Bruges dialect
| Brugs | |
|---|---|
| Region | Bruges |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | – |
| Glottolog | None |
The Bruges dialect (Standard Dutch and West Flemish: Brugs [ˈbrɵxs]) is a dialect of West Flemish used in Bruges. It is rapidly declining, being replaced with what scholars call general (rural) West Flemish.[1][2][3]
Phonology
Consonants
- After /u/, the sequence /nd/ is realized as a velar nasal [ŋ].[1]
- The sequence /ən/ is realized as a sequence [ən], rather than a syllabic [n̩].[1]
Realization of /r/
According to Hinskens & Taeldeman (2013), /r/ is realized as a voiced uvular trill with little friction [ʀ̝]. In the neighbouring rural area, an alveolar [r] is used.[1]
However, according to Sebregts (2014), the vast majority of the speakers in Bruges have realize /r/ as alveolar, not uvular.[4]
Definitely, the most common realization of /r/ is a voiced alveolar tap [ɾ], which is used about four times more often than the second most common realization, which is a voiced alveolar trill [r]. The other alveolar realizations include: a voiceless alveolar trill [r̥], a partially devoiced alveolar trill [r̥], a voiceless alveolar fricative tap/trill [ɾ̞̊ ~ r̝̊], a voiceless alveolar/postalveolar fricative [ɹ̝̊, ɹ̠̊˔] (the least common realization), a voiced alveolar/postalveolar fricative [ɹ̝ ~ ɹ̠˔] and a voiced alveolar approximant [ɹ].[4]
Among the uvular realizations, he lists a voiced uvular trill [ʀ], a voiced uvular fricative trill [ʀ̝], a voiced uvular fricative [ʁ] and a voiced uvular approximant [ʁ̞], among which the uvular fricative trill is the most common realization. He also lists a central vowel (which probably means [ə], [ɐ] or both of these) and elision of /r/, both of which are very rare.[4]
Vowels
| Front | Central | Back | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unrounded | rounded | unrounded | rounded | ||||||
| short | long | short | long | short | short | short | long | ||
| Close | ɪ | ʏ | ʊ | ||||||
| Mid | oral | ɛ | ɛː | œː | ə | ɵ | ɔ | ɔː | |
| nasal | ɛ̃ː | ||||||||
| Open | æ | æː | ɑ | ɑː | |||||
- In comparison with Standard Dutch, the short front vowels underwent a chain shift, so that the standard /i, y, ɪ, ʏ, ɛ/ became /ɪ, ʏ, ɛ, ɵ, æ/. The standard /u/ was also lowered to /ʊ/, yet the standard /ɔ/ was left untouched.
- Among the back vowels, /ʊ, ɔ, ɔː/ are rounded, whereas /ɑ, ɑː/ are unrounded.
- /ɪ, ʏ, ʊ/ are near-close [ɪ̟, ʏ, ʊ̠]; /ɪ/ is fully front, whereas /ʊ/ is fully back.
- /ʏ, ʊ, œː/ (but not /ɵ, ɔ, ɔː/) are rather weakly rounded [ʏ̜, ʊ̜, œ̜ː].
- /ɛ, ə, ɵ/ are mid [ɛ̝, ə, ɵ̞].
- /ɛː, ɛ̃ː, œː, ɔ, ɔː/ are open-mid [ɛː, ɛ̃ː, œː, ɔ, ɔː].
- Before /l/, /æ/ is lowered and retracted to [ɑ]. This feature is typical of working class speech, and is nearly extinct.[1][2]
| Ending point | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Front | Central | Back | |
| Close | iːə uːə | ||
| Close-mid | eɪ øʏ | eːə | oʊ |
| Open-mid | ɔːə | ɔu | |
- All of the diphthongs are falling.
- /eɪ, øʏ, oʊ/ used to be pronounced as monophthongs [eː, øː, oː],[1] a realization which is rapidly regaining popularity among younger speakers.
- Traditionally, /ɔu/ used to have such a close first element that there was practically no distinction between /ɔu/ and /oʊ/.
- Phonetically, /ɔːə/ can be either [ɔːə] or [ɔːɑ].
References
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hinskens & Taeldeman (2013), p. 167.
- 1 2 Vandekerckhove (2010), p. 326.
- ↑ Taeldeman (2005), p. 277.
- 1 2 3 Sebregts (2014), p. 90.
Bibliography
- Hinskens, Frans; Taeldeman, Johan, eds. (2013), Dutch, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-018005-3
- Sebregts, Koen (2014), "3.4.2 Bruges", The Sociophonetics and Phonology of Dutch r (PDF), Utrecht: LOT, pp. 89–93, ISBN 978-94-6093-161-1
- Taeldeman, Johan (2005), "The influence of urban centres on the spatial diffusion of dialect phenomena", in Auer, Peter; Hinskens, Frans; Kerswill, Paul, Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–284, ISBN 0-521-80687-9
- Vandekerckhove, Reinhild (2010), "Urban and rural language", in Auer, Peter; Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Theories and methods, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 315–332, ISBN 978-3-11-018002-2