Anti-Turkism

Anti-Turkism, also known as Turcophobia (Turkophobia) or anti-Turkish sentiment, is the hostility, fear, intolerance or racism against the Turkish people, Turkish culture, Turkic people, Turkic countries, or Turkey itself (previously the Ottoman Empire).[1][2]

Anti-Turkism or Turkophobia does not only refer to intolerance against the Turks of Turkey, but also against the Turks as whole such as Azeri Turks, Iranian Turks, Qashqai Turks, Crimean Turks, Turkmen people, Bulgarian Turks, Macedonian Turks, Turkish Cypriots, Bosnian Turks, Turks of Georgia, Turks of the Dodecanese, Kosovo Turks, Croatian Turks, and Romanian Turks.[3][4][5] It can also refer to racism against ethnic Turks of Turkey living outside of Turkey in the Turkish diaspora.[6][7][8][9]

Early history

The roots of Turcophobia can be traced back to the Hunnic invasions of Europe, where Huns or Turks were ruthless foreign nomadic hordes in Europe and inspired fear amongst local Europeans.[10] The later evidence of anti-Turkism in Europe originated in 1453-54 in the form of lithurgical masses against Turks, missa contra Turcos in Latin.[11] By 1870, the anti-Turk phenomenon is defined by the term Turcophobia.[12] Turcophobia is traced to the Fall of Constantinople and the Turkish Wars in Europe of the Late Middle Ages, viz. the attempts of Western Christianity to stem the expansion of the Ottoman Empire. By the middle of the 15th century special masses called missa contra turcas (translated as "mass against Turks") were celebrated in various places in Europe,[13] the message of these masses was that victory over the Turks was only possible with the help of God and that a Christian community was therefore necessary to withstand the cruelty of the Turks.[11][14][15]

16th century

Original prints from the 16th century at Hungarian National Museum depicting a Turkish warrior butchering infants

As the Ottomans expanded their empire West, Western Europe came into more frequent contact with the Turks, often militarily. During the Ottoman Venetian Wars several notable battles were fought, such as the Ottoman conquest of the island of Cyprus, where over 56,000 Christian inhabitants were massacred or taken prisoner, and the island's commander Marco Antonio Bragadin was mutilated and flayed alive, despite Turkish assurances he and his men could leave upon surrender. Such accounts of atrocities became so frequent that the Turks quickly gained the reputation for cruelty and lack of honor in war.

Bishop Fabri of Vienna (1536–41) claimed that:

"There are no crueler and more audacious villains under the heavens than the Turks who spare no age or sex and mercilessly cut down young and old alike and pluck unripe fruit from the wombs of mothers".[13]

In the 16th century about 2,500 publications about the Turks were spread around Europe (over a thousand of which were in German). In these publications the image of the 'bloodthirsty Turk' was imprinted on reader. In fact in the period of 1480 to 1610, twice as many books were published about the Turkish threat to Europe than about the discovery of the continents of the New World.[13]

During this time the Ottoman Empire had invaded the Balkans and had been besieging Vienna. There was much fear in Europe about the Ottoman advance, most profoundly in Germany.[16] German Protestant Reformation leader Martin Luther cleverly used these fears by asserting that "the "Turks" were the agents of the Devil who, along with the Antichrist located in the heart of the Catholic Church, Rome, would usher in the Last Days and the Apocalypse".[17]

Luther had the view that the Turks' invasion of Europe was God's punishment of Christianity because it had allowed the corruption of both the Holy See and the Church.[18] In 1518 when he defended his 95 theses, Luther claimed that God had sent the Turks to punish the Christians in the same way as he had sent war, plagues and earthquakes. The reply of Pope Leo X was the famous papal bull in which he threatened Luther with excommunication and attempted to portray Luther as a troublemaker who advocated capitulation to the Turks.[13] In his writings On War Against the Turk and Military Sermon Against the Turks Martin Luther is "consistent in his theological conception of the Turks as a manifestation of God's chastising rod". Luther and his followers "particularly" made "important" contributions to the view that the war between Habsburgs and Ottomans was also a war "between Christ and antichrist" or "between God and the devil.[19]

The Portuguese Empire, seeking to invade more lands in east Africa and other parts of the world, used any encounter with the "Terrible Turk" provided them with "a prime opportunity to establish credentials as champions of the faith on par with other Europeans".[20]

Stories of the Wolf-Turk also gave Europe this negative image of the Turks. The Wolf-Turk was claimed to be a man-eating being, half animal half human with a Wolf's head and tail. Military power and cruelty were the recurring attributes in all these claims about the origins of the Turks.[13]

17th century

During the 17th century Turks and Turkish life style continued to be portrayed negatively. According to some sympathetic orientalist authors, the usage of accounts of Turkish customs and Turkish people written during the 17th and 18th centuries, "served as an "ideological weapon" during the Enlightenment's arguments about the nature of government".[21] Authors projected an image of Turkish people that is "inaccurate but accepted".[22] Regarding writings on Turkish people and their life styles, "accuracy [was] of little importance; what matters [was] the illusion".[23] Yet at the same time, contradictory and contemporary reports exist documenting the brutality, corrupt governance and atrocities of subjugated Christian peoples (such as the law forcing all Christian families to relinquish at least one child into Janissaries[24]) to fulfill the Muslim quranic concept and requirement of Jizya as well as other accounts detailing rapes, forced conversions, murders under torture and full-scale massacres which occurred in Rhodope Mountain region of what is now Bulgaria[25]

In Sweden, the Turks were designated the arch-enemy of Christianity. This is evident in a book entitled Luna Turcica eller Turkeske måne, anwissjandes lika som uti en spegel det mahometiske vanskelige regementet, fördelter uti fyra qvarter eller böcker ("Turkish moon showing as in a mirror the dangerous Mohammedan rule, divided into four quarters or books") which was published in 1694 and was written by the parish priest Erland Dryselius of Jönköping. In sermons the country's clergy preached about the Turks' general cruelty and bloodthirstiness and of how they systematically burned and plundered the areas they conquered. In a Swedish school book published in 1795 Islam was described as "the false religion that had been fabricated by the great deceiver Muhammad, to which the Turks to this day universally confess".[13]

In Orientalism, Edward Said noted that:

"Until the end of the seventeenth century the 'Ottoman peril' lurked alongside Europe to represent for the whole of Christian civilization a constant danger, and in time European civilization incorporated that peril and its lore, its great events, figures, virtues, and vices, as something woven into the fabric of life."[26]

18th century

Voltaire and other European writers criticized the Turks as tyrants who destroyed Europe's heritage.[27]

In 1718, James Puckle demonstrated his new invention, the Defence Gun, better known as the Puckle gun,—a tripod-mounted, single-barreled flintlock weapon fitted with a multishot revolving cylinder, designed for shipboard use to prevent boarding. Puckle demonstrated two versions of the basic design: one, intended for use against Christian enemies, fired conventional round bullets, while the second variant, designed to be used against the Muslim Turks, fired square bullets, designed by Kyle Tunis, which were considered to be more damaging and would, according to its patent, convince the Turks of the "benefits of Christian civilization."[28]

19th century

English author Charles Dickens, in an 1844 poem titled A Word in Season, criticized Turkish people for "ruthlessly" defacing "God's living image", saying that they lived in "brutal ignorance, and toil, and dearth". Dickens contrasts these traits with Britain's "highly civilized and thinking nation".[29]

In his 1869 travelogue The Innocents Abroad, American author Mark Twain called Turks "a people by nature and training filthy, brutish, ignorant".[30]

British MP (and off and on Prime Minister) William Ewart Gladstone criticized the Ottoman Empire's war against Bulgarian rebels. A pamphlet he published in September 1876, Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East,[31] attacked the Disraeli government for its indifference to the Ottoman Empire's violent repression of the Bulgarian April uprising. An often-quoted excerpt illustrates his rhetorical powers:

Let the Turks now carry away their abuses, in the only possible manner, namely, by carrying off themselves. Their Zaptiehs and their Mudirs, their Bimbashis and Yuzbashis, their Kaimakams and their Pashas, one and all, bag and baggage, shall, I hope, clear out from the province that they have desolated and profaned. This thorough riddance, this most blessed deliverance, is the only reparation we can make to those heaps and heaps of dead, the violated purity alike of matron and of maiden and of child; to the civilization which has been affronted and shamed; to the laws of God, or, if you like, of Allah; to the moral sense of mankind at large. There is not a criminal in a European jail, there is not a criminal in the South Sea Islands, whose indignation would not rise and over-boil at the recital of that which has been done, which has too late been examined, but which remains unavenged, which has left behind all the foul and all the fierce passions which produced it and which may again spring up in another murderous harvest from the soil soaked and reeking with blood and in the air tainted with every imaginable deed of crime and shame. That such things should be done once is a damning disgrace to the portion of our race which did them; that the door should be left open to their ever so barely possible repetition would spread that shame over the world!
Let me endeavour, very briefly to sketch, in the rudest outline what the Turkish race was and what it is. It is not a question of Mohammedanism simply, but of Mohammedanism compounded with the peculiar character of a race. They are not the mild Mohammedans of India, nor the chivalrous Saladins of Syria, nor the cultured Moors of Spain. They were, upon the whole, from the black day when they first entered Europe, the one great anti-human specimen of humanity. Wherever they went a broad line of blood marked the track behind them, and, as far as their dominion reached, civilization vanished from view. They represented everywhere government by force as opposed to government by law. – Yet a government by force can not be maintained without the aid of an intellectual element. – Hence there grew up, what has been rare in the history of the world, a kind of tolerance in the midst of cruelty, tyranny and rapine. Much of Christian life was contemptuously left alone and a race of Greeks was attracted to Constantinople which has all along made up, in some degree, the deficiencies of Turkish Islam in the element of mind![32]

Within the Ottoman Empire

Within the Ottoman Empire, the name "Turk" was sometimes used to denote the Turkmen backwoodsmen, bumpkins, or the illiterate peasants in Anatolia. "Etrak-i bi-idrak", for example, was an Ottoman play on words, meaning "the ignorant Turk".[33]

Özay Mehmet in his book Islamic Identity and Development: Studies of the Islamic Periphery mentions:[34]

The ordinary Turks (Turkmen) did not have a sense of belonging to a ruling ethnic group. In particular, they had a confused sense of self-image. Who were they: Turks, Muslims or Ottomans? Their literature was sometimes Persian, sometimes Arabic, but always courtly and elitist. There was always a huge social and cultural distance between the Imperial centre and the Anatolian periphery. As Bernard Lewis expressed it: "in the Imperial society of the Ottomans the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages." (Lewis 1968: 1)

In the words of a British observer of the Ottoman values and institutions at the start of the twentieth century: "The surest way to insult an Ottoman gentleman is to call him a 'Turk'. His face will straightway wear the expression a Londoner's assumes, when he hears himself frankly styled a Cockney. He is no Turk, no savage, he will assure you, but an Ottoman subject of the Sultan, by no means to be confounded with certain barbarians styled Turcomans, and from whom indeed, on the male side, he may possibly be descended."(Davey 1907: 209)

Contemporary Anti-Turkism

Before the 1960s, Turkey had "relatively low emigration".[35] After the adoption of new constitution in 1961, Turkish citizens began migrating outside.[36] Gradually, in certain Western countries, Turks became a "prominent ethnic minority group",[37] and thus, become "increasingly visible and vocal".[38] But since the beginning Turks were subject to discrimination against them. Even when host countries launched a shift in policy regarding their immigrants "only the Turkish workers were excluded" from them.[39]

The term "Turk" has acquired a meaning similar to "barbarian" or "heathen" in various European languages,[13][40][41][42][43] or use "Turk" as a slur or curse.[13][44] Due to that negative influence, it had instances of negative use and image in the U.S.[45]

Armenia

Armenia–Turkey relations have historically been hostile[46] primarily due to the Armenian Genocide of 1915 and its denial by Turkey. According to a 2007 survey, 78% of Armenians see Turkey as a threat.[47] In 2016, the President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, forged a coalition with the anti-Turkish political party Armenian Revolutionary Federation.[48]

Bulgaria

Turkish refugees from the Veliko Tarnovo district coming into Shumen (1877).
Konstantin Makovsky (1839–1915). The Bulgarian Martyresses (1877). A painting from the April Uprising, it sparked outrage in the West against alleged Turkish atrocities in Bulgaria.

The Turkish population of Bulgaria before the country was reformed in 1878 is estimated at one third of the total.[49] By 1876, approximately 70% of the fertile arable land belonged to the Turks. Afterward, an estimated 220,000 Turks migrated to Turkey between 1923 and 1949, though the Turkish government encouraged the emigration. Then, another wave of Turks left Bulgaria, some 155,000 were either expelled or allowed to leave in 1949–51, though the emigration occurred following an agreement with the Turkish government.[50][51]

In 1984, the Bulgarian government started a Bulgarisation process whereby policies were instigated to limit the cultural and ethnic characteristics of Bulgarian Turks. Approximately 800,000 Turks were forced to change their names to Bulgarian names. Furthermore, Turks were not allowed to attend the Muslim religious ceremonies,[52] speak Turkish in public places or wear traditional Turkish clothing.[53] This eventually led to the biggest mass exodus in Europe since World War II ensued after the border with Turkey was opened in June 1989 and in the span of three months approximately 350,000 Turks left Bulgaria on tourist visas (hence the event is known as The Big Excursion) and crossed the border into Turkey.[54] Eventually, especially after the removal of Todor Zhivkov from power, over 150,000 Turks returned to Bulgaria, but more than 200,000 chose to remain in Turkey permanently.[55]

The current Bulgarian prime minister Boyko Borisov (2009–2013 and again since 2014) has been accused of having anti-Turkish tendencies.[56] In December 2009, Borisov "declared himself in favor of a motion put forth by the nationalist party ATAKA and its leader for holding a referendum over the broadcast of daily Turkish language news emissions on the Bulgarian National TV", but he later withdrew support.[57] The Turkish prime minister "expressed his concern of rising anti-Turkish sentiments in Bulgaria"[58] to the Bulgarian prime minister. The Turkish Foreign Ministry also "expressed its concern over the rising heated rhetoric in Bulgaria"[59] on the issue of the Turkish language news. According to a report by Ivan Dikov, "not just ATAKA but a large number of Bulgarians have resented the news in Turkish".[57]

Moreover, in 2009 Borissov referred to Turks (and Roma) as "bad human material".[60][61][62][63] The vice-president of the Party of European Socialists, Jan Marinus Wiersma claimed that he "has already crossed the invisible line between right wing populism and extremism."[64]

Croatia

Cyprus

See also: Turks in Cyprus

The island of Cyprus became an independent state in 1960, with power sharing between the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots under the 1960 Zurich agreements. In December 1963, the events known as Bloody Christmas (tr:Kanlı Noel)[65] occurred where Turkish Cypriots were ousted from the Republic and Greek Cypriots initiated a military campaign against them, which led to the beginning of ethnic clashes between the two communities that were to continue for 11 years.[66] At this time, Turkish Cypriots bore the heavier cost in terms of casualties and some 25,000 Turkish Cypriots became internally displaced accounting to about a fifth of their population.[67] These Turkish Cypriots had become internally displaced and lived as refugees for at least ten years before the 1974 Turkish invasion.[67] By the late 1960s, tension continued to grow and approximately 60,000 Turkish Cypriots left their homes and moved into enclaves.[68] This resulted in an exodus of Turkish Cypriots with the majority migrating to the United Kingdom whilst others went to Turkey, North America and Australia.[69]

Germany

The Solingen arson attack of 1993 was one of the most severe instances of xenophobic violence in modern Germany when neo-Nazis set fire to a Turkish family's home.

It has been observed that Turks are "the most prominent ethnic minority group in contemporary Germany".[70] But discrimination against Turkish minority "occurs in various everyday situations"[71] in Germany. After the adoption of the 1961 constitution, Turkish citizens began migrating outside the country.[36] While the population of Turkish immigrant workers reached 3 million, Turkish minorities have become "well-known butts of welfare chauvinism and racial violence in Germany".[72] Turks were subjected to negative jokes and public discourse and were portrayed as "ludicrously different in their food tastes, dress, names, and even in their ability to develop survival techniques".[73] Those "eye-opening" jokes contained such animosity and aggressivenes such that it was "reflected in the actual increasing violence towards Turks".[74] As a result of this discrimination, "serious behavioral consequences of prejudice against Turks is prevailing in Germany".[71]

The number of violent acts by right-wing extremists in Germany increased dramatically between 1990 and 1992.[75] On November 25, 1992, three Turkish residents were killed in a firebombing in Mölln (Northern Germany).[76] The attack prompted even further perplexity since the victims were neither refugees nor lived in a hostel.[77] The same was true for the incident in a Westphalian town on May 29, 1993; where another arson attack took place in Solingen on a Turkish family that had resided in Germany for twenty-three years, five of whom were burnt to death.[78] Several neighbours heard someone shout Heil Hitler! before dousing the front porch and door with gasoline and setting the fire to the home.[79] However, most Germans condemned these attacks on foreigners and many marched in candlelight processions.[80]

According to Greg Nees, "because Turks are both darker-skinned and Muslim, conservative Germans are largely against granting them citizenship."[81]

Greece

Historic events such as the Fall of Constantinople and various Ottoman-era practices such as the Devşirme, as well as modern events such as the 1955 Istanbul pogrom, the Turkish Invasion of Cyprus and the Aegean dispute also contributed to the anti-Turkish sentiments or Turcophobia in Greece. These sentiments have also left an impact to the Turkish community in Western Thrace, which is located in the north-eastern part of Greece.

The Turkish community lived in Western Thrace since the 15th century and the Ottoman conquest of the region. The Turks owned 84% of the land in Western Thrace in 1922, but now the minority estimates this figure to be between 20–40%. This stems from various past practices of the Greek administration whereby ethnic Greeks were encouraged to purchase Turkish land with soft loans granted by the state.[82][83] The Western Thrace Turks have traditionally been estimated to number between 120,000 and 130,000.:[84][85] Yet, this is the estimate of the Turkish state, and the Greeks claim that the Muslim population consists of various ethnic and religious backgrounds of which the Pomaks (Muslim people of Slavic origins and language) and Muslim Gypsies (Roma-related people of Muslim religion) make up the majority of the overall Muslim groups with Sunni Muslims that self-ascribe ethnically as Turks being the minority. In terms of religion, next to Sunni Muslims, the Pomaks and Gypsies present sizeable Alevite and Bektashi groups. Thus, the Greek government refers to the overall Muslim community - the one Turkey ascribes as "Turkish community" - as Greek Muslims or Hellenic Muslims, and does not recognise any specific Turkish minority in Western Thrace.[84] Greek courts have also outlawed the use of the word 'Turkish' to describe the community so as to avoid the term being wrongly ascribed indiscriminately to unrelated Muslim citizens. In 1988, the Greek High Court affirmed a 1986 decision of the Court of Appeals of Thrace in which the Union of Turkish Associations of Western Thrace was ordered closed for reasons of illegally ascribing the term on unrelated/unaware people. The court held that the use of the word 'Turkish' referred to citizens of Turkey, and could not be used to describe citizens of Greece.

India

Anti-Turkism in India is traceable to historical factors as well as modern Turkish support for Pakistan in its conflicts with India.

Malta

Having fought the Ottoman Empire in the Siege of Malta of 1565, the Maltese still have colourful vocabulary regarding this event. For example, when the sun is visible during rainfall, the expression "tghammed tork" (translates to "a Turk has been baptised", which was considered to be a rare event), or alternatively "twieled tork" ("a Turk was born"), is often used. Another expression is "Haqq ghat-torok" (curse on the Turks!), used when something goes wrong.[86] Religious representations reveal the extent of this historic rivalry, with a diplomatic incident nearly arising following the wrong depiction of the Turkish flag instead of that of the Ottoman Empire in a religious statue displayed for a village festa in Vittoriosa.[87]

Netherlands

The Netherlands has a sizable Turkish minority group as well as Germany. The Turkish ethnic minority group is the "second largest ethnic minority group living in the Netherlands" and their culture is considered to "differ substantially from Dutch culture".[88] Even though progressive policies are installed, "especially compared with those in some other European countries such as Germany"[89] Human Rights Watch criticized the Netherlands for new legislations violating the human rights of Turkish ethnic minority group.[90] The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance published its third report on Netherlands in 2008. In this report the Turkish minority group is described as a notable community which has been particularly affected by "stigmatisation of and discrimination against members of minority groups"[91] as a result of controversial policies of the governments of Netherlands. The same report also noted that "the tone of Dutch political and public debate around integration and other issues relevant to ethnic minorities has experienced a dramatic deterioration".

Recently, use of the word "allochtonen" as a "catch-all expression" for "the other" emerged as a new development. European Network against Racism, an international organisation supported by European Commission reported that, in Netherlands, half of the Turks reported having experienced racial discrimination.[92] Same report points "dramatic growth of islamophobia" parallel with antisemitism. Another international organisation European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia highlighted negative trend in Netherlands, regarding attitudes towards minorities, compared to average EU results.[93] The analysis also noted that compared to most other Europeans, in the Netherlands, majority group is "more in favour of cultural assimilation of minorities" rather than "cultural enrichment by minority groups".

Russia and former Soviet Union

A World War I Russian propaganda poster depicting an oriental imagined Turk running away from a Russian.

Within the Soviet Union, ethnic cleansing of Turks during World War II took the form of mass deportations carried out by the NKVD and the Red Army.[94] The reason for the deportation was because the Soviet Union was preparing to launch a pressure campaign against Turkey. In June 1945 Vyacheslav Molotov, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, formally presented a demand to the Turkish Ambassador in Moscow for the surrender of three Armenian provinces (Kars, Ardahan and Artvin). Moscow was also preparing to support Armenian claims to several other Armenian provinces. Thus, war against Turkey seemed possible, and Joseph Stalin wanted to clear the strategic Turkish population (especially those situated in Meskheti) located near the Turkish-Georgian border which were likely to be hostile to Soviet intentions.[95] The deportation is relatively poorly documented, but Soviet sources suggests that an estimated 115,000 Turks were deported mainly to Central Asia, most of which settled in Uzbekistan.[96] However, numerous Turks died along the way.[97]

In 1989, ethnic clashes between the Uzbeks and Turks occurred. According to official figures, 103 people died and over 1,000 were wounded. Moreover, 700 houses were destroyed and more than 90,000 Meskhetian Turks were driven out of Uzbekistan.[98] The events of 1989 are considered by the Turks as their 'second deportation'. Those that remained in Uzbekistan complained (in private due to the fear of repercussions) of ethnic discrimination.[99]

Although some have returned to Meskheti, a problem has constantly been that Georgians and Armenians who settled into the homes of the Turks have vowed to take up arms against any return movements. Moreover, many Georgians have advocated that the Meskhetian Turks should be sent to Turkey, 'where they belong'.[100]

More recently, some Turks in Russia, especially those in Krasnodar, have faced hostility from the local population. The Krasnodar Meskhetian Turks have suffered significant human rights violations, including the deprivation of their citizenship. They are deprived of civil, political and social rights and are prohibited from owning property and employment.[101] Thus, since 2004, many Turks have left the Krasnodar region for the United States as refugees, which is now becoming their third deportation. They are still barred from full repatriation to Georgia.[102]

Nowadays, many Georgians have antipathy (and sometimes hatred) toward Turks, due historical reasons and Turkish migration in Adjara region.

After the 2015 Russian Sukhoi Su-24 shootdown, anti-Turkish sentiment rose in Russia.

Serbia

See also: Turks in Serbia

Quotes and sayings

Quotes

They [the Ottomans] were, upon the whole, from the black day when they first entered Europe, the one great anti-human specimen of humanity. Wherever they went, a broad line of blood marked the track behind them, and, as far as their dominion reached, civilization disappeared from view. They represented everywhere government by force, as opposed to government by law.
William Gladstone, 1876[103]
The barbarian power, which has been for centuries seated in the very heart of the Old World, which has in its brute clutch the most famous countries of classical and religious antiquity and many of the most fruitful and beautiful regions of the earth ... ignorantly holding in its possession one half of the history of the whole world.
Cardinal Newman (1801–1890)
... tyrants of the women and enemies of arts ...
Voltaire (1694–1778)[27]
... to chase away from Europe these barbaric usurpers ...
Voltaire (1694–1778)[27]
I wish fervently that the Turkish barbarians be chased away immediately out of the country [Greece] of Xenophon, Socrates, Plato, Sophocles and Euripides. If we wanted, it could be done soon but seven crusades of superstition have been undertaken and a crusade of honour will never take place. We know almost no city built by them; they let decay the most beautiful establishments of Antiquity, they reign over ruins.
Voltaire (1694–1778), The Orient's Christian Realm
When I consider history, I find that there has been no nation that has practiced more blasphemy of God, brutally, shameful fornication, and every kind of wild and chaotic living than the Turks.
Philipp Melanchthon[104]
The gentlest man among these pious Turks,

God's living image ruthlessly defaces;
Their best high-churchman, with no faith in works,
Bowstrings the Virtues in the market-places:

Charles Dickens, A Word in Season, 1844[29]
Lastly, I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.
Charles Darwin[105]
I never disliked a Chinaman as I do these degraded Turks and Arabs, and when Russia is ready to war with them again, I hope England and France will not find it good breeding or good judgment to interfere.
Mark Twain, 1869[106]
Mosques are plenty, churches are plenty, graveyards are plenty, but morals and whiskey are scarce.
Mark Twain, 1869[106]
... and lied like a Turk when he said it.
Mark Twain, 1869[106]
... such individuals as the furthermost Turks found in the remote North, the Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational animals.
Maimonides[107]

Sayings

The term "Turk" acquired a meaning similar to "barbarian" or "heathen" in various European languages, as evident from the following dictionary entries:

Many vices in the world came to be associated with the Turks as they moved westward towards Europe. The following is an incomplete list of sayings about Turks in various countries of Europe and the Middle East.

 Armenia

 Bulgaria

Idiom:(after negation) indicates extreme obstinacy, reluctance: by no manner of means. Synonym: by no means

 Denmark

 France

 Germany

 Greece and  Cyprus

 India

 Iran

 Italy

 Japan

 Korea

 Malta[86]

 Netherlands See also:nl:Turk (scheldwoord) Turk (insult) in Dutch Wiki

 North Korea

 Norway

 Romania

 Russia

 Serbia (and other ex-Yugoslavia countries)

 Syria and  Tunisia

See also

References

  1. Libaridian, Gerard J. (2004). Modern Armenia: people, nation, state. Transaction Publishers. p. 193. ISBN 978-0-7658-0205-7. One consequence of the shift from anti-communism to anti-Turkism was that an important segment of the Diaspora lived through moments ...
  2. Khalidi, Rashid (1991). The origins of Arab nationalism. Columbia University Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-231-07435-3. In the first place, Arabist ideology, including a bitter anti-Turkism, was fully formulated long before the Young Turk revolution
  3. "The Turk in America". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  4. "The Muslim World League Journal". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  5. "From Eastern Europe to Western China". google.com.
  6. "Cartographies of Diaspora". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  7. "Communication and Identity in the Diaspora". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  8. "Sociology of diaspora". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  9. "The Turk in America". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  10. "The Greatest Story Ever Forged: Curse of the Christ Myth - David Hernandez". Books.google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  11. 1 2 "Denmark and the Crusades". google.com.
  12. "Journal of the Ethnological Society of London". google.com.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ""Turkey, Sweden and the EU Experiences and Expectations", Report by the Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies" (PDF). Sieps.se. April 2006. p. 6. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  14. "The Cultural Life of the Early Polyphonic Mass". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  15. "La Croisade". Google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  16. "Harvesting Martin Luther's Reflections on Theology, Ethics, and the Church - Timothy J. Wengert". Books.google.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  17. "Project MUSE - Muslims and Social Change in the Atlantic Basin". Muse.jhu.edu. doi:10.1353/jwh.0.0064. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  18. Smith, R. O. (2007). Luther, the Turks, and Islam. Currents in Theology and Mission, 34(5), 351-365: "Luther's statement of explanation created yet more contention. Indeed, it was singled out for condemnation in Exsurge Domine, the papal bull of excommunication directed at Luther by Pope Leo X on 15 June 1520. Among the "destructive, pernicious, scandalous, and seductive" errors enumerated in the bull is an essentialized version of Luther's position: "To go to war against the Turks is to resist God who punishes our iniquities through them." (11) But even before Exsurge Domine, Luther tied his struggles with Rome to the war against the Turk. Prior to the beginning of the Leipzig Debate with Johannes Eck in June 1519, Luther wrote to his friend Wencenlaus Linck, "I think I can demonstrate that today Rome is worse than the Turk."
  19. "Harvesting Martin Luther's Reflections on Theology, Ethics, and the Church - Timothy J. Wengert". Books.google.com. p. 185. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  20. "Project MUSE - Global Politics in the 1580s: One Canal, Twenty Thousand Cannibals, and an Ottoman Plot to Rule the World". Muse.jhu.edu. doi:10.1353/jwh.2007.0020. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  21. Grosrichard, A. (1998). The sultan's court: European fantasies of the East. (p. 125). London: Verso.
  22. "Project MUSE - Royal French Women in the Ottoman Sultans' Harem: The Political Uses of Fabricated Accounts from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century". Muse.jhu.edu. doi:10.1353/jwh.2006.0038. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  23. Grosrichard, A. (1998). The sultan's court: European fantasies of the East. (pp. xiii, xiv, 125, 169, 185). London: Verso.
  24. "Janissary". Encyclopedia Britannica.
  25. Anton Donchev. "Време разделно". Goodreads.
  26. Edward Said. "Orientalism", (1978), p. 59–60
  27. 1 2 3 Archived October 1, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  28. "h2g2 - The Machine Gun 1718 - 1914 - Edited Entry". Bbc.co.uk. 2003-01-27. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  29. 1 2 Charles Dickens (1903). The poems and verses of Charles Dickens. Harper & brothers. p. 141.
  30. Mark Twain (1911). The writings of Mark Twain. P. F. Collier & Son Company. p. 120.
  31. Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East, Bulgarian horrors and the question of the east by W. E. Gladstone
  32. Gladstone, William Ewart (1876). Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East. London: J Murray. p. 31. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  33. Alfred J. Rieber, Alexei Miller. Imperial Rule, Central European University Press, 2005. pg 33
  34. Ozay Mehmet, Islamic Identity and Development: Studies of the Islamic Periphery, Routledge, 1990. pg 115
  35. Schwartz, J. M. (1977). "Review of the book Turkish workers in Europe, 1960–1975: A socio-economic reappraisal, by Nermin Abadan-Unat". Contemporary Sociology. 6(5): 559–560. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  36. 1 2 Unat, N. A. (1995). Turkish migration to Europe. In R. Cohen (Ed.), The Cambridge survey of world migration (p. 279). Cambridge University Press.
  37. Hübner, E., & Rohlfs, H. H. (1992). Jahrbuch der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: 1992/93. München: Beck. OCLC 28132828
  38. Micallef, R. (2004). Turkish Americans: Performing identities in a transnational setting. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 24(2), 233-241. doi:10.1080/1360200042000296636.
  39. Hahamovitch, C. (2003). "Creating perfect immigrants: Guest workers of the world in historical perspective 1". Labor History. 44 (1): 69–94. doi:10.1080/0023656032000057010.
  40. 1 2 "Webster". Archived from the original on 2005-11-06. Retrieved 2005-11-06.
  41. 1 2 "AENJ 1.1: Stigma, racism and power". aen.org.nz.
  42. 1 2 "De Telegraaf-i [] Binnenland - Van Dale vrijuit". Krant.telegraaf.nl. 2001-11-15. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  43. nl:Turk (scheldwoord)#cite note-2 Turk (scheldwoord) Dutch Wikipedia article about Turk (curseword)
  44. 1 2 https://web.archive.org/web/20110818025845/http://htdig.informatia.ro/jurnalul/afisez.php?sid=145486&date=2009-03-03&afisez=local. Archived from the original on August 18, 2011. Retrieved May 18, 2009. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  45. "The Turk in America". google.com.
  46. Falkowski, Maciej (13 October 2009). "A symbolic breakthrough in Armenian-Turkish relations". Centre for Eastern Studies. Retrieved 2 July 2013. The signature of the documents marks a symbolic breakthrough in the hostile relations between Turkey and Armenia.
  47. "Armenia National Voter Study October 27 – November 3, 2007" (PDF). IRI, USAID, Baltic Surveys Ltd./The Gallup Organization, ASA. p. 34. Retrieved 4 May 2013.
  48. "A Concise History of Bulgaria - R. J. Crampton". Books.google.com. 2005-11-24. p. 111. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  49. Minahan 2002, 1613.
  50. R. J. Crampton, 2007, Bulgaria, pp. 431–433
  51. Waardenburg, Jacques (2003). Muslims and others: relations in context. Walter de Gruyter. p. 266. ISBN 978-3-11-017627-8. Anti-Islamic campaigns arose in the nationalist anti-Turkish measures implemented in Bulgaria in the 1980s.
  52. Katsikas 2010, 65.
  53. Neuburger 2004, 82.
  54. Eminov 1997, 97.
  55. Doran, Peter B (July 18, 2009). "Bulgarian election raises red flags". guardian.co.uk. United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  56. 1 2 Dikov, Ivan (December 30, 2009). "The Bulgaria 2009 Review: Domestic Politics". Sofia, Bulgaria: Novinite Ltd. Sofia News Agency. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  57. "Erdogan to Borisov: Radical Statements Target Turkish Minority in Bulgaria". Sofia, Bulgaria: Novinite Ltd. Sofia News Agency. December 18, 2009. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  58. Dikov, Ivan (December 30, 2009). "The Bulgaria 2009 Review: Diplomacy". Sofia, Bulgaria: Novinite Ltd. Sofia News Agency. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  59. "Изказване на Бойко Борисов в Чикаго – емигрантска версия - НДТ, Добрич, България". Ndt1.com. 2009-02-05. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  60. https://web.archive.org/web/20110906034411/http://www.segabg.com/data/BBorisovChicago.mp3. Archived from the original on September 6, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2015. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  61. "Mayor of Sofia brands Roma, Turks and retirees 'bad human material'". Telegraph. 2009-02-06. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  62. "Sofia Mayor to Bulgarian Expats: We Are Left with Bad Human Material Back Home - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency". Novinite.com. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  63. "Challenge to EPP over leader's statement on bad human material". Socialistgroup.eu. 6 February 2009.
  64. Papadakis 2005, 82.
  65. Demirtaş-Coşkun 2010, 39.
  66. 1 2 Kliot 2007, 59.
  67. Tocci 2004, 53.
  68. Hüssein 2007, 18.
  69. Klink, A.; Wagner, U. (1999). "Discrimination against ethnic minorities in Germany: Going back to the field". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 29 (2): 402–423. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01394.x.
  70. 1 2 Shohat, M.; Musch, J. (2003). "Online auctions as a research tool: A field experiment on ethnic discrimination". Swiss Journal of Psychology. 62 (2): 139–145. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.62.2.139.
  71. R. Cohen. (1995). Labour migration to western Europe after 1945. In R. Cohen (Ed.), The Cambridge survey of world migration. (p. 279). Cambridge University Press.
  72. Toelken, B. (1985). "Turkenrein" and "Turken, Rausl"—Images of fear and aggression in German Gastarbeitterwitze. In N. Furniss & I. Basgoz (Eds.), Turkish workers in Europe: An interdisciplinary study. (p. 155). Indiana: Indiana University Turkish Studies.
  73. Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). "Whither multiculturalism?". Applied Psychology. 46 (1): 44–49. doi:10.1080/026999497378494.
  74. Ramet 1999, 72.
  75. Solsten 1999, 406.
  76. Staab 1998, 144.
  77. Dummett 2001, 142.
  78. Lee 1999, 331.
  79. Cornelius, Martin & Hollifield 1994, 213
  80. Nees 2000, 155.
  81. Whitman 1990, 2
  82. Hirschon 2003, 106
  83. 1 2 Whitman 1990, i
  84. Levinson 1998, 41.
  85. 1 2 "Introduction" (PDF). Thinksite.eu. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  86. Abela, Lauro (26 August 2006). "When Turkey took umbrage over a statue". The Times. Valletta.
  87. Hagendoorn, L., & Hraba, J. (1989). Foreign, different, deviant, seclusive and working class: Anchors to an ethnic hierarchy in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, (12), 441-468.
  88. Mendes, H. F. (1994). Managing the multicultural society: The policy making process. Paper presented at the Conference on Today's Youth and Xenophobia: Breaking the Cycle. Wassenaar, Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study.
  89. "Human Rights Watch" (PDF). Hrw.org. 2009. Retrieved 2015-09-06. Human Rights Watch world report 2009: Events of 2008
  90. "Third report on the Netherlands. Strasbourg, FRANCE : The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance" (PDF). ECRI. 2008. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  91. Dinsbach, W.; Walz, G.; Boog, I. (2009). "ENAR shadow report 2008: Racism in the Netherlands. Brussels, Netherlands: ENAR Netherlands" (PDF). Cms.horus.be. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  92. Thalhammer, E., Zucha , V., Enzenhofer, E., Salfinger , B., & Ogris, G. (2001). Attitudes towards minority groups in the European Union: A special analysis of the Eurobarometer 2000 survey on behalf of the European Monitoring Centre on racism and xenophobia. Vienna, Austria: EUMC Sora. .
  93. Ther & Siljak 2001, 4.
  94. Bennigsen & Broxup 1983, 30.
  95. Cohen & Deng 1998, 263.
  96. "Meskhetian Genocide by Russia". Topix.
  97. Schnabel & Carment 2004, 63.
  98. Drobizheva, Gottemoeller & Kelleher 1998, 296
  99. Cornell 2001, 183.
  100. Barton, Heffernan & Armstrong 2002, 9
  101. Coşkun 2009, 5.
  102. "Full text of "Bulgarian horrors and the question of the East"". Archive.org. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  103. Luther, M., & Melanchthon, P. (1532). Zwen trostbrieve geschriben an der Durchleuchtigen und hochgebornen Fürsten und Herrn Joachim Churfürste und Marckgraven zu Brandenburger vom Türken zuge. (p. 4b.). Nürmberg: Berg.
  104. "Captcha" (in Chinese). Gutenberg.org. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  105. 1 2 3 "Innocents Abroad". Etext.lib.virginia.edu. 2008-09-18. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  106. "Perplexed.html". umd.edu.
  107. Archived December 21, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
  108. Խուզարկություններ ու հարցաքննություններ ընդդիմության շարքերում (in Armenian). A1plus. 7 May 2007. Archived from the original on January 30, 2012. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  109. Den Danske Ordbog
  110. Ordbog over det danske Sprog
  111. "TURC". Portail.atilf.fr. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  112. "Ηλεκτρονικός Κόμβος ΚΕΓ". komvos.edu.gr.
  113. Fereydoun Safizadeh. "Is There Anyone in Iranian Azerbaijan Who Wants to Get a Passport to Go to Mashad, Qum, Isfahan or Shiraz? - The Dynamics of Ethnicity in Iran", Payvand's Iran News, February 2007
  114. Brenda Shaffer. "The Formation of Azerbaijani collective identity in Iran", Nationalities Papers, 28:3 (2000), p. 463
  115. "er qualmt wie ein Trke - Google Search". google.com.
  116. Umberto Eco, Alastair McEwen, Turning back the clock: hot wars and media populism, 2006, p. 3
  117. Philip Jenkins. God's continent: Christianity, Islam, and Europe's religious crisis, New York, 2007, p. 104
  118. "Google Translate". Mountain View, California, U.S.: Google Inc. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  119. "Fra hav og strand: en tylt fortćllinger - Just W. Flood". Books.google.com. p. 24. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  120. 1 2 3 "turc - definitie | DEX online". Dexonline.ro. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  121. "A nu fuma ca un turc | FINANCIARUL - informatii utile din Business, Eco-Agricultura, Stiinta, Educatie si Viata sanatoasa". Financiarul.ro. Retrieved 2015-09-06.
  122. Offord, D. (1996). Using Russian. Cambridge University Press.
  123. "Пуши као Турчин - Радио-телевизија Војводине". Rtv.rs. 2011-11-28. Retrieved 2015-09-06.

Bibliography

  • Aydıngün, Ayşegül; Harding, Çigğdem Balım; Hoover, Matthew; Kuznetsov, Igor; Swerdlow, Steve (2006), Meskhetian Turks: An Introduction to their History, Culture, and Resettelment Experiences (PDF), http://www.cal.org/: Center for Applied Linguistics 
  • Barton, Frederick D.; Heffernan, John; Armstrong, Andrea (2002), Being Recognised as Citizens (PDF), http://www.humansecurity-chs.org/: Commission on Human Security 
  • Blacklock, Denika (2005), FINDING DURABLE SOLUTIONS FOR THE MESKHETIANS (PDF), http://www.ecmi.de/: EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES 
  • Çetin, Turhan (2008), "THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC OUTCOMES OF THE LAST TURKISH MIGRATION (1989) FROM BULGARIA TO TURKEY", Turkish Studies, 3 (7): 241–270 
  • Cohen, Roberta; Deng, Francis Mading (1998), The Forsaken People: Case Studies of the Internally Displaced, Brookings Institution Press, ISBN 0-8157-1514-5 .
  • Cornelius, Wayne; Martin, Philip; Hollifield, James (1994), Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, Stanford University Press, ISBN 0-8047-2498-9 .
  • Cornell, Svante E. (2001), Small nations and great powers: a study of ethnopolitical conflict in the Caucasus, Routledge, ISBN 0-7007-1162-7 .
  • Coşkun, Ufuk (2009), AHISKA/MESKHETIAN TURKS IN TUCSON: AN EXAMINATION OF ETHNIC IDENTITY (PDF), http://www.u.arizona.edu/: UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 
  • Demirtaş-Coşkun, Birgül (2010), "Reconsidering the Cyprus Issue: An Anatomy of Failure og European Catalyst (1995–2002)", in Laçiner, Sedat; Özcan, Mehmet; Bal, İhsan (eds), USAK Yearbook of International Politics and Law 2010, Vol. 3, USAK Books, ISBN 978-605-4030-26-2 .
  • Drobizheva, Leokadia; Gottemoeller, Rose; Kelleher, Catherine McArdle (1998), Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Soviet World: Case Studies and Analysis, M.E. Sharpe, ISBN 1-56324-741-0 .
  • Dummett, Michael (2001), On Immigration and Refugees, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-22707-0 .
  • Eminov, Ali (1997), Turkish and other Muslim minorities in Bulgaria, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-91976-2 .
  • Hirschon, Renée (2003), Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange Between Greece and Turkey, Berghahn Books, ISBN 1-57181-562-7 .
  • Hüssein, Serkan (2007), Yesterday & Today: Turkish Cypriots of Australia, Serkan Hussein, ISBN 0-646-47783-8 .
  • Katsikas, Stefanos (2010), Bulgaria and Europe: Shifting Identities, Anthem Press, ISBN 1-84331-846-6 .
  • Lee, Martin (1999), The Beast Reawakens, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0-415-92546-0 .
  • Levinson, David (1998), Ethnic groups worldwide: a ready reference handbook, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 978-1-57356-019-1 .
  • Minahan, James (2002), Encyclopedia of the Stateless Nations: L-R, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0-313-32111-6 .
  • Nees, Greg (2000), Germany: Unraveling an Enigma, Intercultural Press, ISBN 1-877864-75-7 .
  • Neuburger, Mary (2004), The Orient within: Muslim minorities and the negotiation of nationhood in modern Bulgaria, Cornell University Press, ISBN 0-8014-4132-3 .
  • Papadakis, Yiannis (2005), Echoes from the Dead Zone: Across the Cyprus divide, I.B.Tauris, ISBN 1-85043-428-X .
  • Ramet, Sabrina (1999), The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe Since 1989, Penn State Press, ISBN 0-271-01811-9 .
  • Savvides, Philippos K (2004), "Partition Revisited: The International Dimension and the Case of Cyprus", in Danopoulos, Constantine Panos; Vajpeyi, Dhirendra K.; Bar-Or, Amir(eds), Civil-military relations, nation building, and national identity: comparative perspectives, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0-275-97923-7 .
  • Solsten, Eric (1999), Germany: A Country Study, DIANE Publishing, ISBN 0-7881-8179-3 .
  • Staab, Andreas (1998), National Identity in Eastern Germany: Inner Unification or Continued Separation?, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0-275-96177-X .
  • Ther, Philipp; Siljak, Ana (2001), Redrawing nations: ethnic cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944–1948, Rowman & Littlefield, ISBN 0-7425-1094-8 .
  • Tocci, Nathalie (2004), EU accession dynamics and conflict resolution: catalysing peace or consolidating partition in Cyprus?, Ashgate Publishing, ISBN 0-7546-4310-7 .
  • Tocci, Nathalie (2007), The EU and conflict resolution: promoting peace in the backyard, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-41394-X .
  • Whitman, Lois (1990), Destroying ethnic identity: the Turks of Greece, Human Rights Watch, ISBN 0-929692-70-5 .

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Anti-Turkism.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.