lide, ed. (2003). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (84th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-0484-9. 

External links

• Heat Conduction Calculator
• Thermal Conductivity Online Converter - An online thermal conductivity calculator
• Thermal Conductivities of Solders
• Thermal conductivity of air as a function of temperature can be found at James Ierardi's Fire Protection Engineering Site
• Non-Metallic Solids: The thermal conductivites of non-metallic solids are found in about 1286 pages in the TPRC Data Series volume 2 at the PDF link here: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA951936
• Gasses and Liquids: The thermal conductivities of gasses and liquids are found in the TPRC Data Series volume 3 at the PDF link here: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA951937
• Metals: The thermal conductivities of metals are found in about 1595 pages in the TPRC Data Series volume 1 at the PDF link here: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA951935
• Vacuums: Vacuums and various levels of vacuums and the thermal conductivites of air at reduced pressures are known at http://www.electronics-cooling.com/2002/11/the-thermal-conductivity-of-air-at-reduced-pressures-and-length-scales/