Peter Breggin

Peter Breggin
Born (1936-05-11) May 11, 1936
Residence New York, United States
Fields Psychiatry, psychotherapy
Known for Criticism of biopsychiatry and psychiatric drugs
Website
www.breggin.com

Peter Roger Breggin (born May 11, 1936)[1] is an American psychiatrist and controversial critic of biological psychiatry and psychiatric medication. In his books, he advocates replacing psychiatry's use of drugs and electroconvulsive therapy with psychotherapy, education, empathy, love and broader human services.[2]

Breggin is the author of many books critical of modern psychiatry, including Toxic Psychiatry, Talking Back to Prozac and Talking Back to Ritalin. His most recent book, Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry, discusses his theory of medication spellbinding (in which patients are said to do worse after treatment but fail to see this or recognize why),[3] the adverse effects of drugs and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the hazards of diagnosing and medicating children, Breggin's theory of a "psychopharmaceutical complex", and guidelines for psychotherapy and counseling.

Breggin now lives in the Finger Lakes Region of Central New York and practices psychiatry in Ithaca, New York.

Education and early career

Breggin graduated from Harvard College with honors,[4] and attended Case Western Reserve Medical School. His postgraduate training in psychiatry began with an internship year of mixed medicine and psychiatry at the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse. Breggin completed a first year of psychiatric residency at Harvard's Massachusetts Mental Health Center in Boston, where he was a teaching fellow at Harvard Medical School, and finished his final two years of psychiatric residency at SUNY. This was followed by a two-year staff appointment to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), where he worked to build and staff mental health centers and education. Breggin has taught at several universities, obtaining faculty appointments to the Washington School of Psychiatry, the Johns Hopkins University Department of Counseling, and the George Mason University Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution. Breggin has worked in a private practice since 1968.

Breggin is a life member of the American Psychiatric Association and an editor for several scientific journals. His opinions have been portrayed both favorably and unfavorably in the media, including Time magazine[5] and The New York Times.[6][7] He has appeared as a guest on many radio and television shows, including 60 Minutes, 20/20, Nightline, and numerous network news reports.

Research and publications

Since 1964, Breggin has published on his major topic of interest, clinical psychopharmacology. He wrote dozens of other articles, several book chapters, and more than twenty books. Many of Breggin's more recent articles are published in the peer-reviewed journal he co-founded with David Cohen and Steven Baldwin, Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, and in The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine as well as in other scientific journals such as Primary Psychiatry (2006),[8] and the Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2000).[9] Many of his published articles discuss psychiatric medication, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approval process, the evaluation of clinical trials, and the ethics of psychiatric practice. According to the Web of Science, Breggin's work has been cited by more than 700 publications, with an h-index of 20.[10]

Breggin published one science fiction novel, After The Good War: A Love Story, in 1972.[11] It has a strong proportion of psychiatric subject matter.

Conventional psychiatry

A large portion of Breggin's work concentrates on the negative side effects of psychiatric medications, arguing that the harmful side effects typically outweigh any benefit. Breggin also argues that psychosocial interventions are almost always superior in treating mental illness. He has argued against psychoactive drugs, electroshock (ECT), psychosurgery, coercive involuntary treatment, and biological theories of psychiatry.

According to Breggin, the pharmaceutical industry propagates disinformation that is accepted by unsuspecting doctors, saying "the psychiatrist accepts the bad science that establishes the existence of all these mental diseases in the first place. From there it's just a walk down the street to all the drugs as remedies." He points out problems with conflicts-of-interest (such as the financial relationships between drug companies, researchers, and the American Psychiatric Association). Breggin states psychiatric drugs, "... are all, every class of them, highly dangerous". He asserts: "If neuroleptics were used to treat anyone other than mental patients, they would have been banned a long time ago. If their use wasn't supported by powerful interest groups, such as the pharmaceutical industry and organized psychiatry, they would be rarely used at all. Meanwhile, the neuroleptics have produced the worst epidemic of neurological disease in history. At the least, their use should be severely curtailed."[12]

In his book, Reclaiming Our Children, he calls for the ethical treatment of children. Breggin argues that the mistreatment of children is a national (U.S.) tragedy, including psychiatric diagnoses and prescription of drugs for children whose needs were not otherwise met. He especially objects to prescribing psychiatric medications to children, arguing that it distracts from their real needs in the family and schools, and is potentially harmful to their developing brains and nervous systems.[13]

ADHD and Ritalin

The New York Times has labeled Breggin as the nation's best-known Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) critic. As early as 1991 he sardonically coined the acronym DADD, stating, "... most so-called ADHD children are not receiving sufficient attention from their fathers who are separated from the family, too preoccupied with work and other things, or otherwise impaired in their ability to parent. In many cases the appropriate diagnosis is Dad Attention Deficit Disorder (DADD)". Breggin has written two books specifically on the topic entitled, Talking Back to Ritalin and The Ritalin Factbook. In these books he has made controversial claims, such as "Ritalin 'works' by producing malfunctions in the brain rather than by improving brain function. This is the only way it works".[14]

Together with Fred Baughman, Breggin testified about ADHD to the United States Congress. In Congress Breggin claimed "that there were no scientific studies validating ADHD", that children diagnosed with ADHD needed "discipline and better instruction" rather than psychiatric drugs, and that therapeutic stimulants "are the most addictive drugs known in medicine today."[15] Baughman and Breggin were also the major critics in a PBS Frontline TV series about ADHD entitled 'Medicating Kids'.[16] In an interview during this time period he referred to ADHD as a fiction. This increased critical attention to Ritalin resulted in the Ritalin class action lawsuits against Novartis, the American Psychiatric Association (APA), and CHADD in which the plaintiffs sued for fraud. Specifically, they charged that the defendants had conspired to invent and promote the disorder ADHD to create a highly profitable market for the drug Ritalin. All five lawsuits were dismissed or withdrawn before they went to trial.

Breggin has been very critical of psychologist Russell Barkley's work on ADHD, claiming that he exaggerates the benefits of stimulants and minimizes their hazards.[17]

SSRI antidepressants

In 1994, Breggin said that Eli Lilly and Company (maker of the antidepressant Prozac) attempted to discredit him and his book Talking Back to Prozac by linking him to the Church of Scientology and labeling his views as "Neo-Scientology".[18] Breggin denied any connection to Scientology.[18] Breggin later clarified that he was still in agreement with some of CCHR's anti-psychiatric views, supporting Tom Cruise's public stance against psychiatry.[19]

Electroshock

Breggin has written several books and scientific articles critical of electroshock therapy (ECT). He claims "... the damage produces delirium so severe that patients can't fully experience depression or other higher mental functions during the several weeks after electroshock." He was one of nineteen speakers at the 1985 NIH Consensus Development Conference on ECT. The Consensus panel (of which Breggin was not a member) found that ECT could be a useful therapy in some carefully defined cases.[20]

Organizations

In 1971 Breggin founded the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology (ICSPP), a nonprofit research and educational network concerned with the impact of mental health theory and practices upon individual well-being, personal freedom, and family and community values. As of July 2008 the center has a board of directors composed of 27 psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, counselors and other professionals in the mental health field.[21] The center holds annual scientific conferences that are open to the public. In 1999, the Center began to publish Ethical Human Sciences and Services (EHSS), which was later renamed Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry. The peer-reviewed journal is published by Springer Publishing Company (no affiliation with Springer Verlag[22]), and "is the official journal of the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry".[23] The stated goal of EHSS is to "raise the level of scientific knowledge and ethical discourse, while empowering professionals who are devoted to principled human sciences and services unsullied by professional and economic interests."[24] According to the Scopus database, since its inception the most citations it has received in a year is 13.[25] In 2002, Breggin left ICSPP. He is no longer on the Board of Directors of ICSPP, does not participate in board meetings, and has no role within the organization.[26][27]

He now runs The Center for the Study of Empathic Therapy, Education and Living, a 501(c) organization.[28]

Expert witness

Breggin testified as an expert witness in the Wesbecker case (Fentress et al., 1994), a lawsuit against Eli Lilly, makers of Prozac. Ultimately, the jury found for Eli Lilly. Breggin later claimed that this was because the plaintiffs and defendants had secretly settled behind closed doors.[29] The Supreme Court of Kentucky concluded that the Wesbecker trial had been secretly settled by Eli Lilly before going to the jury in return for defendants presenting a weakened case that was bound to lose. Trial Judge Potter was empowered by the Kentucky Supreme Court to change the verdict from a jury verdict in favor of Eli Lilly to "settled with prejudice" by Eli Lilly.[30][31][32]

In South Carolina, Breggin testified on behalf of Peggy S. Salters, a psychiatric nurse who sued her doctors and Palmetto Baptist Hospital in Columbia after ECT left her incapacitated in 2000. A jury found in favor of her and awarded her $635,177 in actual damages.[33]

In 2002, Breggin was hired as an expert witness by a survivor of the Columbine High School massacre in a case against the makers of an anti-depressant drug. In his report, Breggin failed to mention the Columbine incident or one of the killers, instead focusing on the medication taken by the other, "... Eric Harris was suffering from a substance induced (Luvox-induced) mood disorder with depressive and manic features that had reached a psychotic level of violence and suicide. Absent persistent exposure to Luvox, Eric Harris probably would not have committed violence and suicide."[34] However, according to The Denver Post, the judge of the case "... was visibly angry that the experts failed to view evidence prior to their depositions" even though they had months to do so. The evidence would have included hundreds of documents including a significant amount of video and audio tape that the killers had recorded. The judge stated, "... lawyers will be free to attack them on the basis of the evidence they haven't seen and haven't factored into their opinions."[35] The lawsuit was eventually dropped with the stipulation that the makers of Luvox donate $10,000 to the American Cancer Society.[34]

On September 16, 2011, in Winnipeg, Canada, a provincial judge cited Breggin's testimony in concluding that Prozac caused a sixteen-year-old boy to knife a friend to death, noting that, "Dr. Breggin's explanation of the effect Prozac was having on C.J.P.'s behavior both before that day and in committing an impulsive, inexplicable violent act that day corresponds with the evidence."[36] About the boy, Judge Robert Heinrichs determined, "His basic normalcy now further confirms he no longer poses a risk of violence to anyone and that his mental deterioration and resulting violence would not have taken place without exposure to Prozac."[37]

On November 20, 2012, a New York State Supreme Court jury awarded $1.5 million malpractice verdict to the family of a man who committed suicide while taking psychiatric drugs, including antidepressants.[38] Dr. Breggin was the expert witness for the family.[39]

Several judges have questioned Breggin's credibility as an expert witness. For example, a Maryland judge in a medical malpractice case in 1995 said, "I believe that his bias in this case is blinding ... he was mistaken in a lot of the factual basis for which he expressed his opinion."[40] In that same year a Virginia judge excluded Breggin's testimony stating, "This court finds that the evidence of Peter Breggin, as a purported expert, fails nearly all particulars under the standard set forth in Daubert and its progeny.... Simply put, the Court believes that Dr. Breggin's opinions do not rise to the level of an opinion based on 'good science.'"[41][42] [43]

In 2005, the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas disqualified the testimony of Breggin because it did not meet the scientific rigor established by the Frye standard. The judge stated "... Breggin spends 14 pages critiquing the treatment provided not because it ran counter to the acceptable standards of care, but because it ran counter to Breggin's personal ideas and ideologies of what the standards ought to be."[44]

Breggin alleges that pharmaceutical manufacturers, particularly Eli Lilly, have committed ad hominem attacks upon him in the form of linking him to Scientology campaigns against psychiatric drugs. Breggin acknowledges that he did work with Scientology starting in 1972, but states that by 1974 he "found [himself] opposed to Scientology's values, agenda, and tactics", and in consequence "stopped all cooperative efforts in 1974 and publicly declared [his] criticism of the group in a letter published in Reason".[45] Breggin has also stated that he has a personal reason to dislike Scientology: his wife, Ginger, was once a Scientologist,[45][46] and when they first met she was urged by other Scientologists to have no association with him because he was not also.

Criticism

Due to his outspoken criticisms of conventional psychiatry, Breggin has become a controversial figure who is regularly at odds with the mental health establishment.[47] He uses terms like "fraud" to describe the biological and genetic theories of mental disorders. He is critical of the medications used to treat these disorders, and the political process that determines the labels used for diagnosing mental disorders. He has also consistently warned about conflict of interest problems.[46]

In 1987, National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) brought a complaint against Breggin with licensure board of the State of Maryland. NAMI was upset about remarks he made on The Oprah Winfrey Show on April 2, 1987. On the TV show, Breggin stated that mental health clients should judge their clinicians in terms of their empathy and support; if they failed to show interest in them and tried to prescribe drugs during the first session, he advised such clients to seek assistance elsewhere. He also pointed out the iatrogenic effects of neuroleptic drugs. He was defended by a diverse group of psychiatrists and others who defended his right to publicly state his critical opinion.[6] Breggin was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Maryland medical board.[7] Time has noted that other mental health professionals worry that "Breggin reinforces the myth that mental illness is not real, that you wouldn't be ill if you'd pull yourself up by the bootstraps...his views stop people from getting treatment. They could cost a life."[48]

See also

Bibliography

Books

Selected articles

References

  1. Contemporary Authors Online, s.v. "Peter R(oger) Breggin" (accessed March 24, 2008).
  2. Breggin, P. R. (2007). Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry. New York: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0826129345.
  3. Breggin. Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry. p. 15.
  4. International Who's Who, 2004, p. 218, Breggin, Peter R.
  5. Christine Gorman (1994-10-10). "Prozac's Worst Enemy". Time. Retrieved 2006-07-08.
  6. 1 2 Daniel Goleman (1987-09-22). "Free Expression or Irresponsibility? Psychiatrist Faces a Hearing Today". The New York Times. Retrieved 2013-07-07.
  7. 1 2 "Psychiatrist says Panel Cleared Him". The New York Times. Associated Press. 1987-09-24. Retrieved 2013-07-07.
  8. Breggin, P. R. (2006). "Recent regulatory changes in antidepressant labels: Implications of activation (stimulation) for clinical practice". Primary Psychiatry. 13 (1): 57–60.
  9. Breggin, P. R. (2000). "Psychopharmacology and human values". Journal of Humanistic Psychology (43): 34–49.
  10. Google Scholar Search for "PR Breggin", accessed October 30, 2010
  11. https://www.amazon.com/After-Good-War-Love-Story/dp/0812814924
  12. Peter Breggin. "Should the use of neuroleptics be severely limited?". Archived from the original on March 29, 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  13. "The Psychiatric Drugging of Toddlers" (pdf). Editorial by Peter R. Breggin. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
  14. "Talking Back to Ritalin—New Breggin Book Excerpts". Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  15. Peter Breggin. "Ritalin Class Action Suits". Breggin.com. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  16. "Frontline: medicating kids". PBS. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  17. Breggin, P. R. Brain Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry. p. 264.
  18. 1 2 Peter R. Breggin, M.D. "Joe McCarthy Lives! Prozac Manufacturer Uses Smear Tactics to Try and Silence Critic". Archived from the original on October 16, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-07.
  19. Peter R. Breggin, M.D. (July 17, 2005). "Thanks Tom Cruise". Psychiatric Drug Facts.
  20. Electroconvulsive Therapy. NIH Consensus Statement Online 1985 Jun 10–12, 5(11):1–23, accessed July 28, 2008
  21. "Board of Directors". ICSPP. Archived from the original on September 8, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-28.
  22. "Springer Publishing Company History". Retrieved 2009-02-12.
  23. Laurence R. Simon. "Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry: An International Journal of Critical Inquiry" (pdf). Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  24. "IngentaConnect Publication: Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry". Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  25. Scopus journal analyser
  26. "Peter R. Breggin, MD is no longer affiliated with the Center for the Study of Psychiatry, informally known as International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology, which he founded and led from 1972-2002, and Dr. Breggin is no longer involved in its annual October conference."
  27. http://www.icspp.org/Why-We-Left.html
  28. http://www.empathictherapy.org
  29. "Eli Lilly, Missing Documents, Fentress Verdict" (PDF). A Report by Peter Breggin. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
  30. "Potter v. Eli Lilly and Co. 926 S.W.2d 449 (1996)". Supreme Court of Kentucky. May 23, 1996. Retrieved Nov 18, 2011.
  31. Zitrin, R.; Langford, M. C. (April 21, 1999). "Throwing a Head Case: The depressing tale of a clandestine Prozac settlement" (PDF). The Recorder. Retrieved Oct 26, 2011.
  32. Zitrin, R.; Langford, M. C. (1999). "The Moral Compass of the American Lawyer". Ballantine Books. Retrieved Oct 26, 2011.
  33. Unpublished Judicial Opinions, South Carolina
  34. 1 2 "Legal News". Archived from the original on 2007-11-20. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  35. Treatment Advocacy Center Newsletter – November 15 2002
  36. "The Provincial Court of Manitoba, Brian R. Bell and Daniei T. Angus, For the Crown vs G. Gregory Brodsky, Q.C., for the Accused. Judgment delivered: September 16, 2011." (PDF). p. 18. Retrieved 2011-10-23.
  37. McIntyre, Mike (Oct 23, 2011). "Judge agrees Prozac made teen a killer; Declines to move case to adult court". Winnipeg Free Press. Retrieved 2011-10-23.
  38. O'Brien, J. (November 21, 2012). "Widow of former Henninger High coach Joe Mazella wins $1.5M in lawsuit over his suicide". The Post-Standard. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
  39. Breggin, P. R. (November 27, 2012). "Jury Awards $1.5 Million in Suicide Malpractice Suit". The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
  40. Judge Hilary J. Caplan in Lightner v. Alessi, No. 94013064/CL174959 (Baltimore City Circuit Court, 1995)
  41. Magistrate Judge B. Waugh Crigler in Lam v. The Upjohn Company, No. 94-0033-H, W. Dist., of VA (Harrisonburg Division, U.S. District Court, 1995)
  42. Steven Milloy (September 13, 2002). "What Makes an 'Expert' an Expert?". FoxNews.com.
  43. Richard Bradley (2008-03-28). "Some Background on Peter Breggin". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2009-02-03.
  44. "Pa. Ct. Affirms Rejection Of Expert, Dismissal Of Med-Mal Case" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  45. 1 2 "Joe McCarthy Lives!: He's whispering in the ear of Eli Lilly & Co., the manufacturer of Prozac". Dr. Breggin's comments on Eli Lilly, Scientology and his relationship with it. Retrieved 2006-07-08.
  46. 1 2 "medicating kids: interviews: Peter Breggin". PBS – Frontline. 2000-05-03. Retrieved 2006-07-29.
  47. "A Headache For Novartis: Psychiatrist Peter Breggin is masterfully leading a campaign against Ritalin. Could he be overstating the case?". Forbes.com. 2001-07-23. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
  48. "Prozac's Worst Enemy". Time. 1994-10-10. Retrieved 2008-04-06.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/25/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.