Inner-worldly asceticism

Inner-worldly asceticism was characterized by Max Weber in Economy and Society as the concentration of human behavior upon activities leading to salvation within the context of the everyday world.[1]

He saw it as a prime influence in the emergence of modernity and the technological world,[2] a point developed in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Four-fold typology

Weber's typology of religion set off the distinction between asceticism and mysticism against that between inner-worldly and other-worldly orientations, to produce a four-fold set of religious types.[3][4] According to Talcott Parsons, otherwordly stances provided no leverage upon socio-economic problems, and inner-worldly mystics attached no significance to the material world surrounding them,[5] the inner-worldly ascetic acted within the institutions of the world, while being opposed to them, and as an instrument of God. However Stefan Zaleski showed that inner-worldly mysticism that is magic was interested in active transformation of reality.[4]

In religions which can be characterized by inner-world-asceticim, the world appears to the religious virtuoso as his responsibility.[6]

Rationalism

For Weber, the worldly ascetic is a rationalist. He rationalizes his own conduct but also rejects conduct which is specifically irrational, esthetic, or dependent upon his own emotional reactions to the world.[7]

Inner-worldly asceticism, including above all Protestantism, taught the fulfillment of obligations in the world as the sole method of proving religious merit. Its emphasis on the importance of one's calling encouraged the differentiation of life-spheres, while its rationality favoured an emphasis on natural law[8] – further aspects enhancing the impact Weber postulated such asceticism had upon the development of capitalism,[9] or rather the particular type of capitalism Weber saw as marked by "the rational organization and institutionalization of social relationships...rational bourgeois capitalism".[10]

Criticism

See also

References

  1. G. R. Elton, Reformation Europe (1969) p. 278
  2. John O'Neill, Sociology as a Skin Trade (1972) p. 14 and p. 60
  3. Talcott Parsons, Introduction, Max Weber, The Sociology of Religion (1971) p. li
  4. 1 2 Pawel Stefan Zaleski "Ideal Types in Max Weber’s Sociology of Religion: Some Theoretical Inspirations for a Study of the Religious Field", Polish Sociological Review No. 3(171)/2010
  5. Parsons, p. li-lii
  6. Weber, Max. "Asceticism, Mysticism and Salvation." In Economy and society; an outline of interpretive sociology.. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968. 542.
  7. Weber, Max. "Asceticism, Mysticism and Salvation." In Economy and society; an outline of interpretive sociology.. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968. 544.
  8. David Owen, Maturity and Modernity (1994) p. 11-7
  9. Peter Gay, Freud (1989) p. 528
  10. Weber, Sociology p. 183 and p. lix
  11. Guy Oakes, 'The Thing That Would Not Die: Notes on Refutation' in H. Lehman/G. Roth eds, Weber's Protestant Ethic (1995)
  12. Elton, p. 312-8
  13. R. Appiganesi/C. Garratt, Postmodernism for Beginners (1995) p. 102
  14. Lehmann, p. 5
  15. M. Hardt/K. Weeks, The Jameson Reader (2005) p. 51

Further reading

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/17/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.