Euclid's lemma

In number theory, Euclid's lemma is a lemma that captures a fundamental property of prime numbers, namely: ^{[note 1]}

For example, if p = 19, a = 133, b = 143, then ab = 133 × 143 = 19019, and since this is divisible by 19, the lemma implies that one or both of 133 or 143 must be as well. In fact, 133 = 19 × 7.

This property is the key in the proof of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.^{[note 2]} It is used to define prime elements, a generalization of prime numbers to arbitrary commutative rings.

The lemma is not true for composite numbers. For example, in the case of p = 10, a = 4, b = 15, composite number 10 divides ab = 4 × 15 = 60, but 10 divides neither 4 nor 15.

Formulations

Let p be a prime number, and assume p divides the product of two integers a and b. (In symbols this is written p|ab. Its negation, p does not divide ab is written p∤ab.) Then p|a or p|b (or both). Equivalent statements are:

• If p∤a and p∤b, then p∤ab.
• If p∤a and p|ab, then p|b.

Euclid's lemma can be generalized from prime numbers to any integers:

This is a generalization because if n is prime, either

• n|a or
• n is relatively prime to a. In this second possibility, n∤a so n|b.

History

The lemma first appears as proposition 30 in Book VII of Euclid's Elements. It is included in practically every book that covers elementary number theory.^{[4][5][6][7][8]}

The generalization of the lemma to integers appeared in Jean Prestet's textbook Nouveaux Elémens de Mathématiques in 1681.^[9]

In Carl Friedrich Gauss's treatise Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, the statement of the lemma is Euclid's Proposition 14 (Section 2), which he uses to prove the uniqueness of the decomposition product of prime factors of an integer (Theorem 16), admitting the existence as "obvious." From this existence and uniqueness he then deduces the generalization of prime numbers to integers.^[10] For this reason, the generalization of Euclid's lemma is sometimes referred to as Gauss's lemma, but some believe this usage to be incorrect^[11] due to confusion with Gauss's lemma on quadratic residues.

Proof

Proof using Bézout's lemma

The usual proof involves another lemma called Bézout's identity. ^[12] This states that if x and y are relatively prime integers (i.e. they share no common divisors other than 1) there exist integers r and s such that

Let a and n be relatively prime, and assume that n|ab. By Bézout's identity, there are r and s making

Multiply both sides by b:

The first term on the left is divisible by n, and the second term is divisible by ab which by hypothesis is divisible by n. Therefore their sum, b, is also divisible by n. This is the generalization of Euclid's lemma mentioned above.

Proof of Elements

Euclid's lemma is proved at the Proposition 30 in Book VII of Elements. The original proof is difficult to understand as is, so we quote the commentary from Euclid & Heath (1956, pp. 319-332).

Proposition 19

If four numbers be proportional, the number produced from the first and fourth will be equal to the number produced from the second and third; and, if the number produced from the first and fourth be equal to that produced from the second and third, the four numbers will be proportional. ^{[note 3]}

Proposition 20

The least numbers of those which have the same ratio with them measures those which have the same ratio the same number of times, the greater the greater and the less the less. ^{[note 4]}

Proposition 21

Numbers prime to one another are the least of those which have the same ratio with them. ^{[note 5]}

Proposition 29

Any prime number is prime to any number which it does not measure. ^{[note 6]}

Proposition 30

If two numbers by multiplying one another make same number, and any prime number measure the product, it will also measure one of the original numbers. ^{[note 7]}

Proof

If c, a prime number, measure ab, c will measure either a or b.
Suppose c does not measure a.
Therefore c, a are prime to one another. ［VII. 29］
Suppose ab＝mc.
Therefore c ： a＝b ： m. ［VII. 19］
Hence ［VII. 20, 21］ b＝nc, where n is some integer.
Therefore c measures b.
Similarly, if c does not measure b, c measures a.
Therefore c measures one or other of the two numbers a, b.
Q.E.D. ^[18]

See also

Footnotes

Notes

Citations

References

• Bajnok, Béla (2013), An Invitation to Abstract Mathematics, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4614-6636-9 .
• Euclid; Heath, Thomas Little (translator into English) (1956), The Thirteen Books of the Elements, Vol. 2 (Books III-IX), Dover Publications, ISBN 978-0-486-60089-5 - vol. 2
• Euclid; Vitrac, Bernard (translator into French) (1994), Les Éléments, traduction, commentaires et notes (in French), 2, pp. 338–339, ISBN 2-13-045568-9 
• Gauss, Carl Friedrich; Clarke, Arthur A. (translator into English) (2001), Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (Second, corrected ed.), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0-300-09473-2 
• Gauss, Carl Friedrich; Maser, H. (translator into German) (1981), Untersuchungen uber hohere Arithmetik (Disquisitiones Arithemeticae & other papers on number theory) (Second ed.), New York: Chelsea, ISBN 978-0-8284-0191-3 
• Hardy, G. H.; Wright, E. M.; Wiles, A. J. (2008-09-15), An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (6th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-921986-5 
• Ireland, Kenneth; Rosen, Michael (2010), A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory (Second ed.), New York: Springer, ISBN 978-1-4419-3094-1 
• Joyner, David; Kreminski, Richard; Turisco, Joann (2004), Applied Abstract Algebra, JHU Press, ISBN 978-0-8018-7822-0 .
• Landau, Edmund; Goodman, J. E. (translator into English) (1999), Elementary Number Theory (2nd ed.), Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-821-82004-9 
• Martin, G. E. (2012), The Foundations of Geometry and the Non-Euclidean Plane, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4612-5725-7 .
• Riesel, Hans (1994), Prime Numbers and Computer Methods for Factorization (2nd ed.), Boston: Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-0-8176-3743-9 .

External links

• Weisstein, Eric W. "Euclid's Lemma". MathWorld.