Artificial chemistry

An artificial chemistry [1] [2] [3] is a chemical-like system that usually consists of objects, called molecules, that interact according to rules resembling chemical reaction rules. Artificial chemistries are created and studied in order to understand fundamental properties of chemical systems, including prebiotic evolution, as well as for developing chemical computing systems. Artificial chemistry is a field within computer science wherein chemical reactions—often biochemical ones—are computer-simulated, yielding insights on evolution, self-assembly, and other biochemical phenomena. The field does not use actual chemicals, and should not be confused with either synthetic chemistry or computational chemistry. Rather, bits of information are used to represent the starting molecules, and the end products are examined along with the processes that led to them. The field originated in artificial life but has shown to be a versatile method with applications in many fields such as chemistry, economics, sociology and linguistics.

Formal definition

An artificial chemistry is defined in general as a triple (S,R,A). In some cases it is sufficient to define it as a tuple (S,I).

Types of artificial chemistries

Important concepts

History of artificial chemistries

Artificial chemistries emerged as a sub-field of artificial life, in particular from strong artificial life. The idea behind this field was that if one wanted to build something alive, it had to be done by a combination of non-living entities. For instance, a cell is itself alive, and yet is a combination of non-living molecules. Artificial chemistry enlists, among others, researchers that believe in an extreme bottom-up approach to artificial life. In artificial life, bits of information were used to represent bacteria or members of a species, each of which moved, multiplied, or died in computer simulations. In artificial chemistry bits of information are used to represent starting molecules capable of reacting with one another. The field has pertained to artificial intelligence by virtue of the fact that, over billions of years, non-living matter evolved into primordial life forms which in turn evolved into intelligent life forms.

Important contributors

The first reference about Artificial Chemistries come from a Technical paper written by John McCaskill .[4] Walter Fontana working with Leo Buss then took up the work developing the AlChemy model [5] .[6] The model was presented at the second International Conference of Artificial Life. In his first papers he presented the concept of organization, as a set of molecules that is algebraically closed and self-maintaining. This concept was further developed by Dittrich and Speroni Di Fenizio into a theory of chemical organizations [7] .[8]

Two main schools of artificial chemistries have been in Japan and Germany. In Japan the main researchers have been Takashi Ikegami ,[9] [10] Hideaki Suzuki [11] [12] and Yasuhiro Suzuki [13] .[14] In Germany, it was Wolfgang Banzhaf, who, together with his students Peter Dittrich and Jens Ziegler, developed various artificial chemistry models. Their 2001 paper 'Artificial Chemistries - A Review' [3] became a standard in the field. Jens Ziegler, as part of his PhD thesis, proved that an artificial chemistry could be used to control a small Khepera robot .[15] Among other models, Peter Dittrich developed the Seceder model which is able to explain group formation in society through some simple rules. Since then he became a professor in Jena where he investigates artificial chemistries as a way to define a general theory of constructive dynamical systems.

Applications of artificial chemistries

Artificial Chemistries are often used in the study of protobiology, in trying to bridge the gap between chemistry and biology. A further motivation to study artificial chemistries is the interest in constructive dynamical systems. Yasuhiro Suzuki has modeled various systems such as membrane systems, signaling pathways (P53), ecosystems, and enzyme systems by using his method, abstract rewriting system on multisets (ARMS).

See also

External links

References

  1. 1 2 W. Banzhaf and L. Yamamoto. Artificial Chemistries, MIT Press, 2015.
  2. P. Dittrich. Artificial chemistry (AC) In A. R. Meyers (ed.), Computational Complexity: Theory, Techniques, and Applications, pp. 185-203, Springer, 2012.
  3. 1 2 P. Dittrich, J. Ziegler, and W. Banzhaf. Artificial chemistries — A review. Artificial Life, 7(3):225–275, 2001.
  4. J.S.McCaskill. Polymer chemistry on tape: A computational model for emergent genetics. Technical report, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry, 1988.
  5. W. Fontana. Algorithmic chemistry. In C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer, and S. Rasmussen, editors, Artificial Life II, pages 159–210. Westview Press, 1991.
  6. W. Fontana and L. Buss. “The arrival of the fittest”: Toward a theory of biological organization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 56(1):1–64, 1994.
  7. P. Dittrich, P. Speroni di Fenizio. Chemical Organization Theory. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2007) 69: 1199:1231.
  8. P. Speroni di Fenizio. Chemical Organization Theory. PhD thesis, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 2007.
  9. T. Ikegami and T. Hashimoto. Active mutation in self-reproducing networks of machines and tapes. Artificial Life, 2(3):305–318, 1995.
  10. T. Ikegami and T.Hashimoto. Replication and diversity in machine-tape coevolutionary systems. In C. G. Langton and K. Shimohara, editors, Artificial Life V, pages 426–433. MIT Press, 1997.
  11. H.Suzuki. Models for the conservation of genetic information with string-based artificial chemistry. In W. Banzhaf, J. Ziegler, T. Christaller, P. Dittrich, and J. T. Kim, editors, Advances in Artificial Life, volume 2801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 78–88. Springer, 2003.
  12. H. Suzuki. A network cell with molecular agents that divides from centrosome signals. Biosystems, 94(1-2):118–125, 2008.
  13. Y. Suzuki, J. Takabayashi, and H. Tanaka. Investigation of tritrophic interactions in an ecosystem using abstract chemistry. Artificial Life and Robotics, 6(3):129–132, 2002.
  14. Y. Suzuki and H. Tanaka. Modeling p53 signaling pathways by using multiset processing. In G. Ciobanu, G. Pa ̆un, and M. J. Pérez-Jiménez, editors, Applications of Membrane Computing, Natural Computing Series, pages 203–214. Springer, 2006.
  15. J.Ziegler and W.Banzhaf. Evolving control metabolisms for a robot. ArtificialLife, 7(2):171–190, 2001.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/20/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.