Identity management

In computer security, identity and access management (IAM) is the security and business discipline that "enables the right individuals to access the right resources at the right times and for the right reasons". It addresses the need to ensure appropriate access to resources across increasingly heterogeneous technology environments and to meet increasingly rigorous compliance requirements.^[1]

The terms "identity management" (IdM) and "identity and access management" are used interchangeably in the area of Identity access management. "Identity management" comes under the umbrella of IT security.^[2]

Identity-management systems, products, applications and platforms manage identifying and ancillary data about entities that include individuals, computer-related hardware, and software applications.

IdM covers issues such as how users gain an identity, the protection of that identity and the technologies supporting that protection (e.g., network protocols, digital certificates, passwords, etc.).

Definitions

Identity management (IdM) is the task of controlling information about users on computers. Such information includes information that authenticates the identity of a user, and information that describes information and actions they are authorized to access and/or perform. It also includes the management of descriptive information about the user and how and by whom that information can be accessed and modified. Managed entities typically include users, hardware and network resources and even applications.

Digital identity is an entity's online presence, encompassing personal identifying information (PII) and ancillary information. See OECD^[3] and NIST^[4] guidelines on protecting PII.^[5] It can be interpreted as the codification of identity names and attributes of a physical instance in a way that facilitates processing.

Function

In the real-world context of engineering online systems, identity management can involve four basic functions:

1. The pure identity function: Creation, management and deletion of identities without regard to access or entitlements;
2. The user access (log-on) function: For example: a smart card and its associated data used by a customer to log on to a service or services (a traditional view);
3. The service function: A system that delivers personalized, role-based, online, on-demand, multimedia (content), presence-based services to users and their devices.
4. Identity Federation: A system that relies on federated identity to authenticate a user without knowing his or her password.

Pure identity

A general model of identity can be constructed from a small set of axioms, for example that all identities in a given namespace are unique, or that such identities bear a specific relationship to corresponding entities in the real world. Such an axiomatic model expresses "pure identity" in the sense that the model is not constrained by a specific application context.

In general, an entity (real or virtual) can have multiple identities and each identity can encompass multiple attributes, some of which are unique within a given name space. The diagram below illustrates the conceptual relationship between identities and entities, as well as between identities and their attributes.

In most theoretical and all practical models of digital identity, a given identity object consists of a finite set of properties (attribute values). These properties record information about the object, either for purposes external to the model or to operate the model, for example in classification and retrieval. A "pure identity" model is strictly not concerned with the external semantics of these properties.

The most common departure from "pure identity" in practice occurs with properties intended to assure some aspect of identity, for example a digital signature or software token which the model may use internally to verify some aspect of the identity in satisfaction of an external purpose. To the extent that the model expresses such semantics internally, it is not a pure model.

Contrast this situation with properties that might be externally used for purposes of information security such as managing access or entitlement, but which are simply stored, maintained and retrieved, without special treatment by the model. The absence of external semantics within the model qualifies it as a "pure identity" model.

Identity management, then, can be defined as a set of operations on a given identity model, or more generally as a set of capabilities with reference to it.

In practice, identity management often expands to express how model contents is to be provisioned and reconciled among multiple identity models.

User access

User access enables users to assume a specific digital identity across applications, which enables access controls to be assigned and evaluated against this identity. The use of a single identity for a given user across multiple systems eases tasks for administrators and users. It simplifies access monitoring and verification and allows the organization to minimize excessive privileges granted to one user. User access can be tracked from initiation to termination of user access.

When organizations deploy an identity management process or system, their motivation is normally not primarily to manage a set of identities, but rather to grant appropriate access rights to those entities via their identities. In other words, access management is normally the motivation for identity management and the two sets of processes are consequently closely related.

Services

Organizations continue to add services for both internal users and by customers. Many such services require identity management to properly provide these services. Increasingly, identity management has been partitioned from application functions so that a single identity can serve many or even all of an organization's activities.

For internal use identity management is evolving to control access to all digital assets, including devices, network equipment, servers, portals, content, applications and/or products.

Services often require access to extensive information about a user, including address books, preferences, entitlements and contact information. Since much of this information is subject to privacy and/or confidentiality requirements, controlling access to it is vital.

Identity federation

As the name implies, identity federation comprises one or more systems that federate user access and allow users to log in based on authenticating against one of the system participating in the federation. This trust between several systems is often known as "Circle of Trust". In this setup, one system acts as the Identity Provider (IdP) and other system(s) acts as Service Provider (SP). When a user needs to access some service controlled by SP, he/she first authenticates against the IdP. Upon successful authentication, the IdP sends a secure "assertion" to the Service Provider. "SAML assertions, specified using a mark up language intended for describing security assertions, can be used by a verifier to make a statement to a relying party about the identity of a claimant. SAML assertions may optionally be digitally signed."^[6]

System capabilities

In addition to creation, deletion, modification of user identity data either assisted or self-service, Identity Management controls ancillary entity data for use by applications, such as contact information or location.

• Authentication : Verification that an entity is who/what it claims to be using a password, biometrics such as a fingerprint, or distinctive behavior such as a gesture pattern on a touchscreen.
• Authorization : Managing authorization information that defines what operations an entity can perform in the context of a specific application. For example, one user might be authorized to enter a sales order, while a different user is authorized to approve the credit request for that order.
• Roles : Roles are groups of operations and/or other roles. Users are granted roles often related to a particular job or job function. For example, a user administrator role might be authorized to reset a user's password, while a system administrator role might have the ability to assign a user to a specific server.
• Delegation : Delegation allows local administrators or supervisors to perform system modifications without a global administrator or for one user to allow another to perform actions on their behalf. For example, a user could delegate the right to manage office-related information.
• Interchange : The SAML protocol is a prominent means used to exchange identity information between two identity domains.^[7] For non-SAML enabled devices there exist tools, like the SMRTe, which can be used to exchange identity information.

Privacy

Putting personal information onto computer networks necessarily raises privacy concerns. Absent proper protections, the data may be used to implement a surveillance society.(Taylor, Lips & Organ 2009)

Social web and online social networking services make heavy use of identity management. Helping users decide how to manage access to their personal information has become an issue of broad concern.(Gross, Acquisti & Heinz 2008)(Taylor 2008)

Identity theft

Identity theft happens when thieves gain access to identity information such as the PIN that grants access to a bank account.

Research

Research related to the management of identity covers disciplines such as technology, social sciences, humanities and the law.^[8]

European research

Within the Seventh Research Framework Programme of the European Union from 2007 to 2013, several new projects related to Identity Management started.

The PICOS Project investigates and develops a state-of-the-art platform for providing trust, privacy and identity management in mobile communities.^[9]

PrimeLife develops concepts and technologies to help individuals to protect autonomy and retain control over personal information, irrespective of activities.^[10]

SWIFT focuses on extending identity functions and federation to the network while addressing usability and privacy concerns and leverages identity technology as a key to integrate service and transport infrastructures for the benefit of users and the providers.^[11]

Ongoing projects

Ongoing projects include Future of Identity in the Information Society (FIDIS]),^[12] GUIDE^[13] and PRIME.^[14]

Publications

Academic journals that publish articles related to identity management include:

• Ethics and Information Technology
• Identity in the Information Society
• Surveillance & Society

Less specialized journals publish on the topic and for instance have special issues on Identity such as:

• Online Information Review.^[15]

Standardization

ISO (and more specifically ISO/IEC JTC1, SC27 IT Security techniques WG5 Identity Access Management and Privacy techniques) is conducting some standardization work for identity management (ISO 2009), such as the elaboration of a framework for identity management, including the definition of identity-related terms. The published standards and current work items includes the following:

• ISO/IEC 24760-1 A framework for identity management—Part 1: Terminology and concepts
• ISO/IEC 24760-2 A Framework for Identity Management—Part 2: Reference architecture and requirements
• ISO/IEC DIS 24760-3 A Framework for Identity Management—Part 3: Practice
• ISO/IEC 29115 Entity Authentication Assurance
• ISO/IEC 29146 A framework for access management
• ISO/IEC CD 29003 Identity Proofing and Verification
• ISO/IEC 29100 Privacy framework
• ISO/IEC 29101 Privacy Architecture
• ISO/IEC 29134 Privacy Impact Assessment Methodology

Organization implications

In each organization there is normally a role or department that is responsible for managing the schema of digital identities of their staff and their own objects, which are represented by object identities or object identifiers (OID).^[16]

See also

References

• Gross, Ralph; Acquisti, Alessandro; Heinz, J. H. (2005). "Information revelation and privacy in online social networks". Workshop On Privacy In The Electronic Society; Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society. pp. 71–80. doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214 
• Halperin, Ruth; Backhouse, James (2008). "A roadmap for research on identity in the information society". Identity in the Information Society. Springer (published 2009). 1 (1): 71. doi:10.1007/s12394-008-0004-0. 
• Lusoli, Wainer; Miltgen, Caroline (2009). "Young People and Emerging Digital Services. An Exploratory Survey on Motivations, Perceptions and Acceptance of Risks". JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Sevilla: EC JRC IPTS (published March 2009) (EUR 23765 EN). doi:10.2791/68925. 
• ISO, IEC (2009). "Information Technology—Security Techniques—A Framework for Identity Management". ISO/IEC WD 24760 (Working draft) 
• Pohlman, M.B. (2008). Oracle Identity Management: Governance, Risk and Compliance Architecture. Auerbach Publications. ISBN 978-1-4200-7247-1. 
• Pounder, C. N. M. (2008). "Nine principles for assessing whether privacy is protected in a surveillance society". Identity in the Information Society. Springer (published 2009). 1: 1. doi:10.1007/s12394-008-0002-2. 
• Taylor, John A.; Lips, Miriam; Organ, Joe (2009). "Identification practices in government: citizen surveillance and the quest for public service improvement". Identity in the Information Society. Springer. 1: 135. doi:10.1007/s12394-009-0007-5. 
• Taylor, John A. (2008). "Zero Privacy". IEEE Spectrum. 45 (7): 20–20. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2008.4547499. 
• Williamson, Graham; Yip, David; Sharni, Ilan; Spaulding, Kent (September 1, 2009). Identity Management: A Primer. MC Press. ISBN 978-1-58347-093-0. 

External links

• Fine-grained permission management in IAM solutions
• General Public Tutorial about Privacy and Identity Management
• Identity Management Overview (Computer Weekly)
• Secure Widespread Identities for Federated Telecommunications (SWIFT)
• Identity management and information sharing in ISO 18876 Industrial automation systems and integration
• 50 Data Principles for Loosely-Coupled Identity Management: SlideShare
• Stop Remembering Password and Switch to Identity Management: Business Insider