EverQuest Next

EverQuest Next
Developer(s) Daybreak Game Company
Publisher(s) Daybreak Game Company
Producer(s) Terry Michaels
Designer(s) Darrin McPherson
Programmer(s) Steven Klug
Artist(s) Rosie Rappaport
Composer(s) Jeremy Soule
Series EverQuest
Engine Forgelight Engine
Platform(s) Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4
Release date(s) Cancelled
Genre(s) Massively multiplayer online role-playing game

EverQuest Next was a planned massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG), meant to be the successor to EverQuest, EverQuest Online Adventures and EverQuest II. The game was in development by the Daybreak Game Company, but the project was terminated in 2016.[1]

The game was not planned to be a sequel or prequel to any of the games in the EverQuest franchise; it was planned to present to players a "parallel world" of Norrath, one in which some of the locations and characters may be familiar, but specific relationships and events can diverge from the official storylines of the other games. The developers had stated an intention to return to a style of gameplay more like the original EverQuest, while retaining the advances in MMORPG design that have developed in the years since that game first launched. Daybreak Game Company was using their game engine called Forgelight for EverQuest Next, making this the second game to use this engine. Forgelight focuses on lighting effects and game characters. This engine is being used for eighth generation consoles and has been discussed as "amazingly intuitive".[2]

EverQuest Next and Landmark intended to use a DirectX 11 based rendering engine and supported some features of the Forgelight 2 Engine, which is currently in development.[3]

Development

The first indication that a new game was in development appeared in a chapter written by EverQuest creative director Rich Waters in the EverQuest 10th Anniversary Book (2009).[4]

At the Sony Online Entertainment Live 2012 event, John Smedley stated that EverQuest Next has been completely redeveloped, stating "What we are building is something that we will be very proud to call EverQuest. It will be the largest sandbox style MMO ever designed... We are remaking Norrath unlike anything you’ve ever seen, but you'll recognize it."[5] During Sony Online Entertainment Live, John Smedley mentioned that EverQuest Next will attempt to keep the free-to-play model for as long as possible. This means that once a player has purchased the game, they will not be required to pay a subscription fee in order to continue to play.[6]

At PAX East 2013, game developer Dave Georgeson confirmed a full reveal of EverQuest Next on August 2 at SOE Live.[7] EverQuest Next was intended to be subdivided into two segments: a standard, quest-based MMORPG, and a world-building tool called Landmark. Applications for Landmark beta-testing are already being accepted, and John Smedley has said that the best of Landmark's player-made worlds would have been brought into the MMORPG.

On January 31, 2014, EverQuest Next's counterpart Landmark began its official alpha testing phase. Purchasers of the $99.99 Founders Pack or the $59.99 Explorers Pack were allowed into this alpha testing as part of the game developers goal of "making development a collaborative process". Landmark began its closed-beta testing on March 26, 2014.

In January 2014, John Smedley confirmed that EverQuest Next would be coming to the PlayStation 4 console.[8]

In February 2014, on Reddit, John Smedley announced that the game would support the Oculus Rift, "in some way shape or form"[9]

In August 2014, at SOE Live, the EverQuest Next team revealed three new classes: the Tempest, the Cleric and the Elementalist. Brand new combat videos showing off how players work together was also shown at the event.[10]

In June 2015, it was announced that Daybreak shifted the main development focus of the team from Landmark to EverQuest Next.[11]

On March 11, 2016, Daybreak announced development had been discontinued.[12] Daybreak Game Company's president, Russell Shanks, said that "As we put together the pieces, we found that it wasn't fun".[13]

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/26/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.