Evolution of mammals

Further information: Evolutionary history of life
Restoration of Procynosuchus, a member of the cynodont group, which includes the ancestors of mammals

The evolution of mammals has passed through many stages since the first appearance of their synapsid ancestors in the late Carboniferous period. The most ancestral forms in the class Mammalia are the egg-laying mammals in the subclass Prototheria.[1] By the mid-Triassic, there were many synapsid species that looked like mammals. The lineage leading to today's mammals split up in the Jurassic; synapsids from this period include Dryolestes, more closely related to extant placentals and marsupials than to monotremes, as well as Ambondro, more closely related to monotremes.[2] Later on, the eutherian and metatherian lineages separated; the metatherians are the animals more closely related to the marsupials, while the eutherians are those more closely related to the placentals. Since Juramaia, the earliest known eutherian, lived 160 million years ago in the Jurassic, this divergence must have occurred in the same period.

After the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event wiped out the non-avian dinosaurs (birds are generally regarded as the surviving dinosaurs) and several mammalian groups, placental and marsupial mammals diversified into many new forms and ecological niches throughout the Paleogene and Neogene, by the end of which all modern orders had appeared.

Mammals are the only living synapsids.[3] The synapsid lineage became distinct from the sauropsid lineage in the late Carboniferous period, between 320 and 315 million years ago.[4] The sauropsids are today's reptiles and birds along with all the extinct animals more closely related to them than to mammals.[4] This does not include the mammal-like reptiles, a group more closely related to the mammals.

Throughout the Permian period, the synapsids included the dominant carnivores and several important herbivores. In the subsequent Triassic period, however, a previously obscure group of sauropsids, the archosaurs, became the dominant vertebrates. The mammaliaforms appeared during this period; their superior sense of smell, backed up by a large brain, facilitated entry into nocturnal niches with less exposure to archosaur predation. The nocturnal lifestyle may have contributed greatly to the development of mammalian traits such as endothermy and hair. Later in the Mesozoic, after theropod dinosaurs replaced rauisuchians as the dominant carnivores, mammals spread into other ecological niches. For example, some became aquatic, some were gliders, and some even fed on juvenile dinosaurs.

Most of the evidence consists of fossils. For many years, fossils of Mesozoic mammals and their immediate ancestors were very rare and fragmentary; but, since the mid-1990s, there have been many important new finds, especially in China. The relatively new techniques of molecular phylogenetics have also shed light on some aspects of mammalian evolution by estimating the timing of important divergence points for modern species. When used carefully, these techniques often, but not always, agree with the fossil record.

Although mammary glands are a signature feature of modern mammals, little is known about the evolution of lactation as these soft tissues are not often preserved in the fossil record. Most research concerning the evolution of mammals centers on the shapes of the teeth, the hardest parts of the tetrapod body. Other important research characteristics include the evolution of the middle ear bones, erect limb posture, a bony secondary palate, fur, hair, and warm-bloodedness.

Definition of "mammal"

While living mammal species can be identified by the presence of milk-producing mammary glands in the females, other features are required when classifying fossils, because mammary glands and other soft-tissue features are not visible in fossils.

One such feature available for paleontology, shared by all living mammals (including monotremes), but not present in any of the early Triassic therapsids, is shown in figure 1: mammals use two bones for hearing that all other amniotes use for eating. The earliest amniotes had a jaw joint composed of the articular (a small bone at the back of the lower jaw) and the quadrate (a small bone at the back of the upper jaw). All non-mammalian tetrapods use this system including amphibians, turtles, lizards, snakes, crocodilians, dinosaurs (and their descendants the birds), ichthyosaurs, pterosaurs and therapsids. But mammals have a different jaw joint, composed only of the dentary (the lower jaw bone, which carries the teeth) and the squamosal (another small skull bone). In the Jurassic, their quadrate and articular bones evolved into the incus and malleus bones in the middle ear.[5][6] Mammals also have a double occipital condyle; they have two knobs at the base of the skull that fit into the topmost neck vertebra, while other tetrapods have a single occipital condyle.[5]

In a 1981 article, Kenneth A. Kermack and his co-authors argued for drawing the line between mammals and earlier synapsids at the point where the mammalian pattern of molar occlusion was being acquired and the dentary-squamosal joint had appeared. The criterion chosen, they noted, is merely a matter of convenience; their choice was based on the fact that "the lower jaw is the most likely skeletal element of a Mesozoic mammal to be preserved."[7] Today, most paleontologists consider that animals are mammals if they satisfy this criterion.[8]

The ancestry of mammals




Sauropsids (including dinosaurs)












The first fully terrestrial vertebrates were amniotes — their eggs had internal membranes that allowed the developing embryo to breathe but kept water in. This allowed amniotes to lay eggs on dry land, while amphibians generally need to lay their eggs in water (a few amphibians, such as the Surinam toad, have evolved other ways of getting around this limitation). The first amniotes apparently arose in the middle Carboniferous from the ancestral reptiliomorphs.[9]

Within a few million years, two important amniote lineages became distinct: mammals' synapsid ancestors and the sauropsids, from which lizards, snakes, crocodilians, dinosaurs, and birds are descended.[4] The earliest known fossils of synapsids and sauropsids (such as Archaeothyris and Hylonomus, respectively) date from about 320 to 315 million years ago. The times of origin are difficult to know, because vertebrate fossils from the late Carboniferous are very rare, and therefore the actual first occurrences of each of these types of animal might have been considerably earlier than the first fossil.[10]


The original synapsid skull structure has one hole behind each eye, in a fairly low position on the skull (lower right in this image).

Synapsid skulls are identified by the distinctive pattern of the holes behind each eye, which served the following purposes:

The synapsid pelycosaurs included the largest land vertebrates of the Early Permian, such as the 6 m (20 ft) long Cotylorhynchus hancocki. Among the other large pelycosaurs were Dimetrodon grandis and Edaphosaurus cruciger.


Therapsids descended from pelycosaurs in the middle Permian and took over their position as the dominant land vertebrates. They differ from pelycosaurs in several features of the skull and jaws, including larger temporal fenestrae and incisors that are equal in size.[11]

The therapsid lineage that led to mammals went through a series of stages, beginning with animals that were very like their pelycosaur ancestors and ending with some that could easily be mistaken for mammals:[12]

Therapsid family tree

(simplified from;[11] only those that are most relevant to the evolution of mammals are described below)












(Mammals, eventually)

Only the dicynodonts, therocephalians, and cynodonts survived into the Triassic.


The Biarmosuchia were the most primitive and pelycosaur-like of the therapsids.[14]


Dinocephalians ("terrible heads") included both carnivores and herbivores. They were large; Anteosaurus was up to 6 m (20 ft) long. Some of the carnivores had semi-erect hindlimbs, but all dinocephalians had sprawling forelimbs. In many ways they were very primitive therapsids; for example, they had no secondary palate and their jaws were rather "reptilian".[15]


Lystrosaurus, one of the few genera of dicynodonts that survived the Permian-Triassic extinction event

The anomodonts ("anomalous teeth") were among the most successful of the herbivorous therapsids — one sub-group, the dicynodonts, survived almost to the end of the Triassic. But anomodonts were very different from modern herbivorous mammals, as their only teeth were a pair of fangs in the upper jaw and it is generally agreed that they had beaks like those of birds or ceratopsians. [16]


The theriodonts ("beast teeth") and their descendants had jaw joints in which the lower jaw's articular bone tightly gripped the skull's very small quadrate bone. This allowed a much wider gape, and one group, the carnivorous gorgonopsians ("gorgon faces"), took advantage of this to develop "sabre teeth". But the theriodont's jaw hinge had a longer term significance — the much reduced size of the quadrate bone was an important step in the development of the mammalian jaw joint and middle ear.

The gorgonopsians still had some primitive features: no bony secondary palate (but other bones in the right places to perform the same functions); sprawling forelimbs; hindlimbs that could operate in both sprawling and erect postures. But the therocephalians ("beast heads"), which appear to have arisen at about the same time as the gorgonopsians, had additional mammal-like features, e.g. their finger and toe bones had the same number of phalanges (segments) as in early mammals (and the same number that primates have, including humans).[17]


Artist's conception of the cynodont Trirachodon within a burrow

The cynodonts, a theriodont group that also arose in the late Permian, include the ancestors of all mammals. Cynodonts' mammal-like features include further reduction in the number of bones in the lower jaw, a secondary bony palate, cheek teeth with a complex pattern in the crowns, and a brain which filled the endocranial cavity.[18]

Multi-chambered burrows have been found, containing as many as 20 skeletons of the Early Triassic cynodont Trirachodon; the animals are thought to have been drowned by a flash flood. The extensive shared burrows indicate that these animals were capable of complex social behaviors.[19]

Triassic takeover

The catastrophic Permian-Triassic mass extinction slightly more than 250 million years ago killed off about 70 percent of terrestrial vertebrate species and the majority of land plants.

As a result,[20] ecosystems and food chains collapsed, and the establishment of new stable ecosystems took about 30 million years. With the disappearance of the gorgonopsians, which were dominant predators in the late Permian,[21] the cynodonts' principal competitors for dominance of the carnivorous niches were a previously obscure sauropsid group, the archosaurs, which includes the ancestors of crocodilians and dinosaurs.

The archosaurs quickly became the dominant carnivores,[21] a development often called the "Triassic takeover". Their success may have been due to the fact that the early Triassic was predominantly arid and therefore archosaurs' superior water conservation gave them a decisive advantage. All known archosaurs have glandless skins and eliminate nitrogenous waste in a uric acid paste containing little water, while the cynodonts probably excreted most such waste in a solution of urea, as mammals do today; considerable water is required to keep urea dissolved.[22]

However, this theory has been questioned, since it implies synapsids were necessarily less advantaged in water retention, that synapsid decline coincides with climate changes or archosaur diversity (neither of which has been tested) and the fact that desert-dwelling mammals are as well adapted in this department as archosaurs,[23] and some cynodonts like Trucidocynodon were large-sized predators.[24]

The Triassic takeover was probably a vital factor in the evolution of the mammals. Two groups stemming from the early cynodonts were successful in niches that had minimal competition from the archosaurs: the tritylodonts, which were herbivores, and the mammals, most of which were small nocturnal insectivores (although some, like Sinoconodon, were carnivores that fed on vertebrate prey, while still others were herbivores or omnivores).[25] As a result:

This retreat to a nocturnal role is called a nocturnal bottleneck, and is thought to explain many of the features of mammals.[31]

From cynodonts to crown mammals

Fossil record

Mesozoic synapsids that had evolved to the point of having a jaw joint composed of the dentary and squamosal bones are preserved in few good fossils, mainly because they were mostly smaller than rats:

In the past 40 years, however, the number of Mesozoic fossil mammals has increased decisively; only 116 genera were known in 1979, for example, but about 310 in 2007, with an increase in quality such that "at least 18 Mesozoic mammals are represented by nearly complete skeletons".[32]

Mammals or mammaliaforms

Some writers restrict the term "mammal" to the crown group mammals, the group consisting of the most recent common ancestor of the monotremes, marsupials, and placentals, together with all the descendants of that ancestor. In an influential 1988 paper, Timothy Rowe advocated this restriction, arguing that "ancestry... provides the only means of properly defining taxa" and, in particular, that the divergence of the monotremes from the animals more closely related to marsupials and placentals "is of central interest to any study of Mammalia as a whole."[33] To accommodate some related taxa falling outside the crown group, he defined the Mammaliaformes as comprising "the last common ancestor of Morganucodontidae and Mammalia [as he had defined the latter term] and all its descendants." Besides Morganucodontidae, the newly defined taxon includes Docodonta and Kuehneotheriidae. Though haramiyids have been referred to the mammals since the 1860s,[34] Rowe excluded them from the Mammaliaformes as falling outside his definition, putting them in a larger clade, the Mammaliamorpha.

Some writers have adopted this terminology noting, to avoid misunderstanding, that they have done so. Most paleontologists, however, still think that animals with the dentary-squamosal jaw joint and the sort of molars characteristic of modern mammals should formally be members of Mammalia.[8]

Where the ambiguity in the term "mammal" may be confusing, this article uses "mammaliaform" and "crown mammal".

Family tree – cynodonts to crown group mammals

(based on Cynodontia:Dendrogram – Palaeos)



















crown group Mammals

Morganucodontidae and other transitional forms had both types of jaw joint: dentary-squamosal (front) and articular-quadrate (rear).


The Morganucodontidae first appeared in the late Triassic, about 205M years ago. They are an excellent example of transitional fossils, since they have both the dentary-squamosal and articular-quadrate jaw joints.[35] They were also one of the first discovered and most thoroughly studied of the mammaliaforms outside of the crown-group mammals, since an unusually large number of morganucodont fossils have been found.


Reconstruction of Castorocauda. Note the fur and the adaptations for swimming (broad, flat tail; webbed feet) and for digging (robust limbs and claws).

Docodonts, among the most common Jurassic mammaliaforms, are noted for the sophistication of their molars. They are thought to have had general semi-aquatic tendencies, with the fish-eating Castorocauda ("beaver tail"), which lived in the mid-Jurassic about 164M years ago and was first discovered in 2004 and described in 2006, being the most well-understood example. Castorocauda was not a crown group mammal, but it is extremely important in the study of the evolution of mammals because the first find was an almost complete skeleton (a real luxury in paleontology) and it breaks the "small nocturnal insectivore" stereotype:[36]


The family tree above shows Hadrocodium as an "aunt" of crown mammals. This mammaliaform, dated about 195M years ago in the very early Jurassic, exhibits some important features: [37]

Earliest crown mammals

The crown group mammals, sometimes called 'true mammals', are the extant mammals and their relatives back to their last common ancestor. Since this group has living members, DNA analysis can be applied in an attempt to explain the evolution of features that do not appear in fossils. This endeavor often involves molecular phylogenetics, a technique that has become popular since the mid-1980s.

Family tree of early crown mammals

Cladogram after.[32] († marks extinct groups)

Crown group mammals







Spalacotheroidea †







Colour vision

Early amniotes had four opsins in the cones of their retinas to use for distinguishing colours: one sensitive to red, one to green, and two corresponding to different shades of blue.[38][39] The green opsin was not inherited by any crown mammals, but all normal individuals did inherit the red one. Early crown mammals thus had three cone opsins, the red one and both of the blues.[38] All their extant descendants have lost one of the blue-sensitive opsins but not always the same one: marsupials and placentals (except for cetaceans) retain one blue-sensitive opsin while monotremes retain the other.[40] Some placentals and marsupials, including humans, subsequently evolved green-sensitive opsins; like early crown mammals, therefore, their vision is trichromatic.[41][42]

Australosphenida and Ausktribosphenidae

Ausktribosphenidae is a group name that has been given to some rather puzzling finds that:[43]

Australosphenida is a group that has been defined in order to include the Ausktribosphenidae and monotremes. Asfaltomylos (mid- to late Jurassic, from Patagonia) has been interpreted as a basal australosphenid (animal that has features shared with both Ausktribosphenidae and monotremes; lacks features that are peculiar to Ausktribosphenidae or monotremes; also lacks features that are absent in Ausktribosphenidae and monotremes) and as showing that australosphenids were widespread throughout Gondwanaland (the old Southern Hemisphere super-continent).[45]

Recent analysis of Teinolophos, which lived somewhere between 121 and 112.5 million years ago, suggests that it was a "crown group" (advanced and relatively specialised) monotreme. This was taken as evidence that the basal (most primitive) monotremes must have appeared considerably earlier, but this has been disputed (see the following section). The study also indicated that some alleged Australosphenids were also "crown group" monotremes (e.g. Steropodon) and that other alleged Australosphenids (e.g. Ausktribosphenos, Bishops, Ambondro, Asfaltomylos) are more closely related to and possibly members of the Therian mammals (group that includes marsupials and placentals, see below).[46]


Teinolophos, from Australia, is the earliest known monotreme. A 2007 study (published 2008) suggests that it was not a basal (primitive, ancestral) monotreme but a full-fledged platypus, and therefore that the platypus and echidna lineages diverged considerably earlier.[46] A more recent study (2009), however, has suggested that, while Teinolophos was a type of platypus, it was also a basal monotreme and predated the radiation of modern monotremes. The semi-aquatic lifestyle of platypuses prevented them from being outcompeted by the marsupials that migrated to Australia millions of years ago, since joeys need to remain attached to their mothers and would drown if their mothers ventured into water (though there are exceptions like the water opossum and the lutrine opossum; however, they both live in South America and thus don't come into contact with monotremes). Genetic evidence has determined that echidnas diverged from the platypus lineage as recently as 19-48M, when they made their transition from semi-aquatic to terrestrial lifestyle.[47]

Monotremes have some features that may be inherited from the cynodont ancestors:

Unlike other mammals, female monotremes do not have nipples and feed their young by "sweating" milk from patches on their bellies.

Of course these features are not visible in fossils, and the main characteristics from paleontologists' point of view are:[43]


Skull of the multituberculate Ptilodus

Multituberculates (named for the multiple tubercles on their "molars") are often called the "rodents of the Mesozoic", but this is an example of convergent evolution rather than meaning that they are closely related to the Rodentia. They existed for approximately 120 million yearsthe longest fossil history of any mammal lineagebut were eventually outcompeted by rodents, becoming extinct during the early Oligocene.

Some authors have challenged the phylogeny represented by the cladogram above. They exclude the multituberculates from the mammalian crown group, holding that multituberculates are more distantly related to extant mammals than even the Morganucodontidae.[49][50] Multituberculates are like undisputed crown mammals in that their jaw joints consist of only the dentary and squamosal bones-whereas the quadrate and articular bones are part of the middle ear; their teeth are differentiated, occlude, and have mammal-like cusps; they have a zygomatic arch; and the structure of the pelvis suggests that they gave birth to tiny helpless young, like modern marsupials.[51] On the other hand, they differ from modern mammals:


Therian form of crurotarsal ankle. Adapted with permission from Palaeos

Theria ("beasts"), is the clade originating with the last common ancestor of the Eutheria (including placentals) and Metatheria (including marsupials). Common features include:[52]


The living Metatheria are all marsupials (animals with pouches). A few fossil genera, such as the Mongolian late Cretaceous Asiatherium, may be marsupials or members of some other metatherian group(s).[53][54]

The oldest known metatherian is Sinodelphys, found in 125M-year-old early Cretaceous shale in China's northeastern Liaoning Province. The fossil is nearly complete and includes tufts of fur and imprints of soft tissues.[55]

Didelphimorphia (common opossums of the Western Hemisphere) first appeared in the late Cretaceous and still have living representatives, probably because they are mostly semi-arboreal unspecialized omnivores.[56]

The best-known feature of marsupials is their method of reproduction:

Skull of thylacine, showing marsupial pattern of molars

Although some marsupials look very like some placentals (the thylacine or "marsupial wolf" is a good example), marsupial skeletons have some features that distinguish them from placentals:[58]

Marsupials also have a pair of marsupial bones (sometimes called "epipubic bones"), which support the pouch in females. But these are not unique to marsupials, since they have been found in fossils of multituberculates, monotremes, and even eutherians — so they are probably a common ancestral feature that disappeared at some point after the ancestry of living placental mammals diverged from that of marsupials.[59][60] Some researchers think the epipubic bones' original function was to assist locomotion by supporting some of the muscles that pull the thigh forwards.[61]


Main article: Eutheria

The time of appearance of the earliest eutherians has been a matter of controversy. On one hand, recently discovered fossils of Juramaia have been dated to 160 million years ago and classified as eutherian.[62] Fossils of Eomaia from 125 million years ago in the Early Cretaceous have also been classified as eutherian.[63] A recent analysis of phenomic characters, however, classified Eomaia as pre-eutherian and reported that the earliest clearly eutherian specimens came from Maelestes, dated to 91 million years ago.[64] That study also reported that eutherians did not significantly diversify until after the catastrophic extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, about 66 million years ago.

Eomaia was found to have some features that are more like those of marsupials and earlier metatherians:

Eomaia also has a Meckelian groove, a primitive feature of the lower jaw that is not found in modern placental mammals.

These intermediate features are consistent with molecular phylogenetics estimates that the placentals diversified about 110M years ago, 15M years after the date of the Eomaia fossil.

Eomaia also has many features that strongly suggest it was a climber, including several features of the feet and toes; well-developed attachment points for muscles that are used a lot in climbing; and a tail that is twice as long as the rest of the spine.

Placentals' best-known feature is their method of reproduction:

It has been suggested that the evolution of placental reproduction was made possible by retroviruses that:[67]

From a paleontologist's point of view, eutherians are mainly distinguished by various features of their teeth,[68] ankles and feet.[69]

Expansion of ecological niches in the Mesozoic

There is still some truth in the "small, nocturnal insectivores" stereotype, but recent finds, mainly in China, show that some mammaliaforms and crown group mammals were larger and had a variety of lifestyles. For example:

Eutriconodonts were specialised carnivores, the largest of which capable of taking small or similar sized dinosaurs. Jugulator amplissimus, here taking a juvenile Deinonychus, further illustrates mammalian diversity by also possibly being a glider or flyer.

Evolution of major groups of living mammals

Further information: Mammal classification

There are currently vigorous debates between traditional paleontologists and molecular phylogeneticists about how and when the modern groups of mammals diversified, especially the placentals. Generally, the traditional paelontologists date the appearance of a particular group by the earliest known fossil whose features make it likely to be a member of that group, while the molecular phylogeneticists suggest that each lineage diverged earlier (usually in the Cretaceous) and that the earliest members of each group were anatomically very similar to early members of other groups and differed only in their genetics. These debates extend to the definition of and relationships between the major groups of placentals — the controversy about Afrotheria is a good example.

Fossil-based family tree of placental mammals

Here is a very simplified version of a typical family tree based on fossils, based on Cladogram of Mammalia – Palaeos. It tries to show the nearest thing there is at present to a consensus view, but some paleontologists have very different views, for example:[81]

For the sake of brevity and simplicity, the diagram omits some extinct groups in order to focus on the ancestry of well-known modern groups of placentals — X marks extinct groups. The diagram also shows the following:


Xenarthra (late cretaceous)
(armadillos, anteaters, sloths)

Pholidota (late cretaceous)

Epitheria (latest Cretaceous)

(some extinct groups) X

Insectivora (latest Cretaceous)
(hedgehogs, shrews, moles, tenrecs)


Zalambdalestidae X (late Cretaceous)

Macroscelidea (late Eocene)
(elephant shrews)

Anagaloidea X

Glires (early Paleocene)

Lagomorpha (Eocene)
(rabbits, hares, pikas)

Rodentia (late Paleocene)
(mice & rats, squirrels, porcupines)


Scandentia (mid-Eocene)
(tree shrews)


Plesiadapiformes X

Primates (early Paleocene)
(tarsiers, lemurs, monkeys, apes including humans)

Dermoptera (late Eocene)

Chiroptera (late Paleocene)

Carnivora (early Paleocene)
(cats, dogs, bears, seals)

Ungulatomorpha (late Cretaceous)
Eparctocyona (late Cretaceous)

(some extinct groups) X

Arctostylopida X (late Paleocene)

Mesonychia X (mid-Paleocene)
(predators / scavengers, but not closely related to modern carnivores)


Cetacea (early Eocene)
(whales, dolphins, porpoises)

Artiodactyla (early Eocene)
(even-toed ungulates: pigs, hippos, camels, giraffes, cattle, deer)


Hilalia X

Perissodactyla (late Paleocene)
(odd-toed ungulates: horses, rhinos, tapirs)

Tubulidentata (early Miocene)

Paenungulata ("not quite ungulates")

Hyracoidea (early Eocene)

Sirenia (early Eocene)
(manatees, dugongs)

Proboscidea (early Eocene)

This family tree contains some surprises and puzzles. For example:

Molecular phylogenetics based family tree of placental mammals

Molecular phylogenetics uses features of organisms' genes to work out family trees in much the same way as paleontologists do with features of fossils — if two organisms' genes are more similar to each other than to those of a third organism, the two organisms are more closely related to each other than to the third.

Molecular phylogeneticists have proposed a family tree that is very different from the one with which paleontologists are familiar. Like paleontologists, molecular phylogeneticists have different ideas about various details, but here is a typical family tree according to molecular phylogenetics:[86][87] Note that the diagram shown here omits extinct groups, as one cannot extract DNA from fossils.

Atlantogenata ("born round the Atlantic ocean")

Xenarthra (armadillos, anteaters, sloths)


Afrosoricida (golden moles, tenrecs, otter shrews)

Macroscelidea (elephant shrews)

Tubulidentata (aardvarks)

Paenungulata ("not quite ungulates")

Hyracoidea (hyraxes)

Proboscidea (elephants)

Sirenia (manatees, dugongs)

Boreoeutheria ("northern true / placental mammals")

Erinaceomorpha (hedgehogs, gymnures)

Soricomorpha (moles, shrews, solenodons)

Cetartiodactyla (camels and llamas, pigs and peccaries, ruminants, whales and hippos)


Pholidota (pangolins)

Chiroptera (bats)

Carnivora (cats, dogs, bears, seals)

Perissodactyla (horses, rhinos, tapirs).


Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares, pikas)

Rodentia (late Paleocene) (mice and rats, squirrels, porcupines)


Scandentia (tree shrews)

Dermoptera (colugos)

Primates (tarsiers, lemurs, monkeys, apes including humans)

Here are the most significant of the many differences between this family tree and the one familiar to paleontologists:

The grouping together of the Afrotheria has some geological justification. All surviving members of the Afrotheria originate from South American or (mainly) African lineages — even the Indian elephant, which diverged from an African lineage about 7.6 million years ago.[90] As Pangaea broke up, Africa and South America separated from the other continents less than 150M years ago, and from each other between 100M and 80M years ago.[91][92] So it would not be surprising if the earliest eutherian immigrants into Africa and South America were isolated there and radiated into all the available ecological niches.

Nevertheless, these proposals have been controversial. Paleontologists naturally insist that fossil evidence must take priority over deductions from samples of the DNA of modern animals. More surprisingly, these new family trees have been criticised by other molecular phylogeneticists, sometimes quite harshly:[93]

Timing of placental evolution

Recent molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that most placental orders diverged late in the Cretaceous period, about 100 to 85 million years ago, but that modern families first appeared later, in the late Eocene and early Miocene epochs of the Cenozoic period.[97][98] Fossil-based analyses, on the contrary, limit the placentals to the Cenozoic.[99] Many Cretaceous fossil sites contain well-preserved lizards, salamanders, birds, and mammals, but not the modern forms of mammals. It is likely that they simply did not exist, and that the molecular clock runs fast during major evolutionary radiations.[100] On the other hand, there is fossil evidence from 85 million years ago of hoofed mammals that may be ancestors of modern ungulates.[101]

Fossils of the earliest members of most modern groups date from the Paleocene, a few date from later and very few from the Cretaceous, before the extinction of the dinosaurs. But some paleontologists, influenced by molecular phylogenetic studies, have used statistical methods to extrapolate backwards from fossils of members of modern groups and concluded that primates arose in the late Cretaceous.[102] However, statistical studies of the fossil record confirm that mammals were restricted in size and diversity right to the end of the Cretaceous, and rapidly grew in size and diversity during the Early Paleocene.[103][104]

Evolution of mammalian features

Jaws and middle ears

Hadrocodium, whose fossils date from the early Jurassic, provides the first clear evidence of fully mammalian jaw joints and middle ears, in which the jaw joint is formed by the dentary and squamosal bones while the articular and quadrate move to the middle ear, where they are known as the incus and malleus.

One analysis of the monotreme Teinolophos suggested that this animal had a pre-mammalian jaw joint formed by the angular and quadrate bones and that the definitive mammalian middle ear evolved twice independently, in monotremes and in therian mammals, but this idea has been disputed.[105] In fact, two of the suggestion's authors co-authored a later paper that reinterpreted the same features as evidence that Teinolophos was a full-fledged platypus, which means it would have had a mammalian jaw joint and middle ear.[46]


It has been suggested that lactation's original function was to keep eggs moist. Much of the argument is based on monotremes (egg-laying mammals):[106][107][108]

Later research demonstrated that caseins already appeared in the common mammalian ancestor approximately 200310 million years ago.[109] The question of whether secretion of a substance to keep egg moist translated into actual lactation in therapsids is open. A small mammaliomorph called Sinocodon, generally assumed to be the sister group of all later mammals, had front teeth in even the smallest individuals. Combined with a poorly ossified jaw, they very probably did not suckle.[110] Thus suckling may have evolved right at the pre-mammal/mammal transition. However, tritylodontids, generally assumed to be more basal, show evidence of suckling.[111]

Hair and fur

The first clear evidence of hair or fur is in fossils of Castorocauda and Megaconus, from 164M years ago in the mid-Jurassic.[36] As both extant mammals, Megaconus and Castorocauda have a double coat of hair, with both guard hairs and an undercoat, it may be assumed that their last common ancestor did as well. This animal must have been Triassic as it was an ancestor of the Triassic Tikitherium.[32] More recently, the discovery of hair remnants in Permian coprolites pushes back the origin of mammalian hair much further back in the synapsid line to Paleozoic therapsids.[112]

In the mid-1950s, some scientists interpreted the foramina (passages) in the maxillae (upper jaws) and premaxillae (small bones in front of the maxillae) of cynodonts as channels that supplied blood vessels and nerves to vibrissae (whiskers) and suggested that this was evidence of hair or fur.[113][114] It was soon pointed out, however, that foramina do not necessarily show that an animal had vibrissae; the modern lizard Tupinambis has foramina that are almost identical to those found in the non-mammalian cynodont Thrinaxodon.[13][115] Popular sources, nevertheless, continue to attribute whiskers to Thrinaxodon.[116] A trace fossil from the Lower Triassic had been erroneously regarded as a cynodont footprint showing hair,[117] but this interpretation has been refuted.[118] A study of cranial openings for facial nerves connected whiskers in extant mammals indicate the Prozostrodontia, small immediate ancestors of mammals, presented whiskers similar to mammals, but that less advanced therapsids would either have immobile whiskers or no whisker at all.[119] Fur may have evolved from whiskers.[120] Whiskers themselves may have evolved as a response to nocturnal and/or burrowing lifestyle.

Ruben & Jones (2000) note that the Harderian glands, which secrete lipids for coating the fur, were present in the earliest mammals like Morganucodon, but were absent in near-mammalian therapsids like Thrinaxodon.[121] The Msx2 gene associated with hair folicle maintenance is also linked to the closure of the parietal eye in mammals, indicating that fur and lack of pineal eye is linked. The pineal eye is present in Thrinaxodon, but absent in more advanced cynognaths (the Probainognathia).[119]

Insulation is the "cheapest" way to maintain a fairly constant body temperature, without consuming energy to produce more body heat. Therefore, the possession of hair or fur would be good evidence of homeothermy, but would not be such strong evidence of a high metabolic rate.[122] [123]

Erect limbs

Understanding of the evolution of erect limbs in mammals is incomplete living and fossil monotremes have sprawling limbs. Some scientists think that the parasagittal (non-sprawling) limb posture is limited to the Boreosphenida, a group that contains the therians but not, for example, the multituberculates. In particular, they attribute a parasagittal stance to the therians Sinodelphys and Eomaia, which means that the stance had arisen by 125 million years ago, in the Early Cretaceous. However, they also discuss that earlier mammals had more erect forelimbs as opposed to the more sprawling hindlimbs, a trend still continued to some extent in modern placentals and marsupials.[124]


"Warm-bloodedness" is a complex and rather ambiguous term, because it includes some or all of the following:

Since scientists cannot know much about the internal mechanisms of extinct creatures, most discussion focuses on homeothermy and tachymetabolism. However, it is generally agreed that endothermy first evolved in non-mammalian synapsids such as dicynodonts, which possess body proportions associated with heat retention,[125] high vascularised bones with Haversian canals,[126] and possibly hair.[127]

Modern monotremes have a low body temperature compared to marsupials and placental mammals, around 32 °C (90 °F).[128] Phylogenetic bracketing suggests that the body temperatures of early crown-group mammals were not less than that of extant monotremes. There is cytological evidence that the low metabolism of monotremes is a secondarily evolved trait.[129]

Respiratory turbinates

Modern mammals have respiratory turbinates, convoluted structures of thin bone in the nasal cavity. These are lined with mucous membranes that warm and moisten inhaled air and extract heat and moisture from exhaled air. An animal with respiratory turbinates can maintain a high rate of breathing without the danger of drying its lungs out, and therefore may have a fast metabolism. Unfortunately these bones are very delicate and therefore have not yet been found in fossils. But rudimentary ridges like those that support respiratory turbinates have been found in advanced Triassic cynodonts, such as Thrinaxodon and Diademodon, which suggests that they may have had fairly high metabolic rates. [113] [130][131]

Bony secondary palate

Mammals have a secondary bony palate, which separates the respiratory passage from the mouth, allowing them to eat and breathe at the same time. Secondary bony palates have been found in the more advanced cynodonts and have been used as evidence of high metabolic rates.[113][114][132] But some cold-blooded vertebrates have secondary bony palates (crocodilians and some lizards), while birds, which are warm-blooded, do not.[13]


A muscular diaphragm helps mammals to breathe, especially during strenuous activity. For a diaphragm to work, the ribs must not restrict the abdomen, so that expansion of the chest can be compensated for by reduction in the volume of the abdomen and vice versa. Diaphragms are known in caseid pelycosaurs, indicating an early origin within synapsids, though they were still fairly inefficient and likely required support from other muscle groups and limb motion.[133]

The advanced cynodonts have very mammal-like rib cages, with greatly reduced lumbar ribs. This suggests that these animals had more developed diaphragms, were capable of strenuous activity for fairly long periods and therefore had high metabolic rates.[113][114] On the other hand, these mammal-like rib cages may have evolved to increase agility.[13] However, the movement of even advanced therapsids was "like a wheelbarrow", with the hindlimbs providing all the thrust while the forelimbs only steered the animal, in other words advanced therapsids were not as agile as either modern mammals or the early dinosaurs.[134] So the idea that the main function of these mammal-like rib cages was to increase agility is doubtful.

Limb posture

The therapsids had sprawling forelimbs and semi-erect hindlimbs.[114][135] This suggests that Carrier's constraint would have made it rather difficult for them to move and breathe at the same time, but not as difficult as it is for animals such as lizards, which have completely sprawling limbs.[136] Advanced therapsids may therefore have been significantly less active than modern mammals of similar size and so may have had slower metabolisms overall or else been bradymetabolic (lower metabolism when at rest).


Mammals are noted for their large brain size relative to body size, compared to other animal groups. Recent findings suggest that the first brain area to expand was that involved in smell.[137] Scientists scanned the skulls of early mammal species dating back to 190-200 million years ago and compared the brain case shapes to earlier pre-mammal species; they found that the brain area involved in the sense of smell was the first to enlarge.[137] This change may have allowed these early mammals to hunt insects at night when dinosaurs were not active.[137]

See also


  1. http://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Prototheria/
  2. Rougier, G. W.; Martinelli, A. G.; Forasiepi, A. M.; Novacek, M. J. (2007). "New Jurassic mammals from Patagonia, Argentina: A reappraisal of australosphenidan morphology and interrelationships" (PDF). American Museum Novitates. American Museum of Natural History. 3566 (3566): 1–54. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2007)507[1:NJMFPA]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0003-0082.
  3. Ben Waggoner (February 2, 1997). "Introduction to the Synapsida". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved April 28, 2012.
  4. 1 2 3 White, A. T. (May 18, 2005). "Amniota – Palaeos". Archived from the original on December 20, 2010. Retrieved January 23, 2012.
  5. 1 2 Mammalia: Overview – Palaeos
  6. Cowen, R. (2000). History of Life. Oxford: Blackwell Science. p. 432. ISBN 0-7266-0287-6.
  7. K. A. Kermack; Frances Mussett; H. W. RIgney (January 1981). "The skull of Morganucodon". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 71 (1): 148. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1981.tb01127.x.
  8. 1 2 Kemp, T. S. (2005). The Origin and Evolution of Mammals. Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-19-850760-7.
  9. Carroll R.L. (1991): The origin of reptiles. In: Schultze H.-P., Trueb L., (ed) Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods — controversy and consensus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp 331-353.
  10. "Synapsida: Varanopseidae – Palaeos". Retrieved 15 October 2013.
  11. 1 2 "Therapsida – Palaeos".
  12. Kermack, D.M.; Kermack, K.A. (1984). The evolution of mammalian characters. Croom Helm. ISBN 0709915349.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Bennett, A.F.; Ruben, J.A. (1986). "The metabolic and thermoregulatory status of therapsids". In Hotton III, N; MacLean, P.D.; Roth, J.J.; et al. The ecology and biology of mammal-like reptiles. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. pp. 207–218.
  14. "Therapsida: Biarmosuchia – Palaeos". Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  15. "Dinocephalia – Palaeos".
  16. "Ammodontia – Palaeos". Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  17. "Theriodontia – Paleos". Retrieved 2013-10-15.
  18. "Cynodontia Overview – Palaeos".
  19. Groenewald, G.H., Welman, J. and MacEachern, J.A. (April 2001). "Vertebrate Burrow Complexes from the Early Triassic Cynognathus Zone (Driekoppen Formation, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa". PALAIOS. 16 (2): 148–160. doi:10.1669/0883-1351(2001)016<0148:VBCFTE>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0883-1351. Retrieved 2008-07-07.
  20. "Olenekian Age of the Triassic – Palaeos".
  21. 1 2 Benton, M.J. (2004). Vertebrate Palaeontology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 978-0-632-05637-8
  22. Campbell, J.W. (1979). C.L. Prosser, ed. Comparative Animal Physiology (3rd ed.). W. B. Sauders. pp. 279–316.
  23. Darren Naish, Episode 38: A Not Too Shabby Podcarts
  24. Oliveira, T.V.; Soares, M.B.; Schultz, C.L. (2010). "Trucidocynodon riograndensis gen. nov. et sp. nov. (Eucynodontia), a new cynodont from the Brazilian Upper Triassic (Santa Maria Formation)". Zootaxa. 2382: 1–71.
  25. Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004), p.5
  26. Ruben, J.A.; Jones, T.D. (2000). "Selective Factors Associated with the Origin of Fur and Feathers". American Zoologist. 40 (4): 585–596. doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.585.
  27. Rowe, T.B.; Macrini, T.E.; Luo, Zhe-Xi (2011). "Fossil evidence on origin of the mammalian brain". Science. 332 (6032): 955–957. Bibcode:2011Sci...332..955R. doi:10.1126/science.1203117. PMID 21596988.
  28. Raichle, M.E.; Gusnard, D.A. (August 6, 2002). "Appraising the brain's energy budget". PNAS. 99 (16): 10237–10239. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9910237R. doi:10.1073/pnas.172399499. PMC 124895Freely accessible. PMID 12149485.
  29. "Brain power". New Scientist. 2006.
  30. Vorobyev, M. (2006). "Evolution of colour vision: The story of lost visual pigments". Perception. ECVP Abstract Supplement. 35.
  31. Gerkema, M. P.; Davies, W. I. L.; Foster, R. G.; Menaker, M.; Hut, R. A. (3 July 2013). "The nocturnal bottleneck and the evolution of activity patterns in mammals". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 280 (1765): 20130508–20130508. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0508.
  32. 1 2 3 Luo, Z.-X. (2007). "Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution" (PDF). Nature. 450 (7172): 1011–1019. Bibcode:2007Natur.450.1011L. doi:10.1038/nature06277. PMID 18075580.
  33. Rowe, T. (1988). "Definition, diagnosis, and origin of Mammalia" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 8 (3): 241–264. doi:10.1080/02724634.1988.10011708.
  34. "Microlestes rhaeticus Dawkins 1864 (mammal)". Paleobiology Database. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  35. "Morganucodontids & Docodonts – Palaeos".
  36. 1 2 3 Ji, Q.; Luo, Z-X; Yuan, C-X; Tabrum, A.R. (February 2006). "A Swimming Mammaliaform from the Middle Jurassic and Ecomorphological Diversification of Early Mammals". Science. 311 (5764): 1123–7. Bibcode:2006Sci...311.1123J. doi:10.1126/science.1123026. PMID 16497926. See also the news item at "Jurassic "Beaver" Found; Rewrites History of Mammals".
  37. Luo, Z-X.; Crompton, A.W. & Sun, A-L. (May 2001). "A New Mammaliaform from the Early Jurassic and Evolution of Mammalian Characteristics" (PDF). Science. 292 (5521): 1535–1540. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1535L. doi:10.1126/science.1058476. PMID 11375489.
  38. 1 2 Jacobs, G. H. (2009). "Evolution of colour vision in mammals" (PDF). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 364 (1531): 2957–67. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0039. PMC 2781854Freely accessible. PMID 19720656.
  39. Bailes, H. J.; Davies, W. L.; Trezise, A. E. O.; Collin, S. P. (2007). "Visual pigments in a living fossil, the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri" (PDF). BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7: 200–207. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-200.
  40. Collin, S. P. (2010). "Evolution and Ecology of Retinal Photoreception in Early Vertebrates". Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 75 (3): 174–185. doi:10.1159/000314904.
  41. Dulai, K. S.; von Dornum, M.; Mollon, J. D.; Hunt, D. M. (1999). "The Evolution of Trichromatic Color Vision by Opsin Gene Duplication in New World and Old World Primates" (PDF). Genome Research. 9 (7): 629–638. doi:10.1101/gr.9.7.629. PMID 10413401.
  42. Arrese, C. A.; Hart, N. S.; Thomas, N.; Beazley, L. D.; Shand, J. (2002). "Trichromacy in Australian marsupials" (PDF). Current Biology. 12 (8): 657–660. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00772-8. PMID 11967153.
  43. 1 2 "Mammalia – Palaeos".
  44. 1 2 Jacobs, L.L., Winkler, D.A., and Murry P.A. (July 1, 1989). "Modern Mammal Origins: Evolutionary Grades in the Early Cretaceous of North America". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 86 (13): 4992–4995. Bibcode:1989PNAS...86.4992J. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.13.4992. ISSN 0027-8424. JSTOR 34031. PMC 297542Freely accessible. PMID 2740336.
  45. Rauhut, O.W.M., Martin, T., Ortiz-Jaureguizar, E. and Puerta, P. (14 March 2002). "A Jurassic mammal from South America". Nature. 416 (6877): 165–168. Bibcode:2002Natur.416..165R. doi:10.1038/416165a. PMID 11894091.
  46. 1 2 3 Rowe, T.; Rich, T.H.; Vickers-Rich, P.; Springer, M. & Woodburne, M.O. (January 2008). "The oldest platypus and its bearing on divergence timing of the platypus and echidna clades". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (4): 1238–1242. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.1238R. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706385105. PMC 2234122Freely accessible. PMID 18216270.
  47. Phillips, M. J.; Bennett, T. H.; Lee, M. S. Y. (2009). "Molecules, morphology, and ecology indicate a recent, amphibious ancestry for echidnas". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (40): 17089–17094. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10617089P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904649106. PMC 2761324Freely accessible. PMID 19805098.
  48. 1 2 "Appendicular Skeleton".
  49. Butler, P. M. (2000). "Review of the early allotherian mammals" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica. 45 (4): 317–342.
  50. White, A. T. (May 21, 2005). "Mammaliaformes—Palaeos". Archived from the original on December 20, 2010. Retrieved January 20, 2012.
  51. Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004), p. 299
  52. "Mammalia: Spalacotheroidea & Cladotheria – Palaeos".
  53. "Metatheria – Palaeos".
  54. Szalay, F.S.; Trofimov, B.A. (1996). "The Mongolian Late Cretaceous Asiatherium, and the early phylogeny and paleobiogeography of Metatheria". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 16 (3): 474–509. doi:10.1080/02724634.1996.10011335. Archived from the original on 5 March 2001.
  55. "Oldest Marsupial Fossil Found in China". National Geographic News. 2003-12-15.
  56. "Didelphimorphia – Palaeos". Retrieved 2013-10-15.
  57. "Family Peramelidae (bandicoots and echymiperas)".
  58. "Species is as species does... Part II".
  59. "Marsupials". Archived from the original on 5 April 2003.
  60. Novacek, M.J.; Rougier, G.W.; Wible, J.R.; McKenna, M.C.; Dashzeveg, D; Horovitz, I (1997). "Epipubic bones in eutherian mammals from the late Cretaceous of Mongolia". Nature. 389 (6650): 440–441. Bibcode:1997Natur.389..483N. doi:10.1038/39020. PMID 9333234.
  61. White, T.D. (August 9, 1989). "An analysis of epipubic bone function in mammals using scaling theory". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 139 (3): 343–57. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80213-9. PMID 2615378.
  62. Zhe-Xi Luo; Chong-Xi Yuan; Qing-Jin Meng; Qiang Ji (25 August 2011). "A Jurassic eutherian mammal and divergence of marsupials and placentals" (PDF). Nature. 476 (7361): 442–445. Bibcode:2011Natur.476..442L. doi:10.1038/nature10291. PMID 21866158.
  63. "Eomaia scansoria: discovery of oldest known placental mammal".
  64. O'Leary MA; Bloch, J. I.; Flynn, J. J.; Gaudin, T. J.; Giallombardo, A.; Giannini, N. P.; Goldberg, S. L.; Kraatz, B. P.; et al. (2013). "The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals". Science. 339 (6120): 662–7. Bibcode:2013Sci...339..662O. doi:10.1126/science.1229237. PMID 23393258.
  65. Reilly, S.M.; White, T.D. (January 2003). "Hypaxial Motor Patterns and the Function of Epipubic Bones in Primitive Mammals". Science. 299 (5605): 400–402. Bibcode:2003Sci...299..400R. doi:10.1126/science.1074905. PMID 12532019. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
  66. Novacek, M.J.; Rougier, G.W; Wible, J.R.; McKenna, M.C; Dashzeveg, D. & Horovitz, I. (October 1997). "Epipubic bones in eutherian mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia". Nature. 389 (6650): 483–486. Bibcode:1997Natur.389..483N. doi:10.1038/39020. PMID 9333234. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
  67. Fox, D (1999). "Why we don't lay eggs". New Scientist.
  68. "Eutheria – Palaeos".
  69. Ji, Q.; Luo, Z-X.; Yuan, C-X.; Wible, J.R.; Zhang, J-P. & Georgi, J.A. (April 2002). "The earliest known eutherian mammal". Nature. 416 (6883): 816–822. Bibcode:2002Natur.416..816J. doi:10.1038/416816a. PMID 11976675. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
  70. Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation: Bulletin 36
  71. Meng Chen, Gregory Philip Wilson, A multivariate approach to infer locomotor modes in Mesozoic mammals, Article in Paleobiology 41(02) · February 2015 DOI: 10.1017/pab.2014.14
  72. Luo, Z.-X.; Wible, J.R. (2005). "A Late Jurassic Digging Mammal and Early Mammal Diversification". Science. 308 (5718): 103–107. Bibcode:2005Sci...308..103L. doi:10.1126/science.1108875. PMID 15802602.
  73. Meng, J.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, C. (December 2006). "A Mesozoic gliding mammal from northeastern China". Nature. 444 (7121): 889–893. Bibcode:2006Natur.444..889M. doi:10.1038/nature05234. PMID 17167478.
  74. 1 2 Gaetano, L.C.; Rougier, G.W. (2011). "New materials of Argentoconodon fariasorum (Mammaliaformes, Triconodontidae) from the Jurassic of Argentina and its bearing on triconodont phylogeny". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 31 (4): 829–843. doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.589877.
  75. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, C. (2000). "A new family of primitive mammal from the Mesozoic of western Liaoning, China". Chinese Science Bulletin. 46 (9): 782–785. doi:10.1007/BF03187223. abstract, in English
  76. Hu, Y.; Meng, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, C. (2005). "Large Mesozoic mammals fed on young dinosaurs" (PDF). Nature. 433 (7022): 149–152. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..149H. doi:10.1038/nature03102. PMID 15650737.
  77. Michael J. Benton,Mikhail A. Shishkin,David M. Unwin, The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia
  78. CHRISTIAN DE MUIZON and BRIGITTE LANGE-BADRÉ, Carnivorous dental adaptations in tribosphenic mammals and phylogenetic reconstruction, Article first published online: 29 MAR 2007 doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1997.tb00481
  79. Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska, Richard L. Cifelli, Zhe-Xi Luo (2004). "Chapter 12: Metatherians". Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: origins, evolution, and structure. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 425–262. ISBN 0-231-11918-6.
  80. Sigogneau-Russell, D. (1995) Two possibly aquatic triconodont mammals from the Early Cretaceous of Morocco. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 40(2), p.149-162.
  81. Wible, J.R.; Rougier, G.W.; Novacek, M.J. & Asher, R.J. (2007). "Cretaceous eutherians and Laurasian origin for placental mammals near the K/T boundary". Nature. 447 (7147): 1003–1006. Bibcode:2007Natur.447.1003W. doi:10.1038/nature05854. PMID 17581585.
  82. Waddell, PJ; Cao, Y; Hasegawa, M; Mindell, DP (1999). "Assessing the Cretaceous superordinal divergence times within birds and placental mammals by using whole mitochondrial protein sequences and an extended statistical framework". Systematic Biology. 48 (1): 119–137. doi:10.1080/106351599260481. PMID 12078636.
  83. O'Leary, Maureen A.; Bloch, Jonathan I.; Flynn, John J.; et al. (8 February 2013). "The Placental Mammal Ancestor and the Post–K-Pg Radiation of Placentals". Science. 339 (662): 662–7. Bibcode:2013Sci...339..662O. doi:10.1126/science.1229237. PMID 23393258.
  84. 1 2 Meredith, R. W.; Janecka, J. E.; Gatesy, J.; Ryder, O. A.; Fisher, C. A.; Teeling, E. C.; Goodbla, A.; Eizirik, E.; et al. (2011). "Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on Mammal Diversification". Science. 334 (6055): 521–4. Bibcode:2011Sci...334..521M. doi:10.1126/science.1211028. PMID 21940861.
  85. Bininda-Emonds, Olaf R. P.; Cardillo, Marcel; Jones, Kate E.; et al. (29 March 2007). "The delayed rise of present-day mammals". Nature. 446: 507–12. Bibcode:2007Natur.446..507B. doi:10.1038/nature05634. PMID 17392779.
  86. Murphy, W.J.; Eizirik, E.; Springer, M.S; et al. (14 December 2001). "Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics". Science. 294 (5550): 2348–2351. Bibcode:2001Sci...294.2348M. doi:10.1126/science.1067179. PMID 11743200.
  87. Kriegs, J.O.; Churakov, G.; Kiefmann, M.; et al. (2006). "Retroposed Elements as Archives for the Evolutionary History of Placental Mammals". PLOS Biology. 4 (4): e91. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040091. PMC 1395351Freely accessible. PMID 16515367. (pdf version)
  88. Nishihara, H.; Maruyama, S.; Okada, N. (2009). "Retroposon analysis and recent geological data suggest near-simultaneous divergence of the three superorders of mammals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (13): 5235–40. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.5235N. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809297106.
  89. Churakov, G.; Kriegs, J. O.; Baertsch, R.; Zemann, A.; Brosius, J.; Schmitz, J. (2009). "Mosaic retroposon insertion patterns in placental mammals". Genome Research. 19 (5): 868–75. doi:10.1101/gr.090647.108. PMC 2675975Freely accessible. PMID 19261842.
  90. "Scientists map elephant evolution". BBC News. 2007-07-24. Retrieved 2008-08-11.
  91. Historical perspective (the Dynamic Earth, USGS)
  92. Cretaceous map
  93. Insectivora Overview – Palaeos
  94. Springer, M.S.; Douzery, E. (1996). "Secondary Structure and patterns of evolution among mammalian mitochondrial 12S rRNA molecules". J. Mol. Evol. 43 (4): 357–373. doi:10.1007/BF02339010. PMID 8798341.
  95. Springer, M.S.; Hollar, L.J.; Burk, A. (1995). "Compensatory substitutions and the evolution of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in mammals". Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 (6): 1138–1150. PMID 8524047.
  96. Li, W-H (1997). Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates. ISBN 0-87893-266-6.
  97. Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P.; Cardillo, M.; Jones, K.E.; Beck, Robin M. D.; Grenyer, Richard; Price, Samantha A.; Vos, Rutger A.; et al. (2007). "The delayed rise of present-day mammals". Nature. 446 (7135): 507–511. Bibcode:2007Natur.446..507B. doi:10.1038/nature05634. PMID 17392779.
  98. James E. Tarver; Mario dos Reis; Siavash Mirarab; Raymond J. Moran; Sean Parker; Joseph E. O’Reilly; Benjamin L. King; Mary J. O’Connell; Robert J. Asher; Tandy Warnow; Kevin J. Peterson; Philip C.J. Donoghue; Davide Pisani (5 January 2016). "The Interrelationships of Placental Mammals and the Limits of Phylogenetic Inference". Genome Biology and Evolution. 8 (2): 330–344. doi:10.1093/gbe/evv261.
  99. Wible, J. R.; Rougier, G. W.; Novacek, M. J.; Asher, R. J. (2007). "Cretaceous eutherians and Laurasian origin for placental mammals near the K/T boundary" (PDF). Nature. 447 (7147): 1003–1006. Bibcode:2007Natur.447.1003W. doi:10.1038/nature05854. PMID 17581585. Retrieved March 25, 2013.
  100. Benton, M.J. (December 1999). "Early origins of modern birds and mammals: molecules vs. morphology". BioEssays. 21 (12): 1043–1051. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199912)22:1<1043::AID-BIES8>3.0.CO;2-B. PMID 10580989.
  101. Archibald, J.D. (May 1996). "Fossil Evidence for a Late Cretaceous Origin of "Hoofed" Mammals". Science. 272 (5265): 1150–1153. Bibcode:1996Sci...272.1150A. doi:10.1126/science.272.5265.1150. PMID 8662448. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
  102. Martin, R.D.; Soligo, C.; Tavaré, S. (2007). "Primate Origins: Implications of a Cretaceous Ancestry" (PDF). Folia Primatologica. 78 (5–6): 277–296. doi:10.1159/000105145. PMID 17855783. — a similar paper by these authors is free online at New light on the dates of primate origins and divergence
  103. Alroy J. (March 1999). "The fossil record of North American mammals: evidence for a Paleocene evolutionary radiation". Systematic Biology. 48 (1): 107–18. doi:10.1080/106351599260472. PMID 12078635.
  104. Archibald J.D.; Deutschman D.H. (June 2001). "Quantitative Analysis of the Timing of the Origin and Diversification of Extant Placental Orders". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 8 (2): 107–124. doi:10.1023/A:1011317930838. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
  105. Rich, T.H.; Hopson, J.A.; Musser, A.M.; Flannery., T.G.F. & Vickers-Rich, P. (11 February 2005). "Independent Origins of Middle Ear Bones in Monotremes and Therians". Science. 307 (5711): 910–914. Bibcode:2005Sci...307..910R. doi:10.1126/science.1105717. PMID 15705848. For other opinions see "Technical comments" linked from same Web page
  106. Oftedal, O.T. (2002). "The mammary gland and its origin during synapsid evolution" (PDF). Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 7 (3): 225–252. doi:10.1023/A:1022896515287. PMID 12751889.
  107. Oftedal, O.T. (2002). "The origin of lactation as a water source for parchment-shelled eggs" (PDF). Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 7 (3): 253–266. doi:10.1023/A:1022848632125. PMID 12751890.
  108. Lactating on Eggs
  109. Borders, R.; Robertson, W. (1993). "Washington's pesticide panel: process and product". Veterinary and human toxicology. 35 (3): 258–259. PMID 8351802.
  110. Mammals of the Mesozoic: The least mammal-like mammals
  111. Hu, Yaoming; Meng, Jin; Clark, James M. "A New Tritylodontid from the Upper Jurassic of Xinjiang, China". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (3): 385–391. doi:10.4202/app.2008.0053.
  112. P Bajdek, Microbiota and food residues including possible evidence of pre‐mammalian hair in Upper Permian coprolites from Russia, G. 2015, DOI: 10.1111/let.12156
  113. 1 2 3 4 Brink, A.S. (1955). "A study on the skeleton of Diademodon". Palaeontologia Africana. 3: 3–39.
  114. 1 2 3 4 Kemp, T.S. (1982). Mammal-like reptiles and the origin of mammals. London: Academic Press. p. 363. ISBN 0-12-404120-5.
  115. Estes, R. (1961). "Cranial anatomy of the cynodont reptile Thrinaxodon liorhinus". Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 125 (1253): 165–180.
  116. "Thrinaxodon: The Emerging Mammal". National Geographic Daily News. February 11, 2009. Retrieved August 26, 2012.
  117. Ellenberger, Paul (1976). "Une piste avec traces de soies épaisses dans le Trias inférieur a moyen de Lodève (Hérault, France): Cynodontipus polythrix nov. gen., nov. sp. les Cynodontes en France". Geobios. 9 (6): 769–787. doi:10.1016/S0016-6995(76)80078-2.
  118. Olsen, Paul E. (2012): Cynodontipus: A procolophonid burrow – not a hairy cynodont track (Middle-Late Triassic: Europe, Morocco, Eastern North America). Program for Northeastern Section – 47th Annual Meeting (18–20 March 2012) Hartford, Connecticut, the Geological society of America
  119. 1 2 Benoit, J.; Manger, P. R.; Rubidge, B. S. (9 May 2016). "Palaeoneurological clues to the evolution of defining mammalian soft tissue traits". Scientific Reports. 6: 25604. doi:10.1038/srep25604. Retrieved 14 September 2016.
  120. Switek, Brian. "Getting to the Root of Fur". National Geographic. Retrieved 24 November 2014.
  121. Ruben, J.A.; Jones, T.D. (2000). "Selective Factors Associated with the Origin of Fur and Feathers" (PDF). American Zoologist. 40 (4): 585–596. doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.585.
  122. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1975). Animal physiology: Adaptation and environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 699. ISBN 0-521-38196-7.
  123. Withers, P.C. (1992). Comparative Animal Physiology. Fort Worth: Saunders College. p. 949. ISBN 0-03-012847-1.
  124. Kielan−Jaworowska, Z.; Hurum, J.H. (2006). "Limb posture in early mammals: Sprawling or parasagittal" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 51 (3): 10237–10239. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
  125. Bakker 1975
  126. JENNIFER BOTHA-BRINK and KENNETH D. ANGIELCZYK, Do extraordinarily high growth rates in Permo-Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) explain their success before and after the end-Permian extinction?, Version of Record online: 26 JUL 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00601.x
  127. Microbiota and food residues including possible evidence of pre-mammalian hair in Upper Permian coprolites from Russia Piotr Bajdek1, Martin Qvarnström2, Krzysztof Owocki3, Tomasz Sulej3, Andrey G. Sennikov4,5, Valeriy K. Golubev4,5 andGrzegorz Niedźwiedzki2 Article first published online: 25 NOV 2015 DOI: 10.1111/let.12156
  128. Paul, G.S. (1988). Predatory Dinosaurs of the World. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 464. ISBN 0-671-61946-2.
  129. J.M. Watson; J.A.M. Graves (1988). "Monotreme Cell-Cycles and the Evolution of Homeothermy". Australian Journal of Zoology. CSIRO. 36 (5): 573–584. doi:10.1071/ZO9880573.
  130. Hillenius, W.H. (1992). "The evolution of nasal turbinates and mammalian endothermy". Paleobiology. 18 (1): 17–29. JSTOR 2400978.
  131. Ruben, J. (1995). "The evolution of endothermy in mammals and birds: from physiology to fossils". Annual Review of Physiology. 57: 69–95. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.000441. PMID 7778882.
  132. McNab, B.K. (1978). "The evolution of endothermy in the phylogeny of mammals". American Naturalist. 112 (983): 1–21. doi:10.1086/283249.
  133. Markus Lambertz et al, A caseian point for the evolution of a diaphragm homologue among the earliest synapsids, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2016). DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13264
  134. Ccowen, R. (2000). History of Life. Oxford: Blackwell Science. p. 432.
  135. Jenkins, F.A. Jr (1971). "The postcranial skeleton of African cynodonts". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History (36): 1–216.
  136. Pough, F.H; Heiser, J.B.; McFarland, W.N. (1996). Vertebrate Life. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. p. 798. ISBN 0-02-396370-0.
  137. 1 2 3 Victoria Gill (20 May 2011). "Mammals' large brains evolved for smell". BBC News. Retrieved 22 May 2011.


External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/25/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.