Every Student Succeeds Act
.svg.png) | |
| Acronyms (colloquial) | ESSA |
|---|---|
| Enacted by | the 114th United States Congress |
| Citations | |
| Public law | Pub.L. 114–95 |
| Codification | |
| Acts amended |
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 No Child Left Behind Act |
| Legislative history | |
| |
| Education in the United States |
|---|
 Education portal United States portal |
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) is a US law passed in December 2015 that governs the United States K–12 public education policy.[1] The law replaced its unpopular[2] predecessor, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and modified but did not eliminate provisions relating to the periodic standardized tests given to students.[3][4] Like the No Child Left Behind Act, ESSA is a reauthorization of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which established the American federal government's expanded role in funding public education.
The Every Student Succeeds Act passed both chambers of Congress with strong bipartisan support.[5]
Overview
.jpg)
The bill is the first to narrow the United States federal government's role in elementary and secondary education since the 1980s. The ESSA retains the hallmark annual standardized testing requirements of the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act but shifts the law's federal accountability provisions to states. Under the new law, students will continue to take annual tests between third and eighth grade.[2]
History
| Senate[6] | House[7] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rep. | Dem. | Rep. | Dem. |
| 40-12 | 45-0 | 178-64 | 181-0 |
The No Child Left Behind Act was due for reauthorization in 2007, but was not pursued for a lack of bipartisan cooperation.[8] Many states failed to meet the NCLB's standards, and the Obama Administration granted waivers to many states for schools that showed success but failed under the NCLB standards.[9] However, these waivers usually required schools to adopt academic standards such as the Common Core.[9] The NCLB was generally praised for forcing schools and states to become more accountable for ensuring the education of poor and minority children.[8] However, the increase in standardized testing that occurred during the presidencies of Bush and Obama met with resistance from many parents, and many called for a lessened role for the federal government in education.[9] Similarly, the president of the NEA teachers union decried the NCLB's "one-size-fits-all model . . . of test, blame and punish."[10]
Following his 2014 re-election, Senate HELP Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who had served as Education Secretary under President George H.W. Bush, decided to pursue a major rewrite of No Child Left Behind.[11] Alexander and Patty Murray (D-WA), the ranking member of the HELP committee, collaborated to write a bipartisan bill that could pass the Republican-controlled Congress and earn the signature of President Barack Obama.[11] At the same time, John Kline (R-MN), chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, pushed his own bill in the House. In July 2015, each chamber of the United States Congress passed their own renewals of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.[12] President Obama remained largely outside of the negotiations, though Alexander did win Obama's promise to not threaten to veto the bill during negotiations.[11] As the House and Senate negotiated for the passage of a single bill in both houses, Bobby Scott (D-VA), the ranking member of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, became a key player in ensuring Democratic votes in the House.[11] By September 2015, the House and Senate had been able to resolve most of the major differences, but continued to differ on how to evaluate schools and how to respond to schools that perform poorly.[11] House and Senate negotiators agreed to a proposal from Scott to allow the federal government to mandate specific circumstances in which states had to intervene in schools, while broadly giving states leeway in how to rate schools and in how to help struggling schools.[11] Other major provisions included a pre-K program (at the urging of Murray), a provision to help ensure that states would not be able to exempt large swaths of students from testing (at the behest of civil rights groups), and restrictions on the power of the Education Secretary (at the urging of Alexander and Kline).[11] The surprise resignation of Speaker John Boehner nearly derailed the bill, but incoming Speaker Paul Ryan's support of the bill helped ensure its passage.[11] In December 2015, the House passed the bill in a 359-64 vote; days later, the Senate passed the bill in an 85-12 vote.[2] President Obama signed the bill into law on December 10, 2015.[11]
Reception
.webm.jpg)
Libby Nelson of Vox wrote that the ESSA was a victory for conservatives who wished to see federal control of school accountability transferred to states, and that states could choose to make less effort to improve schools serving impoverished students.[2]
References
- ↑ Hirschfeld Davis, Julie (10 December 2015). "President Obama Signs Into Law a Rewrite of No Child Left Behind". New York Times. Retrieved 19 December 2015.
- 1 2 3 4 Nelson, Libby. "Congress is getting rid of No Child Left Behind. Here's what will replace it.". Vox. Vox Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2015. Retrieved December 2, 2015.
- ↑ Korte, Gregory (11 December 2015). "The Every Student Succeeds Act vs. No Child Left Behind: What's changed?". USA Today. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- ↑ Walker, Tim (9 December 2015). "With Passage of Every Student Succeeds Act, Life After NCLB Begins". NEA Today. Retrieved 19 December 2015.
- ↑ "President Obama Signs Education Law, Leaving 'No Child' Behind". National Public Radio. 10 December 2015. Retrieved 22 December 2015.
- ↑ "Question: On the Conference Report (Conference Report to Accompany S.1177 )". US Senate. Retrieved 11 December 2015.
- ↑ "FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 665". House.gov. US House. Retrieved 11 December 2015.
- 1 2 Rich, Mokoto (6 July 2012). "'No Child' Law Whittled Down by White House". New York Times. Retrieved 12 December 2015.
- 1 2 3 Rich, Motoko (20 March 2015). "No Child Left Behind Law Faces Its Own Reckoning". New York Times. Retrieved 12 December 2015.
- ↑ Eskelsen García, Lily (21 April 2015). "Get rid of 'test, blame, punish': Opposing view". USA Today. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Severns, Maggie (11 December 2015). "How Congress finally killed No Child Left Behind". Politico. Retrieved 12 December 2015.
- ↑ Schneider, Mercedes (July 27, 2015). "About the Upcoming House-Senate ESEA Conference Committee... And One from the Past". The Huffington Post. AOL. Archived from the original on December 2, 2015. Retrieved December 2, 2015.