Degasperis–Procesi equation

In mathematical physics, the Degasperis–Procesi equation

is one of only two exactly solvable equations in the following family of third-order, non-linear, dispersive PDEs:

where and b are real parameters (b=3 for the Degasperis–Procesi equation). It was discovered by Degasperis and Procesi in a search for integrable equations similar in form to the Camassa–Holm equation, which is the other integrable equation in this family (corresponding to b=2); that those two equations are the only integrable cases has been verified using a variety of different integrability tests.[1] Although discovered solely because of its mathematical properties, the Degasperis–Procesi equation (with ) has later been found to play a similar role in water wave theory as the Camassa–Holm equation.[2]

Soliton solutions

Main article: Peakon

Among the solutions of the Degasperis–Procesi equation (in the special case ) are the so-called multipeakon solutions, which are functions of the form

where the functions and satisfy[3]

These ODEs can be solved explicitly in terms of elementary functions, using inverse spectral methods.[4]

When the soliton solutions of the Degasperis–Procesi equation are smooth; they converge to peakons in the limit as tends to zero.[5]

Discontinuous solutions

The Degasperis–Procesi equation (with ) is formally equivalent to the (nonlocal) hyperbolic conservation law

where , and where the star denotes convolution with respect to x. In this formulation, it admits weak solutions with a very low degree of regularity, even discontinuous ones (shock waves).[6] In contrast, the corresponding formulation of the Camassa–Holm equation contains a convolution involving both and , which only makes sense if u lies in the Sobolev space with respect to x. By the Sobolev embedding theorem, this means in particular that the weak solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation must be continuous with respect to x.

Notes

  1. Degasperis & Procesi 1999; Degasperis, Holm & Hone 2002; Mikhailov & Novikov 2002; Hone & Wang 2003; Ivanov 2005
  2. Johnson 2003; Dullin, Gottwald & Holm 2004; Constantin & Lannes 2007; Ivanov 2007
  3. Degasperis, Holm & Hone 2002
  4. Lundmark & Szmigielski 2003, 2005
  5. Matsuno 2005a, 2005b
  6. Coclite & Karlsen 2006, 2007; Lundmark 2007; Escher, Liu & Yin 2007

References

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/7/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.