Holden v. Hardy

Holden v. Hardy

Argued October 21, 1897
Decided February 28, 1898
Full case name Holden v. Hardy, Sheriff
Citations

169 U.S. 366 (more)

18 S. Ct. 383; 42 L. Ed. 780; 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1501
Prior history Writ of habeas corpus denied; Holden remanded to custody of Sheriff Hardy
Subsequent history None
Holding
Laws limiting working hours in mines and smelters are a legitimate, constitutional exercise of the state police power because of the inherent danger of such work.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Case opinions
Majority Brown, joined by Fuller, Harlan, Gray, Shiras, White, McKenna
Dissent Brewer, Peckham
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Utah state law

Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a Utah state law limiting the number of work hours for miners and smelters as a legitimate exercise of the police power. It held that such a law is legitimate if there is indeed a rational basis, supported by facts, for the legislature to believe particular work conditions are dangerous.

The court was quick to distinguish the case from other cases of the era that imposed universal maximum hour rules, which it held unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the law:

“ The legislature has also recognized the fact, which the experience of legislators in many states has corroborated, that the proprietors of these establishments and their operatives do not stand upon an equality, and that their interests are, to a certain extent, conflicting. The former naturally desire to obtain as much labor as possible from their employees, while the latter are often induced by the fear of discharge to conform to regulations which their judgment, fairly exercised, would pronounce to be detrimental to their health or strength. In other words, the proprietors lay down the rules, and the laborers are practically constrained to obey them. In such cases self-interest is often an unsafe guide, and the legislature may properly interpose its authority. ”

See also

External links

Works related to Holden v. Hardy at Wikisource

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/1/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.