Counter-apologetics
Within criticism of religion, counter-apologetics is a field of thought that criticizes religious apologetics. Every religious apologist criticizes the defense of other religions, though the term counter-apologetics is frequently applied to criticism of religion in general by freethinkers and atheists. Luke Muehlhauser, the former executive director of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, defines counter-apologetics as "a response to Christian apologetics...examining the claims and tactics of Christian apologists and then equipping [a thinker] with skeptical responses to them".[1]
In 2006, the New Atheist television host and blogger Matt Dillahunty founded Iron Chariots, a counter-apologetics encyclopedia (see Iron chariots for origin of the name), using MediaWiki software.[2] Christian apologist and blogger J.W. Wartick has responded to Iron Chariots with posts he termed "counter-counter apologetics".[3]
On his blog, as part of his "why they don't believe" series ("why they reject Christianity and/or theism"), Christian apologist and theologian Randal Rauser invited an anonymous blogger who calls himself Counter Apologist to explain his counter-apologetics, and Rauser provided his own counter-arguments.[4]
The New Testament is well understood to contain apologetics,[5] but counter-apologetics also appears in Christian theology. Theologian John Milbank has written in a 2012 work that Christianity "makes room for" counter-apologetics by not being a Gnostic system of thought,[6] and notes the "authentic Christian fusion of apologetic and counter-apologetic" as it stands in opposition to the anti-materialist nihilism of Browning's Caliban.[7] Likewise, Biblical scholar and theologian Loveday Alexander has written that analysis of the Bible's books Luke and Acts by two other authors shows they contain counter-apologetic features perhaps to convey a pro-Roman perspective to the reader.[8]
See also
Notes
- ↑ Muehlhauser, Luke (March 26, 2010), "Counter-Apologetics: What is Counter-Apologetics?", Common Sense Atheism (blog)
- ↑ Matt Dillahunty (username Sans Deity), User:Sans Deity, Iron Chariots - the counter-apologetics wiki.
- ↑ Wartick, J.W. (July 27, 2009), "Counter-Counter-Apologetics 1: Redeeming Pascal's Wager", Always Have a Reason (blog)
- ↑ Rauser, Randal (May 28, 2013), "Why they don't believe: Counter Apologist", The Tentative Apologist (blog)
- ↑ Dulles 2005, p. 1.
- ↑ Milbank 2012, p. 19 "[T]he apophatic Christian apologia, out of its own internal structure, always makes room for the counter-apologetics for the quotidian ... since Christianity is not Gnosticism or Marcionism, its qualified world refusal will, even at the eschaton, allow the world a place..."
- ↑ Milbank 2012, p. 24.
- ↑ Alexander 1999, p. 24 "...Luke-Acts contains too many counter-apologetic features to impress a Roman reader ... and therefore proposes a reverse reading of the narrative as an apologia pro imperio: it embodies a pro-Roman perspective to a church harboring anti-Roman sentiment..."
References
- Alexander, Loveday (1999), "The Acts of the Apostles", in Mark J. Edwards, Martin Goodman, Simon Price, Chris Rowland, Apologetics in the Roman Empire : Pagans, Jews, and Christians, Clarendon Press, ISBN 9780191544378
- Dulles, Avery Cardinal (2005), "Apologetics in the New Testament", A History of Apologetics (second ed.), Ignatius Press, ISBN 9780898709339
- Milbank, John (2012), "Foreword: An apologia for apologetics", in Davison, Andrew, Imaginative Apologetics: Theology, Philosophy and the Catholic Tradition, Baker Books, p. 19, ISBN 9781441238771
- Vandebrake, Mark (2013), Freethought Resource Guide, CreateSpace chapter Religion & Pseudoscience resources: selected biography: skepticism & counter-apologetics (chapter not online)
External links
- Counter-apologetics encyclopedia page at Iron Chariots, the counter-apologetics wiki